Language vs. Communication

Language is communication through symbols that are arranged according to systematic rules. By this definition alone, dance is a language. However, all types of language are used for both “inter” and “intra” communication. Members of the same species use language not only to pass along information, but to think in solitude. If a dancer is able to think in Dance as we think in English, as the French think in French, and as the deaf think in Sign, then that dancer has turned Dance into his language. The classification of dance therefore depends on each individual dancer; if the art is intrinsic enough to him, it is his language. If not, then it is merely a form of communication, such as the chemical communication between deer or the electrical communication between eels.

Is Dance a Language?

Language is used to express oneself and communicate feelings to other human beings. Therefore, dance is definitely a language. Dance is used to communicate emotions in a much more raw and basic level, but that doesn’t make it any less of a language. When a dancer dances with emotion, whether it be hip-hop or ballet, he or she is essentially communicating those emotions through movement. Just because there are no words doesn’t mean things aren’t being said. Messages can be passed in more ways than one.

Even when we talk, we use hand movements and elaborate gestures to explain what we are trying to say in a more detailed way. Dance takes this to a whole other level by removing words and basing everything on gestures that must stem from emotion. This is even more true in interpretative dance. When a dancer successfully manages to touch the audience and explain their emotions without saying a single word at all, that is when dance is successful.

Dance has been a medium of communication for thousands of years now. Along with being a form of entertainment, it also serves this purpose. I think dance is one of the most diverse and beautiful languages that everyone can speak, in their own way, and yet still communicate with the rest of the world.

Dance = Language ?

When we hear the word “language”, we usually think of information and ideas being exchanged through words. I’ve come to think of language as a communicative way of being able to exchange ideas and info with a person or with people through any means. If an idea is presented and understood between two parties, communication is made. With this being said, I believe that dance is a viable form of language that can be understood by anyone and everyone.

I have been fortunate to have take both American Sign Language and Choreography courses throughout my 4 years of high school. I initially thought the ASL class would be just a crash course in learning to converse with the Deaf. But I’m glad to say that the skills I’ve learned in the class not only helped me become fluent in the language, but also help my choreography skills as well. For example, not all signs require intricate fingering skills. Most rely on facial expressions, body language: emotions that play on the person as a whole. You cannot sign “sad” with a smile and upright posture. Your body must sag inward, your face must drop, your hands fall under your eyes to signify crying. Its a total-body experience.

The same goes for dance.When interpreting lyrics or a melody for dance, you must get lost in the song. You have to feel the words, not just listen to them. You have to extricate beats, break down harmonies for interpretation, listen out for certain instruments, and then convert the message that you received into movement not only for your body, but also for your face. It’s a long (and sometimes frustrating) process. But most people can pick up on the tones of performances; they can see where the dancer is going with their piece, even if the meaning is unclear.

We usually get multiple interpretations of dance from people because everyone takes away a different experience (this was proven with the reactions Dante Adela received when he showed one of his pieces to us last week). Things get “lost in translation”. But this is common in written and oral language as well; in English classes, students take away different meaning from the same passage of a book often. Its one of the many parallels between word and movement. But either way something was communicated, something was exchanged, and something was interpreted. We see it with words all the time. Dance is no exception.

Dance as a Language

Is dance a language?

To me, language is defined as any set form of communication. This communication does not have to be through words, hand signals, or symbols. Ideas can easily be expressed through body movements and dance. The fact that there is a concept known as “body language” proves in itself that the answer to this question is yes.

Dance proves a very good medium through which emotion can be conveyed. The dancing in West Side Story clearly portrayed themes of conflict and tension. Dancing filled with touch and embrace can clearly depict love, a solo dancer can express loneliness through his slow movements and steps, and joy can be seen through fast, upbeat movements. Pauses, changes in pace, and dramatic shifts in style all act as punctuation in dance and contribute to telling a story.

Our meeting with Dante Adela further proves that dance is a language. In the video he showed us, a dance sequence was able to tell a detailed and beautiful story, without the aid of words. We were all able to understand the meaning of the story just through the dancers movements in regard to each other, their sweeping motions, and their speed and rhythm. We cannot limit language just to the realms of words, as it is clear that thoughts, ideas, emotions, and even stories, can be told without them.

Dance as Language

A student slouches into class one early morning, drops his bag unceremoniously on the floor next to a desk, and slumps into a chair. He rubs his eyes a bit, then lets his arms fall slack at his sides, sliding back slowly to stare at the ceiling. This student has not spoken a single word, but to the people around him has spoken volumes. Clearly apathetic, he is not thrilled with the prospect of being awake so early and announces through his movements that he is bored and uninterested in the class. This is an example of body language.

