Both Anderson and Frug agree that ‘right to the city’ and ability to foster change is in the hands of a city’s inhabitants. Both articles provide their own suggestions and ideas for how city dwellers can take back their cities (utilizing previously empty spaces for example, as Anderson points out). To a degree, it seems that New York City in recent years has tried revive itself and give more of itself back to its inhabitants – with projects such as the Highline, for example. Do you think New York City is doing a good job at giving the “right of the city” back to it’s citizens? As a New York City inhabitant, is there anything you would like to be done to enhance your own right to the city? And finally, who’s “right” should New York City focus on? The city has a very diverse population, with different needs and wants. Who’s “right” should New York City give in to? Students? Minority Groups? 9-5 urbanites? Can there be a happy medium?
Topicsclimate change energy business right to the city climate change mitigation wetlands science composting Mannahatta environmentalism architecture parks and nature place NYC politics waterfront carbon postmodernism Italian futurism marsh parks waste-to-energy demographics timeline waste management complexity waste prevention cities physics Sandy law environmental justice (video) gaming farming modernism cooking global warming artificial intelligence time climate change adaptation recycling water planning incineration solar energy rooftops transhumanism PlaNYC risk-based approach information technology wasted food transportation carbon sequestration art culture oyster beds technology risk systems theory infrastructure post-modernism futurism biofuels housing virtual trees