-
Macaulay Honors College
at Baruch, Spring 2013Professor Els de Graauw
ITF Benjamin Miller Log in
Not finding what you need? Search here:
Jamaican Timeline
Vickerman, Milton. “Chapter 7- Jamaicans: Balancing Race and Ethnicity.” New Immigrants in New York. Edited by Nancy Foner. pp. 201-228. New York: Columbia UP, 1987.
Statistical Profiles
New York City is home to 8.1 million people, over 3 million of whom are immigrants. Immigrant groups are diverse by nature, and it is often times difficult to analyze how well they are assimilating to life in a new country, and in this case, the Big Apple. The American Community Survey annually collects data from a small percentage of the population, providing communities with information necessary to appropriately provide services to their people. In the case of immigrants, city planners often analyze this information to judge how well certain foreign-born groups are doing, and then formulize programs to meet the needs of these people. Researchers also use this information to better understand immigration and assimilation trends within large populations.
During this course, we looked at combined American Community Survey data, from the years 2009-2011, for selected populations of foreign-born New Yorkers. In doing so, we selected certain categories from this data set that attempt to develop brief statistical profiles of these groups. Undertaking the process of city planners and researchers, we found these people came to New York for a variety of reasons—from economic to familial. Moreover, we explored different views of assimilation and integration and applied them to our profiles. Our research analyzed the foreign-born populations of Dominicans, Chinese, Jamaicans, Haitians, and Mexicans living in New York.
Chinese Immigration Timeline
*Sources:
“Chinese Immigrants in New York City.” One City Many Nations. Macaulay Honors College, May 2011. Web. 12 May 2013.
Zhou, Min. 2001. “Chinese: Divergent Destinies in Immigrant New York.” Pp. 141-172 in New Immigrants in New York, edited by Nancy Foner. New York: Columbia University Press.
*Data is from “Chinese Immigrants in New York City” unless otherwise noted.
English Proficiency Among FB Mexicans, FB Latinos (including Dominicans) and other FB Groups in NYC from 2009-2011
Being that Mexicans and Latinos have geographic and demographic similarities, it was decided to compare FB Mexicans to FB Latinos. To further the comparison, the decision was made to compare these two ethnically similar groups to all other FB groups residing in New York City. It is important to note that for the purposes of this project, the Dominicans (a different group profiled for this assignment) are included in the FB Latino group. Being that the Mexicans and Latinos have ethnic ties, it then makes sense that their English proficiency correlates. Although a minimal sector of both FB Mexicans and FB Latinos speak only English at home, around half of both groups (35% of Mexicans and 51% of Latinos) speak English very well in addition to another language at home. That is to say, that out of the178,551 Mexicans over the age of 5 who are foreign born, only 63,078 speak English very well. While there are 782,075 FB Latinos in New York City, 402,163 of them speak English very well. It can then be implied that the FB Mexicans are not on par with the FB Latinos in New York–FB Mexicans are lagging behind in their integration experience. From an integration standpoint, although both groups only speak English as a sole language at home minimally, they still speak the English language in addition to their native language. The English proficiency of these groups is key in understanding how they incorporate into New York City society and most importantly the work force.
Jamaican Educational Attainment in NYC, 2000
As shown in the graph, 28.2% of the foreign-born Jamaican population has graduated high school only in New York City. This is actually a higher percentage of high school graduates than NYC’s collective foreign-born population, 23.5%, and more surprisingly the native-born population, 25.1%. Although this may be due to high English proficiency compared to other immigrant groups, foreign-born Jamaicans might also be placing more emphasis on the obtainment of a high school diploma to succeed. The percentage of college attainment or more might still be low, but this may change as they integrate into society. After all, with no language barriers and high school degrees, foreign-born Jamaicans will be able to find employment much more easily and have the basic skills to climb the socio-economic ladder.
Lobo, Arun Peter, and Joseph J. Salvo. 2004. The Newest New Yorkers, 2000: Immigrant New York in the New Millennium. New York: New York City Department of City Planning, Population Division.
