Andrew Zagelbaum — Artist’s letter

Dear Old Friend,

I know it has been long since we last spoke, but for that I beg your sympathy. As you may or may not know, my life has taken twists and turns in which no one can understand. My life has become my work; a passion that will never fill my true beliefs. I am writing to you because of the history we share together. The time we spent when we were younger is time I truly cherished. No one else can fill this space in my heart that is currently occupied by your being. We formed a bond, one that cannot be replaced easily, if at all. You see, like I said, my life has become my work. The problem is, the world isn’t ready for the work I produce. However, I can personally guarantee that one day it will be. In the future, people will appreciate what it is I do, unlike the society I live in today. With this information, I ask you to not invest in my work, but in society’s future. Work is not easily made. It takes time, patience, and most of all, skill. Qualities I possess, but qualities that are not observable by those who surround me. Mark my words, I will repay any and all investments made in the work I produce, but it is unfortunate that for now my work does not gain as much income as it is worth. It pains me to ask for money, especially from such a valued friend, but I fear this is my only choice. If you are unwilling, I understand, but as a friend, I hope all is well.

So long,
Wolfgang Mozart

 

MoMA Art Comparison

States of Mind I: The Farewells [1911]
by Umberto Boccioni

Boccioni’s States of Mind I: The Farewells is an abstract piece of fine art dealing with themes of the psychological dimension of modern life’s transitory nature. This singular piece is actually a series of three paintings set within the confinement of a train station. Through the piece, Boccioni sought to capture “loneliness, anguish, and dazed confusion.” The painting depicts the movement and the fusion of people swept away in waves at the train station as the train’s steam bellows into the sky.

The Subway [1928]
by José Clemente Orozco

Orozco’s The Subway is an expressionist painting depicting three rather shadowy figures riding the subway. Through this painting, he sought to capture his early New York experience and the bleak and pessimistic view he had of mankind. Orozco completed the painting within his first seven years living in the United States, and he conveyed his feelings of isolation and the grim and brutal conditions he witnessed in New York City by depicting himself in a near-empty subway car.

Both Boccioni and Orozco target the same subject matter with very different depictions. The two artists sought to capture the loneliness one felt in the dawn of the industrial revolution, when cities such as New York were becoming so crowded and no one really cared to get to know each other. They both felt the perfect setting to depict this was in the subway: a new invention widely used by New Yorkers yet kept them very divided within its confinement.

In his painting, Boccioni makes use of oblique lines, bold vivid colors, and an abstract following of form. The oblique lines in the painting hint at loneliness, anguish, and dazed confusion. They keep the viewer in the unknown, and makes them feel solitary and confused, much like the subject matter Boccioni wanted to depict. The vertical lines convey the weight of sadness carried by those left behind. The vivid colors allure the bright city lights of New York City, and add a level of profoundness to the subject matter. The very abstract shapes really do not define anything specific in the painting. In fact, the only thing in the painting that is easy to spot is an antenna tower at the top left of the painting.

With his subway cart interior, Orozco targets the same idea of loneliness within the subway, but he depicts it with more realism. This expressionist work is highlighted by dark flat colors, heavy shadowing, and long gloomy figures. The dark colors give a pessimist vibe within the train, and also serves to show the profoundness of space. The darkness makes the cart seem bigger and even more emptier. The heavy shadowing gives the painting the grim and brutal tone that Orozco hoped to capture. It seems almost like a film noir in the dark alley where the thief comes and beats the man for his wallet. The tall gloomy figure behind the man standing in the cart is almost ghostly: it seems as if someone is watching.

Deanna Maravel-Artist’s Letter

Deanna Maravel

The Arts in New York City

Professor Graff

1 November 2012

 

Mozart Styled Letter

Dearest little wife,

I write to you from the bottom of my heart. Oh how I miss you! Things have been so hectic over here, and I offer you my sincerest apologies for not writing sooner. My days have been long and filled with many a sleepless night. I pray that I grace your thoughts as much as you do mine. It has been so lonely over here without you and the children to brighten things up. I hope this letter finds you all in good health. Make sure to give the children a kiss from me. Alas I will keep this letter short as I am having lunch with the Archduke Franz to discuss an inquiry I had posted a month ago. If all goes well, then I must remain here in Vienna but don’t fret! This wonderful opportunity will hopefully be the key to all of our financial troubles! When I find the time, I shall send you a note on the results.  A thousand kisses to you, my dear.

