Both Anderson and Frug agree that ‘right to the city’ and ability to foster change is in the hands of a city’s inhabitants. Both articles provide their own suggestions and ideas for how city dwellers can take back their cities (utilizing previously empty spaces for example, as Anderson points out). To a degree, it seems that New York City in recent years has tried revive itself and give more of itself back to its inhabitants – with projects such as the Highline, for example. Do you think New York City is doing a good job at giving the “right of the city” back to it’s citizens? As a New York City inhabitant, is there anything you would like to be done to enhance your own right to the city? And finally, who’s “right” should New York City focus on? The city has a very diverse population, with different needs and wants. Who’s “right” should New York City give in to? Students? Minority Groups? 9-5 urbanites? Can there be a happy medium?
Topicscomplexity physics virtual trees carbon sequestration Italian futurism cities oyster beds environmentalism recycling right to the city business carbon water wetlands global warming NYC politics Mannahatta post-modernism transhumanism transportation climate change artificial intelligence climate change adaptation rooftops postmodernism infrastructure information technology (video) gaming PlaNYC timeline biofuels waste-to-energy waste management risk-based approach solar energy farming architecture energy demographics parks and nature waste prevention composting Sandy planning housing place wasted food waterfront technology risk law art incineration futurism environmental justice time climate change mitigation cooking systems theory science culture modernism marsh parks