07
Feb 14

The Ghost Map 2/7

            The Ghost Map builds up to the inevitability of a cholera outbreak in Britain, detailing chronically unsanitary conditions, along side outbreaks in other parts of the world prior to 1831, providing the British with a false sense of superiority. Although the V. cholerae bacteria is ancient, an outbreak of cholera within the last two hundred years still managed to puzzle one of the world’s leading superpowers. Disease does not opportunistically prey on the politically, nor economically weak, but rather on populations that hold the social determinants of poor public health. Some determinants mentioned in The Ghost Map include lack of waste disposal systems, overcrowding among the living quarters as well as the deceased, and contamination of water systems, whether aware or unaware of its impurities. Although there is an ample amount of information on accounts of infection and lives and deaths, some of the physical and emotional torment that cholera caused, Johnson admits to require imagination (p. 32).
It may seem very obvious today that if we are quickly losing water, the best option is to rehydrate. Given Cholera’s quick and detrimental effects, however, it is easy to understand why doctors and scientists at the time would consider only complicated medications and solutions to a mysterious disease.

Reflection Questions:
Had foul smells and cramped quarters been a norm in 19th century Britain?  When did the public realize/become educated that their living conditions were increasing their susceptibility to disease?

Pricila Castillo


06
Feb 14

The Ghost Map Chapters 1-4

Johnson’s approach to the London cholera epidemic of 1854 is a unique one that is a surprisingly enjoyable read. Written as more of a novel than a scientific retelling of cold hard facts, he allows readers to both learn the history of the epidemic as well as experience it through the eyes of its victims. His vivid descriptions of 19th century London leave one both intrigued and disgusted, and are a useful way to look at such an epidemic in the context of the entire society at that time.

I particularly liked the idea that most historic events are “self-consciously” historic to those living through them, but epidemics are quite the opposite. It’s a dismal thought; those who are written down in history for their part in epidemics are robbed of even the small sense of celebrity that comes with being a part of a historic, if terrible, event.

The author’s attention to detail is startling, and really brings the storytelling to life, though I wonder how all of this detail, such as the fact that one of the first victims enjoyed a pudding with his contaminated Broad Street water, is known. I also noticed some discrepancies in his observations: for example, he describes the time period as “a world where it was not at all out of the ordinary for an entire family to die in the space of forty-eight hours,” when earlier, he points to the epidemic of 1854 as a frightening and new strain, because of its ability to wipe out entire families in a matter of days. Nevertheless, I am really enjoying the book, as its writing style is laid-back, and the author takes the time to draw readers in. I’m actually a little worried for Whitehead’s well being at this point, given the dramatic ending to Chapter 3.

Lastly, I really enjoyed the balance of looking at the epidemic through both a general and specific lens, by pointing out the entire city and its development, as well as the specific V. cholerae as the causes of the epidemic. These two views allow us to study the epidemic as both a biological and social incident, and give us a really comprehensive look at the episode.

Tzivi Kleinbart


06
Feb 14

The Ghost Map, Chapters 1-4

This story is disgusting, and I mean that in the best way possible. This story is absolutely repulsive. The disease itself is revolting in nature and the history of the decimation it caused is harrowing. And I think that’s why it’s so important that we’re reading about it and learning about it. Like the reading says, epidemics are some of the most influential eventualities that can occur in human history; epidemics, in fact, change history altogether. The modern epidemic HIV, while most certainly widespread and dangerous, does not appear to be on the level of total hopeless destruction that this reading makes out cholera to be, even though sex is as natural and as common a human function as defecation. While this definitely has to do with how medical practice has evolved over time and how we’ve developed medications and a greater understanding of how the science of our bodies works, I think it also has to do with hygenic practices that we’ve learned over time.

That’s why it’s so important that this story is so disgusting, because to be honest, there is no excuse for this.

When refuse is such a commonality that people can be hired to pick it up and sell it and make a living doing so, there is a problem that must be corrected. When you think it’s fair practice to throw a baby’s vomit and stools into a pool of water at the front of the house, when the access to water in the neighborhood is already so poor to begin with, there is a problem. The apparent lack of hygenic common sense that existed back then is appalling to read about. Granted, they didn’t have the filtration systems that they should have, but this was the height of industrialization. Was the lack of filtration because the technology didn’t exist, or because no one thought it was necessary? If the latter, then perhaps I’m spoiled by modern hygiene, but I can’t imagine that not a single person in London looked at the cesspool festering in front of their house and said “It probably doesn’t have to be this way.”

This is why I’m worried about John Snow’s efforts. While it’s important to study cholera from a medical aspect and understand just how it’s affecting the body and just how it’s actually getting into people’s bodies, once Snow finds that information, what will he be able to do to prevent its spread? A disease as malign and widespread as cholera requires a complete upheaval in the way that water is accessed in the city. The systems they had at the time were unsustainable, for the obvious reason that their water supplies were breeding grounds for infectious bacteria. Hopefully the community at large abandons their skepticism about John Snow’s hypotheses and those who have the power to take action do so.

Written by James McKenzie