The Banana Man & Signs On Trees

Here were some interesting images I saw when taking a walk/run the other day.

These were outside of a house with the white Christmas-style lights in the cursive word “Peace,” on its front. No markings of it being an actual church or place of worship were visible to me.

I apologize if the files are large; I couldn’t figure out how to make them smaller.

 

Here is a man I met on the train. I didn’t get a good film of him – some performers don’t like being filmed, so I was kind of nervous.

The Banana Man

At the end he said his message was the spread joy, and encourage the childlike sense of play. Then, he began to repeat himself and say he only wanted to spread joy and remind us to play, and enjoy, and not be afraid to be silly or child-like. THEN he said, “…And I am a Christian, I believe in Jesus Christ. And it is Christ’s word that to enter the Kingdom of Heaven, one must be child-like in faith.” So, the last thing I expected, but an attempt at conversion! I can’t remember if he went on much longer after that – his mention of God was short and not super forceful. I don’t think he mentioned being non-believers or going to Hell in any regard. But I thought that was interesting.

Heaven’s Gate: More Likelihood Towards Violence?

Having never heard of Marshall Applewhite or Heaven’s Gate before, I was completely absorbed upon going to the main website. In relation to Strozier’s points about charismatic leadership, and how a group member must maintain absolute conviction in a cause, separate to what that cause logically/rationally is, I was amazed at the convictions of the Heaven’s Gate website writers and/or Marshalle Applewhite’s writing.

Upon watching most of initiation tape of Heaven’s Gate, I noticed the elements of charismatic leadership occurring. The idea of self-confidence that a charismatic leader must have is very evident in watching Applewhite. The tape may not be the same as a real interaction with him may have been, but I found myself listening and thinking, “Maybe you’re on to something here!” because he managed to speak in a way that held absolute confidence, yet was not forceful or dogmatic. In general I think that is the kind of speaking that draws people in the most. It is, “Hello, I am presenting The Truth. You may not believe me, and that is fine, but it is The Truth. If you want it, please listen.”

As “The Charistmatic Leader and Total Conversion” (Essay 4) states, a charismatic leader is most convincing when that leader sticks to social norms, lore, leadership styles, and convictions. What was so interesting to me about the way Heaven’s Gate operated was how openly it addresses that, “There will be people who think that you are an outsider, cult member, etc.” By operating in the language that the cult knew it would be addressed with, I found it was able to subvert that label of abnormality that would otherwise prevent people from accessing it. There is this, indeed, paranoia mentioned (to me) in the writing of the Heaven’s Gate website. The cult went so far as to address that they may commit suicide (which they indeed did – it was as though the note on suicide was meant as a pre-nuptial, “We make an acception in case this happens.”). They even said that because member are ascending to the Next Level of Human, before the UFOs and and people are taken to Heaven, that they will have to revoke society’s rules and regulations. They psychologically convince the reader by mentioning the caveat that members may be arrested, and will feel distinctly different and struggle from abandoning society’s rules — this psychological isolation, and separation from society that would normal cause someone to become anti-social, (and indeed I think increase the likelihood of mental stress, depression, anxiety, and/or suicidal thoughts or tendencies) is all addressed within the mythology of this “religion.” By separating from society one is re-accessing one’s soul, and thus experiencing a level completely separate and within the binary fundamentalist mindset of humanity. One is becoming not “the Other,” but “the Chosen.”

I was also really interested in how this was different than some fundamentalist Christianity. On one hand, Heaven’s Gate operates within the same binary as “believers,” and “non-believers.” But there is a (to me, huge) difference because Christians believe that anyone can be saved, they just must be willing and open their heart. Anyone is fair game. If someone does not mean to be saved, perhaps they are operating under Satan or perhaps they are just lost. Now, it is true that some fundamentalists develop into the violent idea that anyone who is a non-believers is an operator of Satan, while I feel some think that people aren’t being operators in lines with Satan, but under Satan’s control. However, since Heaven’s Gate contains a caste-like system for a human’s capacity and developmental stages in regards to being saved, I feel like the ideas of violence or disregard of non-believers is even higher. A Heaven’s Gate-r (HG, I’ll abbreviate for now) could in theory commit violence upon a non-HG who is at the age of reasoning/self-control because they are not someone with a soul, or someone who is at level to receive a soul and they are operating for Lucifer. Correct me if I am wrong in this line of thinking, or have missed something that states otherwise. I never found anything against violence (except for suicide) or anything stating, like in the Bible, that one should be good to one’s neighbors, even those non-believers. Also, since people can get reincarnated, an HG who commits violence could argue that the person that the HG committed violence on was not at the level for being saved or ready to receive a deposit, and that violence was done as a way of helping that non-HG recognize his/her Luciferian ways.

