Carnegie Hall

Carnegie Hall, on of the most important and famous concert venues in the world, is located right here in Midtown Manhattan. Designed by William Burnet Tuthill, Carnegie Hall was built in 1891 thanks to the financial support of Andrew Carnegie. When first built, it was intended that the building be used to serve as a place for the Oratorio Society of New York and the New York Symphony Society to hold meetings and any events the two groups organized. The building underwent renovations between 1893-1896, though, in which two towers of artist’s studios were added, alterations were made to the buildings smaller auditorium on the lower level, and board members convinced Carnegie to allow them to name the masterpiece of a building after him. Currently, there are three halls; the Isaac Stern/ Ronald O Perelman Stage, seating 2,804, the Joan and Sanford I. Well Recital Hall, having 268 seats, and the Judy and Arthur Zan Onekle Hall, with 599 seats. One of the most interesting things about the building, structurally anyway, is that it is one of the last large buildings in New York City that is build completely out of masonry without a steel frame. This adds to the sort of magic that Carnegie Hall has, for it is such an old building yet it still stands very distinctly in a city full of giant steal sky scrappers. For our visit to the legendary Carnegie Hall, we saw two pieces be performed. The first piece was Ludwig Van Beethoven’s Violin Concerto in D Major. Op. 61. Beethoven created this piece in the early 1800s and was first performed on December 23, 1806. Prior to this piece, Beethoven had become proficient with the violin, in both playing and writing pieces for the instrument. This piece being a concerto, a musical work with is usually composed of three parts with one solo instrument, is broken up into three movements. In order, the are entitled “Allegro Ma Non Troppo (D Major),” “Larghetto (G Major),” and “Rondo. Allegro (D Major).” There is also an incredible violin solo throughout the piece that was performed by Midori, a woman who made her violin debut at the age of eleven. The popularity of this piece didn’t start when it first came out, though. It is said that Beethoven was so close to not finishing this piece on time for the performance that on the night of the premier, the soloist and violin player Franz Clement had to sight read the piece while playing it for the first time to a live audience. This performance and the piece itself did not have much success at first. This led Beethoven to revise the piece to fit for a piano solo as well, but this just backfired, leaving pianists unsatisfied, and violinists resentful that he would try to alter such a part. It really gained popularity, though, in 1844 when Joseph Joachim performed the soloist’s part with the Philharmonic Society of London providing the music for the rest of the piece. The next piece that we saw was John Adam’s Harmonielehre, meaning “study of harmony” in German was created in 1985. This piece, like Beethoven’s, is a concerto with three movements, with the first being unnamed, the second called, “The Anfortas Wound,” and the third, “Meister Eckhardt and Quackie.” This piece is often described as a “minimalist concerto.” To be considered in the group of minimalism, a piece must be rooted in it’s fundamental features. More specifically to music, minimalism is when, according to our Carnegie Hall packet, “a piece is contemporary and the composer has reduced the range of compositional materials through the use of repetition and static harmony and the music is marked by extreme simplifications of rhythms, patterns, and harmonies.” This piece, Adams claims, was inspired by a dream that he had. In the dream, Adams was crossing the San Francisco- Oland Kay Bridge in which he saw an oil tanker immerge from the water and shoot up into the hair like the Saturn V. After both the dream and creating Harmonielehr, Adams suffered from a writer’s block that lasted over a year. The title of this piece also draws inspiration from a specific thing. Arnold Schoenberg was a composer who wrote a piece called Harmonielehre in 1911 in which he describes in detail chords, chord progressions, vagrant chords, and creations of tonal areas in terms of harmony. After reading this, Adams was highly impacted by his Schoenberg’s writings, leading to the use of this twelve-tone technique in his piece. These two pieces, although separated by almost two hundred years, work very well when played together. Alan Gilbert, the music director, talks about “extending a dialogue to the past.” By putting a contemporary piece after an old classic, the audience is exposed to two very different sounds, but, with these two pieces, there are elements that tie the two pieces together creating a flow between them. Gilbert also says that by putting Adam’s piece after Beethoven’s, one is able to pick up pieces about the most recent piece that would have been lost had the show had two contemporary pieces.

I copied and pasted this from a word document and I don’t think it made ir one big paragraph. I don’t have it in me to go in a find where to indent. Oh well.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Four Trees

This is Jean Dubuffet sculpture “Four Trees” at Chase Manhattan Plaza in lower Manhattan. I saw it and thought it was so interesting to look at. It is amazing how much art there is in the City. You can go anywhere and find amazing pieces just like this.

When looking at it, you eyes are drawn throughout the entire form. The contrast between white and black make an impact on the viewer. I think if this piece were in color, there would be too much going on, since there is already so much shape and line to take in.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Halloween

I’ve never experience Halloween in New York City, so I decided to go to the parade. It was amazing seeing everyone dressed up. It  was like everyone was a walking piece of art.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Big Bambu at the Met

The Starn brother’s “Big Bambu” was a project that I had been incredibly excited to see. This piece was an active sculpture that was constantly changing and being worked on by both the brothers and their team. What they did was took thousands of shoots of bamboo and created this form that represented a sweeping wave of both chaos and grace, all in one. The piece had a life to it, for as you looked at it from afar, it seemed to be moving and supporting everyone that was interacting in it. There was a feeling of unity between this piece and the city it was built in, for, like New York City, it is something that cannot quite be explained, but people understand it. It is constantly in motion and adapting, but always retaining a familiar quality of beauty and serenity.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Blu

I found this video online done by Blu, the artist that David Ellis worked with. I thought it was really interesting and amazing to watch.

watch?v=7MpKvV6JLPY

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

The Tales of Hoffman

So, this was the first opera I have ever attended. To be honest, it is not in any way what I expected. I don’t know that I would make it a hobby to go to the opera on my own time, but it was cool to actually go to one and experience it for myself. What I liked the most about it was the costumes and the set design. There was so much color and fantasy brought into the performance through use of the clothes and the decorations.

