Downstate (NYC) stakeholder’s and the NYC Water Supply

From the POV of downstate stakeholders (i.e. New York City and surrounding residents):

New York City is home to more than 9 million urban dwellers, as well as countless businesses that thrive on the one billion plus gallons of clean drinking water traveling from Upstate New York to New York City each day. The quality of our drinking water is among the best in the world, and keeping it that way requires a lot of management, which is why it is important to ensure the protection of the upstate watersheds. If this doesn’t continue to happen, the city will be forced to build a filtration plant to filter the incoming water supply, which is estimated to cost upwards of $10 billion to construct and $100 million annually to operate, which would undoubtedly be reflected in our taxes, as well as in a water rate increase of approximately 30%, burning an even deeper hole in New Yorkers’ pockets.

According to plaNYC, New York is currently implementing the Watershed Protection Program, which is “a unique strategy that combines protection, land acquisition, and environmentally-sustainable economic development to maintain the high quality of our water supply”. According to plaNYC, this program will also work with local stakeholders in the form of loans to local businesses to support tourism, hospitality, manufacturing and other areas, as well as rehabilitating residential and community septic systems around the watersheds.

Another huge part of this watershed maintenance and protection initiative has to do with protecting New York’s water supply from hydrofracking. Since some of our watershed lay above to Marcellus Shale, numerous gas companies are trying to get permission from local authorities to extract this natural gas. However, this will undoubtedly be harmful to our water supply and if this were to take place, a filtration system would definitely be necessary, which is another reason the state vehemently opposes natural gas fracturing on our watershed land.

Although this maintenance program may be costly and somewhat of a burden to upstate residents in terms of land use and development, the pros far outweigh the cons, and especially costs of building a filtration system, which is the only plausible alternative for now. It is important to maintain the quality of our drinking water that billions of New Yorkers are used to and depend on everyday and try to offset potential filtration costs as much as possible.

“PlaNYC 2030 – The Plan – Water Supply.” PlaNYC 2030 – The Plan – Water Supply. N.p., n.d. <http://www.nyc.gov/html/planyc2030/html/theplan/watersupply.shtml>.

 

Posted in Scientific Work | Leave a comment

Government Agencies and NYC Water Supply

Government agencies such as USEPA, New York City Department of Environmental Protection (NYCDEP), NYS Department of Health, and NYS Department of Environmental Conservation are concerned about the quality of both filtered and unfiltered water that flows to the homes of millions living in the area. They have two options. The agencies can spend a large sum of money to focus on maintaining unfiltered water. Officials would have to continually test for decreases in water quality. Once the water quality dips, they will have to build filtration systems to filter the lower quality water. The other option is to save money and allow water to be unfiltered and distributed to the masses of New York. The latter is what most wish to achieve. According to The Earth Institute at the Columbia University, despite New York being the largest unfiltered system in the United States, New York is also known for its “clean and delicious” drinking water. They explain that the NYC watershed consists of 19 reservoirs and 3 controlled lakes. 90% of the water is provided by the Catskill and Delaware watersheds. 10% of NYC’s drinking water is provided by the Croton water system. It is understandable that New York City’s water must be clean. However, filtering water may not be the way to go. New York’s water is treated with chlorine to kill germs, fluoride to prevent cavities, orthophosphate to inhibit lead contamination from pipes, and sodium hydroxide to lessen acidity. This occurs on top of the necessary requirements that must be fulfilled according to the STWR. The DEP conducts over 900 daily and 330,000 annual tests on drinking water throughout the city. In addition they run 230,000 test in the watershed. This is all for the sake of guaranteeing that NYC water meets the quality standards. There was some controversy regarding the Croton water’s purity as far as 1908. It is also true that Croton watershed had to be shut down for various points in time. However, as a result of this lower quality water, in 2007, the Croton water filtration plant had undergone construction estimating a cost of 2.8 billion dollars. The water in New York is clean. We have spent large sums of money to clean the mere 10% of lower quality water. 90% of our water is considered world-renown for its positive cleanliness and taste. However, the cost for the filtration of Catskill and Delaware watersheds is huge, estimating 8 to 12 billion dollars to construct the plant and a further 350 million dollars to operate it. Government agencies stand by their view to relie on unfiltered water in NYC.

Cho, Renee. “Maintaining the Superiority of NYC’s Drinking Water.” State of the Planet. The Earth Institute Columbia University, 29 July 2011. Web. 30 Nov. 2012. <http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2011/07/29/maintaining-the-superiority-of-nyc%E2%80%99s-drinking-water/>.