Your Ever-loving Husband,

Mozart

 

Dearest friend Franz,

I cannot find the words to express my gratitude for the loan you have given me. This small sum of 100 florins has made a world of difference to me, and I will be forever indebted to you. You are a true friend, coming to my rescue in my desperate time of need. I’m still so ashamed that I had let myself slip into a situation such as that, but it is now over as a result of your wonderful help! It is much to my despair that I shall not be able to return the favor as quickly as I thought. Hard times have struck, and unfortunately, this lovely gift was unable to cover all of the expenses. No worries though! I promise to keep my word, and you will receive your payment as soon as I can get my next salary. I wish you all the very best!

Your Grateful Friend,

Mozart

 

Dearest Daughter,

Just writing to inform you that your Brother is doing exceptionally well at the moment. I could not be more proud of him. Seeing his opera played to the joy of hundreds of listeners brings tears to my eyes. If he maintains this wonderful level of hard work, then he shall never fall into the pit of despair I have found myself trapped in quite a few times. Give my love to the rest of the family. I will write as soon as I reach my next destination.

Mozart

Deanna Maravel-Comparison of Color, Light, and Form

House by the Railroad(1925) by Edward Hopper

American Indian Theme II(1980) by Roy Lichtenstein

Deanna Maravel

The Arts in New York City

Professor Graff

6 November 2012

House by the Railroad and American Indian Theme II

      The realist versus the pop artist, Edward Hopper and Roy Lichtenstein couldn’t have been more different. In his work House by the Railroad, Hopper relies on stylistic details, such as choice of color and lighting, to depict a rather emotional image of rural American architecture. Whereas Lichtenstein’s American Indian Theme II is a visual statement based off of bold choices in symbolism and arrangement.

When you look at House by the Railroad, you can feel the overwhelming sense of loneliness in this oil painting. This picturesque house is all alone, with nothing in the background but the faded blue sky. There are no neighboring houses, so it seems that its only contact with other civilization is by the train track in front of it. Except the contact with the train, with other people, probably lasts only a few minutes, and just as quickly as it came, it’s gone. The very placement of the track at the forefront of the painting suggests that this painting should be filled with movement, however, it is directly contradicted by the stillness of the landscape around it. Hopper’s choice of muted, somber colors helps to visually display the desolate feeling this house pervades. A quiet man, Hopper loved the way the sun would hit these rural houses, and the decision to cast a shadow on the house, so that half is lit and the other is in dim light, suggests the that the house is fading away, just like the setting sun.

On the other hand, American Indian Theme II stands in sharp contrast to Hopper’s portrait. With its bold colors and use of color blocking, it immediately jumps out in an overwhelming print to the viewer. Like a jigsaw puzzle, however, the pieces of this woodcut can be picked apart. In the bottom right corner, bear claw tracks can be seen, right below the canoe, a trademark of the Native American Indians. Geometric shapes surround an abstract cactus, while a feather, another symbol, is almost hidden in the mix. Lichtenstein is known for his fascination with iconic stereotypes, and this comes across clearly here in this print. Working with a color scheme of primary colors, he takes the stereotypes of the Indian culture and carefully integrates them into a picture reminiscent of something from the past. This choice of juxtaposing the motifs of a past culture into modern art was perhaps his way of commenting on the American view of Native American culture.

Done in two different styles, each painting is a representation of something to the artist. Hopper, as the realist, chose to take a more traditional route. In choosing to capture a picture of rural America, he focused on color and lighting to breathe life into the form used.  On the contrary, Lichtenstein chose to focus more on the form and structure of the print. Keeping his colors simple, his choice of blending common, stereotypical images makes a visual and mental statement as opposed to appealing to the viewer’s emotions. While both artists relied on color, form, and technique, the ways in which they applied them led to vastly different, but still effective, results.

