Is it a Mistake to Modernize Timeless Works?

There has been much controversy over the years about the various productions of Shakespeare’s works. Whether it be an opera or a movie, many productions have taken the risk of altering his works to create a contemporary feel. Although some may not deem it a risk since it Shakespeare’s work are usually portrayed in contemporary form. There are unique advantages and disadvantages that result from this. Personally, I appreciate productions that stay true to Shakespeare’s infamous stories. Any form of art that is toyed with or tweaked causes the art to lose its original meaning.

Based on the New York Times article “To Renovate or Not to Renovate” by Charles Isherwood there are benefits to modernizing classics. For instance, it makes the story more relatable to those who experience it. This can enhance the viewer’s understanding. Still, I think part of the fun of reading and/or watching Shakespeare is allowing yourself to become immersed in the setting he has fashioned. Isherwood states that he is uncertain about how he feels towards the revisions of Shakespeare.

 

shake

There are various versions of “Romeo and Juliet” that twist the controversy within the story to be one of race or class. It is understandable that this can emphasize the tension that is within the classic. However, if Shakespeare can construct the same amount of tension with out such add-ons then they aren’t necessary.  A well-know version of Romeo and Juliet is the one that starred Claire Danes and Leonardo DiCaprio. I have seen this movie and found it very entertaining.  However, I don’t think it captures Shakespeare’s “Romeo and Juliet” as effectively as it could have were it to stick to the classic script. The added technology (guns in place of swords, cars) shifts attention away from the true meaning of the play. Even West Side Story is a wonderful movie/play. But it bears its own uniqueness that differs from the original “Romeo and Juliet”. It is like buying a reproduction of an original Picasso. It may still be beautiful and interesting, but it simply isn’t the original.

 

 

Isherwood states “Fundamentally, a great Shakespeare production will rise or fall not on what the actors are wearing, and whether they are barking into cell phones or slinging swords at each other, but on whether they can infuse these magnificent, challenging texts with the life blood of honest feeling and formal beauty.” If one maintains this mentality, perhaps they can get passed the added fluff and changes existent in various modern productions and succeed at grasping Shakespeare’s core message.

Works Cited:

Isherwood, Charles. “To Renovate or Not to Renovate” New York Times. 26 September 2013. Web. 26 September 2013.

 

Metamorphosis edited-by-classmate-in-class-response

This was edited by Kev-DOg.

Metamorphosis, a ballet adaptation to Franz Kafka’s novella, stimulated both visual and auditory senses through fluid, yet crisp movement by Edward Weston. This was also combined with the melodious music of Frank Moon. I truly think the play showed the mental and physical idea of a metamorphosis, climaxing with the family’s loss of faith in Gregor. Edward Weston showed grace and amazing physical strength in a performance as draining, or more so, than a triatholon. The idea by Kafka was a unique one, amd this play did this classic justice with its non uniform style and brilliant cast.

Opera Gone (sort-of) Wrong

Monday evening at the Metropolitan Opera House was supposed to be a night celebrating Russian opera, with a performance of Tchaikovsky’s “Eugene Onegin.” While it was just that, the gala did face a sizable speed bump: angry protestors. In fact, the first voice that was heard by the audience was from a rioter, criticizing the newly established Russian antigay law. This law bans “propaganda on nontraditional sexual relationships.” It’s been common knowledge lately that Russia is very anti-gay, and with the Winter Olympics coming up, this has been a topic of discussion for many people.

Four people were required to leave the show and they complied – having already succeeded in making their point. However, these were only 4 out of the many protestors who were outside the opera house; according to the article, there were tons of picketing and chanting, along with a 50-foot rainbow banner declaring the message “Support Russian gays.” The idea for the protest stemmed from Andrew Rudin, a gay composer. Rudin created an online petition insisting that the Met dedicate the performance to Russian gay rights. The petition, signed by over 9000 people, stated that Tchaikovsky – who is ironically, gay – was going to be performed by artists who supported an antigay Russian government. While it seemed only right – at least to me – for the Met to fulfill the wishes of so many people, they could not. General manager of the Met, Peter Gelb, stated that, although he didn’t disagree, he felt it would be inappropriate if the opera house made a dedication based on a political cause. He continued by explaining that while “Russia may officially be in denial about Tchaikovsky’s sexuality, we’re not. The Met is proud to present Russia’s great gay composer. That is a message in itself.”

I found this article very interesting and relevant – especially considering the fact that Ed’s recent article was related to homophobia in the hip hop community. In his blog post, which could be found here, he asked readers why they personally feel homophobia is so prevalent in the hip hop world. I think it’s very thought provoking to see that the mere hint of something perhaps being antigay is being protested in the art community – a society where you would never expect there to be an issue with homosexuality. Although this Metropolitan Opera protest is indisputably minor compared to the problems in the hip hop community, I still think it’s crazy to see this. It’s also unsettling to see that the problems in Russia could influence people here.