 

Posted in Scientific Work | Leave a comment

Natural Gas Development & Impact on NYC Water Supply

From the viewpoint of an environmentalist:

New York City’s water supply is primarily comprised of surface water, 19 reservoirs and 3 controlled lakes, from a 2,000 square mile watershed in 8 upstate counties. The supply serves half of the population of New York State, 9 million people, and is regulated by the NYC Department of Environmental Protection.

The Marcellus Shale covers approximately 95,000 square miles, or 500tcf of gas reserves. The shale formation underlies the NYC WOH watershed in its entirety. New developments in natural gas mean tapping into these gas reservoirs locked within the Marcellus Shale beneath the NYC water supply. The process of hydraulic fracturing, or hydrofracking, requires the injection of more than a million gallons of water, sand, and chemicals at a very high pressure down, across, and into a horizontally drilled well. This well may be as deep as 10,000 feet below the surface. The pressurized, toxic mixture causes the Marcellus Shale to crack. The fissures in the rock are held open by the sand particles, so as to allow the natural gas to flow up the well for harvesting. The chemicals within the mixture are said to represent only 1% of the hydrofrack fluid. The US Geological Survey, on the other hand, found that a typical 3 million gallon tap project produces 15,000 gallons of chemical waste—waste that threatens our water supply.

Back in January of 2009, the NYC Water Board hired a joint venture group to assess the possible impacts of gas drilling on the NYC water supply. The group measured the impacts to water quality, water quantity, and water supply infrastructure. The environment impacts found in association with hydrofracking include water consumption, wastewater disposal, toxic chemical use, air pollution, noise pollution, substantial truck traffic, and round-the-clock operations. Other impacts include potential groundwater and well water contamination, deforestation, spills, roadbuilding and surface water runoff from the large industrial sites. The overall impact of the project would be the complete transformation of once-rural communities into “fractured communities,” and most importantly the contamination and disruption of the NYC/NYS water supply. The water supply can be directly affected by any on-site spills, subsurface migration of contaminants, water withdrawals (which also impacts local aquatic habitats and biota), flowback water, and/or improper disposal and dilution of hydrofluid. Ultimately, there are far too many ways for natural gas drilling developments to negatively effect the NYC and NYS water supplies, the possible benefits may not necessarily outweigh the potential risks.

 

Garcia, Kathryn. “Natural Gas Development and the NYC Water Supply.” American Academy of Environmental Engineers. AAEE, 14 May 2012. Web. 29 Nov. 2012. <http://aaee.net/>.

“Natural Gas Drilling in Marcellus Shale – Overview.” Natural Gas Drilling in Marcellus Shale – Overview. The City of New York, 2012. Web. 29 Nov. 2012. <http://www.nyc.gov/>.

 

Posted in In the Field, Scientific Work | Leave a comment

Emma Marris Questions

1. How do you think NYC is faring in its efforts to “go green”? Do you have any suggestions other than what was written in the book?

2. I’m curious about your view of Central Park. Central Park is man-made but New York City would not be as species-diverse without it.

3. I know that your book has attracted vast criticism. Are there any instances that you’re aware of in which you have been able to change conservationist minds, even a little bit? If so, what was it that resonated with them the most?

4. Is there a place (nation, park, etc.) that you feel best fits the “rambunctious garden” model? Can you give specifics about what this place does right?

5. What sparked the idea of “rambunctious gardens” in you? Have you always known that you wanted to go into ecology?

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Questions for Emma Marris

1. Do you believe that superstorm Sandy will actually bring political change on global warming and saving the environment?

2. What area in New York represents the best example of a Rambunctious Garden?

3. If you had to choose one area in the United States to conserve what would it be?

4. From the seven different goals you listed at the end of your book,  which goal do you think New Yorkers should concentrate on most?

Posted in Scientific Work | Leave a comment

Questions for Emma Marris

What do you think of Hurricane Sandy and what can the city do in terms of the ecosystem in order to prevent such devastation?

In all your travels, where have you seen the most perfect description of a rambunctious garden?

What can we do in our neighborhoods to promote and possibly establish a rambunctious garden?

The final chapter of your book lists seven goals in conservation, which do you think should have priority and which are less important?

Posted in Scientific Work | Leave a comment

Questions Emma Marris

1. Do you believe Pleistocene rewilding is a good idea for conservationists who would like to return for a baseline even given the possible consequences?
2. What is your opinion of what should be done based on the different options written in the book?
3. You make the zebra mussel sound like it is a problem naturally being solved but it is still a big problem for the people and species living there. Do you really think it shouldn’t be removed?
4. What opinion and criticisms of your book have you come across that you have found noteworthy?