Ashley Haynes: MOMA Painting Comparison

All artwork on a canvas utilizes at least one of the three main elements of color, light and form in a variety of ways. Color gives inanimate objects life. Color is the true quintessence of a painting as rhythm is to music. Considering its subjective nature, color can be used to convey a wide range of emotions and perspectives. Different hues convey their own aspect of liveliness. Green is natural as yellow is to happiness and sunshine. When you take into account the intensity, the strength and vividness, of a color you can convey different moods.  For example, the dark colors of a night scene can convey mystery as soft light colors are to femininity.

Painters use light as a bandage for relating figures in an image. For example, if a painting consists of a group of figures around a campsite fire, since all of the characters are experiencing the same thing, they should each be lit from the side in which they face the campfire. The experience binds them together, so the way in which light is used, is to realistically depict such a reality.

Form is simply the element in art, which refers to shape. Are there three dimensional shapes and figures or are there two-dimensional shapes and figures. It is form that allows the viewers of works of art to analyze and understand the given.

In the painting Beach Girl, the artist Morris Hirshfield utilizes a very simplistic form of color and lighting. The background consists of only three shades of blue. As the image opens up, the shades begin to darken. This element of contrast between a single color, allows the beach girl to pop off of the painting and really draw the viewer’s attention.  The use of blue mellows out the image giving it a very calm, soothing feeling as if one were looking at water, which is also blue.

Likewise, Hirschfield use of lighting immediately draws one’s attention to the girl because she is of a brighter shade and a more defined color of blue, tan and white. He paints an image that is concrete and the viewer is immediately able to identify that the beach girl is the main attraction in the painting. Everything around her is just supplemental detail in order to give the painting more depth. The anatomy of the girl is drawn to the scale of a realistic girl in everyday life.

An antithesis to the painting by Morris Hirshfield is a painting called Simultaneous Contrasts: Sun And Moon by Robert Delaunay. In the painting, Robert Delaunay paints an abstract image. Thus, the viewer can interpret the image in a number of different ways. There isn’t one right answer to what is present in an abstract image.

In order to portray such an abstract image and contrary to Hirsfield, Delaunay manipulates the depth and movement of the painting through various interactions of color. Yet, without directly referencing a concrete image, the viewer of his artwork can imagine his inclination to the natural world. The circular framework can be symbolic of the universe with the brighter colors representing life during the day while the dark blue side being symbolic of nightlife when the moon is up. Delaunay seems to have broken up the form by light in order to create color planes, thus creating the nature of the painting. The use of two-dimensional shapes simply allows figures to be pieced together into what the viewer can interpret as something concrete. Some shapes are actual orientation of the human anatomy as an oval can be seen as symbolically used to represent the child’s head in the upper right hand corner of the image. Then, in the lower left hand corner a conglomerate of shapes are used to piece together a potential figure’s face.

For example, when I initially saw the painting, I immediately visualized a family in the bottom right hand corner who were bunched together early in the morning due to the prominent use of yellow, the color of the sun. When I looked up at the top left hand corner, I immediately visualized a mother tucking her child into bed because the prominence of blue was reminiscent of the night sky as the moon is set to appear.

In each respective painting, the artists manipulated the color, light and forms to ultimately portray different images although they used the same basic artistic elements. This allowed for a uniform interpretation in Hirshfield’s painting compared to a more infinite interpretation in Delaunay’s painting. Hirschfield creating a concrete image while Delaunay created an abstract image.

