MHC Seminar 3, Professor Maya Weltman-Fahs, City College

Author: Nicole Budzinski

Project Proposal- Nicole, Leslie, Raymund and Reid

Background

The growth rates of plants are commonly known to be dependent on fundamental factors such as soil, sunlight, temperature, and water. Studies have been performed in the past to determine how different factors, such as soil water potential, have affected the growth rates of plants (Kang and Wan, 2005). Although Kang and Wan have found that soil water potential treatments do not significantly affect the growth or developments of radish seeds, the question remains as to how modified types of water affect such plants. The salinity of water is one major factor that has been found to affect the nutrient intake of radish seeds (Van Hooijdonk, 1999). With moderate salinity levels, nutrient intake can be increased while instigating plant growth. Carbon dioxide also plays an important role for plant development. A study on tomatoes has shown that irrigated carbonated water has achieved greater yields (Novero et al., 1991). Because radishes require very few resources and time to grow, they serve as excellent subjects to test how different water types can affect their germinations.

 

Research Question

How do different water types affect radish seed germination?

 

Hypothesis

We predict that carbonated water will have the greatest positive effect on the germination rates of the radish seeds. This is due to the fact that common ingredients in carbonated water include minerals such as potassium sulphate and sodium bicarbonate. Most importantly, carbon dioxide has been added to the water, which is essential for plant growth.

 

Method

Our method revolves around the following materials:

  • Radish seeds
  • Paper towels
  • Distilled water
  • Tap water
  • Salt water
  • Carbonated water
  • Mineral water

The radish seeds will be divided into 5 groups of 10 seeds each, to test the different water types we will be using: distilled, tap, salt, carbonated, and mineral. To begin, distilled water will be used as the control group. 10 radish seeds will be spread out on a flat paper towel. Afterwards, the paper towel will be watered with distilled water until completely soaked. The seeds will be left alone and watered every 2 days.

This process will be repeated for each of the other groups, watering the paper towels with their respective water types, for the next 2 weeks. Each of the groups will be placed on the window sill of a room in The Towers to allow the seeds to grow with sunlight. After 2 weeks, the effect of each water type on the seeds will be determined by the measurements in length of their germinated roots.

 

Proposed Stats Analysis

Using the average lengths of the seeds’ roots for each respective group, the data will be analyzed using an ANOVA. If there is a significant statistical difference present within the data, t-tests will be performed to compare every group with one another to determine which group or groups have had the greatest effects on the germination rates of the seeds.

 

Presentation

Our poster board will include a summary of background information needed to know about the growth rates of radish seeds and the different water types that we used for the experiment. Our data will also be presented through histograms and tables showing the ANOVA/t-tests.

 

References

Kang, Y., & Wan, S. 2005. Effect of soil water potential on radish (Raphanus sativus L.) growth and water use under drip irrigation. Scientia Horticulturae, 106: 275-292. Retrieved from

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030442380500124X

Novero, R., D. H. Smith, F. D. Moore, J. F. Shanahan, and R. d’Andria. 1991. Field-Grown Tomato Response to Carbonated Water Application. Agron. J. 83:911-916. doi:10.2134/agronj1991.00021962008300050026x.

Oliva, A., Lahoz, E., Contillo, R., & Aliotta, G. (2002). Effects of Ruta graveolens leaves on soil characteristics and on seed germination and early seedling growth of four crop species. Annals of Applied Biology, 141(1), 87-91.

Van Hooijdonk, M.  1999. “Effects of salinity on growth, water use, and nutrient use in

radish (Raphanus sativus L)”. Plant and Soil. 215: 57-64.

Okumura, T., Muramoto, Y., & Shimizu, N. (2012). Influence of DC electric field on growth of daikon radish (Raphanus sativus). Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation, IEEE Transactions on, 19(6), 2237-2241.

 

Assignment #4

This research was based on college students’ stresses and coping strategies. This paper focused on mental stress rather than physical stress. Researchers came up with four possible hypotheses for the reason college students were stressed. The four hypotheses were as followed: there is a positive correlation between study conditions and mental stresses of college students, there is a positive correlation between employment situations and mental stresses of college students, there is a positive correlation between economic conditions and mental stresses of college students, and there is a positive correlation between persona factors and mental stresses of college students.

Researchers used questionnaires, specifically SPSS to make mean test and variance analysis to validate the hypotheses. A survey was given among 800 college students in Chuangchun University of Science and Technology. 734 copies were valid. A T critical value analysis was done on the sample information and a K value of 1.93 was calculated. This meant the confidence level was 95% on the sample. Questionnaire consisted of 20 questions asking about study conditions, employment situations, economic conditions and personal factors.

There are four variables that cause mental stresses and personal factors included three aspects. Average and standard deviation was tested for each aspect. Average value represented the degree of correlation between each variable and stresses of college students. Hypotheses were verified based on the table given in the article. Mean value for the 734 college students was larger than 3.1 meaning mental stresses of college students have positive correlations with the four factors (study, employment, economic and personal). Employment mean value was 4.33 showing it is more significant. Mean value for study conditions changes with environment and competition. Economic stress may cause different stress for different people. There are different aspects for personal factors based on standard deviation. All four aspects have large standard deviation and are important.

Citation

Ji, Hong, and Lei Zhang. “Research on College Students’ Stresses and Coping Strategies.” Asian Social Science, www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ass/article/view/12451. Accessed 26 Sept. 2017.

