Read/Watch for May 11th

For this week you will watch Saving Face (2004).  It is available in the library.  In addition, you will read the following articles:

1) BUTLER-GENDER AS PERFORMANCE

2) George Chauncey-Gay New York-intro

3) Appiah-Cosmopolitanism

Come ready to talk about these in class but in place of working on your blog, spend some time working on your website project.

Have a good weekend!

| Leave a comment

Community Broadcasting

 

Hi all, There are only a few things to watch and read for this week, since your papers are due next Friday by 5PM and I know you are working very hard on them.

1) Devorah Heitner-The Good Side of the Ghetto

2) http://www.thirteen.org/broadcastingwhileblack/2009/02/24/harry-belafonte-on-inside-bed-stuy-1968/

3)RECOMMENDED:  01 #414_ Right to Remain Silent

4) RECOMMENDED: Rivera-Hip-Hop Puerto Ricans and the Ethnoracial Identities in New York

As the articles for this week suggest, New York has historically been a place of significant community media–media that acts as a political outlet for unheard voices.  Be thinking about the ways that this media calls for different kinds of spectator participation than either “straight” documentary or “narrative” film.  Does it present a different view of some boroughs we have explored in earlier films?

 

| Leave a comment

FYI…

A Critic at Large

The Caging of America

Why do we lock up so many people?

by January 30, 2012

Six million people are under correctional supervision in the U.S.

Six million people are under correctional supervision in the U.S.—more than were in Stalin’s gulags. Photograph by Steve Liss.

A prison is a trap for catching time. Good reporting appears often about the inner life of the American prison, but the catch is that American prison life is mostly undramatic—the reported stories fail to grab us, because, for the most part, nothing happens. One day in the life of Ivan Denisovich is all you need to know about Ivan Denisovich, because the idea that anyone could live for a minute in such circumstances seems impossible; one day in the life of an American prison means much less, because the force of it is that one day typically stretches out for decades. It isn’t the horror of the time at hand but the unimaginable sameness of the time ahead that makes prisons unendurable for their inmates. The inmates on death row in Texas are called men in “timeless time,” because they alone aren’t serving time: they aren’t waiting out five years or a decade or a lifetime. The basic reality of American prisons is not that of the lock and key but that of the lock and clock.

That’s why no one who has been inside a prison, if only for a day, can ever forget the feeling. Time stops. A note of attenuated panic, of watchful paranoia—anxiety and boredom and fear mixed into a kind of enveloping fog, covering the guards as much as the guarded. “Sometimes I think this whole world is one big prison yard, / Some of us are prisoners, some of us are guards,” Dylan sings, and while it isn’t strictly true—just ask the prisoners—it contains a truth: the guards are doing time, too. As a smart man once wrote after being locked up, the thing about jail is that there are bars on the windows and they won’t let you out. This simple truth governs all the others. What prisoners try to convey to the free is how the presence of time as something being done to you, instead of something you do things with, alters the mind at every moment. For American prisoners, huge numbers of whom are serving sentences much longer than those given for similar crimes anywhere else in the civilized world—Texas alone has sentenced more than four hundred teen-agers to life imprisonment—time becomes in every sense this thing you serve.

For most privileged, professional people, the experience of confinement is a mere brush, encountered after a kid’s arrest, say. For a great many poor people in America, particularly poor black men, prison is a destination that braids through an ordinary life, much as high school and college do for rich white ones. More than half of all black men without a high-school diploma go to prison at some time in their lives. Mass incarceration on a scale almost unexampled in human history is a fundamental fact of our country today—perhaps the fundamental fact, as slavery was the fundamental fact of 1850. In truth, there are more black men in the grip of the criminal-justice system—in prison, on probation, or on parole—than were in slavery then. Over all, there are now more people under “correctional supervision” in America—more than six million—than were in the Gulag Archipelago under Stalin at its height. That city of the confined and the controlled, Lockuptown, is now the second largest in the United States.

