For my project, I have chosen to research two of the most common methods used to aid individuals with Autism Spectrum disorders (ASD), Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) and the Floortime method. ABA is a conditioning method which uses positive reinforcement and punishment to teach skills to the student. Floortime is a method which emphasizes the formation of a pathway of effective communication with the student as the foundation for learning. My work over the past six years with individuals who have ASD diagnoses has helped me develop an interest in this topic, along with an interest in cognitive behavior and related disabilities. My personal experience has included three years as an ABA therapist and three years as a DIR/Floortime therapist. in addition, I have utilized both techniques with the same child, and this led me to be curious as to which method is more effective.
After my initial research, I have come to the conclusion that people have profoundly disparate opinions as to the best therapy method for individuals with ASD. There are individuals in the “ABA camp” and others in the “Floortime camp,” and the two groups are vying for recognition of each of their espoused methods as the best treatment option for individuals with autism diagnoses. It is apparent that there has been much more research done about ABA, as the technique has been in use for many more years than Floortime, which is a more recent method. I am hoping to find a comprehensive comparison of the effectiveness of the two techniques, and would be interested to discover if anyone has written about trying to integrate the two methods to utilize the strengths of each to more effectively serve these individuals.
A very public or known study that shows a clear benefit of one therapy over the other, or a comparative study done of the two therapy techniques, would provide a springboard for much further research in my topic.