Posted in Scientific Work | Leave a comment

Questions for Emma Marris

  1. Where did your interest in ecology stem from? When did you first realize this was something you were passionate about?
  2.  What was your favorite part or experience when writing your book, Rambunctious Garden?
  3. You mentioned that the idea of pristine wilderness has long been the  “holy grail” of conservation ecology. Naturally, the introduction of unorthodox notions, such as the ones you mentioned in your book, are likely to evoke criticism. Do you feel that a more novel approach to conservationism is becoming more welcomed, or is there still a lot of hesitation?
  4.  Ten years from now, what is your ideal ecological vision for urban areas such as NYC?
  5. What do you suggest students, who are not necessarily pursuing a career in ecology or the like, do to work with rather than against our environment?
Posted in Scientific Work | Leave a comment

Questions for Emma Marris

1. How will you further market and implement your concept of Rambunctious Gardens? Are there other advocates of this idea that work with you?

2. Of all of the innovative conservation techniques you mentioned in the book such as assisted migration and designer ecosystems which one do you think is the most feasible?

3. How did you get into conservation and the science behind it? What originally sparked your interest?

4.  What are the main arguments of your critics, and how do you deal with the criticism you receive?

5. After reading your book, it seems clear that you are against baseline conservation techniques. How do you try to change the minds of those conservationists? Do they understand and embrace your point of view?

Posted in Scientific Work | Leave a comment

Marris Questions

1)Do you think your rambunctious garden is possible globally or just in first world countries?

2) If there is a global initiative to manage the conservationist movements, who do you think should manage it? (Governments, private sector, a separate international board)

3) Have you had any thoughts about using new movements in technology to help the environment?

4) What has been the biggest argument against your approach to a rambunctious garden and what are your counterarguments?

Posted in Scientific Work | Leave a comment

Emma Marris questions

1. What inspired you to go into the conservation field?

2. What would you say is your greatest professional accomplishment or experience?

3. What do you think is the best way to go about informing and educating people about conservation and climate change?

4. What do you think would be a good indicator that the new style of conservation is taking over?

Posted in Scientific Work | Leave a comment

Questions for Emma Marris

 

  1. What impacts have you book had on the conservation community?
  2. Has your opinion on invasive species changed since publishing your book?
  3. What role do you think government has on the environment?
  4. How has the conservation population taken your book? Are there any solutions that you feel Rambunctious Garden played a key role in?
  5. Why did you write Rambunctious Garden?
Posted in Scientific Work | Leave a comment

Questions for Emma Marris

1. What are some examples of efforts that you have made to help the environment?

2. Where did your idea of a “Rambunctious Garden” come from?

3. What example, if any, would you give of a place that is effectively conserving its ecosystem?

4. What changes do people have to make in their mindset in order for your idea of a “Rambunctious Garden” to thrive?

5. According to you, what is the order of importance for the seven goals of conservation?

Posted in Scientific Work | Leave a comment

Questions for Emma Marris

1. How do you think the publication of this book changed the view of rambunctious gardening?

2. Have you received any criticisms on the book or ideas from the book that have swayed your opinion?

3. Given Hurricane Sandy arrived on the east coast of USA, how do you think urban ecosystem is changed and how should conservation efforts be changed in accordance?

4. Other than your own backyard, what is the best example of a rambunctious garden in your opinion?

5. How do you think the urban ecosystem will change if everyone starts to implement rambunctious gardening? In the book, you mentioned a lot of benefits of this method. Is there any negatives to rambunctious gardening that you can see in the future if it becomes popular?

Posted in Scientific Work | Leave a comment

questions

  1. You’ve probably received a wide array of responses after publishing your book… What would you say the general reaction like, and how did it match/differ from your expectations?
  2. After reviews from critics and readers, are there messages in your book that you would like to clarify? Is there anything you think people are misunderstanding about your arguments or inflating (or deflating) disproportionately?
  3. Which chapter of your book, or idea in the book, is your favorite? Why do you feel passionately about this particular one?
  4. How quickly/slowly do you feel traditional conservationist stances are changing at this point? Have you been able to see any impact for which this particular book is responsible? Do you feel these recent changes/lack of change are un/satisfying?
Posted in Scientific Work | Leave a comment

Q’s for Emma Marris

1. Where do you see more of these rambunctious gardens being built? I feel like New York did a great job on the High Line Park. How can we replicate that elsewhere?

2. Has your views differed from before you wrote the book to after your wrote the book? Did you change your stance since?

3. You mentioned protecting charismatic megafauna as one of your goals. But how does protecting larger species fair for competing species? How do we place one species over another?

4. How do we maximize the utility of plants and undiscovered plant species in an urban area or apply it to an urban area?

