Visitors or inhabitants of New York City are greeted with the same sights upon entering the City: the sound of traffic caused by the enormous volume of cars, the number of people scurrying to their destinations, and the light bouncing off the glass of awe-inspiring skyscrapers. These buildings illuminate the night, symbolize progress and wealth, and are often thought of as the greatest part of the city- the “soul”. According to Sharon Zukin, however, the “soul” of a city encompasses its people, its diversity and its small businesses. The City is defined by not only its ability to change with time, but also its enduring places, neighborhoods, and streets.
Sharon Zukin makes a sound argument when discussing the aspects that define a city and how to approach the problem of disappearing authentic places. On the other hand, Oldenburg makes an interesting argument but not one that I agree with completely. Zukin introduces an idea of the importance of diversity in the survival of a city. Whether it’s large chain stores, a small laundromat, or a food cart, the combination of all these types of businesses and people are essential to the durability of a place. Therefore, when the small businesses are compromised, it is up to the people to appeal to the government. In “The real small business killer”, Benediktsson mentions the government’s contribution to the displacement of the small businesses, specifically in Brooklyn. Rezoning prompted landlords to swap out present commercial tenants for bigger chain stores. This ties to Zukin’s argument about voicing the need for diversity within a community. She references the Red Hook Food Vendors and their display of Latino culture through the food they sell at the soccer games. She uses them as an example to show that with a little pushing, outside communities helped these vendors continue selling their products. The small business was salvaged through the aid of others.
As for Oldenburg, he makes intriguing points about a “third place” which is supposed to feel like home, if not better. I like the idea of there being a place that allows people to spend time with each other not on the basis of work, but rather for enjoyment. Also, the idea of third places as “levelers” is compelling because individuals get to spend time with others based solely on their character and not their social rank. The problem I see with this argument is whether or not there are places that model this perfect “third place”. I’ve never seen a place that completely disregards social statuses and exhibits an extremely joyful ambiance. Although it is sounds excellent, is it possible?
