All posts by hillcaldwell

Let’s Talk about Gentrification

One of the goals of this course is to prepare you to engage critically in discussions and debates about the future of NYC.  One of the most popular topics these days is the focus of this week’s readings: gentrification.  As I said in an earlier class, we won’t be debating whether or not gentrification is a bad thing; our inquiry must go deeper!   Please keep this in mind as you prepare for class on Monday.   For a few more recent/popular media takes on the issue, please see the following!…

http://ny.curbed.com/archives/2015/02/25/new_york_city_rent_hikes_outpace_income_growth_and_it_sucks.php

http://ny.curbed.com/archives/2015/02/26/mapping_25_years_worth_of_rampant_new_york_gentrification.php.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/monique-mo-george/housing-discrimination-ge_b_6701758.html.

Recap of 2/23 Discussion

FullSizeRender(16)FullSizeRender(17)FullSizeRender(18)FullSizeRender(19)FullSizeRender(20)

Today we continued our historical investigation into the policies and practices that have shaped NYC, physically and socially. We focused specifically on the period between 1968 and the 1980s, which is widely known as one of urban decline and decay, as federal support for cities and the civil rights movement waned. The Wallace article gave us insight into the one of the city’s and country’s poorest neighborhoods (then and now), the South Bronx, from 1974-1978. . Unlike many stereotypes and dominant narratives about poor neighborhoods and communities that view poverty through a culture/cycle of poverty framework, this paper shows the hugely significant shaping role of political economy.   In particular, Wallace and Wallace provide a quantitative analysis of the city’s “planned shrinkage” policy during the NYC fiscal crisis, showing the cyclical dynamics of abandonment, its demographic implications (i.e. forced migration, social disintegration) and public health effects.

We also discussed Tom Angotti’s chapter in which he traces the roots of contemporary community planning to various modes of community struggles over urban land and development throughout NYC’s history.  Angotti’s analysis is helpful in highlighting the community resistance that has always been present, and in showing us how the nature/character of that resistance has changed over time, and been shaped by its historical context. We built this into our timeline, and discussed the different waves of struggle from slave rebellions in the 1700s to self-help housing by Community Development Corporations in the 1980s.

Please draw on these articles to make sure you are familiar with how and why community organizing around land and housing in NYC have changed over time, and start working in your groups to connect your project’s issue and community to past struggles!

Project Brief Instructions

Dear Class,

Please see these instructions for your project briefs.  Please begin working in your groups to draft your briefs, which you will share with your community contact in your first meeting and use to get their input. Some key dates to keep in mind:

Wednesday, Feb. 25th, each group will present a draft brief to the class for feedback.  Note: It is not necessary for you to meet with your contact by this date, however it might help you move forward more quickly.

Wednesday, March 4th, each group will submit final project briefs to me.  You MUST have met and taken into account your community contact’s input before submitting on March 4th.

Please refer to the Recap of our Intro to PAR discussion and the Resources pages on our site for help on this activity.

Good luck!

Hillary

Recap of 2/18 Class Discussion

FullSizeRender(13)FullSizeRender(14)

In today’s class and this week’s readings we went deeper in the urban renewal era and its legacies.  Mindy Fullilove’s text re-frames urban renewal as “negro removal” by highlighting its discriminatory premise that African American communities were slums its and disproportionate impact on those communities.  We discussed the way in which Fullilove challenges urban renewal’s premise, by lifting up the hidden history of thriving, if challenged and segregated, African American communities; and, we talked about the long term consequences those communities in terms of various types of harm, including financial, psychological, physical/illness, social/cultural, and political.  Fullilove’s contributions to our understanding of these issues include: her method of analysis (i.e. connecting policies and structures to individual lives and places), her critical intervention of hidden histories, and her use of the concept of “root shock” to portray the experience and long-term consequences of displacement for African American communities. We situated this discussion within the historical timeline we’ve been constructing since the start of the semester, and in specifically relation to Jane Jacobs and Robert Moses, who were active during the urban renewal era.   Finally, we discussed the cultural (i.e. racist/classist stereotypes, ethnocentric biases) as well as political economic (post war labor and capital surpluses) that played a shaping role.

Group Projects- GO!

