Although yes, the private ownership prevents the public from using the space for negative uses such as panhandling and prostitution, landfill or a second Times Square (130), the public would use it more positively as they are doing presently. It can a safe haven to the different kinds of artists, the chess players, the moms out with their children who are all not consciously thinking about the people who own the park, who’s names they may have never heard of. Instead they continue to use it to raise their voices as have been done for the past century and recently against some of the actions of the current president.
A great appeal of this partnership is how it allows New York residents to access green space, entertainment to the sights of the city in areas that seem separate from the city itself. Such a space is the one mentioned in the video called the Highline (which is pretty popular) in which experts and New York residents both mention the pros and cons of public-private partnerships. The pros align with the idea that the public itself wouldn’t be able to maintain all the spaces to their best potentials. The cons involve that the owners are always to create “monopolies” the more projects they get involve in.
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=inOuEymYUio]