Body language is defined by the Merriam Webster dictionary as “the gestures, movements, and mannerisms by which a person or animal communicates with others.” Simply by observing a person, you can often deduce their current state of mind, particularly their mood, because is transfers directly to their body movements. Someone feeling bright and energetic might appear to have a spring in their step; another feeling determined might appear to walk with strong, decisive steps. As our most primal form of communication, we need not to learn a spoken tongue to understand it: body language is universal, transcending the boundaries of spoken word.

Dance is an extension of body language, a conscious effort at communicating through body movements. It allows for great personal expression and the dancer controls the message they want to convey. I have found dance similar to spoken languages in that different styles remind me of certain tongues. A dance with great fluidity of movement might evoke a romance language whereas rough, raw movements could be akin to German. However, each person is an individual in dance, they have their own language. Another person can perform the same moves as the first, but slight nuances will be different and it cannot be a carbon copy, unlike the way humans can learn multiple spoken (and written) languages. Even though one cannot copy another’s dance exactly, it does not mean one cannot understand the emotions being expressed. The exact message might be perceived differently, as it often is in interpretive dance, but the general feeling remains the same. Thus, watching someone perform a dance is like a story, but more of a personal experience.

Live Jazz Performance

On October 16th, I experienced my first excursion to a live jazz performance at Garage, a nice restaurant and café located in Greenwich Village. The festivities began around 6:00 PM, as they do most Friday nights at Garage. By this time, almost every table was filled and there were barely any empty seats along the bar. As the lights dimmed around the restaurant, other lights began to shine on the performers, who that night happened to be the Evan Schwam Quartet. The members included Evan Schwam, who played tenor saxophone, Andrew Bemkey, who played piano, Corcoran Holt, who played bass, and Jeremy Carlstedt, who played drums.

From the very beginning, I could tell this performance was going to be lively and upbeat. You immediately begin to hear the drums and the saxophone and you were roused right away. The music progressed nicely over the course of the performance, with the liveliness continuing. I had brought some of my friends along to the restaurant and they also did not have any prior exposure to jazz. After watching the performance, they gained some appreciation for jazz and had a very enjoyable time.  In addition to the music, the food served was very good, although a bit on the expensive side. However, the combination of great music and food made the evening very enjoyable.

Overall, Garage is a great place to listen to quality jazz. The Evan Schwam Quartet did a magnificent job, and it no surprise that Evan Schwam is a well-known jazz musician, having even played for former President Bill Clinton back in 2006. The group’s music kept everyone happy and upbeat, and made the evening pass by in a flash.

Is Dance a Language?

A year ago one of my students wrote a very interesting and thoughtful essay on this topic and I wanted to share it with you:

Alex.schindler on October 2nd, 2008 12:57 am

Dance is most certainly (see, I can use the word certainly in matters of opinion too) not a language. A language is a set of symbols used for communication. These symbols have, to some degree, an objective meaning, derived from consensus and relationship to other symbols. More importantly for the purpose of distinguishing art from language, these symbols, when replicated in other, non-artistic contexts, mean the same thing. Context, though it plays some role in understanding the meanings of words or syntactic structures, plays second fiddle to dictionary definition.

Dance, like any other art form, transcends language. It takes an idea, perhaps (but not necessarily) verbally expressed, and packages its emotional underpinnings in the form of body movements. Just as Guernica depicts the abstract concept of “pain” in a way that transcends language (it would not be very impressive to anybody if, in describing the Spanish Civil War, I said “pain pain pain pain pain PAIN pain PAIN), dance takes an already abstract concept and depicts it visually, using the artist as the medium of expression.

It is also different for that very reason. A dancer is a paintbrush. In language, if we are even allowing for an analogy between language and art, the word is the paintbrush. A human speaking is a painter. Dance’s painter is the choreographer. What interested me most about Dante was the fact that his art form splits the expression and expresser into two subjects. In painting, there is an artist (subject), and a paintbrush (object). Dance is more like music, in that the composer and performer both have subjective input. And as Dante mentioned, some dancers are just technicians. I can certainly recall writing a scathing (and irrelevant… I was fifteen) review of a certain guitarist in which I used the words “technician”, “machine”, and “automaton” to describe the impressive and soulless playing of a certain finger jockey.

Such a review would be impossible in discussing the merits of language. There is typically only one subject in speech. Oh, perhaps one person could write a speech and another could read it, but generally speaking the spoken and written word is emitted from its author. A good speaker (Barack Obama, anybody?) may be able to adapt someone else’s speech, but this is the exception rather than the norm. Nor are audiobooks and poetry readings the first thing we think of in a discussion about literature. But anyway, this is only a secondary point of dissent.

The real crux of the matter is the meaning of symbols in language, as opposed to the meaning of symbols in art. These fields may overlap in literature, but rarely in dance. A pirouette may be used for a thousand reasons in nine hundred and ninety nine plays. How many definitions can you give the word “happy?” Oh, a spectrum, perhaps, but it represents more or less the same thing to everyone, at any time, in any context.

