Armory Show

The Armory Show, organized by the Association of American Painters and Sculptors, included over 1,400 modern works of art by both Americans and Europeans. In NY, when the exhibit opened, the city was changing politically and socially. There was a shift to progressive thought, and the exhibit added to the shift in the way Americans thought about art. Many Americans, accustomed to realistic art, were now introduced to European methods such as Fauvism, Cubism, and Futurism.  The original exhibit evoked a range of emotions within Americans. Bold colors and primitive forms were used. Some of the paintings were even considered controversial.  Paintings by Henri Matisee, such as Blue Nude, were burned in Chicago by students of the Art Institute because most people were not accustomed to this expressive form of painting. This painting was classified as Fauvist, meaning Matisee used painterly qualities and strong, unrealistic color schemes.  In Blue Nude, Matisee uses the subject of a woman, which has been done throughout all of art history. However, the Impressionistic and slightly surreal style he uses to distort the human image made viewers critical since it was not representing the idolized body image. It did encourage other artists to steer away from what was traditionally and socially acceptable in the art world. I like this painting because despite the distortion, it coincides with reality more so than some other classical nude paintings.

imgres

 

My favorite painting at the Armory Show was Madonna by the expressionist painter Edvard Munch. I like the unfinished, raw look of the painting. It looks textured and rough. The lack of colors places emphasis on the woman, especially her facial expression. She looks as if she is in a state of euphoria. There is a duality with the title of Madonna; she could be seen as a saintly figure with a “halo” wrapping around her head. Yet, she could also be seen as someone who is pain or victimized with the swirling strokes of deep black enveloping the figure. The portrayal of the victimized woman could relate to how women were feeling around 1894. Her arms fade into the swirling strokes behind her head, making it seem as if she is surrendering.

Madonna Munch

 

Vine Woods by Agnes Pelton was the first painting that caught my eye. Up close, the painting looks chaotic as if it were a random arrangement of different colors, but the colors were actually carefully placed so that if a viewer looked from far away, they can see the entire scenery. This helped me understand Impressionism even more. Pelton was inspired my Matisse’s work although she didn’t incorporate many of his tactics. Created in 1910-11, Vine Woods is a romantic, imaginative painting that connects humans with nature. At the exhibit, I learned that Pelton believed that paintings were a form of visual poetry. Vine Woods exemplifies her idea because it is conceptual and leaves for various interpretation. The woman in the can be seen as a symbolist figure similar to characters in poetry.

Vine Wood by Pelton

 

Francis Picabia was one of the most talked about artists at the Armory Show for his use of Cubism. Objects are represented three-dimensionally into abstract form in Dances at the Spring by Picabia. Many had trouble understanding this type of avant-garde art. The use of shadow helps define the two girls dancing in the painting. It was inspired by a peasant dance he saw in 1909 on his honeymoon. Both stillness and liveliness is exemplified here. Picabia expresses inner feelings through geometric shapes similar to Duchamp in his Nude Descending a Staircase. Both pieces helped be understand Cubism as well as a taste of Futurism.

Dances at the Spring

One thought on “Armory Show

  1. Clare Carroll

    Sarah, Excellent work. I love the way you connect “Vine Woods” with symbolist poetry. This is one of the most detailed and diverse of all the blogs. You brought a lot together here. You do a great job of explaining the overall exhibit and the role of each of these works of art in it.

    Still, please be aware that there are some light editorial changes to make. Titles of paintings should actually either be in quotation marks or italics. It might seem like a small detail, but I want you to take great care with your writing. Be sure always to re-read and revise.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *