The Last Ship

For our performance, Shahrouk and I attended a performance of the Broadway musical The Last Ship at the Neil Simon Theatre. The text of the play was written by John Logan and Brian Yorkey, and the musical score was composed by famed musician Sting. The story centers on the recently unemployed shipbuilders of the English town of Wallsend, and their fight to build one last ship. The major plot line sees protagonist Gideon Fletcher return to Wallsend after running away fifteen years prior and attempt to rekindle his relationship with his girlfriend Meg Dawson, whom he left behind. Wallsend was Sting’s real-life hometown, and the musical was inspired in part by his childhood.

Shahrouk and I felt Sting’s score was the production’s best quality. The music evoked real emotion from the audience, and was most effective at adding depth to the plot and characters. The real pain of love was demonstrated through the ballads “August Winds,” “When We Dance,” and “It’s Not the Same Moon.” Emotional conflict was shown through “Island of Souls,” “Dead Man’s Boots,” and “Ghost Story.” And the shipbuilders’ struggle and determination was conveyed to the audience through the upbeat “We’ve Got Now’t Else” and the powerful “Underground River” and “The Last Ship.” The soundtrack can be found on the internet and I suggest listening to some of these numbers.

The plot left us a bit disappointed. Two major storylines were featured (Gideon’s quest to find himself and reclaim Meg; and the shipbuilders’ struggles with unemployment and their determination in building the titular ship) but they did not mesh well together. The story felt disjointed, and a lack of adequate characterization did not serve to remedy this. Whatever the reason may be, plot issues or otherwise, The Last Ship had unusually poor attendance for a new Broadway musical. The poor ticket sales led to the production’s early closure. While attendance increased after composer Sting stepped in to the cast, the show still closed to further avoid losing money. Despite some shortcomings, Shahrouk and I are glad we saw this musical while we had the opportunity.

Straight White Men

Our group consisted of Erica Loo, Daniel Seo and Chloe Chai. We initially chose this performance because of the director and playwright Young Jean Lee. We were trying to focus our choices on a theme of Asian American artists and how they were being represented in New York City’s artistic scene. When we continued to research more about Young Jean Lee we found that she was making a huge impact as a playwright because of her choice of issues that she tackles within her performances. Death, racism, and privilege are a few of those issues which Young Jean Lee brings to light in a variety of ways. Young Jean Lee doesn’t just stick to playwrights but exhibits the different issues through songs as well as dance. She has created her own space called Young Jean Lee’s Theater Company where she is able to direct, create, and perform her pieces. She is a dynamic writer that really dives out of her own comfort zone in order to make the audience jump out of theirs.

As the other groups have mentioned the story line and the interactions between the brothers starts off very light-heartedly, but the tension slowly began to build as it progressed. The climax was short and had an awkward atmosphere that was amplified because the play abruptly ended after Ed, the dad, had asked Matt to move out. This ending was really unsatisfying but it did have a huge effect on the audience. After the show we didn’t know how to respond to the ending or even the entirety of the show. We were all still trying to wrap our minds around what had just occurred because the ending really didn’t provide us with answers. After we silently walked out of the Public Theater and began walking towards the train station, we finally started to discuss our thoughts. We were all so confused and avoided answering what we thought about the play. But our confusion made us dig deeper into the play. We started analyzing the music, the actions of each brother, the jobs they had, the choices they made and the words they said. As we continued to talk about our individual experiences watching the play, we realized that we had learned about what it was like to be a straight white male. We were sympathizing with the characters, and were able to see a glimpse if not the entirety of the message. We each felt differently about the play and empathized with a different character, but all agreed that this play had a huge impact on the way we now see privilege.

— Erica, Daniel, Chloe

We highly recommend watching this play, but sadly this production has come to the end of its run. But The New York Times has written a review on this production which you can read here:

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/19/theater/straight-white-men-opens-at-the-public-theater.html?_r=0

Not only was this play reviewed by The New York Times but also chosen as one of New York Time’s Top 10 Best Theater of 2014, which you can read about here:

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/14/theater/charles-isherwoods-best-theater-of-2014-father-comes-home-from-the-wars-and-more.html?ref=theater&_r=1

Privilege- Straight White Men

Our group, consisted of Anthony Cacchione, Lucius Seo, and I, Christopher Chong, went on to see the performance “Straight White Men” by Young Jean Lee. In all honesty, we were driven to see this performance primarily because of the title, which we thought was very “out-there”, very strange, yet somewhat hysterical. Our immediate sense was that the performance was going to be some sort of comedy, perhaps joking around on the idea of being straight vs. gay, white vs. color, and/or men vs. women.