Ecological Footsteps

Looking at my score in the footprint calculator shocked me. According to the website I would need 3.1 Earths in order for continue living the way I do. When I put the same answers into the other website it told me my score was better than 42% of others. Having done these test really made me think about how I live. I thought I did everything in moderation, be it the type of house I live in or the amount of time I travel but if everyone lived like me our Earth would fail to even exists. This is what concerns me the most, if I live better than 42% of the people out there and I alone need 3.1 Earths to continue living the way I do how much do other people use? It would seem, according to these results, we are killing the Earth. The good news is we can reverse this process. I know personally I would use gas less and travel less by car and more by foot. Also we have to look at the way we eat. Although I only occasionally eat meat,  meat is ruining our Earth. if we all ate less meat we would be able to help reverse the damage we are inflicting. We need to be more aware of the way we live because if we aren’t Earth will fail to exist. With cutting somethings down like electricity and travel I would be able to lower my Earths to 2.3.

Potential Research Ideas

  1. How does the amount of sleep a college student receive affect their performance in school?
  2. How does the location (disturbed vs. not disturbed) affect herb distribution and herb type?
  3. Has  recent climate changes affected the type of plants located in NYC parks?

Bias assignment

I looked at two news article about the U.S. pulling out of the climate change from the Huffington Post and Fox News. I knew these two sources were on the opposite ends of the spectrum, but the bias in them was evident. The title’s themselves showed how much their views differed. The Huffington Post was titled “Donald Trump Pulls U.S. Out of Paris Accord in Crushing Blow to Climate Fight” while the Fox News article was titled “Trump Pulls Out of Paris Climate Deal and Does Something  Right (and Brave)”. Both articles use very different language while addressing Trump’s decision. The Huffington Post uses words such as “crushing, traumatic and devastating” while referring to the presidents decision to pull out.  On the other hand, Fox News praises this idea and uses words such as brave and smart. Both these articles also show how differently they view climate change the Huffington Post talks about how if the U.S. doesn’t stop  these carbon emissions we are going to a bad place. Fox News doesn’t even mention the negative aspects of climate change only that it doesn’t seem to be that large of an issue. Furthermore, both articles show bias in their views towards the president. The Huffington Post refers to Trump as someone with his own agenda and repeatedly portray him as this negative figure. Fox News had nothing but kind things to say about the president.  Although they didn’t insult our president they had no problem insulting democrats and placing the blame on them. While comparing these two articles I saw how it was obvious which opinion each news source held, but the Huffington Post had other people backing up  their opinions, while Fox News had only one person commenting on this story.

Citations:

Erickson, Erick. “Trump pulls out of Paris climate deal and does something right (and brave).” Fox News, FOX News Network, 1 June 2017, www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/06/01/trump-pulls-out-paris-climate-deal-and-does-something-right-and-brave.html. Accessed 12 Sept. 2017.

Kaufman, Alexander C. “Donald Trump Pulls U.S. Out Of Paris Accord In Crushing Blow To Climate Fight.” The Huffington Post, TheHuffingtonPost.com, 1 June 2017, www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-paris-agreement-global-warming_us_593030dae4b07572bdbf9a33. Accessed 12 Sept. 2017.

 

Assignment 2

This research article talks about how to help the sea otters that are listed on the Endangered Species list in the islands off the coast of Alaska by using their ecosystems. Researchers planned on developing a recovery criterion for the sea otters and its ecosystem on the basis of ecological effectiveness.  The reason they did this was because sea otters help preserve sea kelp, which gives off lots of carbon. Sea otters do this by eating sea urchins, which cause kelp forest to deplete. In order to confirm that keeping sea otters within these areas would be efficient for the ecosystem scientist took measurements of kelp and sea urchins in random spots within the coast of the islands. They tested areas that had sea otters at their capacity and other areas that lacked sea otters. The areas that had sea otters showed a low sea urchin biomass and a high kelp population, while the areas with little to no sea otters where shown to have high urchin biomass and low kelp density. These results proved that the rocky reef ecosystem in Alaska’s islands is predictable depending on the presence or absence of sea otters. Researchers hence proved that sea otters helped their ecosystem as much as the ecosystem helped them and they were essential for each others survival, but too many otters would not bring homeostasis to the reef either.

Citation: ESTES, J. A., TINKER, M. T. and BODKIN, J. L. (2010), Using Ecological Function to Develop Recovery Criteria for Depleted Species: Sea Otters and Kelp Forests in the Aleutian Archipelago. Conservation Biology, 24: 852–860. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01428.x

Assignment 1- Nicole Budzinski

This research article discussed a new method of gaining long-term information about lemurs, specifically the red-bellied lemur. This new method is known as LemurFace ID: a system that recognizes individual lemurs in the wild. This system was proven to have a high accuracy rate. It removed previous limitation that tagging and manual identification had. LemurFace ID was shown to be safer for the animals and helped researchers learn about the evolution of lemurs more accurately. Once enhanced, this system could be a cheaper way to observe multiple animals, not just lemurs.

Citation:

Baden, Andrea, Crouse, David, Jacobs, Rachel L, Jain, Anil, Klum, Scott, Richardson, Zach, & Teacot, Stacey. “LemurFaceID: a face recognition system to facilitate individual identification of lemurs.” BMC Zoology, BioMed Central, 17 Feb. 2017, bmczool.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40850-016-0011-9. Accessed 29 Aug. 2017.