Symbols and their relationships in a language are governed by a grammar. I challenge anyone who has seen a modern dance to find me rules of dance syntax. I can find you a meaningless dance, perhaps, but not an ungrammatical one. Because even the drunken cavorting of a nine year old who got into his parents’ liquor cabinet can be part of a story and be used meaningfully in dance. But drunken cavorting, if art were a language, would be analogous to, say, “arblalkjasge” in English. Or maybe to “Snakehemp jumped South Carolina May to degrees help of of the”. The dance analog is useful in some contexts, the language version is both meaningless and ungrammatical. Even that Miss America model who butchered the English language so beautifully (”I think that education also the such as…”) would recognize (unconsciously) that Snakehemp is not a word and that the prepositional phrase “to degrees” cannot be placed meaningfully next to the words following it.

At any rate, I think that everyone agrees that dance is a form of expression. But to call it language is to blur the lines between language and art, and it has always been my belief that the purpose of the latter is to pick up the slack where words simply fail.

Dance as Language

Fundamentally, language allows communication between people. It uses shared and accepted representations of both concrete and abstract ideas to give people ideas of others’ experience, thought, or knowledge. Among all cultures, even those in which language has evolved for thousands of years independent of other influences, language is recognized by its grammar, context, and meaning. The word “language” commonly represents spoken and written words that, although learned, seem to originate in common human capacity for reason. In several respects, however, dance is also a human language.

Dance, as a form of language, communicates ideas. It uses an accepted vocabulary of movements to express ideas of things and thoughts. Emotions especially can be almost universally conveyed through movement. As people from different cultures can understand the emotions in unfamiliar music, so too can they in dance. Dance, like language, can have grammar. Phrases of a series of movements, such as a series of jubilant leaps, or timid, tiny steps, may convey one idea or tell one part of a story. These phrases are punctuated by pauses, like the commas of language, and stops, like periods. When a choreographer defies accepted grammar, especially in a formal dance such as ballet, they use the very lack of grammar to make a point. The change in center of balance that Mr. Adela spoke of serves such a purpose. Like language, dance can be further abstracted from obvious representations, so that the ideas conveyed are less clear. Poems with gibberish words violate the expectations of the reader, and in doing so prompt thought in a manner similar to modern dance. Modern turns traditional dance vocabulary and grammar on its head, or heel, or knee.

Unlike language, however, dance generally conveys ideas more generally. Rather than a phrase as specific as, “I am in love,” dance conveys the joy and experience of love through the force and rhythm of its motions. It is also used less often to communicate the ideas of individuals than the ideas of communities, as Alvin Ailey’s Revelations tells the shared stories of many people with the movements of a few, or as Native American tribal dances once represented an entire community’s attempt to communicate with a God. Dance, in its general ideas and common group mentality, in fact represents a more universal method of communication than words do, or can.

The Language of Dance*

Language is a way to communicate between people — an ability to convey everything or nothing. American Sign Language, however, shows that language doesn’t necessarily have to be spoken. There are certain gestures people can string together that allows another as much or as little into our mind frame as we please. Dance holds a theoretically similar premise. Dance is widely accepted as an art form, but the message dance can send out has meaning in its own right. A dance can tell a story like a person does while speaking. Under the presumption of these guidelines, a conversation in dance would be a dance-off, in which dancers consecutively string moves together. The problem, however, is that dance-offs tend to have competitive tones, as dancers seem to care less about conveying anything more than “Look at me! My extensions are the bomb!” in this situation.

Presuming dance can both speak and be an art form sets the precedent that literature, paintings, and music also have the ability to communicate in some capacity. There are different languages in spoken word, and in a parallel fashion, there are different dance styles. On the surface, dance does appear to have all the tenets of a language. However, dance is a language we observe rather than take part in. At a dance performance, audience members can’t jump on stage and crunk. While observing dance, we will always be left out of the conversation, like going to a bodega. Even if we are dancers ourselves, it is not our conversation to take part in. It is a language we constantly try to crack because even if we cannot take part in it, we know deep down that the language is relatable and understandable in a sense. When we realize this, we are as relieved as when we come to the conclusion that those guys in the bodega aren’t secretly plotting to overcharge us for the twinkies and doughnuts that keep us too overweight to spark a conversation in Dance.

On a somewhat related note, Mr. Adela’s discussion enforced what I knew about dance and dancers. Yes, it is expressive beyond belief. Yes, it rests on passion. Yes, dancers work harder than imaginable. And, most of all, dance is perhaps the most beautiful language on earth — more beautiful than French, more soulful than Italian. In addition, Mr. Adela wowed me on a personal level with his stamina, dedication, and that awesome breakdancing.

BargeMusic

Dear class,

One of the most cherished treasures of New York, a place for young musicians and composers to test their wings under the Brooklyn bridge.

These of you who are interested in tickets to  chamber music on a floating barge, send me e-mail, Indicate  whether a weekend or a weekday is better for you.