The accelerating rate of incarceration over the past few decades is just as startling as the number of people jailed: in 1980, there were about two hundred and twenty people incarcerated for every hundred thousand Americans; by 2010, the number had more than tripled, to seven hundred and thirty-one. No other country even approaches that. In the past two decades, the money that states spend on prisons has risen at six times the rate of spending on higher education. Ours is, bottom to top, a “carceral state,” in the flat verdict of Conrad Black, the former conservative press lord and newly minted reformer, who right now finds himself imprisoned in Florida, thereby adding a new twist to an old joke: A conservative is a liberal who’s been mugged; a liberal is a conservative who’s been indicted; and a passionate prison reformer is a conservative who’s in one.

The scale and the brutality of our prisons are the moral scandal of American life. Every day, at least fifty thousand men—a full house at Yankee Stadium—wake in solitary confinement, often in “supermax” prisons or prison wings, in which men are locked in small cells, where they see no one, cannot freely read and write, and are allowed out just once a day for an hour’s solo “exercise.” (Lock yourself in your bathroom and then imagine you have to stay there for the next ten years, and you will have some sense of the experience.) Prison rape is so endemic—more than seventy thousand prisoners are raped each year—that it is routinely held out as a threat, part of the punishment to be expected. The subject is standard fodder for comedy, and an uncoöperative suspect being threatened with rape in prison is now represented, every night on television, as an ordinary and rather lovable bit of policing. The normalization of prison rape—like eighteenth-century japery about watching men struggle as they die on the gallows—will surely strike our descendants as chillingly sadistic, incomprehensible on the part of people who thought themselves civilized. Though we avoid looking directly at prisons, they seep obliquely into our fashions and manners. Wealthy white teen-agers in baggy jeans and laceless shoes and multiple tattoos show, unconsciously, the reality of incarceration that acts as a hidden foundation for the country.

| Leave a comment

Revised syllabus and readings for Week 12

The Peopling of New York-Syllabus to distribute-REVISED

For next week, you need to read the following:

1) Race and Criminalization-Angela Davis

2) Bruce Western Punishment and Inequality Intro

3) “The New U.S. Black Cinema”-Clyde Taylor

 

Again, there is no blog for this week, since you will be working on paper 2 so diligently.  I look forward to seeing the results of your work. Please don’t forget to set up an appointment with Soniya, our Instructional Technology Fellow about the website project!

| Leave a comment

Blog for this week

We won’t have our normal blog for this week (leading up to class on April 20th). Instead, in class we will have a discussion of your papers and will screen and discuss episodes from The Goldbergs, Amos n’ Andy, and All in the Family. Please come ready to discuss your progress on Paper 2!

Here are the reading for Friday (4/20).  Please read the article entitled Archie Bunker’s Bigotry completely.  But as for “The Meanings of Memory” focus on the sections on “Family Formation and the Economy–Television View” and “Work, Class and Ethnicity.” I know this post is coming in a bit late, so I understand if you cannot give these articles as much thought as you might have otherwise.

1) VidmarRokeach1974

2) George Lipsitz-The meaning of memory family class ethnicity in early network television

But please come prepared to talk about Rockeach and Lipsitz’s argument about the function of television in terms of race and ethnicity after we watch the episodes in class.

Looking forward to seeing you on Friday!

| Leave a comment

Laughter makes it all okay, right?

If Welcome Back, Kotter was reproduced to have a more serious tone—lets say, minus the live audience, minus the plethora of jokes, and minus the energetic, easygoing attitudes of the featured characters, the urban space the cast occupies would not be appealing at all. The small apartment in inner city Brooklyn, the unkempt, formulaic copy of a public school classroom, and the marginal, ethnic misfits that occupy the aforementioned classroom all represent an urban space that is far from appealing. Even the opening theme song for the television show, if taken out of context, has depressing undertones. Lyrics include “Welcome back,
your dreams were your ticket out. Welcome back, to that same old place that you laughed about.” They describe a closed society, devoid of vertical social mobility, where dreams represent the only method of escape. They most likely describe the school setting, in which Kotter returns to—once a rebel, he ends up teaching them.

Principle “Woodhead” asserts that nothing ever changes, certainly a serious theme of such a marginalized community that the show masks with humor. For example, Kotter refuses to pass Washington just because it’s tradition to pass the star athlete, valuing his education over his athletic career, an important moment in the student-teacher relationship that develops over the course of the show. It’s certainly apparent that the students in Kotter’s class represent a dense ethnic community that require much work on Kotter’s part in order for them to accept him.

