Prof. Laura Kolb | Fall 2019 | Baruch College

Author: atolpina

A New Age Crucifixion

 

Crucifixion by Rachel Feinstein 2003

A piece of art that drew my eye during our Jewish Museum visit was Crucifixion by Rachel Feinstein. Made in 2003, this was the first piece Feinstein made after witnessing the  September 11 attacks from her apartment window. This piece consists of a child-project-like crucifixion scene made from sheets of plywood and paper like material. Usually, crucifixion sculptures and paintings are intricate and detailed. They depict Jesus’s plight in great detail: from his facial features to the disciples around him. Feinstein went another direction to an almost universal scene. She did not show any faces and instead vaguely sculpted the bodies of the people involved. 

Furthermore, this piece is clearly a mimesis of the original crucifixion. The abstraction of this scene blends the line between reality and fantasy. The original crucifixion and the events that occured after are a mixture of reality and possible fantasy passed down through word of mouth and “historical documents”. It is hard to tell what exactly happened during this event but it certainly happened.

The Crucifixion by Pietro Lorenzett 1340 (an example of a typical Crucifixion artwork)

Feinstein highlights this mystery by not sculpting the faces of the people involved in the scene and only showing a few symbols. Jesus’s crown of thorns is clearly visible and his extremities are both punched through with nails. A light paper material segments over his chest: an imitation of his ribs. These few symbols highlight Jesus’s sacrifice more than any other symbols can, hence why Feinstein could not include his face and still get the message across. This piece shows the pain and betrayal Jesus felt while he died for our sins. The typical crucifixion scene highlights this sacrifice with rich paint and gold auras around Jesus and his disciples. The simplicity of this piece humanizes Jesus but also his sacrifice becomes less of a religious teaching but more a symbol for human action.

This theme is important because most likely Feinstein’s trust in human character had faded in the years this was made. Since this piece was the first she made and showed since 9/11, Feinstein most likely tried to remind her audience of great sacrifice that occurred years ago. There is very little religious aspects in the piece due to the abstraction and the mysterious element. Instead, Feinstein focuses on the meaning the crucifiction: a sacrifice for the failures and sinful nature of humans. The 9/11 attack caused so much suffering and pain, a huge sin committed against innocent American citizens. Feinstein’s crucifixion scene is a reminder to her audience of the importance of compassion

 

Endless Tunnels Below

Down Down Down, tunnels deepen through the bed of strong granite rock

Tunnels connected to tunnels bringing life to darkness 

Rich and poor, old and young traverse these barren halls of another century

Rumbling, twisting and turning, huge metal machines cut through the bed of strong granite rock

 

A mother clings to her child on a barren platform among the noise

A man in a suit types away at his device, without a look around

A homeless man shakes a small coffee cup filled with jingling change

All alike, waiting, waiting, waiting for a rumbling metal machine to roll in

 

Head by head, they march on, like ants 

Packed like sardines into an unknowing and strange metal can

Hands touching metal and seats filled with people, this machine knows no empty space 

We all have one purpose, one mission, one destination: out 

Stumbling and shoving to the front huge metal doors open up revealing another barren hall of the past

A mother, A suited man, and a homeless man, together shuffle out; herd going to the grass

For an instant paths intertwined, different yet the same

 

But once the metal machines rumblings came to an end, so are the paths of these city residents

Each with their own lives, so complicated and quick

Never consider the fellow who they are riding with

Sprawling tunnels, down, down, down under the ground, endless and divine.

 The City’s heart beats with the tunnels, sounding a rumbling tone

The Mortality of Photographs

Part One

“But very often (too often, to my taste) I have been photographed and knew it. Now once I feel myself observed by the lens, everything changes: I constitute myself in the process of “posing,” I instantaneously make another body for myself, I transform myself to advance into an image. This transformation is an active one: I feel that the Photograph creates my body or mortifies it,” (10-11)

 

This passage begins Barthes’ explanation of the importance of the target in photography. This part stood out to me as he explains rather clearly (surprisingly so), the effect of a camera on a standing target. The person in the photo loses their natural state and turns rigid as Barthes describes. I understood this as I have always had trouble smiling “naturally” for the camera. This is important to Barthes’ exploration of photography as this adds to the idea that photography is missing an element of real life. Additionally, this adds to the theme of “death” in photography. Barthes refers back to photography adding a “mortifying” aspect, hence an important part to his argument.


Part Two

“I studied the little girl and at last rediscovered my mother. The distinctness of her face, the naive attitude of her hands, the place she had docielely taken without either showing or hiding herself … all this constituted the figure of a sovereign innocence … the assertion of a gentleness. (69)

 

Before this passage, Barthes spends a few pages discussing his journey of searching for the perfect photograph of his mother. He looked through everything he could find but each photo seemed off, it didn’t seem to capture his mother as he remembered her. The features might have been vaguely familiar but the emotional aspect given off to Barthes made his mother in the photos he found unrecognizable to him. This passage stood out to me because it was a heartfelt moment where Barthes finally found the photograph he was looking for. Interestingly enough, it was a photo of his mother as a child, way before he was born. So while he doesn’t fully recognize the features of this girl at first, the other non-visual features lead his senses. Specifically, the photograph emanates his mother’s kindness, something that Barthes’ cherishes. This passage helped me understand what Barthes is searching for in a photograph or what in general he is referring to throughout the book.


 

Is there a way to immortalize ourselves through a photograph?

Does that image change depending on who is viewing it?

 

Jumbled Artworks in Jumbled Galleries

Chelsea is oversaturated with art galleries. Each block contains open galleries for the wealthy passersby as well as the casual art student looking for some inspiration. A lot of these galleries follow the model of a “White Cube” at first glance. Upon further investigation, each gallery had its own atmosphere: specifically curated by the gallery owner. To highlight the art as much as possible: spacing, wall placement, as well as lighting is tinkered with in each gallery. This leads to a different experience in every gallery, even if the gallery just consists of white walls.

The first gallery that my group stumbled upon was not even on the list given to us. The Jim Kempner Fine Art gallery, located on the corner of w23rd st and 10th ave, was still under construction but did a nice job of highlighting the art inside. The gallery is surrounded by a large steel wall, a clear departure from the brick buildings that surround it. It reminded me a lot of Richard Serra’s “Tilted Arc”. Between the steel wall and the actual gallery was a small pathway that crossed through a “garden of stones”. This garden decreased the actual square footage of the gallery, but immersed the viewer in the gallery experience. Crossing into the gallery, I felt that I had left the loud, urban city and entered a zen temple. 

The garden was under renovation when we came. This is what it normally looks like.

Upon first glance after entering, the gallery did not show one specific artist. The gallery contained a collection of multiple artists using different mediums. Each artwork was placed within one foot of another, giving the viewer an almost jumbled affect. Everywhere we looked was art. Even on the receptionist’s desk, there was a small sculpture. If anything, this amount of art was overwhelming for a small space. There was a certain centerpiece on the first floor to which the eye naturally gravitated to, separated from the other works on that floor. This was a small version of Mt. Rushmore, very accurately carved out of history books. If everything in that gallery didn’t cost thousands of dollars, I might have bought that piece.

From the first floor to the second was a flight of stairs that seemed so impractical, we didn’t want to step on it, fearing that it was another piece of art.

 

Eventually, we made it up the steps and found a similar exhibition upstairs. What was really interesting about the upstairs part (which was mostly a white cube) was the second room, all the way in the corner of the building. It was separated from the main hall by a small narrow hallway. This second room again, contained tons of art crammed into a small space. It forced the viewer to take a few glances before even recognizing what was there. The centerpiece in this room, among all the art, was a signed cardboard box. This really baffled us. There was much more work in that room that took so much more effort, but the piece in the center was a postage box. It gave the room a feeling of insignificance as the “best” piece in that room was a box.  

The other artwork on the side of the postage box

Captivating postage box for sale

The second gallery we visited was C24 which was located almost at the end of 24th st. Immediately, the gallery seemed closed off as there was a party inside, and an extremely heavy door guarding the entrance. Once we realized it was open and used whatever strength we had to open that door, we strolled in to C24 and found an inviting space. On the top floor, there was a collection of hyperrealistic oil paintings by Mike Dargas. There were only about 4 paintings on the whole floor, giving each painting a dignified status. The gallery put a lot of light and focus on the paintings (that I thought were photographs) to highlight the artists skill. 

The bottom floor was a completely different beast than the first. The bottom floor was currently housing an exhibit from a group of artists called Fields Projects. SImilar to some parts of the Jim Kempner gallery, artworks here were jumbled together and stacked one on top of another, which reminded me of Morse’s “Gallery of the Louvre”. Similar to the painting, there was art everywhere the eye can go, making each one seem a bit insignificant. However, a lot of this art was so surprising or unusual it caught the eye anyway

This bottom gallery was multimedia and even included some television screens. These screens naturally grabbed the viewer’s attention and therefore were placed at eye level. One of these screens was very interesting. It showed looping video, with classical music,  of some guy moving his hands and fingers over and over.

It gave me a weirdly hypnotic affect and made me confused as to why this was being sold or how (does the purchaser get the TV? Does he get a flash drive with this video? Who knows?). The other pieces of work in this gallery were oddly sexual, including a set of clay telephones with strange texts and pictures on them, including nudes (still forged out of clay). These telephones were not hung which made the viewer look over them from the top.

This gave me a feeling that this was someone’s phone and I was reading it from the usual angle that a phone would be held. After walking around a few times, I still felt as though I missed artwork and due to the sheer volume of art in that room I definitely missed the meaning of a lot of those pieces.

The gallery space is crucial to how the artwork is viewed. If a gallery shoves tons of artwork with different mediums into one tiny space, it can throw off the viewer and if anything overwhelm him or her. However, a gallery that shows only a few paintings (such as the top floor of C24) can really give the artist a proper exhibition, on par with any museum.                                                                                                                        

 

Worlds Apart: The Importance of Community in Public Art

Under the dark grey clouds that blanketed the sky, the streets of Coney Island seemed empty. The collection of murals I had always visited during the summer was closed and tucked away (but I was able to sneak a picture anyway). 

For many, Coney Island offers the antithesis to the seemingly bleak modern landscape of Manhattan with a colorful and vibrant collection of old buildings and a serene beach next to them. One of these colorful streets contains a collection of public murals. Similar to the format of a typical art museum, this open space contains huge walls as canvases: each one disconnected and scattered between the gate that encloses it. 

Among the sounds of amusement park rides, screaming children, and squeaking trains, there is a certain serenity to these murals located in a small lot behind the infamous Nathan’s. I would love to visit these murals under the heat and try to understand what the artist is conveying.

One of the first murals visible, once you enter the lot, is a large depiction of a futuristic Coney Island. This mural, titled “Untitled”, stands apart from the rest as it is painted and decorated with very delicate black stenciling on a white background. The absence of color in this mural caught my eye immediately as it contrasted heavily with the color of the neighborhood. At the center of this mural is a behemoth chimera, that seemingly floats above the grey monotonous ocean, with the outline of Coney Island in the background. This creature is a strange mixture of an elephant, a giant squid, and maybe even a whale. While seemingly terrifying and confusing this creature seems almost welcoming and peaceful. 

Its head is shaped similar to an elephant’s. The trunk is replaced with 3 large tentacles. Each tentacle twists and turns in a different direction. As if three tentacles from an elephant’s face wasn’t horrific enough, the artist depicted four more smaller and seemingly useless tentacles that jut out from just under the chin of this creature. The body of this creature is similar to a spiny dinosaur, as dozens of little spikes poke out from the segmented torso. The segments give the illusion that this animal’s skin is rough and coarse. Under the torso are two pectoral fins, resembling a humpback whale. To complete this monstrosity, the artist painted another set of tentacles, instead of legs, that most likely move this creature forward. And under this creature is a note that reads, “Coming Soon 2038!”.

This piece by Alexis Davis, a Puerto Rican painter and muralist, is a good example of Kwon’s idea of “art in a place”. This piece is not meant to be interacted with and its sole intention is to be gazed at. While, this piece of art does pay homage to the neighborhood it resides in, the central subject does not represent any issue or topic within the neighborhood. Last time I checked Coney Island did not have problems with giant elephant squids. Furthermore, this piece and most of the murals around it were curated by a real estate company (Thor equities) that has been working to revamp Coney Island into a tourist destination. These murals are meant to beautify the neighborhood and entice visitors to come and pay at one of the many attractions all around. For this reason, the art does not represent the community as it is curated to generate further profits for a real estate company.

The second piece of public art is much more serious and does not fit the traditional mold of public art in NYC. However, this piece of art plays a large role in my community. Located at the corner of the Sheepshead Bay canal, the Holocaust Memorial Park is a commerative monument to the atrocities commited by the Nazis during World War II. Unlike the previous piece, this memorial is very site specific as the neighborhood immediately surrounding it contains thousands of Jewish people, many of whom were immigrated shortly after the war. Just on West End ave. alone (the street where the memorial is located) there are four synagogues within four blocks.

This park serves not only as something to gaze at but something to interact with and learn from. The architect George Vellonakis, who is not Jewish, sought to create a monument that not only respects and commemorates the lives lost but serves as a beacon of hope and light for the future. The park is very small; it does not even take up a whole block. This park is covered in small trees and shrubs as well as short manicured grass. Before Hurricane Sandy, this park was covered in huge powerful trees that seemed to evoke the strength of the message found in the memorial itself.

The memorial consists of a symmetrical amphithere-like layout. At the center is a large beacon made out of granite with a bronze “flame”, ever lit, at the top. The granite structure is hollow and usually filled with flowers, tokens, and candles put there weekly by residents. The structure is reminiscent of the crematoriums found in many concentration camps. Around the side of the granite is carved a single word: “Remember”. This beacon stands on three granite rings that extend outward into the ground. The names of the countries where the victims of the Holocaust were orignally from are carved into these rings. Outward from the beacon is a long slab of granite which extends towards the canal and describes the history of this tragedy. The beacon and the slab are flanked on either side by trees and manicured shrubbery.

On either side of the beacon is a series of markers with a gravel path between them that leads back out to the canal side of the park. Each marker is a different height, shape, and many are purposely cracked and eroded. This is meant to resemble tombstones and to commemorate the different backgrounds of the victims. The gravel pathway is shut in by more shrubbery. The markers have inscriptions, in Hebrew and English, about many events of the War, the different groups of persecuted people, as well as quotations from survivors. Walking on one of these pathways separates you from the city around and immerses you into this horrific past. Fresh flowers and candles are always accompanying these markers so that the victims are never forgotten.

As tragic as the piece is, it provides a space for the community that immediately surrounds it. Many Jewish holidays are celebrated here. Congregations meet here for Chanukah, Tashlich, and Passover. It is central to the community around it. Even though it was funded by a non-Jewish mayor and built by a non-Jewish architect, it is a space that is enjoyed by many in the community. It fills the “art as a space” paradigm, as it is a piece of art that is meant to be used and interacted with by the community and requires that the community is socially conscious about the message the piece is trying to convey. The purpose of the memorial, as shown by the word around the beacon, is to remember what had happened so many years ago, but also for future generations to learn and support the Jewish community that lives in southern Brooklyn today.

“Untitled” by Alexis Diaz in Coney Island and the Holocaust Memorial Park in Sheepshead Bay are two very different examples of public art. “Untitled” is part of an outdoor museum for public murals in a neighborhood that is meant to attract tourists instead of residents. This piece of art, while very interesting and thought provoking, is not site specific and does not serve a purpose to the community around it. On the other hand, the Holocaust Memorial Park is a tribute to the community around it and is very site speicifc. The memorial is purposely designed to pay tribute to the victims of the past while complementing the canal waterway in front of it. It is designed as a community park where many Jewish residents come to pay their respects to their ancestors. Public art can be found in many forms throughout NYC but some of these forms are much more community oriented than others .

 

The Repast of the Lion by Henri Rousseau at the Metropolitan Museum of Art

Background

This painting was made by a French artist Henri Rousseau. He paints in a post-impressionist style which emphasizes the use of vivid colors and thick layers of paint. He started painting in his early 40s and influenced many later avant-garde artists. This specific piece was painted in 1907 and medium is oil on canvas.

 

Analysis

This painting is not hyper-realistic or even realistic. Most of the art from this time period follows the same pattern of shifting away from realism. Rousseau focuses on the vivid colors and textures of the scene. His painting depicts a jungle full of vegetation. Most of the jungle is painted in a dark green hue with the sun rising directly in the background. Only a few things are not painted in green. This makes the viewer focus on these objects more. This includes the lion in the foreground as well as the bananas in the background. 

This painting depicts a lion in a much different way than most paintings. Other artists tend to put the lion in the center of the painting and really highlight the strength and power of the lion. This may give make the lion seem important to the viewer. On the other hand, Rousseau does not especially focus on the lion. Most of the lion is not visible, as only the face, mane, and paws are above the thick vegetation. The lion also has a dead jaguar in his mouth. Even though Rousseau does not show the muscles and teeth of the lion, the dead jaguar gives this lion power. It makes the viewer feel that this lion controls the vast jungle behind him and we should be cautious entering his domain, even while looking at this painting.