Lucy Snyder: MoMA Painting Comparison

The first painting I looked at was Juan Gris’ Jar, Bottle and Glass, completed in 1911. I first viewed it without reading the title, and I saw many parallel lines, contrast in color and a limited color palette. The color used in this painting is limited to grays, browns, blacks and whites. The brown in the bottom right and the yellow/brown in the top left even stand out a bit because the rest is in greyscale (with some yellow and purple very lightly used in shading). Each of the colors is used in a gradient in different sections of this painting. The gradient indicates a source of light coming from the top left corner because the presence of shadows are prevalent. This painting is abstract, with lot of hard lines and angles as well as curves in some places. The most prominent shape, though, seems to be triangles, created by the gradient shadows. If we tie in the title of this painting (Jar, Bottle and Glass) the viewer would expect to see a still-life painting. Having already seen the image, I searched for these items in the painting. What I found were the lines representing the objects. All three contain straight lines and circles in their cylindrical shapes.

The second painting I viewed was Henri Matisse’s Woman on a High Stool completed in 1914. The central image is exactly what the title of the painting indicates. A woman in a black, blue and green dress sits with her back straight on a wooden stool (though the seat of the stool is not visible). In the background is a thin table and a simple piece of art featuring a bird hanging on the wall above it. The room’s walls are gray with a darker bottom right corner but no shading to indicate corners of walls or borders between wall and floor. It is possible that there is a slight light source coming from the bottom right corner and there is a slight halo around the woman sitting.

The clear difference between these two paintings is their style. One is abstract and one is an obvious image. While both may be “of something,” the styles appeal to different viewers (and artists). The titles of both paintings suggest that there is one or more explicit objects or situations represented in the painting. Surprisingly, Gris’ painting seems to have more prominent shading. Matisse’s is more two-dimensional and shallow, even though Gris’ consists of many two-dimensional shapes like triangles and squares. Gris uses much more light, which is evident because of contrast. Matisse uses dull colors, and the only thing contrasted with the rest of the painting is the image of the bird on the wall. The dull colors give it a sad or even depressed mood, whereas Gris’ painting evokes some confusion, preciseness and presence. Concerning form, Matisse’s work shows a subject with a simple title but can be read into to tell a story. The viewer can come up with background information or deduce a theme or message from looking at this painting. However, Gris’ painting is more pleasing to look at and evokes more self-reflection and thought as opposed to drawing a conclusion or taking away a message. Though these paintings were both done within several years of each other, the artists come from different parts of the world. Gris is Spanish and Matisse is French, so the cultural influence of these countries could have played a role in the effects used in each respective painting.

Artist’s Letter

Joshua Sloan

June 10th 1781

Dear Long Lost Companion,

It’s been too long since our last encounter. It pains me to know that you are alive and living while I am not privy to the happenings of your life. I hope all is well by you. I hope the memorable landscape of Salzburg is as beatific as I remember it. I recall when we were merely boys running over the bridges that cross the spectacular Salzach River. Those scorching hot days where the stifling heat practically pushed us into the river with the other children – the most memorable times of my life I must concede. As your long time friend, I believe I must inform you of some bad news. The musical compositions I’ve been working on have refused to gain the popularity intended for them. The financial burden I’ve been suffering with has forced me to move from my home in order to support my family and myself. It’s an emotional affliction no man should suffer being separated from your family. After all those conversations as boys we had concerning the fame, power, and respect we would one day receive, you would not be impressed with the man I have become. I am forced to humble myself before people who do not deserve respect from ants, although I suppose one could find some respect in doing what’s necessary to provide for your family and pursuing one’s passion. I would love for you to reply to this letter and to come visit me; I am lonesome and dejected and any form of communication illuminates my measly abode with joy. I’ve included some of my most recent works. Perhaps you could give me your opinion on them? When I think about the complexity and originality of my music, I refuse to relinquish the though that it will one day be revered worldwide.
Your Friend,
Wolfgang Mozart

Comparison of two works (Bleron Samarxhiu)

Bleron Samarxhiu
Comparing and Contrasting two works of art from the Museum of Modern Art.

Rue de la Santé by Yves Tanguy and The Wedding by Louis Vivin are two paintings created on the same year: 1925. Despite this remarkable similarity, they are significantly different in the amount of detail, the colors used, and the overall subject shown. Rude de la Santé combines color and the use of light to portray a modern and secular view of a city. The Weddings uses cliché colors and simplicity to depict an average wedding that took place a few centuries ago.

