Kristy Timms – Museum of Modern Art

“Exit the Ballets Russes” by Fernand Leger

“Taillade” by Joan Mitchell

Modern and contemporary art has taken shape through the 20th century.  The constraints placed on paintings – such as the necessity for them to be of a scene, landscape, person or circumstance – were erased as a new, modern era of expression entered the artistic world. From this freedom came a form of applying emotions and feelings onto a canvas without distinct explanation or illustration. This led to the emergence of an array of works which have no limitations or boundaries; although different and diverse, these modern pieces have this free theology as their foundation. Fernand Leger’s “Exit the Ballets Russes” and Joan Mitchell’s  “Taillade” depict this period with their vastly different works.

At first glance, the form of “Exit the Ballets Russes” is far more structured and defined in comparison to “Taillade.” The structure comes from the black outlining, and the clear distinction between colors. Because of this form, Leger’s piece would be categorized as Cubism. Whereas in “Taillade” there is no obvious structure, as the colors flow into one another, allowing the colors to overlap one another and join together. The structure of Leger’s piece portrays a mechanical and industrial feel to the work. The machines/objects make the painting look 3D, while looking at the actual paint, there appears to be little texture. “Taillade” lacks definite structure, giving a sense of uncertainty, with the interpretation left solely to the viewer. Even though the painting does not give a 3D effect, the actual paint on the canvas is textural, giving a literal feel to the painting.

The light and negative space used on each canvas is interesting, and either contains or frees the work. Mitchell’s “Taillade” has a more inconspicuous use of negative space, as it is uncertain as to what is canvas or the actual painting. This unperceivable aspect makes the beginning and end of the painting hard to define. It gives the impression that the painting could continue indefinitely. The two panels of which the painting are made up of, continues to establish this concept, as the idea that another can easily be added, seems to make sense. Leger’s “Exit the Ballets Russes” is different in the fact that the negative space is both discernable and intentional. This, along with the clear structure of the work makes the beginning and end of the work to be evident.

The colors of each painting are contrasting. “Exit the Ballets Russes” is composed of mainly primary colors; a prominence of blue, red and yellow. From those colors come the easily definable light green, brick red and black. The colors are clear, divided and specific. This leaves the viewer with an organized pattern, reinstating the distinguished structure. On the other hand the colors used in “Taillade” sweep across the color wheel, with no plainly pronounced colors, but there is rather an interaction between the colors taking place. They are overlapping and flowing into one another. This use of many colors, and their uncertainty rehashes the freedom of the painting, with the interpretation left up to each individual viewer.

The form, light and color used within Modern era paintings are all different. Each artist is left with complete freedom. There are no rules or expectations to be followed, but the canvas is full of endless opportunities. The artists can go in any direction they so desire. Modern Art truly defines the liberty in art through its no boundaries or constraints. Its work is a broad spectrum which has no beginning or end, no limits or rules; but rather the license to do whatever one wants.

Anissa Daimally: MoMA Paintings

Three Musicians by Pablo Picasso

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Empire of Light ii by Rene Magritte

The 20th century art cannot be defined. This is because we live in a world that is constantly changing. Since art usually reflects society, we can expect that art is ever changing as well.  Pablo Picasso and Rene Magritte, two amazing artists from this time period, differ greatly in their styles, even though their respective artwork is only 30 years apart.

The Three Musicians by Pablo Picasso is one of the most famous paintings of the 20th century. Completed in 1921, this painting embodies the Cubist style, specifically the Synthetic Cubist style. Cubism is an art movement that was created by Picasso himself and Georges Braque. In this type of art, artists break down the subjects they are painting into a number of facets, showing several different aspects of one object simultaneously. Synthetic Cubism, the late phase of the Cubism movement, is the use of more decorative geometric shapes, stenciling, collage and brighter colors. Instead of breaking down the subjects, artists created new structures. In Three Musicians, Picasso paints three figures, the Harlequin strumming the guitar, the Pierrot playing the clarinet, and the monk that holds the sheet music, in a box-like room. These three figures are made up of flat, abstract shapes. Even though this work is painted with oil on canvas, the sharp corners of the shapes suggest that Picasso cut out material and pasted it on the canvas, just like a collage. This work is overwhelmingly two-dimensional. Furthermore, Picasso dominantly uses warm colors but uses dark and bright colors to describe the figures. This painting is asymmetrical in balance; the brown floor extends much farther toward the left than the right. This suggests that the room is lopsided, but the figures in the painting are all-leveled and balance. In addition, it is hard to distinguish the musicians’ bodies, since they all seem to overlap one another. This also gives the impression of a cut-and-paste collage. Picasso utilizes shadowing when painting the dog, creating the dog with his head in the shadow. Overall, this painting gives out an energetic feeling with its use of abstract geometric shapes and distinct lines.

