It seems that Saltz is commercializing art, which makes it seem very unimportant. The point of the Chelsea galleries is for the public to have a chance to see the mass of art that is there.  However, at one point Saltz says that it’s ok for your gallery to “be visible to just enough people with money” even if it is not visible to the general public.  How is this fair to artists? Doesn’t this contradict the very notion of art?