10
Sep 17

Visit to the Guggenheim

The most notable thing about the Guggenheim Museum is the shape of the museum itself. It is a very popular and well known museum, so I knew how it looked before I arrived on the day of class. As I approached the museum that afternoon however, its striking difference to the rest of the New York City skyline became very apparent. Everything else around the museum and blocks away was shaped as most things are in New York, as tall and sharp rectangular buildings. The Guggenheim however stands out on its own as an oddly shaped circular building standing high on a New York City corner. Then, as you enter the museum, you can truly take in the magnificence of the buying itself. The levels wrap themselves around the walls of the circular building giving a spiraling look as you look up. Also, with the absence of stairs in the museum, you truly just ascend into the next levels of the museum, slowly taking up all of its beauty.

I am not a very artsy person myself and was not expecting to enjoy the museum as much as I did once I arrived. I was expecting to be bored with pieces of art that all had the same look or story being told all thrown up on to a wall. The Guggenheim Museum however gave a totally different feel and told a different story than the one I was expecting to get. The gradual ascent and change in artist as you make your way around the spirals truly gave off an artistic and cultured feel.

I was especially in awe and fascinated by the work of Pablo Picasso on his painting of the woman ironing in France. That painting really stood out to me because it so clearly told a story without the use of any words. The woman was in pain and was holding so much weight on her shoulders. She was clearly not happy with her life and was not enjoying the ironing and labor that she was doing in the painting. This painting showed the true side of France. Not everyone was fulfilling their dreams and living a wonderful life. People were in fact suffering and going through very rough times despite what was being broadcasted to the rest of the world. This painting was so amazing to me in that it lent itself to such a deep but simple interpretation.

If I were to create a museum, I would want it to convey the message of equality and innovation. I would not want a museum that showcases the same themes that all other museums carry or portray all the stereotypical stories of that time. I would want to create a museum that invites controversy and change through art. My museum would be one that would be home to innovative, different art that might be frowned upon by other institutions but would be celebrated and recognized in my own. I welcome difference and change, which is exactly what I want my museum to encompass.


09
Sep 17

Truly Seeing the Guggenheim

Approaching the Guggenheim, I was awed by the building itself, for it, standing alone, is a piece of art. My awe only flourished as I raised my eyes in wonder at the soaring atrium that flooded the building with sunlight. As the tour guide described the intentions of architect Frank Lloyd Wright in using open spiral rotundas to display the museum’s collections, he said something that resonated quite deeply with me; the construction allows the viewer to see art from numerous perspectives.

On the tour, we came across a painting that illustrated, literally, the effect of looking at art from a different physical perspective. To see Édouard Manet’s “Before the Mirror” from across the rotunda, it seems just a painting of a woman looking in a mirror. However, as I looked at the piece from up close, the clarity of the painting had become blurred. From far away, the individual brush strokes are lost. From far away, the greens that made up her blonde hair seemed only a shadow. From far away, we see the importance of looking up close. His rushed, defined strokes create the two-dimensionality of the painting, while still defining space, truly earning him a place in the era of Modern Impression.

Aside, from physical perspectives, the rotundas of the Guggenheim represented something more to me. Each art piece in the museum conveys something about the time during which it was created. If one chooses to see the painting at face value, he becomes ignorant of a sliver of history. To look at Picasso’s “Woman Ironing,” is a simple feat, but, to see beyond the woman slaving away, to look at history from a new perspective, is a more complex undertaking. Picasso created this when he was still an impoverished, like the many disenfranchised, artist in Paris during the early 20th century. The tension in the woman’s body, the bleak look on her face, they tell a story, a story that can only be seen from a different perspective. Many pieces were created during movements that Hitler sought to destroy; the Guggenheim provided refuge for them. American culture and society accepted the art barred from Europe, and truly celebrated, and continues to celebrate it.

I believe that Guggenheim was designed to make spectators think about and appreciate each art piece beyond a glance. Throughout the tour I found myself wondering, Why was this placed here? Why during this part of history? What is part of its own history? The paintings seemed to whisper, “look at me from the past, from the present, and from the future.” Like a textbook, a museum often tells a narrative of history; however, the Guggenheim goes beyond this and illustrates a multi-faceted story layered with the evolution of human emotion and expression. A story comes to life in each and every piece. So perhaps I was only able to look at several paintings, but the tour taught me how to truly see them.