Education and English: Chinese Integration
In this bar graph, English proficiency means that an individual aged 5 years and older speaks only English or speaks English very well/well. According to 2009-2011 ACS data, only 45% of foreign-born Chinese in New York City are English proficient, compared 71% of all foreign-born individuals in the city. This shows that a larger percentage of foreign-born Chinese struggle more with the English language compared to other immigrants. Furthermore, 95% of native-born Chinese in New York City are English proficient, compared to 98% of all native-born individuals. This shows that limited English proficiency is a problem especially for foreign-born individuals, and especially foreign-born Chinese, but much less so for their native-born children.
The foreign-born Chinese also have a higher percentage of individuals aged 25 and over who have no high school diploma, at 45%, compared to 35% of all foreign-born individuals and 22% of all native-born individuals in New York City. At the same time, 24% of foreign-born Chinese have earned a BA degree or higher, which is slightly higher than for all foreign-born individuals in New York City (23%) but lower than for all native-born individuals (31%). In terms of education attainment, the foreign-born Chinese are bifurcated between the poorly-educated and well-educated. The Chinese as the “model minority” myth is not complete fallacy; they really do have a significant representation of highly educated and accomplished individuals. It is also misleading, because a lot of Chinese immigrants do not nearly fit the mold, as in a whopping 45%.
Haitian Immigration in New York City
The Haitians are known as a proud and family oriented group (Cook Ross 2010) that has formed strong and identifiable communities all over New York. As a group, the Haitians started coming to New York in large numbers in 1957 upon the beginning of the reign of terror by the dictator Francis Duvalier. Some have hypothesized that the reason Haitians came to New York City originally was because it was the headquarters of a coup against Duvalier, led by his political rivals (Laguerre 1984). When the rivals realized that their revolution would be a failure, they began to bring their families over from Haiti to New York (Laguerre 1984). Since Haitians tend to migrate to places where there are other Haitians and form enclaves (Languerre 1984), New York City became a popular destination for Haitians, and thus lead to the 94,215 foreign-born Haitians that live in New York City’s five boroughs (ACS 2009-2011).
It is no surprise that Haitian immigrants in New York City popularly utilized family-based visas. The annual average for foreign-born Haitian immigration to the city is 3,049 individuals between 1990 and 1999. Ninety-four percent of these foreign-born immigrants benefited from 1965 Immigration and Nationality Act; 59.5 percent are categorized under family preferences, and the other 35.0 percent under immediate relatives (The Newest New Yorkers 2004). The 1986 Immigration Control and Reform Act (IRCA) and the 1988 Immigration Amendments greatly increased the variety and volume of immigrants that were allowed to come to the United States. Furthermore, the remaining 5.5 percent are distributed among employment’s 2.4 percent, refugees and asylees’ 2.1 percent, diversity’s 0.5 percent, and the last 0.5 percent is considered in the “other” classification of admission (The Newest New Yorkers 2004). Despite the inherent increase in the “refugee and aslyees” type of admission due to the Haiti earthquake in 2010, most Haitians are coming to America to reunite with their families. Haitians are known to be family oriented, and the importance of family duties and ties are instilled in their culture and religion (Cook Ross 2010). “It is obligatory for family to visit an ailing member. Consequently, Haitian patients may have a large number of visitors” (Cook Ross 2010). The obligation for even extended family to be close and nearby is deemed necessary for Haitians and can be translated as the cumulative causation of immigration to New York City. This type of enduring family-bond induced immigration follows Douglas S. Massey’s social capital theories of migration most closely, which focuses on the reasons of retaining family ties in the migrating country (Massey).
“[Haitian] family members, both immediate and extended, have very strong ties,” according to the SUNY New Paltz Institute for Disaster Mental Health. The significantly high percentage for the family preferences class admission enforces the notion that family is strongly valued in Haitian culture. The New Economics of Migration Theory may explain these statistics, backed by the idea that immigration decisions are made by groups of individuals, especially families. According to the theory, migration provides the family the opportunity to diversify risk and compensate for market failures and lack of public safety net programs. Therefore, a large number of Haitians have relied on family preferences to gain entry into the United States. In 2009, there is further evidence that family continues to be valued, given that there are 40,467 Haitians living in married couple families as opposed to the 6,962 living alone.