5. What value do you see pleistocene rewilding in an urban setting? Can there be a harmony and synergy in their coexistence?

Posted in Scientific Work | Leave a comment

The Questions to ask Emma Marris

1. You stated that “Rambunctious Gardens” are your goals for urban areas. How likely do you feel that this particular goal can be achieved even if the residents are not helpful? Do you believe that such an idea is possible in this time and age?

2. Which method mentioned in your book do you think would be the best way to go about restoring ecosystem?

3. How well do you think New York City is at conserving the environment? Do you think that further efforts would drastically improve the ecosystem?

4. Has writing your book impacted your perspective of the ecosystem? Did writing your book help you understand our environment to a better degree?

Posted in Scientific Work | Leave a comment

Emma Marris questions

1. Why do you think this idea of Pleistocene rewilding came about when it does not even seem like a plausible idea?

2. Do you think that big businesses would be willing to create conservation plots since many  companies spend extra money just to keep their surrounding “green plots” to look a certain way?

3. I agree that focusing conservation efforts on big parks like Yellowstone and the Amazon is futile, but do you believe that we still need to conserve or “fence” off some of these areas?

4. The Duwamish RIver seems like a model conservation/industrial river, but are there other rivers or areas that can do the same?

Posted in Scientific Work | Leave a comment

Questions for Emma Marris

1. How do you think conservationism is changing? Do you think ecologists are still focused on the “pristine wilderness” idea?

2. How well do you think NYC represents a rambunctious garden?

3. How do you think the conservation of state parks should be run?

4. What are some effective ways to conserve nature?

5. Do you find that the definition of nature is changing?

Posted in Scientific Work | Leave a comment

Questions for Marris

1. Now that your book has been released, in your opinion, have topics mentioned in your book such as “rewilding” and “assisted migration” seen an increase in popularity and acceptance?

2. Given the hurricane that just basically destroyed lower Manhattan, New Jersey, and Long Island, do you think humans or natural disasters have more of an impact on urban ecology?

3. Where would you rank New York City on a scale of the greenest cities in the world?

4. If New York City isn’t high on the list of the most greenest cities, how would you get it there?

Posted in Scientific Work | Leave a comment

Questions for Emma Marris

1.  You seem to be very practical in your approach to conservation, so would you agree that the function of an ecosystem is more important than its composition?

2. Are you willing to accept the consequences (extinctions, loss of larger species, aesthetic beauty etc.) that come with abandoning the traditional approach to conservation?

3. If we embrace the idea of cultivating rambunctious gardens, does that give us licenses continue human encroachment on wildlife? Or is the rambunctious garden simply a solution meant for conservation in places where human disturbance is reeking havoc?

4.  Even if the idea of a Rambunctious Garden was implemented fully, isn’t there a limit to the amount of species these fragmented wildernesses can support within a city? If so, wouldn’t the cost of advocating and implementing the idea be of better use if geared towards a more all-encompassing approach?

5. You mentioned that some of your peers are slowly coming to negative conclusions in their attempt to achieve pristine wilderness by reverting to the baseline. How feasible is it that such attitudes will become published and supported in the near future? Especially since the government is already heavily invested in the more traditional approaches to conservation.

Posted in Scientific Work | Leave a comment

Questions for Emma Marris

  1. Is there one goal that you would say is most important for New York City or do you think that all of the goals should be represented in different natural spaces throughout the city?
  2. How would you feel if people were to completely abandon the idea of conservation and begin building in previously preserved areas, only allowing nature to exist in the form of a rambunctious garden?
  3. You pointed out the flaws in many conservation efforts. Is there one example of a conservation effort that you most agreed with?
  4. Since publishing your book, have you learned about any new efforts relating to conservation everywhere that you consider noteworthy?
Posted in Scientific Work | Leave a comment

Questions for Marris

1) I know it sounds a little sci-fi but if humans end up killing themselves with nuclear wars or whatever what do you think will end up happening to nature? Will nature just take over or will the radiation be too much for nature and destroy it?

2) If money wasn’t a problem which of the two policies that you brought up in the book (Rewilding or Designer Ecosystems) do you think would better the environment?

3) At what point do you think (if this point exists) should we stop caring about a certain type of invasive species and just let it do what it wants?

4) Is “The Rambunctious Garden” your favorite topic in Urban Ecology or are there other topics that interest you more? And if this isn’t your favorite topic then why’d you write about “The Rambunctious Garden”?

