1. Is the new Pathways program a genuine attempt to ease students by creating a more unified CUNY core system, or is there some behind-the scene contract that gave CUNY an incentive to create and implement this program?

2. Do you feel that the decisions, votes, and proposals from the individual board members are based on what’s best for the school, or what’s best for that individual member?

3. For President Gould (probably shouldn’t ask this, but just an idea)-The current debate over the role and capabilities of the University President is basically non corporate duty vs. a corporate duty. If a President made a negligent decision that ended up causing the university to lose a critical bundle of funding, do you believe that termination of that President would be sufficient, or should the university have the option to sue that President personally for negligence?