To me, this element of Heaven’s Gate, with its caste-like separation and levels, made it both much more compelling and much more easily steered towards mass-violence and violent behavior.

Aesthetics of the Apocalypse

Although I started my studying with the Fundamentalist Mindset readings, my first reaction upon looking at the Heaven’s Gate website was that it was a complete eyesore and that difficult to understand because of reasons unrelated to content. The bright colored fonts were hard to read on a patterned background. Although the HTML and graphics were par for the course for late nineties web design, odd embellishments  do not enhance the credibility of the site’s creators. Yet it does remind me of something made by someone with as little attachment to earthly possessions as the mission statement claims. It is a recruitment tool, but there is something about this page that seeks to separate Heaven’s Gate from the masses that would criticize its workings and motives.

For those that are curious, results of the readability tests at http://juicystudio.com/services/readability.php place the Heaven’s Gate website homepage http://www.heavensgate.com/index.html#keys somewhere between Time and the Wall Street Journal, at roughly the 6th grade level. Srrody’s Earth exit statement is considered by the program calculator to be simpler than the homepage, but Glonody’s is more complex. I think that this seems to confirm the idea that a fundimentalist ideal being ever present and also so abstract that only the “right people” can be smart enough to understand/believe it and that they feel themselves to be alien from the “they” by the nature of having greater understanding. Certain Apocalyptic ideas are, as the result of a paranoid makers’ insanity, an subconscious attempt to be distance oneself from a more mainstream other while forming a familiar supportive group.

I found Strozier’s discussion for a need for a religious conversion to apocalyptic imagery in Chapter 4 especially interesting. Conversion imagery is seen as a tool to unite the split self by offering something familiar and concrete.

I wonder how a graphic designer’s reprensentation (or an artistic outside observer like Dave Gibbons or Michal Tolkin) of apocalyptic fundamentalists’ mind relates to the media that they create themselves.

A Leader’s Actions To Control A Group

As I read the three chapters, I tried to figure out how they all connected to one another and make my own theory on how the readings would be interconnected. Perhaps the wise and charismatic leaders of cults are able to attract various members because they are able to attract members that are either out casted or previously humiliated by a prior event by uniting them under one cause. Afterwards, the group would be conducted in a way that catered to the way that majority of the cult wanted in order for the leader to keep their members. The violence or extreme that the cult chose to take would then be decided by the leaders, as they are in charge with the degree of a cult’s potential for violence. Continue reading

Re: Heaven’s Gate

I found this, which is the first part of the Heaven’s Gate Initiation Tape.

Part One of Heaven’s Gate

Also found this – not Heaven’s Gate, but the homepage/ENTER page was interesting and, I’ll be honest, kind of made me laugh.

I also have a video I’ll post of a man I met on the train the weekend before Halloween that ended up being relevant to the Apocalypse. I also took some photos that I thought would be interesting to show you guys – will hopefully post that tomorrow.

Drugs, Personal Apocalypses and Large Scale Destruction

Religion is the opiate of the masses.

– Karl Marx

I love how Rick Moody’s Albertine Notes mentions in passing the bombing of half of a large portion of the city and the corruption of its water supply, weighing them against one another, but instead focus’ primarily on the dangers of mass drug use and the impact of that on the city. Continue reading

For those not enraptured with The Rapture

Hi everyone,

I’ve been intrigued by these responses, many of which assume that Tolkin is trying to create a story faithful to Revelation, but has failed to do so.  Try to think about the film from another angle, in which doubt and skepticism about such belief might prevail, a film in which the idea of a god who allows human suffering is itself questioned.  How would such a stance then represent Sharon’s conversion, the sect which she joins, and the way in which her “reality” unfolds at the end? Eric and Amy discuss this to some extent so take a look at their posts. And Christine poses a question at the end that really gets at this key issue.

The film met with a significant splitting of opinion when it was released.  Many leading critics praised it, including NY Times’ Janet Maslin, and it won an award at Sundance, while some (though fewer) panned it.  That alone makes it a worthy vehicle for discussion.

Finally, what might we make of the pearl?  There are several references in Revelation to pearls: 17:4, 18:12, 18:16, and 21:21.  Using them in the film doesn’t necessarily mean the film is portraying Revelation as happening.  Might these be hints about the nature of born-again belief and its effects on believers?