Posted in Scientific Work | Leave a comment

Marris Questions

1. Did any of the criticism you received about the book make you question and reconsider your ideas and what you wrote about?
2. What do you believe is the best way to go about conservation in New York City?
3. What place do you believe is the best example, or closest to your idea of a rambunctious garden?
4. In fifty years from now, how do you imagine the world to be? Do you believe the people can really work to save and conserve the environment, or will we just continue to destroy and harm the environment?

Posted in Scientific Work | Leave a comment

Questions for Emma Marris

1. What event in your life influenced you to become so passionate in urban ecology and the environment? What assisted you in formulating this idea of a rambunctious garden?

2. In your last chapter, entitled “A Menu of Goals,” you listed 7 goals that can assist us in saving the environment, which ones do you think are most important and why?

3. What specific examples can you give us as to how you have changed your life to revolve around this idea of a “rambunctious garden”?

4. Have you ever encountered a certain place or area that allowed you to say to yourself that this is the quintessential example of a “rambunctious garden”?

Posted in Scientific Work | Leave a comment

Questions

1) Is there/what is your favorite example of rambunctious gardening?

2) How do you feel about ethically questionable actions to preserving ecosystems? (Such as spreading rat poison on an island)

3) What is your stance on invasive species that have clear, detrimental effects on ecosystems/the environment?

4) Do you think that the size of a city/urban area makes it harder to implement the idea of conservation everywhere?

Posted in Scientific Work | Leave a comment

Questions for Emma Marris

1. What is your idea about tradition conservation projects and current conservation projects?

2. What is your most recommended conservation for the urbanized area such New York City?

3. Do you think humans have more impact on the nature or the natural disasters?

4. In your thoughts, what is the best conservation project in the past that benefited the environment the most?

5. What was your favorite idea that you mentioned in your novel Rumbustious Garden?

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Questions for Emma Marris

1. How do you justify assisted migration to those who dismiss it as having catastrophic consequences on ecosystems?

2. How can rapidly developing countries such as BRIC countries maintain their economic development while protecting their ecosystems from damage, pollution, etc.? How different is maintaining a “rambunctious garden” in the Western world than in the developing world?

3. What specific goals should governments have in mind concerning the ecosystem (preserving ecosystems, biodiversity, etc.)?

4. Do you think the scientific community is as focused as it ever was on the image of pristiness of nature over anything else?

 

Posted in Scientific Work | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Questions for Emma Marris

  1. What do you think is the most effective way to conserve urban environment in New York City?
  2. In the last chapter of the book you listed seven different goals, are there particular ones that you think New Yorkers should mostly focus on?
  3. What’s the difference between how European and American scientists conserve their ecosystem?
  4. How do you think conservation will evolve for the next few decades? And do you think the trend toward conservation will be more positive or negative?
Posted in Scientific Work | Leave a comment

Questions for Emma Marris

1. There are many different types of strategies and tools that people are using to help “conserve” the environment. Do you think that there are any types of conservation efforts that are actually poor, ineffective ways of helping/protecting nature in urban areas?

2. What conservation efforts do you think people in highly urbanized areas should practice?

3. How did you come up with the seven goals for conservation for your last chapter? Do you think there are now even more important goals that people should be focusing on?

4. How closely related do you think the relationship between natural disasters (e.g. droughts, hurricanes, etc) and changes in the environment (e.g. climate) is?

5. In your book, you discuss a lot about the past history of environmental changes and successions and influences. What kind of ecological changes do you think will take place within the next 100 years? Do you think they will be good changes or bad changes for nature?

Posted in Scientific Work | Leave a comment

Questions for Emma Marris

  1. How do you think New York City is doing in terms of creating its own rambunctious garden? And are you participating in your own version of a rambunctious garden?
  2. Out of the seven goals that you have listed in the last chapter of your book, which would you consider the most important? How would you order them, one being the most important, and seven being the least?
  3. You have listed many great advantages of creating a rambunctious garden. Let’s say you were on the side of the traditional conservationists. What would your arguments against the rambunctious garden be?
  4. Do you see New York City to be slowly evolving its methods of conservation to the rambunctious garden method? Or do you see it stay in its own views of traditional conservation?
Posted in Scientific Work | Leave a comment

Questions for Emma Marris

1. What do you think of the conservation efforts being made in New York City? How would you improve or change them?

2. Given the natural catastrophes (earthquakes, tsunamis, hurricanes) in the last few years, do you think that conservationists need to alter their efforts in any way?

3. Other than writing the book, how else are you actively promoting your idea of conservation and trying to change peoples’ ideas on what nature is and should be?

4. Is there any new research or development that makes you want to change what you have written in your book?

Posted in Scientific Work | Leave a comment

Questions for Emma Marris

1. Has the advocacy and support of “rambunctious gardens” impacted your life significantly, and if so, in what way?

2. Conservationists often do whatever they can to save resources they use in their daily life. This would include paper, water, etc. What do you do to conserve?

