“Resource Management as a Key Factor for Sustainable Urban Planning” Response

While most of the readings we have read have focused on New York City, specifically in terms of its ecological history from the Native Americans to the European colonists to the present times, this journal discussed civilizations and groups of people from thousands of years ago to mindsets that the authors hope will be adopted by future generations. This hope for change stems from the fact that cities use resources at monumental rates, but they have caused drastic changes in their surrounding environments. For example, New York City may have a land area of just over 300 square miles, but it has approximately 8.5 million people, and a lot of its water supply comes from the Catskills, part of which are not even in the metropolitan area. From a global perspective, the human population is growing exponentially, reaching seven billion just a few years ago, and it shows no signs of slowing down. We will torture nature to reveal its secrets just to support us and our insatiable needs, but we only look at short-term solutions and ways that we can personally benefit rather than how we have affected the natural cycles of organisms and non-living portions of ecosystems. Our resources are finite, and at this point, it looks like only a catastrophe of epic proportions will change our behaviors, even if it may be too late to reverse the damage that we have done.

The authors are a bit more optimistic than this, striving for the implementation of greater resource management into urban planning. Urban planning nowadays is only done for people, not the environment. We focus on building cities that are efficient for commuting, commerce, and social functions, and try to tackle issues such as racism, poverty, and gender inequality, but this is only one slice of the pie. We must include environmental factors as well for the sake of the organisms that we have symbiotic relationships with, since their extinction will ultimately lead to our own downfall as well. Interestingly, our distant ancestors were looked at in the most positive light, being described as “hunters and gatherers … [who] collected resources in different places, migrating when resources became scarce. The energetic metabolism of hunters and gatherers has been described as an ‘uncontrolled solar energy system’.” (2297). Now, with the advent of agriculture and industrialization, people have chosen to stay put and expect resources to come to them, and use them at faster rates than at any other time in the past; the inventions of the automobile, plane, and other forms of transportation may be the primary reasons behind this.

The journal is very well-organized, given the two diagrams describing the holistic relationship between urban planning, resource management, and sustainable development, and how all of them have changed dramatically over the past millennia. The recycling of waste and nutrients is alluded to, and a real-life example, even if it is a bit gruesome, is Bill Gate’s Omni Processor, which converts fecal matter and sewage into drinking water. However, environmentalists, businessmen, and politicians can only do so much to encourage change by giving thoughtful directions; people themselves have to take the wheel and drive.

Resource Management Response

We talk about urban planning in class as something thought of in post-production terms; things we have to add onto/ into our city. But this article pointed out that my view of it has been completely flawed. As the abstract spells out, resource management and urban planning have literally gone hand in hand with each other since the beginning of time. The human race wouldn’t have gotten so far if they hadn’t followed their intuition/logic to see how important it was to manage their resources to the benefit them. In modern society now, we’re trying to manage them to benefit both us and the environment.

As Samin points out in his response, the article focuses on how cities can use their limited resources and make them last longer. Why have our resources been depleted so quickly? The authors list industrialism, rapid growth of the world population, urbanization and technological development to be the leading factors. These are things that we can also view as progress for the human race; it’s a double-edged blade. These are also things we can’t really do much about. We talked about dissuading people from having ton of kids, but we can’t control them. It’d also be hard to stop technological progress and industrialization. That’s why we just have to run with it/ work with it. We don’t have the luxury of using up resources without consequences.

The article poses the question of what can be sustained and developed at the same time. The WCED defines sustainable development as “development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs”. But this seems to be a hard balance to find. It’s what requires resource management to be so well thought out, testing all options, knowing the trade-offs. In the 1990s, SD became something linked to social and economic issues which was helpful for awareness and also for idea generation, but I don’t know if this is actually a good thing (draws us away from the main issue?). It would really suck if good ideas and plans were scrapped because of political red tape which seems to be everywhere.