Contrasting with Picasso’s Three Musicians, Rene Magritte’s Empire of Light II, completed in 1950, is a painting that looks more ‘real’. It is an example of Magritte’s surrealistic style. This painting is focused on a street. Being the main source of light in the painting, the lamppost located in front of the buildings emits a bright light. There is also light illuminating from the windows of the buildings. Instead of using flat geometric shapes like Picasso, Magritte paints the scene in a three-dimensional world. When viewed in the museum, the painting looks like a photograph enlarged. However, upon taking a closer look at the painting, one can notice that the house is painted in an unusual situation. While the bottom half of the painting shows the street in the night, the top half of the painting is of a bright sky in broad daylight. This striking juxtaposition gives the painting a mysterious feeling. Like Picasso, Magritte contrasted with his colors; he used warm colors for the buildings on the street and then contrasts that with the bright blue sky.  However, both parts of the painting are painted realistically. Even though there are no humans or animals in the painting, movement is evident; the floating clouds in the sky evoke motion.

Overall, it can be seen that although two artists are from the same century, it does not mean that their artwork will be similar.

 

Deanna Maravel-Comparison of Color, Light, and Form

House by the Railroad(1925) by Edward Hopper

American Indian Theme II(1980) by Roy Lichtenstein

Deanna Maravel

The Arts in New York City

Professor Graff

6 November 2012

House by the Railroad and American Indian Theme II

      The realist versus the pop artist, Edward Hopper and Roy Lichtenstein couldn’t have been more different. In his work House by the Railroad, Hopper relies on stylistic details, such as choice of color and lighting, to depict a rather emotional image of rural American architecture. Whereas Lichtenstein’s American Indian Theme II is a visual statement based off of bold choices in symbolism and arrangement.

When you look at House by the Railroad, you can feel the overwhelming sense of loneliness in this oil painting. This picturesque house is all alone, with nothing in the background but the faded blue sky. There are no neighboring houses, so it seems that its only contact with other civilization is by the train track in front of it. Except the contact with the train, with other people, probably lasts only a few minutes, and just as quickly as it came, it’s gone. The very placement of the track at the forefront of the painting suggests that this painting should be filled with movement, however, it is directly contradicted by the stillness of the landscape around it. Hopper’s choice of muted, somber colors helps to visually display the desolate feeling this house pervades. A quiet man, Hopper loved the way the sun would hit these rural houses, and the decision to cast a shadow on the house, so that half is lit and the other is in dim light, suggests the that the house is fading away, just like the setting sun.

On the other hand, American Indian Theme II stands in sharp contrast to Hopper’s portrait. With its bold colors and use of color blocking, it immediately jumps out in an overwhelming print to the viewer. Like a jigsaw puzzle, however, the pieces of this woodcut can be picked apart. In the bottom right corner, bear claw tracks can be seen, right below the canoe, a trademark of the Native American Indians. Geometric shapes surround an abstract cactus, while a feather, another symbol, is almost hidden in the mix. Lichtenstein is known for his fascination with iconic stereotypes, and this comes across clearly here in this print. Working with a color scheme of primary colors, he takes the stereotypes of the Indian culture and carefully integrates them into a picture reminiscent of something from the past. This choice of juxtaposing the motifs of a past culture into modern art was perhaps his way of commenting on the American view of Native American culture.

Done in two different styles, each painting is a representation of something to the artist. Hopper, as the realist, chose to take a more traditional route. In choosing to capture a picture of rural America, he focused on color and lighting to breathe life into the form used.  On the contrary, Lichtenstein chose to focus more on the form and structure of the print. Keeping his colors simple, his choice of blending common, stereotypical images makes a visual and mental statement as opposed to appealing to the viewer’s emotions. While both artists relied on color, form, and technique, the ways in which they applied them led to vastly different, but still effective, results.

Ashley Haynes: MOMA Painting Comparison

All artwork on a canvas utilizes at least one of the three main elements of color, light and form in a variety of ways. Color gives inanimate objects life. Color is the true quintessence of a painting as rhythm is to music. Considering its subjective nature, color can be used to convey a wide range of emotions and perspectives. Different hues convey their own aspect of liveliness. Green is natural as yellow is to happiness and sunshine. When you take into account the intensity, the strength and vividness, of a color you can convey different moods.  For example, the dark colors of a night scene can convey mystery as soft light colors are to femininity.

Painters use light as a bandage for relating figures in an image. For example, if a painting consists of a group of figures around a campsite fire, since all of the characters are experiencing the same thing, they should each be lit from the side in which they face the campfire. The experience binds them together, so the way in which light is used, is to realistically depict such a reality.