3. Of the seven ultimate goals you listed and argued for, which one in particular is the most important to you? Which one is the most feasible?

4. Was ecology a field you always wanted to pursue, or was it something that you stumbled upon and loved?

5. If you could change one thing in your past, what would it be and why?

Posted in Scientific Work | Leave a comment

Questions for Emma Marris

  1. How did you coin the term, “rambunctious garden”?
  2. Is there anything significant (i.e. reviews, critiques, counterarguments) that has occurred since the publication of your book that makes you want to alter what you wrote?
  3. If you could give people only one piece of advice on conservation (specifically in urban areas like NYC), what would it be and why?
  4. Of all the places you visited to conduct research for your book, which one would you say exhibited the most exemplary conservationism? Would it be applicable in other places as well?
Posted in Scientific Work | Leave a comment

Marris Questions

1.  How do you entwine the ideas of a “rambunctious garden” into your daily life?
2. Did any criticisms/critiques change your thoughts about your novel? If not , were there any that stood out to you?
3. Out of the seven goals you listed in the last chapter “A Menu of New Goals,” which do you believe is the most important (why)? Do you think that they are all connected together?
4. What influenced you to write Rambunctious Garden? How did you become interested in urban ecology/ the environment?

Posted in Scientific Work | Leave a comment

Questions for Emma Marris

1. What suggestions do you have for conservation in urban areas such as New York City?

2. Which ecological preserve did you enjoy visiting the most and why?

3. What criticisms and critiques have conservational biologists made about the suggestions you made in the book?

4. Which of the seven goals discussed at the end of your book are the most important to focus on in your opinion?

 

Posted in Scientific Work | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Emma Marris Questions

1. What do you think is the biggest obstacle being faced by conservationists today?

2. When did you decide you wanted to devote your life to nature and conservationism?

3. Of all the places you mentioned visiting in your book, which did you have the most personal connection with?

4. Have you seen any change in the mindset of conservationists since the publication of your book?

5. How do you, in your own daily life, make an effort to conserve and protect the environment?

Posted in Scientific Work | Leave a comment

Q&A for Emma Marris

  1. Where in the country you see a great number of rambunctious gardens? High Line Park was a fortunate accident in New York City. How exactly can we replicate that result elsewhere in the city?
  2. In your book you offered many ways of approaching conservation. Which method do you think would be the best and most efficient? Which one is your favorite?
  3. What do you think is the impact of Hurricane Sandy on the ecosystems of the Northeastern region? Do you think authority should restore it to a pre-Sandy baseline or create a completely new ecosystem?
  4. Where do you think New York City stands on the effort of conservation?
  5. In the present time, which force do you think has more impact on conversation? Human or nature?
Posted in Scientific Work | Leave a comment

Questions for Author Emma Marris

1. In the book, Marris suggested many different strategies in tackling the problems of current conservation problems. While it was made clear that a combination of techniques would be required to stabilize our world, which one would Marris prioritize first?

2. Green rooftops are one way New York metropolitans try to decrease the negative qualities of urbanization. That aside, what other “conservation everywhere” techniques would work in the hugely concrete Manhattan area?

3. How would Marris apply rewilding to the hugely urban New York City? Or should rewilding be focused more or less exclusively on less habited locations?

4. Given the mixture of human population, domestic pets, migratory species, scavengers and more that travel in and through New York City (and, by extension, many other cities), what would be a good designer goal to start at?

Posted in Scientific Work | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Questions for Author Emma Marris

1) How did you coin the term the “rambunctious garden”? Why did you choose the adjective “rambunctious”?

2) In your novel you detail going to various places i.e. Mammoth Hot Springs, Bialowieza Primeval Forest etc. At the time did you have the intention to write a novel based on your findings ? If you did not what inspired you to write your novel?

3) Since your first stages of writing the novel, were there any chapters or information that you added or deleted before it was published?

4) What is the general reception towards the idea of a “rambunctious garden” do other conservationists or ecologists believe that it is a feasible approach? What are their counter arguments, if any?

Posted in Scientific Work | Leave a comment

Questions for Emma Marris

1. How do your daily activities incorporate your ideas of a rambunctious garden or the seven goals listed in the last chapter?

2. In class, we went over some of the worst invasive species in history. While you definitely have a positive view on invasive species, why did you choose not to give more information on destructive invasive species like the zebra mussel?

3. What are your thoughts on the High Lines in New York City? What would you like to see in the High Lines in the future?