Dear class,

Please review the following: “Introduction to PAR” to help you get started on your group projects.  Also, please make sure you have read the following articles, which tie the projects together:

1. The Mayor’s State of the City Address: watch the video:
http://www.nytimes.com/video/nyregion/100000003489329/de-blasios-state-of-the-city-address.html;
or read the text:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/04/nyregion/new-york-mayor-bill-de-blasios-state-of-the-city-address.html
2. And a response:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/04/nyregion/an-obstacle-to-mayor-de-blasios-affordable-housing-plan-neighborhood-resistance.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&module=second-column-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0

See you next week,

Hillary

Research Design and Proposal Resources

Community Engagement Tools:

Community Tool Box: a set of 16 online tool kits for doing community work. Each kit outlines a particular process/series of activities and provides examples from actual projects.  #2: Assessing Community Needs and Resources and #3: Analyzing Problems and Goals will be most relevant to your group projects, but you might find others of interest as well.

Research for Organizing Toolkit: a toolkit for Participatory Action Research created by the Urban Justice Center’s Community Development Project; includes a step-by-step timeline for doing PAR, case studies, example activities, and example tools.

Project Proposal Outline:

Please use this “proposal writing short course” from the Foundation Center to as a guide for writing your project proposals (briefs).

Research Product Resources

Tips for your White Paper (Research Reports):

How to Write a White Paper

How to Present and Package a Report

Popular Education/Public Engagement Resources:

The Center for Urban Pedagogy: an NYC based non-profit that uses art and design to enhance civic engagement.  They are pros at making complex policy and planning issues more accessible to the general public, and in a way that is strategic for community organizing goals.  See especially their Making Policy Public and Envisioning Development series for group project ideas.

Hester Street Collaborative: another super cool NYC non-profit that uses art and design for social change, in collaboration with community groups and students.

Dr. Pop: a popular education website that helps people become better story-tellers and strategic thinkers; Dr. Pop tells complicated stories in simple ways, through games, videos, and other media, and then explains how to do it.

Introduction to Participatory Action Research (PAR)

Today (2/11) we switched gears from our historical analysis of what’s shaping (the future of) NYC, to discuss the research process, and how it can be integrated into efforts to shape change through community organizing.  In this class we will be using Participatory Action Research (PAR) as a general approach, which is concerned with not only academic knowledge, but also knowledge from personal experience and community/cultural knowledge- especially from those who are most affected by/involved with the focus issue.  From a PAR perspective, all of these kinds of knowledge are critical to the process of shaping change, whether through community organizing, public policies, or urban planning.

During class we charted the basic components/timeline of a PAR project, and we shared from our own experiences with these different pieces.  Your group projects will follow this general approach and incorporate all components, to some extent.  Soon you will be connected to your community contact, with whom you will craft your research questions and plan.  Before our next class, each of your groups should be preparing to meet with your community contact by learning everything you can about them and the focus issue.

Begin thinking about different ways to translate your issue into a research problem, using this as a guide: http://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/analyze/analyze-community-problems-and-solutions/define-analyze-problem/main. Start collecting information on your research problem, using this as a guide: http://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/assessment/assessing-community-needs-and-resources/collect-information/main. Gather a range of 9-10 materials, including recent research, and recent and historical media- at least 3 of each.  Note any difficulties you have understanding the research and we’ll discuss them.

 

The Future of Homelessness and the Shelter-Industrial Complex

Homelessness is at record levels and on the rise in NYC, despite multiple administrations promising to address it. Recent press has raised the public profile of this “hidden” issue through investigations into terrible shelter conditions, which are extremely costly for taxpayers: http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2013/10/28/hidden-city?currentPage=all, http://www.nytimes.com/projects/2013/invisible-child/#/?chapt=1. Meanwhile, the NYC Community Land Initiative, led by members of Picture the Homeless, is advocating for NY City and State to fund “Homes Not Shelters” https://indypendent.org/2014/02/25/homeless-folks-have-real-solutions-housing-crisis;http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/2012/01/new_york_has_mo_1.php.– And are working together with people who have housing but are threatened by displacement to develop alternative proposals for need-based homes rather than market-driven housing and shelters. NYCCLI is trying to build a policy campaign around moving money from the shelter system into permanent homes, and to show how this could work in their people’s plan for East Harlem.  Can you help?

  • Zumana Miyfa, Annalise Armenta, Omar Nagaria, Riley Tinney, Anna Kornak, Corrin Chow

Recap of 2/9 Discussion

FullSizeRender(8)FullSizeRender(9) FullSizeRender(10)

During Monday’s class we discussed two of the most legendary shapers of NYC, Robert Moses and Jane Jacobs.  We started by situating them and the texts we read within the historical timeline that we charted last week and then reviewed their different approaches to shaping the city.  Drawing from Scott Larson’s text, we traced their legacies to policy and planning practices today (esp. under Bloomberg), which try to take the best of both approaches, but still fail to address growing inequality and injustice.