Rue de la Santé by Yves Tanguy can more be recognized as modern. Clearly, there is no mention of religion in it whatsoever. The oil on canvas features a conspicuous avenue that leads up to another street and that is very wide and centered in the painting. This modern road or street obviously is in a city and it makes use of different shades of gray along the road. Because of this, one can also make note of Tanguy’s strokes on the street. The use of light in the painting is odd but interesting. On the left side, lighter shades of gray are used, and most likely the sun is shining on each building on this side of the street, clearly allowing to distinguish the buildings. Each building in this case clearly has its own color and height and few have shadows. On the right side, the avenue uses darker shades of gray and the large building that encompasses the entire block is blacked out. It is unknown if a large cloud is causing this blackout or if the artist is proposing that this side of the street is under nighttime.  Yet the entire sky is cloudy and appears to be still under daytime. The perspective is somewhat distorted in the painting, not making it clear if the viewer is looking at a hill or if the buildings have been crookedly built. Tanguy in his artwork pays less attention to detail and focuses more on use of color and light.

In The Wedding by Louis Vivin, the viewer can immediately notice the amount of time it took to paint every visible brick of the structures. The roads on which pedestrians walk are a simple, dull color. Yet this painting uses a perspective that is more realistic and more appealing to the human eye. There are much more people on the street, probably because there is a wedding, and because the painting shows a scene from more than three hundred years ago, the scene portrays the center of a small town that is heavily involved in religion. The colors used for the buildings and used in general are less varying. In other words, colors were reused for other buildings, making the work of art less appealing to the other one. In fact, the reusing of the color yellow throughout the buildings and the windows hurts the eyes. Almost every building is identical; that includes windows, chimneys, and height. Furthermore, there is no notice that the painter put significant effort to the amount of light in the painting. It seems that this is an average wedding taking place in the town square with the sun shining at the entire scene and revealing no shadow. Vivin maintains simplicity throughout his artwork by reusing standard colors and plain structures.

Possible reasons why the two paintings are significantly contrasting is because Tanguy was born about four decades later than Vivin was. Other reasons include that fact that the works of art were possibly painted at different locations, one in the United States and the other in France. In addition, the fact that this is modern art gives the artist practically less restraints on what to create.

In comparison, both paintings are oil on canvas finished in 1925. In fact, Yves Tanguy and Louis Vivin are of French descent, Vivin being French and born in France and Tanguy being American and born in France. The two works of art show these significantly large buildings or structures that tower over pedestrians. Visually, both are nearly the same general dimensions. Within the actual painting, neither of the artists concentrated on creating a impressive sky. Both artists use a simple color for the sky and cover it with clouds. Each artwork’s features are more contrasting than similar.

Kristy Timms – Artist’s Letter

To Micheal Puchberg —

Dearest best of friend, and honorable O.B.

I trust this letter finds you well. Your health and well-being are of the utmost importance to me, dear brother. It has been an unfortunate matter that I have not yet seen you for the longest time, although I have tried with all my might, it has been a most challenging period. Your friendship holds the greatest value for me, richer than gold, purer than water. I hope you are in good health, with your table full and your wine glass overflowing.