4. Is there anything in the book you would like to add or change? Why or why not?

5. What topic are you currently studying on or working on?

Posted in Scientific Work | Leave a comment

Emma Marris Questions

1. In your last chapter, you provide the reader with 7 different possibilities for saving the ecosystem. Which do you consider the most effective and efficient?

2. It’s clear from the novel that you are extremely passionate about ecology. What sparked this passion?

3. The views you’ve exposed the readers in your novel are highly controversial topics. How have you responded to those on the other side of the debate?

4. How have you personally changed or adapted your lifestyle to revolve around the rambunctious garden?

Posted in Scientific Work, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Emma Marris Questions

1. In the future, do you plan on perhaps revisiting the studies you discussed in your book and seeing what progress has been made or how these ecosystems have changed?

2. At the beginning of your book, you mention you attended Audobon camp, is this the moment you realized your fascination with the natural environment? How did you become particularly interested in urban ecology?

3. Is there one ecosystem you visited as part of your book that demonstrates your idea of conservation the best?

4. As urban dwellers, is there any advice you have for us as to how we should recognize, care for and appreciate the nature that is in our city?

 

 

Posted in Scientific Work | Leave a comment

Questions For Emma Marris

1. In the next 15-20 years, how do you see conservation ecology changing? Where do you see think these changes will be begin and/or be most prevalent?

2. What would be your ideal approach to the conservation of New York City’s urban ecology and wildlife specifically? Do you think we are headed in the right direction with the various initiatives the city has taken on?

3. Of the seven goals you listed in your final chapter, which do you find to be most important? How would you prioritize them, whether by importance or feasibility?

4. The topics of a few of your chapters to me seemed very radical and controversial. Realistically, do you think Pleistocene rewilding or designer ecosystems will ever become accepted in the ecological community, or ever become common practice?

Posted in Scientific Work | Leave a comment

Questions for Emma Marris

  1. How do you think the field of ecology will evolve over the next century?
  2. What areas of study are you currently focusing on?
  3. What do you think is the best way to go about changing the ordinary person’s mindset about nature?
  4. Of the seven goals you specified in the last chapter, which is the most important to you?
  5. How do ecologists, the government, and private interest groups work together to achieve ecological goals?
Posted in Scientific Work | Leave a comment

Questions for Marris

1. Which goal, listed in the final chapter, would you suggest aspiring to or focusing on?

2. What kind of feedback have you gotten from other people in your field in regard to Rambunctious Garden?

3. Of all the places you’ve visited, which did you find to be the best example of what you consider a rambunctious garden? Was it the most native, natural, or untouched region?

4. Which conservation techniques do you believe are most effective for urban ecosystems specifically?

Posted in Scientific Work | Leave a comment

Poster Questions

Just realized I posted questions for the wrong topic.

1)  How has the water supple been affected by big businesses in the past few years?

2) How has urban settlement by humans affected species diversification?

3) Does the amount of parks and green-land in an area affect the attitudes or hygiene of its inhabitants?

 

Posted in Macaulay Presentations, Weekly Readings | Leave a comment

Poster Questions?

1.) What are the affects of the coyote’s and other predatory species migrating into the urban are? Howe are they affected and conversely how are we affected?

2.) How does the runoff from more urbanized areas affect the ph balance of ground water in surrounding boroughs and suburban areas.  Is this connected to acid rain and air pollution?

3.) How beneficial are small parks in providing refuge for wild life in urbanized areas. Are  their vicinities close enough to allow species migration? Analysis of city parks and what essentials are needed for survival.

Posted in Macaulay Presentations, Scientific Work, Weekly Readings | Leave a comment

Chapter 10: A Menu Of New Goals

In the concluding chapter of Rambunctious Garden, Emma Marris sends us off into the world with a new perspective. Having gone through the multiple and conflicting issues surrounding conservation through out the previous chapters, Marris presents her clear-cut idea of what concepts to take away from the book and which initiatives to support and follow.  She does this by laying out a set of seven goals to be taken into consideration by the human population Marris’ seven goals are direct. However, they also come with their pros and cons- as did many of the other issues in Rambunctious Garden, leaving us to somewhat fend for ourselves when searching for her resounding message.

Marris’ list of goals goes as follows; Protect The Rights Of Other Species, Protect Charismatic Megafauna, Slow The Rate Of Extinctions, Protect Genetic Diversity, Define and Defend Biodiversity, Maximize Ecosystem Services, and Protect The Spiritual And Aesthetic Experience of Nature. A few of the these concepts that stood out more to me were the last three having to do with biodiversity, ecological services and the aesthetics of nature. In my opinion these three summed up natures true overall value to us as a dominant species as well as to our ecosystems and the other species that reside within them. However, each of these goals has its trade off and not one is more important than another.

