25
Apr 14

Body Economic Part Dos

I feel sometimes as I read this book that the IMF would really absolutely love it if everyone on the planet agreed that increased social spending negatively affects the government’s budgets and profits, and cutting on these social programs during times of economic worry is a necessary evil. However, as we can see from Iceland, it’s simply not always the case.

This might say something about how I feel about the U.S. but it blows my mind how much the Icelandic government actually paid attention to it’s citizens during an economic crisis instead of having officials in the government argue with each other on what should be done. It’d be nice to have my voice heard every now and then in regards to how the country should be run… It warmed my heart to see the people of Iceland maintain their health even during an economic crisis.

It also infuriates me that the IMF simply does not adapt it’s plans based on the country. Making cuts everywhere should not be the ‘go to’ strategy. Countries’ economies are complex and deserve at least some analysis before you go ahead and affect the lives of thousands of people.


25
Apr 14

Bad Ideas

The reading this week, to me, illustrates a perfect example of preconceived notions being carried throughout time and having a huge effect. Stuckler and Basu do a pretty great job- and convincing one- of illustrating how the IMF’s policies failed Greece and how a departure from austerity helped Iceland. However, the IMF reacts like a school kid caught in web of lies- they just keep making it worse by sticking to their original policies.

I’m not so into conspiracy theories like James is, so I don’t believe the IMF is recommending their policies in order to cause harm, or because they don’t care about lower-class segments of the population. I think the IMF really just believes in their policies and are blind to the evidence because of their preconceived notions. What needs to happen is the field of policy advising needs to become more scientific- in the sense where recommendations are based on real trial and error, as opposed to intuition and old practices.


25
Apr 14

Greece and Iceland in The Body Economic

In the final reading of Body Economic, I was startled by the political and economic ways of Iceland and Greece. These two countries underwent similar sufferings and downturns, yet chose entirely different paths for the so called ‘recovery’ of their citizens and economy. Iceland chose to not cut welfare and other public funding, despite the IMF’s ideas otherwise. They knew that without the health and well being of their people, the economy would not pick up. This seems to be something the United States has yet to understand. Without a strong and steady undercurrent of trust and well being among citizens, where can our fiscal crisis disappear to? If citizens are not well and do not feel collectively protected in times of need, there is no reason or ability to function economically. I found this concept incredibly basic, yet it seems to be something that our political agenda constantly glazes over. It is often the ‘rich and elite’ who are able to decide the fate of all others, for better or worse. However, it seems obvious to me that we should follow suit along with Iceland and enjoy the comforts of a more healthy and balanced population.
Annaliisa Gifford