1. The authors affirm that an understanding of the vocabulary of art, the principals of design, as well as the “historical, social, and political context” of a work of art will allow a “more meaningful dialogue” with that work. Do you feel that this perspective somewhat contradicts the idea that art is supposed to “transcend understanding” and perhaps renders purely aesthetic admiration of art superficial, or does it give you hope that those who do not have a meaningful relationship with art may find one through these means? (2)

2. The authors discuss how standards of beauty differ between Western and Non-western cultures, but they also emphasize comprehension of the principals of design as a factor in understanding art. Does the latter support the idea that there are certain visual elements which humans instinctively gravitate towards (i.e. symmetry), or is it all dependent on cultural forces?  (2-3)

Alina Pena