Although somewhat irrelevant to this article, I remember finding out about the antigay feelings in Russia and I strongly felt that our country should’ve decided to boycott the Olympics. However, after realizing how hard our athletes trained, I thought it just wouldn’t be fair to them. So, I’m asking you all because I’m curious: how do you feel about the Olympics being in an area of antigay government? What does it say about our world, that we’re allowing this to happen? Does this tiny protest at the Metropolitan Opera House symbolize something larger?

 

Source: Cooper, Michael. “Gay Rights Protest Greets Opening Night at the Met” New York Times. 23 September 2013. Web. 25 September 2013.

Metamorphosis Review

         The Metamorphosis ballet performed at The Joyce Theater, was an unnerving and remarkable interpretation of Kafka’s work. Edward Weston, who successfully portrayed the suffering protagonist, epitomized the essence of the newly transformed Gregor through his contortionist-like movements. The setup of the stage strategically displayed two separate scenes, granting the audience into  mind of Gregor and also the struggles of his family members. The movements of the professional dancers conveyed emotion as effectively, if not more so, then the Kafka’s infamous novella. The greatest advantage, other then the staging, was the lighting. It directed the audience’s focus perfectly and precisely, guiding their attention and emotions throughout the ballet.

No Longer In Denial

In James C. McKinley Jr.’s article, “Giving Drug Advice Along With Music”, he discusses the new approach being implemented at the TomorrowWorld festival that begins this Friday, September 27. A nonprofit drug education group will be holding sessions on controlling drug usage and preventing over doses. This is a response to the recent deaths that occurred at Electric Zoo and other dance festivals.

We’re living in a generation where concerts are associated with such intense drug usage, and it’s producing “negative publicity” that is potentially hurting the industry, which makes me personally wonder… Since when has doing drugs become such a crucial part of the concert experience?

The article mentions that these safety measures are something that has already been commonplace for some time in Europe, which proves that once again, America lags behind in caring for the health of its youth. The reason for that probably has largely to do with the “zero tolerance for drugs” policy at these events. Obviously, they don’t do an efficient job of enforcing that policy, so I think the important aspect to focus on is accepting the wide range of drug use and working to regulate it and educate the youth on how to minimize putting people’s lives at risk. It’s too late to be in denial and more effective to provide resources, such as rehabilitation centers that will benefit those who have been harmed. Obviously hearing “drugs are bad… don’t do drugs” hasn’t stopped many. The effective solution is to start saying “ don’t mix drugs with alcohol… don’t do more than this amount… etc.”

In the article Missi Woolridge, the president of the DanceSafe Board, mentions that providing information on drugs can save lives, just like providing information on sex has prevented many from STDs and AIDS. I think it’s important to look at the analogy of the promotion of safe sex. No one says “don’t have sex”, but instead we are educated to have safe sex and take precautionary measures. Much like this, we need to start having informative drug sessions across the nation. Lack of awareness is one of the issues raised and the deaths at Electric Zoo finally caught the nation’s attention. We all heard about those losses, but this isn’t the first time people have died from overdosing at concerts. We only hear about the big news and the big festivals, but this actually happens from time to time at smaller concerts as well.

I’ve personally witnessed our generation give in to the trap of not only substances that alter your state of mind, but also deteriorate the brain. These drugs can cause irreparable damage and because many kids have a false sense of invincibility they refuse to accept that, so they end up engaging in behaviors that can potentially end their lives. Most kids  have lost motivation to work hard and be productive, slimming their chances of graduating high school, getting a college degree, and ultimately finding a job.  So I fully support these information sessions and even if they only change a small percentage of minds it will make a difference.

Source:

McKinley Jr., James C. “Giving Drug Advice Along With Music” New York Times. 25 September 2013. Web. 25 September 2013.

 

Metamorphosis Review

In this adaptation of Franz Kafka’s Metamorphosis, Gregor Samsa’s transformation into a giant cockroach is expressed through fluid movement and echoed musicality. The whole performance, including the dance sequences, stage movements, special effects and lighting were amazingly choreographed. Edward Watson’s performance of Gregor epitomized a transformation from an average business man to a grotesque insect. The stage started out as a blank canvas but took new life transforming into a layered piece. This production took on a separate identity from Kafka’s tale as it placed more emphasis on the Samsa family’s view of the ordeal, than that of the story in which we are within Gregor’s mind. The Royal Ballet Production did a splendid job in providing its audience with an interesting view and perspective on the piece.

Metamorphosis

The twisted and dark story of Franz Kafka’s novel brought to life by the Royal Ballet at the Joyce Theatre shows the metamorphosis of Gregor, portrayed by principal dancer Edward Weston, from a run of the mill 1900’s salesman to a grotesque cockroach.  The cramped and simplistic set design by Simon Daw, paired with the ominous and eclectic music from Frank Moon establishes a feeling of angst as Watson writhes and scuttles the giant roach.  Arthur Pita’s unique choreography portrays the effects of Gregor’s metamorphosis beautifully. As Weston moves about, his ability to be tense and rigid as an exoskeletal bearing insect, yet delicate as Gregor maintains his humanity is beautiful.  The shows interpretation of Kafka’s novel makes it both uncomfortable but enjoyable- truly a unique experience.