In the description provided by The Public Theatre, the show is a gathering of four guys, three sons and their father, during the time of Christmas. The wonderful evening eventually goes downhill as they start to evaluate their roles as being straight white men. Our group was very interested to see how this would all played out, and we solidify our decision to see it.

The stage of the performance was very well designed, and although the music was very vulgar and didn’t seem to fit the scene, everyone seemed to be quite content with what they were about to see (at least we were). I couldn’t help but to constantly laugh at the disparity between the music and the audience.

As the show starts and went on, one thing that really struck us was the game Privilege, which was a modified version of Monopoly. Created by the three sons’ mother, the significance of the game was that it was intended to teach the sons from not becoming that stereotypical “straight white men” by using monopoly rules. For example, instead of having “chance” and “community chance”, there was “denial” and “excuse”, which often led to a fine. As Tony has mentioned, Straight White Men deals with the idea of privileges that a straight white male have with respect to gender, race, sexual orientation, and this game was trying to depict these issues. The thing with the three brothers is their perception of privilege, which Matt (the oldest) attempts to disregard and completely depend on himself. The other two younger brothers, Jake and Drew, recognizes it and is indifferent towards it. As Matt continues to deal with his problems with privilege, his two brothers, and also his father Ed attempts to help him solve his problem, but ends up making the situation even worst. A supposedly wonderful Christmas evening ends up being one full of tension.

While the music is one that we thought did not suit the atmosphere, we also thought that the end was a bit abrupt, with everyone leaving the scene except Matt, who contemplates in front of us silently for about 30 seconds. We thought that it would’ve been better had their been closure to the situation, but the way in ended perhaps heightened the reality of the situation.

Although the show has ended its performances, Young Jean Lee continues to produce excellent plays, especially on subjects that are very controversial, like “Straight White Men”. We totally recommend anyone to go see it, and we do hope that the audience will be able to learn from what they see.

 

~Christopher Chong with Lucius Seo and Anthony Cacchione

P.S. Here is a cute video that I saw which teaches the idea of privilege

What a Christmas Spectacular, Indeed!

On November 24th, our group – Nabila Akthar, Sophia Ebanks, Angelika Pokovba – went to see the Radio City Musical Hall’s Christmas Spectacular featuring the Rockettes, a show that’s advertised around NYC abundantly at this time of year. From the time we entered, we could tell there would be some incorporation of technology because of the 3-D glasses we were handed as part of the experience. The computerized graphics were actually a huge part of the show. They were used to create settings and scenarios that would be impossible to create on the stage, such as flying sleighs and falling snowflakes. It added to the excitement in the crowd; we could feel the amazement of all people in the audience, especially  the little children.The Christmas Show also included various other forms of art that we’ve learned about and seen: orchestral music, singing, dancing, and acting.

The Orchestra at the Christmas Show

The Orchestra at the Christmas Show

The show started with a live orchestra raising up out of the stage while playing Christmas carols. Then, the Rockettes appeared on stage alongside Santa Claus. Of course, they were the most important characters in the show. Basically they aimed to show the journeys of Santa Claus, display the meaning of Christmas, and  recreate the Nativity scene. It was very impressive how the show smoothly put all of this together. There were scenes that also showed off the wonderful and historic attractions in New York during Christmastime, something we believe was meant to accommodate the vast amount of tourists in the audience.

Rockettes in the process of doing their famous leg kick!

Rockettes in the process of doing their famous leg kick!

The Rockettes, the main attraction of the show, went through a number of dance routines and costume changes that were unexpected. Actually, we didn’t think they would have so many scenes to dance in. It spoke to their dedication and skill. For certain, they carried the show.

By the end of the Spectacular, one thing was for sure: the Radio City Music Hall really loves its history. We couldn’t even count the amount of times the actors on stage repeated the fact that the Christmas Spectacular started in 1933. The Radio City Music Hall itself along with its Christmas Spectacular is a historic attraction, so why not boast about it? Afterwards, the Hall had a number of pieces and items for sale and on display to give us all a glimpse into its history. The experience truly didn’t end until we exited the Hall. It is as if the Hall aimed to extended this period of euphoria and feeling of magic.