Form is simply the element in art, which refers to shape. Are there three dimensional shapes and figures or are there two-dimensional shapes and figures. It is form that allows the viewers of works of art to analyze and understand the given.

In the painting Beach Girl, the artist Morris Hirshfield utilizes a very simplistic form of color and lighting. The background consists of only three shades of blue. As the image opens up, the shades begin to darken. This element of contrast between a single color, allows the beach girl to pop off of the painting and really draw the viewer’s attention.  The use of blue mellows out the image giving it a very calm, soothing feeling as if one were looking at water, which is also blue.

Likewise, Hirschfield use of lighting immediately draws one’s attention to the girl because she is of a brighter shade and a more defined color of blue, tan and white. He paints an image that is concrete and the viewer is immediately able to identify that the beach girl is the main attraction in the painting. Everything around her is just supplemental detail in order to give the painting more depth. The anatomy of the girl is drawn to the scale of a realistic girl in everyday life.

An antithesis to the painting by Morris Hirshfield is a painting called Simultaneous Contrasts: Sun And Moon by Robert Delaunay. In the painting, Robert Delaunay paints an abstract image. Thus, the viewer can interpret the image in a number of different ways. There isn’t one right answer to what is present in an abstract image.

In order to portray such an abstract image and contrary to Hirsfield, Delaunay manipulates the depth and movement of the painting through various interactions of color. Yet, without directly referencing a concrete image, the viewer of his artwork can imagine his inclination to the natural world. The circular framework can be symbolic of the universe with the brighter colors representing life during the day while the dark blue side being symbolic of nightlife when the moon is up. Delaunay seems to have broken up the form by light in order to create color planes, thus creating the nature of the painting. The use of two-dimensional shapes simply allows figures to be pieced together into what the viewer can interpret as something concrete. Some shapes are actual orientation of the human anatomy as an oval can be seen as symbolically used to represent the child’s head in the upper right hand corner of the image. Then, in the lower left hand corner a conglomerate of shapes are used to piece together a potential figure’s face.

For example, when I initially saw the painting, I immediately visualized a family in the bottom right hand corner who were bunched together early in the morning due to the prominent use of yellow, the color of the sun. When I looked up at the top left hand corner, I immediately visualized a mother tucking her child into bed because the prominence of blue was reminiscent of the night sky as the moon is set to appear.

In each respective painting, the artists manipulated the color, light and forms to ultimately portray different images although they used the same basic artistic elements. This allowed for a uniform interpretation in Hirshfield’s painting compared to a more infinite interpretation in Delaunay’s painting. Hirschfield creating a concrete image while Delaunay created an abstract image.

Lauren Vicente, Romantic Short Story

Inspiration: The Abduction of Rebecca by Eugène Delacroix

The first thing I heard was the screech of a horse. No – that was a chorus of screeches, followed by the bellowing orders of a man. No, men, many men! The smell of burning hickory and ash interrupted my thought. What was I doing here? What was this?

I turned and faced the barren city, or at least what was left of it. The cacophonous roars of battle cries and ear piercing screams drowned out any sort of happiness that evaded the area.

“We’ve got her!” The cheers were coming closer. I slipped behind a small thicket, peering out cautiously. A large, black horse holding up two men and a woman let out a slight whinny. There was a shift of the horse’s legs as one of the soldiers slipped off. “Come on, men!” He called down the hill. The other man held up the incapacitated woman. Were they her savior? Or were they the enemy?

“We need to leave…now!” The soldier in red could barely make out his words; whether it was from nerves or fatigue I would never know.

The sullen look on her face looked to artificial to be from any natural means, and the success plastered upon the green-shirted soldier’s face seemed too maniacal. It finally occurred to me that this…this heist, this burning – this was their plan all along!

Horses started pulling up to the area now, carrying soldiers from the burning city. I peered out from the bushes and realized this army extended down the hill and extended back to the city. I was afraid to let out even the slightest noise – I didn’t plan to become part of the action!

“General, where to?” Another voice came from the next horsed solider upon the hill.

“Until the troops are here and accounted for, we will remain.”

“Will Rebecca wake up?”

“Who knows, Bois-Guilbert wants her, so he’ll get her… in whatever state!” A hearty laugh sprung up between the men. It sickened me. Rebecca wasn’t property, but it was obvious that her value as a person was meaningless.

The cacophony had died down at this point. The city looked even more lifeless than before, if possible. It was as if the remainder of the army was the only life that was left, and now that they had left, it was over. Rebecca had been retrieved by any and all means.

“They’re all out, General!”

“On to Bois-Guilbert!” The second laugh replaced the noise of the fallen city and slowly faded into the clack-clack of horseshoes.