Renaming Harlem

I saw this NY1 article shared by many of my Facebook friends and all of them were outspoken with rage, as they should be. As if taking over most of New York City wasn’t enough, modern developers and real estate agents came up with a plan to rename the area from 110th to 125th Streets as “SoHa”, or South Harlem to make it sound as trendy as SoHo. This, in my opinion, is absolutely ridiculous. Even if gentrification were to spread into Harlem, Harlem should keep its name. We should have learned back in 1492 when Christopher Columbus sailed the ocean blue that changing the identity of a place is just wrong. Moving people out of their homes and destroying the culture of a neighborhood just to increase the capital of a land is wrong. Sprinkling a coffee shop or two in an area and then immediately claiming it is a pretty offensive slap in the face. The strong historic African-American culture is still there, so what is the point of ignoring it and saying “sorry this is SoHa now, screw your feelings”. Harlem has so much history behind it, and to just strip the neighborhood of that to make it sound trendy in order to attract more gentrifiers is really disgusting and selfish.

http://www.ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs/news/2017/05/24/harlem-soha-residents-unhappy-name-change-push.html

Petition to prevent a bar cafe from being created inside WNYC Transmitter Park

I was scrolling through Reddit when I came across this post and I immediately related it to our class. This post is a petition to prevent a cafe from being built in WNYC Transmitter Park, which is the same location where Smorgasburg pops up once a week. Smorgasburg is obviously a very creative class targeted market, selling burgers with buns made out of ramen noodles, overpriced mangoes in the shape of flowers, and whole coconuts to drink out of. A cafe in this location is perfectly suited for this population, as well as the population of the rest of the neighborhood around it (that being Williamsburg). It is so interesting to me that the community is in fact, AGAINST building this kind of establishment. The end of the petition reads, “A COMMERCIAL BUSINESS AT THE HEART OF THIS PARK WOULD RUIN THE TRANQUILITY OF THIS SMALL, SPECIAL SPACE.” Just like that, bolded and in all caps. This petition shows that although developers might think it’s a great idea to further provide for the targeted population, sometimes enough is enough. Hipsters like to have a place of peace and quiet too, just like the rest of us.

https://www.change.org/p/friends-of-wnyc-transmitter-park-prevent-a-bar-cafe-from-being-created-inside-transmitter-park?recruiter=9094127&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=copylink

Desegregating our Public Schools

I recently stumbled upon this editorial on The New York Times, “Confronting Segregation in New York City School.” After doing hours of research on socioeconomic segregation in public schools for our seminar paper, I was immediately drawn to this article. During our presentation, socioeconomic segregation was presented as a result of gentrification. The reality is, however, that low income students have been at a disadvantage for decades as a result of the political system in our country. This goes beyond gentrification and leads back to redlining, mass incarceration, faulty justice system, segregation etc. Schools with a high percentage of low income students have proven to have lower test scores and graduation rates than integrated schools. These schools are also less likely to have qualified teachers and resources compared to more affluent schools. Desegregating schools should not be done for the sole purpose of promoting diversity, but rather to promote equity in the education system.

When asked about this issue, Mayor de Blasio responded “We cannot change the basic reality of housing in New York City.” We cannot have a dismissive attitude when communities of color are constantly being denied the right to a proper education. The article points out that segregation in schooling goes beyond housing and is a result of decades old educational policies that ensure low income students remain at a disadvantage. As a New Yorker, I used to be very proud of the fact that we are a part of one of the most diverse cities in the nation. Although I am still proud to be from New York, we have a long way to go before patting ourselves on the back for being a diverse city. It is extremely unfitting for a city like our own, known for being the “Melting Pot” or “Tossed Salad” to have “one of the most deeply segregated school systems in the nation.”

 

Reference:

Hudson Yards’ New Competitor: Manhattan West

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/17/realestate/hudson-yards-meet-your-new-neighbor-manhattan-west.html?_r=0

Manhattan West is a new emerging set of towers that rivals Hudson Yards in luxury and scale. The project is located on 9th Av between West 31st and 33rd. The chairman of Brookfield Property Partners, the company behind the project, said that it’s like “creating a new neighborhood.” This hints at what Sharon Zukin discusses in Naked City. She talks about the quest for “authenticity” in neighborhoods. Companies like Brookfield want to create manufactured, corporatized neighborhoods and sell them as authentic lifestyle experiences, not simply places to live.

Greenpoint, Brooklyn: The Hipster’s Perspective

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R892zc4ptnE&w=560&h=315]

We talked for a bit in class about how Greenpoint was home to a vibrant Polish community. This has changed quickly over the past decade as Natalie was kind enough to share her personal experiences of how Greenpoint became a victim of gentrification.

I stumbled upon this video that looks into Greenpoint. It was the first video that appeared on YouTube so maybe it would really helpful for a person looking into Greenpoint. The title suggests that it is going to present various points of interest and popular restaurants in Greenpoint, so that a person who might be interested in visiting the neighborhood would know where to go. However, it seemed to me more as a McCafe commercial with Greenpoint in the background. Watch the 3-minute video and you’ll see at least 3 references to McCafe.

Sure, they have a quick little scene in front of a Polish bakery, talking about the Polish influence in Greenpoint, but they quickly take away from it by beginning a racist joke about the Polish. They even introduce the video with a hipster in the background and later describe him as a hip, young person who contributes to the culture of Greenpoint.

This purpose of this video is up in the air to me. What is the purpose of making a video that does not give much insight about Greenpoint? Why are there so many promotions of McCafe? Nonetheless, this video seems to put Greenpoint in the light of hipsters and not the Polish immigrants who made Greenpoint the Polish haven.