When speaking on biodiversity Marris mentions how defending biodiversity would allow us to defend a multitude of other ideologies such as species diversity, genetic diversity and population diversity. This broad almost indefinability of the term has its pro as well as its cons. Protection of biodiversity gives way to protecting ecosystems and their interconnections rather than just trying to save a particular species. However, because biodiversity is so undefined, the lines between which species are allowed in one system versus another are no so clear, leaving us to wonder why we should protect an ecosystem’s biodiversity that is forever changing.

Marris’ goal #6 to maximize ecosystem services, I felt to be the most relatable to the humans of this anthropogenic era. Many people inherently feel that although nature may be valuable in its existence, humans are somehow entitled to reap the benefits of its services. This is why suggesting the conservation of an ecosystem to preserve a tangibly valuable resource and/ or ecological service would be most effective in gaining support. Marris also explains that despite some selfish reasons for jumping on board, by preserving ecological services, we also as a result preserve biodiversity as well as a host of other environmental causes.

Lastly, Marris appeals to our sense of aesthetics and deriving pleasure from nature by asserting that we protect nature as a whole, just to experience it. Although this point seems vague and somewhat illegitimate because there I no way to quantify the pleasure derived from experiencing or interacting with nature, I agree with its validity. Ultimately if we do not seek to actively conserve what we enjoy, it will be gone or severely diminished.  With all of this said, I really enjoyed how Emma Marris ended her list of goals. With all this said and done, Marris implores us to just embrace the change in nature, whether we want to make major conservational changes or to embrace the natural cycles slowly making their own mark on the landscape. Following her aforementioned goals or pursuing a more specific tract of settling a smaller environmental issue Marris wants us to embrace what has become our rambunctious garden in hopes that we learn to appreciate nature more along the way.

Posted in 10/4: Marris, chap 10, Scientific Work, Weekly Readings | Leave a comment

Chapters 8 & 9

In Chapter 8 of Rambunctious Garden, Emma Marris brings her focus towards more revolutionary ideals. Different from the first two- thirds or so of the book, this section brings us to the possibilities that may come from changing our view of the natural world. Marris even says that ecologists’ views are changing to think less about restoration of areas to baselines and more towards preservation of natural systems and resources. After having examined and analyzed several main issues tackled by today’s ecologists and conservationists from types of restoration to invasive species and the process of rewilding, Marris makes her point of stating clearly that designer ecosystems looks to be a way for nature to be maintained in the future.

Although this method of designing ecosystems, as Marris describes is in ways progressively better than trying to recreate an entire ecosystem from a historical point of view, it has both benefits as well as trade offs.  With more specific goals at hand, such as lowering the nitrogen levels in streams or rebuilding riverbanks to decrease erosion and sediment degradation the chances are greater that more wildlife ecosystems will be preserved. However, at the same time there are consequences such as the increased chances of fish in waters where nitrogen-lowering initiatives are taking place to store mercury in their fatty tissues. In this section of the book, Marris argues that just because an ecosystem is restored to look like it was in the past or to look stable does not mean that its ecological processes are thoroughly beneficial. A point blatantly made by Marris is that at the end of the day, as much as ecologists know about any given ecosystem, the intricate processes within a particular system are not fully understood. Ultimately, Marris envisions the best way for nature to be conserved is for it to be via this new method of designing ecosystems with a key goal in mind.

With this in mind, Marris goes into the next chapter, Conservation Everywhere, to explain and unfold her idea on the future of conservation in more detail. In this chapter Marris describes a world where ecosystems are not designed separate from human existence but looking to integrate into the anthropocene with the use of corridors to expand the habitats of migratory species as well as those that occupy larger areas beyond the national parks and preservations in which they are contained. In this way, greater biodiversity will be able to flourish as species have a larger area to roam. Marris tells of how humans who now have a greater population in urban areas rather than in the suburbs, will in the future, by her predictions, dominate in urban areas- having less of an ecological impact. With this migration of humans to city areas, there would be even more spaces to be turned back into livable habitats for the earth’s species. Marris says that pavement is not forever, suggesting that as we turned grasslands into parking lots, we can revert them back to being natural landscapes. Over these two chapters, Emma Marris takes us into the future she sees in conservation and human interaction with the natural world as we become ever dominant. I am not so sure how much I agree with the connected corridors idea she ha for expanding conservation efforts. However, turning more parking lots and industrial structures into areas that can be used for wildlife seems as though it would be beneficial for animal and plant species as well as the human population.

 

Posted in 10/2: Marris, chaps 8-9, Scientific Work, Weekly Readings | Leave a comment