Sorrowfully I write with little joy from my side. My friend and honorable brother, my only true friend it is only you to whom I can divulge the horrid dangers of which I am experiencing. Before I go further, I ask that you forgive me for my need, as I wish it were not mine. I, wholeheartedly, wish I was no ones pain to bare for it is too harsh for words. With a hollow stomach, cold feet and perspiration, I attempt. I have paced upon the floor for some time, a blank paper lying on my desk. My heart be too heavy to write the words. My plea comes not from a place of not want but a desperate place of need. For both my family and me. I protest my own desperation in order to not have to ask yet again, but my present condition has left me with no other possibility. The thought of my request from such a brother makes me shudder. Dear sir, forgive me. It has come to the place where I no longer have an option, but I am left with little choice. Friend, my confidant, spare me grace and mercy, I beg. The truth is too bitter for words and I find shame in putting them to paper. With a somber breathe I write these words. It appears to be so that my work is not accounted for by its worth, as the contacts remain of little pay and benefit for yours truly. My musical influence has not yet spread with vivacity. My hours of labor into my craft do not cease yet the rewards run low. A disappointing truth left deaf on the ears of those who need be listening. The honest, hard truth my true friend. The result of this unfairness brings its effects too close to my home. The rent is due. It has already been due, and now coercions have been set forth if the amount remains incomplete tomorrow. My friend, for a loan I request. The amount only enough for the coercions to refrain and my soul to rest for a day. I promise on its return at the earliest hour, with the greatest amount of interest I can accompany with it.

It will give me the greatest joy per chance you are able to save me yet again from the grave, honorable brother. Your assistance will come as a light in the unspeakable darkness. I have travelled with a burden for which I could no longer bare to carry a step further. It is you, dear friend, who will be able to rid me of this pain, and for that I kiss your feet in respect and thanks for your generosity. I praise you for your bounteousness in the past, and I plead for it now once again.

Your,

humblest debtor, most grateful servant, dearest friend and brother,

W. A. Mozart.

 

Artist’s Letter (Bleron Samarxhiu)

November 1, 1790

Most honourable O.B.!

Dearest of all friends,

I am sorry to present such a dire situation to your hands, but I have no other choice, and I have to do what is a must to survive. All I ask from you, brother, is nothing but a fair amount of money that I need to support myself away from home and a little for my ill wife whom I had left alone a short while ago. She can barely walk by herself and has been at the baths recently to try and treat her terrible illness. I have myself been somewhat ill these past few days, but I am terribly worried for her. May God watch over her and do the baths for her good!

There is no doubt that you have heard of my success in my latest pieces lately and I am looking forward to continue this success in the future, but all that is required that is just the financial support of a moneylender. I am obliged to moneylenders to live and to continue my musical works. I am so obliged that I have to beg you, most honourable brother, at this very moment. Do not withdraw our friendship due to this inhumane begging which society forces me to do. As soon as I make significant amounts of money, I will repay you, despite I have already been long indebted to you. All I need my brother is the time to accomplish this!

Oh, I have already asked you too much, but I cannot help it but ask of you just one small favor. I will not be able to write letters in the upcoming month due to my busy schedule, and therefore I oblige to ask you this favor. I have a score of one of my early works in my house. All I ask of you to do is ask my lovely wife for it; she knows exactly which one it is as I have already mentioned it to her to give it to you. Ask her for it after she finally comes back from the baths. Afterwards, give it to Lord Henry and he will pay you a relatively significant amount of money. That will at least pay back some of my infinite debt that I owe you. May God never ruin our dear friendship!

In the meantime, offer some support to my wife, as she needs the money to live and to treat her terrible illness. At the moment, I have two pupils and am planning on increasing that number to eight to lower the number of expenses I have. Issue it abroad across the towns that I give lessons. I have talked enough of my indebtedness to you, and I would like to discuss with you of my recent travels and success here near this town.

I have through many towns. Last night, I had the most splendid Moselle wine and the sweetest coffee to fill our stomachs. Throughout my travels, I have had nothing but very fine and beautiful weather except for one day, during which it was raining and gave me irritable discomfort. I have finally secured a room here in this town; the inn is not too dear, but still requires a decent amount of money for which I am unable to pay at the moment.

My quartet and my sonatas are ready to be performed, but what I desire is the ability to pay for the expenses. If you could do so, oh how much it would overflow me with happiness. My pupils here are learning quite quickly and in the meantime I am currently working on my latest pieces and am in need of relieving my anxiety and stress. Send anything that you could to me. Anything will be appreciated! I am very most grateful to you, brother!

Thank you,

Every thy your best of friends

W.A. Mozart

 P.S. I will be around town very soon and look forward to having dinner with you. Be sure to respond to this letter as soon you finished the favors.