Why is power innate but sex not?
Sunday, February 21st, 2010
Why is power innate but sex not? Part 5 of Foucault’s History of Sexuality focuses on different power structures, namely, how there was a shift from power from blood (in purity and spillage) to sex. I was relieved, first of all, when he finally acknowledged the sex act itself; that sex is a social construct […]
Why is power innate but sex not?
Tags: deployment of sexuality, power, Thunder Cats
Posted in Foucault: History of Sexuality, Katharine Maller | Comments Off on Why is power innate but sex not?
Museum of Sex, Norton, Weeks
Thursday, February 18th, 2010
Museum of Sex, Norton, Weeks I was struck by the condom exhibit at the Museum of Sex for two reasons. One, despite Talmudic law that prohibits the “waste” of semen, the two most largely used types of condoms – animal skin and latex – were invented by Jews (one American, one German.) This is as […]
Museum of Sex, Norton, Weeks
Tags: condoms, essentialism, homosexuality, museum of sex, porn, social construction
Posted in Katharine Maller, Major Problems in the History of American Sexuality | 4 Comments »
Big Brother is watching Stephen Dedalus
Sunday, February 7th, 2010
Big Brother is watching Stephen Dedalus I found Foucault’s discussion of the Repressive Hypothesis (the second half of Part 2) to be the most intriguing. Foucault states that “Educators and doctors combated children’s onanism like an epidemic that needed to be eradicated,” but, rather than fixate on actually abolishing masturbation, those in a position of […]
Big Brother is watching Stephen Dedalus
Tags: Fear, James Joyce
Posted in Foucault: History of Sexuality, Katharine Maller | Comments Off on Big Brother is watching Stephen Dedalus