For class, I was a part of the Freud group, in which we took the ideas of Freud and his concept of the uncanny and applied it to the Tales of Hoffman. Freud’s concept of the uncanny is a concept of an instance where something can be familiar, yet foreign at the same time, resulting in a feeling of it being uncomfortably strange. A haunting sense of nostalgia that one cannot quite analyze or define. And it is not things that are visually frightening, but rather make someone feel fear and uncertainty. The uncanny is hard to define, thus making it even more frightening than if it was a clear and measurable feeling. These ideas are present through The Tales of Hoffman and helps the opera make it as great and memorable today as it was when it came out in 1851.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Sneaking Museum Photos

This is a picture of a poster in the Chaos and Classicism exhibit that I both liked and wa sable to sneak a picture of.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Chaos and Classicism

Today I decided to taker a trip over to the Guggenheim to see the show “Chaos and Classicism.” I saw and add for it on the subway and though it would be an interesting collection to go and see. When I walked into the Museum, it was very different from when I went to see the “Haunted” exhibit. The place was much more bright, and the ceiling was open letting the sunlight poor in. As for the art, I didn’t like the individual pieces as much as I liked the history behind them and the story they told.

“October 1, 2010–January 9, 2011

Following the chaos of World War I, a move emerged towards figuration, clean lines, and modeled form, and away from the two-dimensional abstracted spaces, fragmented compositions, and splintered bodies of the avant-gardes—particularlyCubismFuturism, and Expressionism—that dominated the opening years of the 20th century. After the horrors visited upon humanity in the Western hemisphere by new machine-age warfare, a desire reasserted itself to represent the body whole and intact. For the next decade-and-a-half classicism, “return to order,” synthesis, organization, and enduring values, rather than the pre-War emphasis on innovation-at-all-costs, would dominate the discourse of contemporary art.Chaos and Classicism traces this interwar classical aesthetic as it worked its way from a poetic, mythic idea in the Parisian avant-garde; to a political, historical idea of a revived Roman Empire, under Mussolini; to a neo-Platonic High Modernism at the Bauhaus, and then, chillingly, a pseudo-biological classicism, or Aryanism, in nascent Nazi culture. Interwoven through these closely related but distinct classical paradigms will be the key movements that proclaimed visual and thematic “clarity”: Purism, Novecento, and Neue Sachlichkeit. This vast transformation of contemporary aesthetics in France, Italy, and Germany will encompass painting, sculpture, photography, architecture, film, fashion, and the decorative arts. Chaos and Classicism: Art in France, Italy, and Germany, 1918–1936 is the first exhibition in the United States to focus upon this international phenomenon and to examine its manifestations in all media.  Among the artists represented are Balthus, Jean Cocteau, Giorgio de Chirico, Otto Dix, Hannah Höch,Fernand LégerHenri Matisse, Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, Pablo Picasso, and August Sander. Chaos and Classicism is curated by Kenneth E. Silver, Guest Curator and Professor of Modern Art, New York University. This exhibition is supported in part by grants from the National Endowment for the Arts and The David Berg Foundation.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Snapshot Day Photos

These are five of the best pictures I took for the Snapshot day. We were supposed to take pictures of things that represented our neighborhood, which, in my opinion, is all of New York City. These pictures, although all over the place, convey a variety of people, places, and ideas, which is what living in the City is all about.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

WUNDERKAMMERS EVERYWHERE.

The other day I went to the Museum of Art and Design in Columbus Circle to see the “Dead or Alive” exhibit. I had never been to the museum, and didn’t really know what to expect. When I got there, though, and went up to the small, two floor exhibit, I was surprisingly enthralled.

Dead or Alive, presented by the Museum of Arts and Design from April 27 through October 24, 2010, will showcase the work of over 30 international artists who transform organic materials and objects that were once produced by or part of living organisms-insects, feathers, bones, silkworm cocoons, plant materials, and hair-to create intricately crafted and designed installations and sculptures.

The exhibition explores a territory related to MAD’s Second Lives: Remixing the Ordinary, which featured contemporary works created from multiples of ordinary manufactured items. In Dead or Alive, the materials transformed by the artists are entirely natural. Once-living parts of flora and fauna are recombined and rearranged into works of art that address the transience of life, and all that is elegant and alarming about the natural world.”

The reason I am posting this is because the first thing I saw when I enetered the gallery was this:

It was a poster that talked about wunderkammers and how this show, in essence, was one big cabinet of mysteries.

I was also able to sneak two other photos, but then got yelled at for having my camera out. Oh well.

Prophecy by David Hirst

Obatala by Jorge Mayet

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment