Several of the proposals for incineration facilities disclosed in “Incinerators in Disguise,” were challenged by the residents and environmental justice groups of the community, as they formed coalitions against the waste-treatment companies’ claims of “zero emissions,” until they were rejected. The New York City Department of Sanitation’s Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan for 2006-2025 seeks to reduce NYC’s reliance on “out-of-City landfill disposal options” and explores the possibility of new and emerging technologies being sited in New York City. Although case studies have proven that waste-treatment facilities falsely claim that their technology is “pollution-free,” and has “no emissions,” do you think an incineration facility, promoting technologies such as pyrolysis, gasification, plasma arc, and catalytic cracking, is capable of operating pollution-free? And if an incinerator such as the one mentioned by the DSNY were sited in New York City, how do you think residents of NYC would respond? How would you respond to an emerging incinerator in your community?
Topicsscience risk environmental justice wasted food Italian futurism Sandy risk-based approach place technology systems theory post-modernism PlaNYC physics infrastructure oyster beds recycling law waste management climate change adaptation culture biofuels housing complexity futurism marsh parks right to the city modernism NYC politics carbon sequestration waterfront virtual trees parks and nature (video) gaming business information technology cities transhumanism carbon rooftops cooking wetlands timeline global warming waste-to-energy transportation Mannahatta climate change mitigation artificial intelligence demographics environmentalism energy architecture art composting solar energy postmodernism farming climate change time planning waste prevention water incineration