Contrasting Views on Robert Moses, and His Impact on Staten Island

As we look around our city, and take in its grand structures and majesty, we can accredit much of it to Robert Moses, a 20th century “building maestro” who led expansions across all 5 boroughs, making a huge impact on its development. Although he has done a lot to build up our city, he’s also been known to be a pretty controversial figure. He is referred to as “the greatest builder in American history” but also as an “evil genius”. In ‘Robert Moses and the Rise of New York: The Power Broker in Perspective’ Kenneth T. Jackson goes on to defend Moses from many of the negative claims made by Robert A. Caro. He mentions that many of Moses’ accomplishments weren’t positively received at first, since they were seemingly too sacrificial of other things, until the benefits of his plans were reaped. Many people also blame him for things that weren’t his fault, but at the same time he is responsible for many harsh things, such as efforts to clear slums to make luxury apartments and medical and cultural centers, devastating lower income families (Jackson 69). As a Staten Islander, born and raised, I was curious as to how his work affected Staten Island, positively or negatively, how people received his ideas during his time and how it has been looked at in retrospect.

Continue reading “Contrasting Views on Robert Moses, and His Impact on Staten Island”

Robert Moses: An Industrial Visionary or Ruthless Dictator

Robert Moses is seen by many as a revolutionary who changed the landscape of New York City with his conviction in his beliefs and a will to change the city for the betterment of the middle class. However his aggressive personality and powerful beliefs to apply his vision to the entirety of New York City came at the expense of many. Moses built bridges, highways, houses, and used Title 1 to create multiple expansive projects destroying slums and creating new modernized buildings in accordance with his vision. However the problem with Moses’ vision was that these new slums relocated massive amounts of people that originally lived in the already condensed area that was renovated. And with the increase in living prices associated with the projects Moses was building projects the lower classes could not afford even though the new areas for are built on property they previously had lived in. This led to a massive relocation of many poorer families leading to Moses gaining a dual perception as both a tenacious visionary and a inconsiderate uncultured dictator forcing his vision leading to large scale movements of people form their homes.

Continue reading “Robert Moses: An Industrial Visionary or Ruthless Dictator”

Real Life in New York’s Public Housing

One of Robert Moses’ main three goals was to build affordable housing to bring the middle class back into the city. He wanted to avoid a divided city of the rich and the poor. This left people in the lower classes stuck in “new slums” or public housing. Those who are in the lower class are also disproportionately people of color. Not only are people of color driven into less than desirable housing situations by their incomes, but also by Robert Moses himself. Moses believed “‘Negroes and whites don’t mix” and that allowing people of color to live in the same neighborhoods as white people would decrease the value of all properties.

Continue reading “Real Life in New York’s Public Housing”

Robert Moses and His Effects on New York

“When Moses yields, God must be near at hand” (Ballon and Jackson 75).  Robert Moses was a public official who organized and planned public works.  These included the Triborough bridge, Verrazano bridge, Brooklyn-Queens Expressway, and Lincoln Center.  Moses was known for his productive, persistent, and insensitive nature.  He was a powerful character that catalyzed change in New York’s layout for decades in the 20th century.  Moses was the chairman of the Mayor’s Committee on Slum Clearance.  As chairman, he acted under Title 1 from 1949 to 1960.  Under this law, Moses gained New York $65.8 million to spend on removing slums (Ballon 16).  Moses and many urban planners believed that slums negatively affected a city as a whole since people did not have as many resources as they should and since the upkeep of the people in slums was greater than the taxes these people paid.  Moses used his position and his persistence to make deals with private companies to tear down and rebuild slums including housing and apartment buildings.  Moses and urban planners at this time believed that “large-scale clearance, replanning, and private redevelopment” was the only way to remove slums (Ballon 21).  In doing these large-scale projects, people in these areas had to be displaced.  As chairman, Moses was obligated to observe the movements of these people and he or the companies he worked with were to find the people housing in other areas.  However, Moses did not care much for these displaced people as he only cared about the city as a whole and not individual neighborhoods.  Usually, less than 15% of people who were displaced stayed in public housing and the average rent of these people increased greatly.  Also, new slums were being created from these displaced people who could not afford housing in prominent areas.  These people caused crowding in surrounding areas as well.  This lack of care and harsh treatment caused public backlash which Moses responded to, doubling down on his own principles, and mostly ignoring the cries of the people. Continue reading “Robert Moses and His Effects on New York”

