13
Mar 14

99 Problems and the New Jim Crow is One

To continue the apparent theme of quoting famous rappers in our reading responses, this week’s reading of The New Jim Crow is essentially summarized in Jay-Z’s ‘04 single, 99 Problems. Though many of the lyrics would most likely not be deemed appropriate for a Macaulay blog post, in his second verse Jay-Z describes an incident that occurred nearly 10 years earlier, back when he was a notorious drug dealer. After being pulled over to the side of the road with “raw,” or cocaine, in his trunk, he is asked, quite condescendingly by the approaching police officer, “Son do you know why I’m stopping you for?”

Jay-Z, clearly possessing the “chutzpah and/or stupidity to tell a police officer to get lost” (the same trait that Professor Tracey Maclin argued most of us do not have), responds, accurately of course, “Cause I’m young and I’m black and my hat’s real low. Do I look like a mind-reader sir, I don’t know.” Fairly, Jay-Z is calling out the police officer for racially profiling a young black male and using the pretext of a traffic violation to accost and harass him, a clear violation of the Fourth Amendment that was, in fact, endorsed by the Supreme Court Decision Ohio v. Robinette. Jay-Z emphasizes the arbitrary nature of such a blatant infringement of his constitutional rights with the response of the “fictional,” police officer: “Well you was doing 55 in a 54. License and registration and step out of the car. Are you carrying a weapon on you? I know a lot of you are.”

Jay-Z, being well versed in historical and influential Supreme Court decisions, proves himself a “reasonable person,” (as determined by the U.S. Justices in Florida v. Bostick) by refusing to give his consent to be frisked, and otherwise violated. “I ain’t stepping out of s**t, all my paper’s legit”

The officer, not one to be denied, pushes further for consent, “Well, do you mind if I look around the car a little bit.”

 Jay-Z, still quite aware of his Fourth Amendment rights, boldly retorts, “Well, my glove compartment is locked, so is the trunk in the back. And I know my rights, so you gon’ need a warrant for that.”

The officer, likely intimidated by the young and apparently intelligent black man in front of him, replies, frustrated, “Well we’ll see how smart you are when the K9 come,” reflecting the Supreme Court ruling that “walking a drug-sniffing dog around someone’s vehicle does not constitute a “search,” and therefore does not trigger Fourth Amendment scrutiny.”

Luckily for him, Jay-Z got away that day, and if his careers as a rapper, business mogul and sports agent do not work out, he would seemingly be able to fend for himself as a lawyer. His song sort of represents the difficulty in assessing the necessity of the War on Drugs, demonstrating both the racial prejudice inherent in much of police action and the fact that these “unreasonable and discriminatory stops and searches” are sometimes correct, however rarely that may be.


07
Mar 14

New Jim Crow

Flipping through TV channels the other night, I came across one of my favorite shows, Cops. I only had to watch for about 10 minutes before I started noticing some biased policies within the police force. Officers often talk about how they drive through the “projects” or down dark alleys to look for criminal activity, usually petty drug deals, instead of patrolling random areas. They also set up undercover operations where they use former convicted drug users to set up drug deals and then bust the dealers, taking advantage of poverty, race, and lack of opportunity on both ends of the situation.

According to the NAACP, “African Americans now constitute nearly 1 million of the total 2.3 million incarcerated population” (x) which clearly indicates bias and discrimination within the system, as African Americans make up roughly 13% of the total U.S. population and yet represent close to 50% of individuals in jail or prison. It doesn’t take a mathematician to see that these numbers don’t match up, and yet so many people deny the existence of statistically provable institutionalized racism in our beautiful United States of America. This is largely due to the fact that racist policies have moved from Jim Crow and the KKK to “New Jim Crow”, as is discussed in the reading for this week. One recently published book by Ian Haney López, Dog Whistle Politics: How Coded Racial Appeals have Reinvented Racism and Wrecked the Middle Class, examines in-depth the language used by the likes of Clinton and Reagan to appear colorblind, unbiased, and politically correct in order to disguise true underlying racist and classist biases and policies. I would recommend giving this book a flip-through, as it sheds light on our politicians and our media, revealing discrimination and 1984-esque “newspeak” that is present in the very sources that we normally look to for information, education, and enlightenment. Another great tool to check out is The Sentencing Project, which takes a look at racial disparities within the American justice system and proposes reform projects. 

This is an extremely pressing and serious issue, and the public needs to have their eyes opened to the new ways in which racism is subtly integrated into our American way of life. But besides grassroots and org efforts, how can such a large, complex, and historically rooted system of inequality be dismantled? There was a recent discussion on the news of the new requirement of Los Angeles police officers to wear small video cameras on their uniforms in order to increase police accountability and to limit biases. In my opinion, this may be just the sort of thing needed to begin fighting institutionalized racism in the criminal justice system, but do you think it will be good enough? Is this the type of policy we need, and will it be effective, or will it bring up even more issues? What do you think?   

JE


07
Mar 14

The New Jim Crow

As I began the reading, I felt that the claims being made were quite outlandish- a sentiment I’m sure many of my classmates felt as well. However, as noted by some of the posts that I’ve looked at, the author provides a well-thought out argument that, by the end of the first chapter, has you convinced that her claims are true to a large extent.

What bothers me most about this disturbing idea- that our justice system is, in fact, a vehicle for racism- is the fact that it is so unnoticed. How can it be that in such a race-conscious time, where the idea of equality is ingrained in us and stressed in most institutions of higher education, that such an elaborate system of racism exists under our nose? How can it be that officials who went through several years of schooling meant to provide a liberal arts education of rational and free thinking make policies intended to freeze out a sizeable portion of our population from their rights?

The idea of the ‘new Jim Crow’ and these questions are things that leave much to be thought about. We must answer these crucial questions if we hope to ever achieve true equality.