All posts by Monica Saw-Aung

Rising Sea Levels: Staying Afloat in Florida and Antartica

Monica Saw-Aung

Final Blog Post

In 2006, Al Gore’s publication of An Inconvenient Truth garnered mass support for the global climate change movement. However, although the public acknowledges the impact of climate change, its consequences seem distant and gradual to many people. This is not the case for the residents of South Florida and the scientists studying West Antartica’s ice sheets. The impact of rising sea levels in these two locations emphasize the very tangible and widespread effects of climate change as its tides literally approach our doorstep.

(c) Lynn Sladky/AP

In South Florida, flooded streets have become a common occurrence. Regarded as the “ground-zero of sea rise,” West Florida suffers because of its low elevation topography and its limestone foundation. The low overall elevation makes the region among the cities most susceptible to storm surges in the nation. Florida’s limestone base is filled with holes which are, in turn, filled with water. Furthermore, South Florida once existed as continuous wetland (known as the Everglades), circumvented today by a complex water system consisting of pump stations, canals, and other water control structures. This system works by maintaining a dynamic equilibrium where more freshwater pushes out to prevent less saltwater from pushing in. Unfortunately, as the sea levels rise and the saltwater front pushes onward, Florida witnesses its coastal regions being overtaken by saltwater and its drinking aquifers becoming salty. From another angle, the water table also rises, causing a reduction of stormwater capture and more extreme rainfall conditions. Regardless of restoration plans, South Florida will most likely be inundated in the future, partially due to the rapidly melting ice sheet in West Antartica’s Amundsen Sea.



At the other end of the Earth, West Antartica’s Ice Sheet has fallen into irreversible decline. Most of the ice sheet is built on a bed below sea level, which makes the point of attachment between the bed and the ice sheet (grounding line) vulnerable to warm water delivered by ocean currents. If that wasn’t problematic enough, the bed also slopes down such that parts of the bed lie more than a mile below sea level, making it even easier for ocean water to separate the ice from its grounding line. A specific part of the West Antartic Ice Sheet, known as the Amundsen Sea region, faces the greatest risk because of its small ice shelves and its lack of grounding obstructions (e.g. islands). Should the ice sheet in the Amundsen Sea region melt completely, global sea levels will see a rise of 4 feet.
In a process known as thermal expansion, the higher sea temperatures of recent years also cause water to expand and infiltrate the ice to a greater extent.



Although Florida and West Anartica are seeing the extreme consequences of rising sea level right now, coastal land regions around the world should prepare themselves. Already, large storms are creating more destructive impacts with their powerful storm surges, as was the case with Hurricane Katrina, Hurricane Sandy, and Hurricane Irene in America. People who inhabit low-lying islands and flooding-vulnerable areas may have to evacuate and lose their homes to the unforgiving water.

The only way to put off this impending doom is to reduce our carbon emissions, but even then, as with the inevitable loss of the Amundsen Sea glaciers, sea levels will probably increase anyway. Still, as inhabitants of this planet, we have a choice if that sea level rise will be small or large. Instead of passively observing the environment worsen, we must reduce our carbon footprint in the ways we know how (see here for tips to reduce your footprint). Starting from something as small as biking to school rather than driving, every decision matters if we want to stay afloat.

Sources

http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/12/21/the-siege-of-miami

https://www.nasa.gov/jpl/news/antarctic-ice-sheet-20140512/

http://ocean.nationalgeographic.com/ocean/critical-issues-sea-level-rise/

http://www.npr.org/2016/05/10/476071206/as-waters-rise-miami-beach-builds-higher-streets-and-political-willpower

Dakota Access Pipeline: Investigating the Green Side of the Oil Spill Issue

Monica Saw-Aung

Recently, protests over the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) have garnered mass publicity via social media and the press. Newspapers and websites are covered in photographs of injured Native American protesters. The #NoDAPL movement has a running petition with over 350,000 signatures. Celebrity activists like Shailene Woodley, Mark Ruffalo, and even Bernie Sanders have expressed their opposition to the DAPL. In this blog post, I will attempt to elucidate the two sides of the dispute  regarding the environmental debate on DAPL, which centers around the possibility of an oil spill.

First, what exactly is the Dakota Access Pipeline? This controversial $3.8 billion project aims to build a pipeline crossing 200 rivers that will connect oil production areas in North Dakota to pipelines in Illinois. It is about 60% constructed already.  If completed, the network will transport nearly 470,000 barrels of sweet crude oil from Bakken and Three Forks in North Dakota to major US markets. However, the pipeline’s construction runs through the reservation lands of the Standing Rock Sioux tribe. The first Americans of this tribe claim that completion of the DAPL project will pollute the water supply, threaten public health, and violate the sanctity of the reservation.

dapl
Native Americans protest the DAPL.