Robert Moses’s Negative Impacts

Cities around the world must always work competitively to stay modern and draw more people and resources to them. This is especially true of cities such as New York City (NYC), which one of the top global cities, which is an important title. To stay in this position of power and importance, the city has to continue to be the first to new advances in areas such as technology, finance, and education. Another area a city must excel in is in its architecture and infrastructure. Transportation is also very significant.

Continue reading “Robert Moses’s Negative Impacts”

NYC Past to Future Lens Through Moses’ Eyes

The impact that Robert Moses had on NYC is indisputable. During his reign as the “building maestro”, he completed massive projects in with speed and efficiency, building hundreds of miles of new roads, thousands of acres of parklands and beaches, multiple art complexes as well as new bridges, and more (page 2-3). Despite these indisputable remarkable feats that he accomplished, a massive controversy exists questioning his methodologies and ultimate impacts: did he propel NYC into the future with massive modernization efforts and through projects focused on eradication of slums and building of new roads or did he displace great numbers of innocent people and nearly destroy the city as we know it? In my personal opinion, the answer to this controversy is not at all black and white and in a way I think Moses did both. However, after completing this week’s reading, I found myself focusing on a different approach to the readings. I had the following question in mind: what would New York City look like today if Robert Moses still had the power he once yielded? The pictures above provide a visual model with a potential answer to this question.

Continue reading “NYC Past to Future Lens Through Moses’ Eyes”

Robert Moses as a Controversial Figure

Robert Moses represents a significant and controversial figure in New York City’s history. He represents a man who was pivotal in creating the layout and outlook of the city as it is today, as well as a man who worked to bring his vision to reality without care for those who served as collateral damage. In Hilary Ballon and Kenneth Jackson’s Robert Moses and the Transformation of New York, Moses and his plans for the city were discussed and debated, outlining the goals he wanted to achieve and how he achieved them. Moses advocated for complete urban redevelopment, leading the largest slum clearance program in the 1950s (Ballon 94). In doing so, he aimed to bring back the middle class with affordable housing to reduce the polarization between the two extremes of the social class spectrum, to establish New York as a center of higher education by making land available for university expansion, and to elevate the status of the city in the nation and the world through installations of different “world-class cultural institutions” (Ballon 106). Finally, he wanted to create expressways throughout the city as a more efficient way of traveling through automobile rather than the “ancient relic” of the public transport system (Jackson 68-69). He argued that the city was built “by and for traffic” (Fishman 125). From his perspective, the city needed to be redeveloped in order to make it more efficient and uniform, as well as to create a center of success and culture known across the globe.

Continue reading “Robert Moses as a Controversial Figure”

Expanding Higher Education

New York University at Bronx Campus, (1894)

The photograph presented above is a still of New York University’s campus in the Bronx location. It is incredibly astonishing to view New York University in this setting — secluded, humbly compact, and located in a predominantly low income borough of New York City. The NYU campus we know of today expands to a large area near Washington Square, and encompasses a dental, medical, business, and law school along with its undergraduate university. In our readings, we have explored how Robert Moses transformed the city of New York in the post-World War II era.

Continue reading “Expanding Higher Education”

A Burgeoning Education in New York City

A plentiful read in Robert Moses and the Modern City: The Transformation of New York is his Title I program, where Moses advocated for the tearing down of slums, relocation of original tenants, and subsequent rebuilding of new infrastructure. Moses believed that by providing incentives for institutions of higher education, the value of and interest in New York City would skyrocket. He viewed slums as a nuisance that must be eradicated, and acted as the mediator between the private and public sectors. While Moses undoubtedly spearheaded projects with visible significance to this day, we can argue that his vision for New York City was tainted with issues, in the ideological, business, and public welfare aspects.

Continue reading “A Burgeoning Education in New York City”