Blast-to-the-past with a view of old Rockettes' costumes

Blast-to-the-past with a view of old Rockettes’ costumes

 

-Sophia, with Nabila and Angelika

How individuals work together and behave as one: Complexions Contemporary Ballet

Joshua, Kevin, and I went to Complexions Contemporary Ballet on their opening performance. Joyce Theatre is a movie theatre re-purposed as a dance space. It has been open as a space for dancers since 1982. On a cold day in November, Complexions Contemporary Ballet performed a set of dances entitled “Head Space”.

Complexions Contemporary Ballet is a dance group keen on reinventing dance by blending methods, styles and cultures. They focus on removing boundaries between the styles of each individual culture they include and amalgamating all of those styles into their work. Throughout their dances, this dance group has developed a prevalent theme of stacking their dancers one on another. Many times one individual would lift her leg up high and hold on to her partner for balance. Most of the ballet included these kinds of dance moves that required two partners to perform. The two individuals would have to function as one system to perform the quick paced yet meticulous dance. The dances also had the effect of emphasizing what freedom of thought looked like. They were purposed to stress that freedom of thought.

-Adrian, with Kevin and Joshua

Straight White Men!

Straight White Men is a play that is written and directed by Young Jean Lee. This play consists of only four characters. Austin Pendelton plays Ed, the father. James Stanley plays Matt, the oldest child. Gary Wilmes plays Jake, the middle child. Pete Simpson plays Drew, the youngest child. This play was presented by the Public Theater, which can be found at 425 Lafayette Street.

The play addresses the issue of privilege and how privilege is actually problematic in society. Having such an interesting idea at hand, our group (Chris Pun, Elyssa Sur, and Tony Chu) wanted to go see what this was all about.

We were shocked when we walked into the auditorium to be seated. We weren’t surprised by how the theater looked. Instead we were amazed at the vulgar music that was playing. Considering how majority of the audience consisted of elderly Caucasian men and women, it was hard to understand why rap music was being played. The music did play a part as it set the stage for the amount of vulgar language that was used in the play.

The former half of the play was not as serious as we would expect it. The brothers were fooling around with each other. Jokes were made left and right. There was even some childish dancing that made everyone in the audience chortle. The latter half of the play became serious really quickly. Soon Matt was questioned about his employment status and why he was in the situation he was in. Jake starts to explain that there are many privileges that being a straight white man that homosexual people, colored people, and women don’t have. Jake then explains that Matt chooses to not utilize the privileges because he is being the noble sacrifice since not every Caucasian can use their privilege. Ed and Drew question Matt to see if Jake’s theory is correct. Matt however disagrees and displays how he feels like he needs to earn his way up in this world. In the end of it all, the family is torn apart over this issue of privilege.

We found the play to be quite powerful and a lot to take in considering how most of the issues unraveled themselves in the latter half of the play. Although we don’t have our own take on the idea of white privilege, we have come up with some thoughts on the play itself. Ed seemed to acknowledge and respect the fact that he has white privilege and uses it accordingly. Drew, like his father, acknowledges his privilege and feels indifferent to it. Jake abuses the privilege he has and it shows throughout the whole play. Matt despises the fact that he has privilege and rejects it. Matt feels that everything should be earned and because of this his family turned their backs on him.

This play as a whole was well written and almost perfectly executed. Our only criticisms would be that the crude waiting music should be changed along with the fact that the actors shouldn’t over-emphasize certain phrases. We would definitely go see another play by Young Jean Lee.

– Tony with Pun and Elyssa

Who Said Politics Was No Fun?

For the wildcard part of the “The Art of Choosing,” Samantha, Jillian and I decided to attend a performance of Tail! Spin!. Tail! Spin!, created by Mario Correa, is a satire of recent US political sex scandals. Correa created the script using only the words the politicians had used surrounding the course of their scandal. This led to the shows intriguing tagline: “A new comedy texted, Tweeted, told by your elected leaders.” Tail! Spin! was performed at the Lynn Redgrave Theater at Culture Project, and consisted of an ensemble of five hilarious actors: Arnie Burton as Representative Mark Foley, Sean Dugan as Senator Larry Craig, Tom Galantich as Governor Mark Sanford, Nate Smith as the infamous NY Representative Anthony Weiner, and Saturday Night Live star Rachel Dratch as the women who were “victims” of the scandals (and also as Barbara Walters during a rather interesting interview).