Looking away from ethical arguments, the DAPL raises unclear environmental implications. Energy Transfer Partners, the company at the helm of the project, claims that the DAPL will significantly reduce truck and railroad transportation usage in the long term because the pipeline will serve as a more efficient mode of oil transfer. In turn, domestic oil production will go up and domestic energy independence will increase. Energy Transfer also says that the “new advanced pipeline technology” contains “tremendous safety factors” to protect against any risk of an oil spill.

On the other hand, the Standing Rock Sioux and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) cast these illustrious claims into doubt. When the US Army Corps of Engineers originally presented the draft for DAPL to the EPA, the EPA warned them that the oil could leak into rivers – a warning that the Army Corps dismissed. Additionally, the recent shift of the pipeline path to under Lake Oahe concerns the Sioux because an oil spill there could contaminate the water supply for the rez inhabitants and ruin the aquatic ecosystem.
 unexpertstellusnodapl
The Standing Rock Sioux have a strong environmental argument to avoid an oil spill in their waters. Oil spills are notorious forms of pollution because of the permanent damage they can wreak on a body of water and the organisms that rely on that water. They can block sunlight from passing through the water surface, which can be fatal to marine organisms. The oil can get stuck in the feathers and fur of nearby animals; many animals cannot float, choke to death, or become blind. Baby animals run the risk of starving to death if their parent cannot detect their scent under the coat of oil.

The level of environmental risk the DAPL poses to the reservation area differs depending on who you ask.  Still, it’s clear that an oil spill would be catastrophic and the Standing Rock Sioux would have more to lose should one occur. I personally stand with the #NoDAPL movement in more ways than one, especially factoring in this nation’s history of Native American oppression and the shaky scientific basis that the pipeline technology rests on. For now, the Obama administration has asked Energy Transfer Partners to temporarily halt the progression of the pipeline, leaving the fate of the DAPL in limbo until all details are above ground.

Sources

http://petitions.moveon.org/sign/no-dapl?source=s.tw&r_by=10164408

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/sep/13/dakota-access-pipeline-protests-north-dakota-sioux

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3036302-DAPLSTLFINALEAandSIGNEDFONSI-3Aug2016.html

http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/07/us/dakota-access-pipeline-visual-guide/

http://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/understanding-controversy-behind-dakota-access-pipeline-180960450/?no-ist

http://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/a-pipeline-fight-and-americas-dark-past

http://www.conserve-energy-future.com/effects-of-oil-spills.php

Aquaponics and Zooarchaeology in Antigua & Barbuda

Monica Saw-Aung: Blog Post 1
For most New York City residents, access to fresh food is just a short walk to the grocery store. We take the fruits and vegetables that line the aisles of our supermarkets for granted. Even if we don’t choose to eat these nutritious foods, we know that we have the option to do so.
For the inhabitants of Antigua and Barbuda, healthy food is a luxury. In 2011, the country spent EC$240 million – about $92 million in US dollars – on imported food, greatly outweighing local food production. Sanctions and diminishing ocean resources restrict the residents from fishing nearby, and the island suffers from a lack of fertile land due to housing construction waste and low water supply. This situation is especially dangerous for Antigua and Barbuda because it is a small island susceptible to hurricanes, droughts, and other natural disasters. Any shock to the system could interrupt shipments and leave the country vulnerable.

This is where the Barbuda Research Complex (BRC) comes in. Hailing from Brooklyn College, Dr. Sophia Perdikaris and her team combine the field work of zooarchaeology with the goal of food security.  Students interested in the program commit hours in the lab learning how to differentiate between species, rocks, and pottery shards. As a freshman, I had the pleasure of working in Dr. Perdikaris’ lab sieving and sorting through the excavation samples from the seaview location at Antigua and Barbuda. From a medical perspective, the hands-on experience offers insight into the anatomy and physiology of animals from snakes to land turtles. From an anthropological perspective, pottery burn and other artifacts allow researchers to glean information about past cultural practices. From a sustainability perspective, zooarchaeology helps form a better ecological profile of Antigua and Barbuda and builds the foundation for the Barbuda Aquaponics Facility next door to the BRC.

The Barbuda Aquaponics Facility breeds tilapia and grows edible plants. Using rainwater and local seeds, the facility focuses on agriculture without introducing potentially harmful invasive species. In the drought of March and April 2014, the facility was even able to continue operating with very little rainwater, producing lettuce and other leafy greens. Although the aquaponics grows enough to offer produce to local markets, the project is still being tweaked and refined to match the climate conditions. In the field of sustainability, aquaponics has so much more room to expand and help other communities like the ones in Antigua and Barbuda. I hope that the future brings more funding for facilities similar to the Barbuda Aquaponics Facility and more interest in local food production.

—–

Sources

http://infoagro.net/programas/seguridad/politicas/RegionCaribe/politica_antigua.pdf

http://www.brooklyn.cuny.edu/web/academics/international/opportunities/past/AntiguaBarbuda_Winter2016.php

http://barbudaresearchcomplex.weebly.com/aquaponics.html

Special thanks to Reaksha Persaud, the most enthusiastic and learnèd research supervisor I could have asked for.