The show covers serious topics, including ethnicity in the face of the establishment (students vs. teacher), and the inner city lifestyle—however, these subjects aren’t bluntly presented to us; the show uses humor and colorful, lighthearted scene presentation to cover the unappealing nature of the show’s setting. Bright, noticeable colors such as purple, red, beige, white, and green adorn the scene, adding a friendly attitude to the setting. The tight framing of many shots center the attention on the humorous facial expressions of many of the characters, often on the laughing face of Kotter himself. The continuous array of jokes function to lighten the situation as well, while simultaneously attacking some of the more serious issues through parody. Ethnic background is often parodied; the ethnic backgrounds of characters are usually poked at through comedy. Epstein’s family history is turned into a humorous tale, while Washington’s obsession with basketball likewise serves as material for laughs.

The series is heavily ethnic in its representation. Both Brooklyn and the classroom are indicative of the marginal lifestyles many ethnic families face in New York City. The characters, themselves, each represent a different culture, and come together in a melting pot indicative of the city itself, the classroom. Interracial relation, and the ideal interaction between the teacher and his students, and student and student, are simply another way in which the series using humor, parody and a lighthearted approach to soften the serious issues which the show addresses.

 

| Leave a comment

Utopian NYC

For this week you will watch two episodes of Welcome Back, Kotter (1975-1979) on Amazon.com.  The episodes I would like you to watch are these: “Basket Case” (September 16, 1975) and “Welcome Back” (September 23, 1975).

Your readings are here:

I would like you to think about Kotter (Gabriel Kaplan) in terms of ethnicity.  Here are some questions you might consider–pick one among them rather than answering them all.

  • How does Kotter differ from Woody Allen’s characters in his relationship to whiteness and to his natal ethnic group?
  • How is humor, in particular, being used here in relationship to ethnicity?
  • And what kind of urban space does Kotter occupy?  Is this space inviting?  Why?
| Leave a comment

Family With a Purpose

The communal relationship between the families in Goodfellas and Radio Days are similar in the way that they rely on their environment in order to create a sense of community.  In Goodfellas, Henri’s purpose in life was to fit in and be a respected and feared gangster, and in essence, he does! In Henri’s case, he is surrounded by and constantly interacting with other gangsters and their families, and they have a responsibility to have each other’s backs. They use their criminal lifestyles to have a have a motive to create a family in a place that they are discriminated against.

In the case of Radio Days, the plot is structured and held through memories that connect family members. Without the radio, the storyline would be chaotic. I feel that this represents the family, as well. Without the radio, they wouldn’t function the same way and have something in common that makes them feel like “the” American family.

| Leave a comment

Woody Allen and Radio Days

Hi Folks!

This week, the assignment is to watch Radio Days which is available in the main office but not the library.  There will only be one reading for this week: I hope this is a welcome break!

Friedman and Desser-Woody Allen

 

Prompt:  For this week’s blog, you might consider how Radio Days’ ethnic family (both nuclear and more broadly communal)–is similar and different from the ethnic family in Goodfellas (1990).  Also, radio is an important part of the film.  Why is radio so crucial to the identities of the various family members?  What kind of cultural connections does it allow them to make? When and where is ethnicity important to this connection?

 

| Leave a comment

Goodfella (1990) and Scorsese

For this week, you will watch Goodfellas (1990), either in the library or on Amazon.com.

Readings:

1) Whiteness and the history of white ethnics-Roediger

2) Paula Massood, “From Mean Streets to The Gangs of New York: Ethnicity and Urban Space in the Films of Martin Scorsese” in The City that Never Sleeps

3) Hayden-The Power of Place

Prompt:  I would like you to address the film in terms of the question of whiteness (and please review our conversation/readings from Richard Dyer).  Is Henry (Ray Liotta) white–and does he become white in the course of the film?  And do you think his neighborhood is white?  Also can you relate the neighborhood Hill grows up in–and is strongly identified with–to Delores Hayden’s project of helping to preserve the memory of vernacular space?  Please also feel free to raise your own questions about the film and to comment on  other films we have watched or that this film brings to mind.

 

| Leave a comment