Tail! Spin! holds true to the off broadway culture. It was performed in a  small theater for a relatively small audience. Its has an obscene focus: the topic of sex scandals, which is something that occasionally appears headlined in the media. It attracted a specific demographic (mostly older, senior adults), as noticed by the audience that night. Nonetheless, our little trio of 18 year olds thoroughly enjoyed the show. It was performed on a mostly empty stage, except for several chairs and a podium that appeared every now and then. The actors, stage lighting, and sound effects did an adept job at creating various settings and scenarios: be it a court room, TV interview, press interview, or even a bathroom.

The show was informative as it was entertaining. The three of us walked in mostly knowing only about Weiner and his Twitter catastrophe. Yet by the end of the night, each of us were able to intelligently crack a joke on Mark Sanford’s exploits in Argentina, or on Larry Craig’s “lewd conduct” that took place within a men’s bathroom stall.

There were no complaints about the show that evening (except for maybe getting back row seats when I was pretty sure I purchased front row seats). Because the cast consisted of such a small ensemble, each actor had to realize multiple characters. Arguably, they did so seamlessly. An actor would switch from a politician, to an interviewer, to a child talking to a 40 year old man on Facebook with sheer ease. Most outstanding had to be Rachel Dratch, who would switch from a seductive and enticing  woman to a loving and considerate wife at the snap of a finger (see her in action). Overall, the show itself flowed nicely with four separate incidents presented in a single, unifying manner.

 

Tail! Spin! does a great job at presenting the obscure theme of political sex scandals in an intriguingly humorous and surprising way. At the end of the show, the three of us could not help but find ourselves in a slight amazement. A general sense of shock came over us as we thought “Did they really say that?” Are our elected politicians, voted to represent us in our government, capable of such raunchy acts? We could not help but chuckle (and shake our heads in shame) at the lengths they went to cover themselves, the ludicrous excuses, and random bouts of memory loss.

Tail! Spin! is a smart and funny show. It really is a great way to spend your night! We recommend that you do go and see it!

-Manjekar, Samantha, Jillian

To What Extent Are We An “Accepting” Culture?

Our group, comprised of Manjekar Budhai, Samantha Dauer, and Jillian Panagakos, chose to see Ayad Akhtar’s play Disgraced. The show, which won the Pulitzer Prize for Drama in 2013, is currently running at the Lyceum Theater. It is directed by Kimberley Senior and has a cast of five actors: Hari Dhillon, Gretchen Mol, Josh Radnor, Karen Pittman, and Danny Ashok. Together, they put together a riveting show about the struggles of Muslim-Americans in modern day New York City that leaves the audience questioning the ideals of our society.

With just five actors and a simpleD setting of a couple’s small apartment, Disgraced is raw. It is not flashy. There are no extravagant backdrops, lighting systems, or musical numbers to draw the audience’s attention away from the significance of the dialogue between two couples at a dinner party. The set designer, John Lee Beatty, seems to have had a specific point to making the setting so simple and it works tremendously. We found that this, perhaps, is the reason why the show was so striking to us: everything about the set up and design is so realistic and so relatable that the themes presented throughout the course of the performance seem all that more conceivable. It was not at all like going to one of the more common Broadway shows, like Wicked or The Lion King, where the audience is able to look in to a fantasy world. Instead, Disgraced is meant to resemble our world as closely as possible in order to make the audience question whether the world of Disgraced is the same as that in which we live.

We were often taken aback by many of the ideas presented in the show and were appalled by the anti-American and anti-Muslim beliefs held by each of the characters. We were often times disgusted by what we saw and heard, to the point where each character was distorted by the end of the play. What started off as a friendly dinner party ended in a blood bath as each person showed their true colors and revealed their inner-struggles and beliefs. Although the ideas were radical, we came to realize that they were also necessary. As the characters spewed hatred and animosity, we were left questioning how true-to-life their opinions are.

Ultimately Disgraced is a piece that sheds light on Islamophobia in even the most progressive societies – particularly New York City. Especially since the September 11th attacks, Americans have grown increasingly afraid of Muslim culture and practices, a fear that mostly stems from an ignorance of Islamic practices and beliefs. Even as society becomes increasingly more progressive and accepting of people from different lifestyles, cultures, and religions, that fear is still present and deep-rooted. Disgraced works to shed light on the discrepancies between who people think that they are, and what is really inside. It presents one of the most important conversations that can be had in contemporary New York society: How deep-rooted is our xenophobia and to what extent are we really an “accepting” culture? By the time the show had finished, we and the rest of the audience were left to question the principles and ideals held by our city, our country, and ourselves.

– Manjekar, Sam, and Jillian