Throughout the readings, but particularly in Hum, we again encounter that concept of enclaves. Hum analyzes the enclave by defining it as an area of “self-segregation, mutual support and solidarity, and upward mobility” (p.34) for its residents. However, Hum counters that this is now debatable as the economy becomes more and more globalized and neighborhoods (such as Queens) see multi-ethnic communities coming together and living in a concentrated area. Businessmen and entrepreneurs are seeking to maximize their profits and expand their businesses to other groups throughout New York City, as well as tapping into the transnational economy with which so many immigrants are involved.
In terms of American society as a whole, specifically New York City, the big question remains as to whether enclaves are more beneficial, or whether it is better that everybody mush together and create a culturally pluralistic society with different ethnicities living in the same area. I would argue that it depends on the needs of the ethnic group in question. If Hispanics have a cultural need or desire to continue speaking their native Spanish or eating in their typical home country restaurants surrounded by their co-ethnic friends, then it makes sense for them to stick together and live in El Bario, Washington Heights, or whatever enclave community they choose that makes them happy with their life here in New York or elsewhere in America. If, like the Asians, they have a desire to branch out and expand their skills or business elsewhere, then it makes sense for them to blend with other ethnicities in different neighborhoods and create an ethnically diverse landscape. Either way, both models are currently happening and both are contributing immensely to the development and diversity of New York City.