Single parenthood (especially single mothers) is not uncommon in Haitian Culture. As demonstrated in the clustered bar graph, Foreign-born Haitians have brought over this culture to their family structures in America. It is evident, in both Foreign born Haitian families and Native-born Haitian families, more households are led by females than males. This facts corresponds to the demographic numbers: As of 2009 census data, there are 53,023 foreign born Haitian Females living in NYC, which is almost 12,000 more than the number of foreign born males in the city. The number of native born Haitian males and females round to almost 23,000 in each category, with about 200 more females than males. These numbers, along with the fact that single-parent households are common in Haiti, explain why there are more female-led households.
The graph above compares the percentage of language proficiency of these nationalities in NYC with their college education rates. We endeavored to determine whether or not there would be a relationship between English proficiency and college education, since knowing English is key to integrating and doing well in school for foreign-born groups. Based on the information in these graphs provided by ACS 2009-2011, Haitians are consistently acquiring BA degrees or higher and English language proficiency at a higher percentage than Mexicans, Dominicans and Latinos for foreign-born groups in NYC. It was anticipated that foreign-born Haitians would trail behind foreign-born Jamaicans in English language proficiency rates; Jamaica’s official language is English. What astonished us was that foreign-born Jamaicans only equal foreign-born Haitians in BA degrees or higher at 19% of their respective populations in NYC. This can be interpreted as a discredit to Jamaican’s level of integration or can be indicative of Haitian’s determination to assimilate through education. Nonetheless, both foreign-born groups are trail far behind other immigrant groups in percentage such as Chinese and Whites.
Foreign and native-born Haitians have a median household income of $56,900 and $57,935, respectively. Haitians trail slightly behind Jamaicans’ median household income of $59,915 for foreign-born and $58,600 for native-born (ACS 2009-2011). The average median household income for all immigrant groups including “other” is $54,913 (ACS 2009-2011). Haitians are above that statistic and it can be said that they are above the curve in economic integration in the city for both foreign and native-born immigrants. According to The Newest New Yorkers (2004), 49 percent Haitian females and 37 percent Haitian males hold occupations categorized as “managerial” and “sales and office.” From this, it can be extrapolated that many Haitians are acquiring jobs that typically require skill, and that, by percentage, females are in contrast acquiring more skilled occupations than males. For example, 27.2 percent of Haitian females are employed in health-care support versus the only 2.9 percent of Haitian males in that occupation.
Furthermore, since a college education is linked to higher income, one may hypothesize that higher English proficiency rates would lead to higher household income. There seems to be a direct correlation between college education and income, but not between English proficiency and college education, and therefore also not between English proficiency and income. The two graphs above illustrate this – while the groups are arranged in order of increasing college education rates, the height of the blue bar signifying English proficiency rates does not appear to follow any pattern. For instance, 37% of foreign-born Haitians, aged 5 and over, are proficient in English, but only 18% of foreign-born Haitians over age 25 have a college education (BA degree or higher), while the respective percentages for the Chinese are 54% and 25%, and for Latinos 76% and 11%. This data suggests that a college education and household income are not dependent on English proficiency . Rather, it may be due to the opportunities (or lack of) and economic conditions of the group being examined. Since college costs money, it might be income that prevents or disconcerts some groups from attaining a college degree. The empirical data from the two graphs demonstrate that there is a positive correlation between education and income, and no correlation between English language proficiency and income or English language proficiency and college education .
TANF
Those receiving TANF (Temporary Assistance for Needy Families) is significantly lower amongst native born Dominicans than the other groups compared in the graph above.. The lack of need to use these programs means that Dominicans are able to sustain themselves financially, which in itself can mean integration.
The comparison between foreign born Mexicans and foreign born Dominicans was made due to the numerous cultural ties that these nations share. The correlation is further shown in the graph above, where foreign born Mexicans and foreign born Dominicans have close educational attainment statistics. A high percentage of the population did not even graduate high school and a very small percentage pursued a higher education. To add, there is a large disparity in population. There are 287,592 Dominicans over 25 and 75,295 Mexicans over the age of 25. These statistics suggests that both these immigrant groups face difficulties in assimilating and pursuing education. Ultimately, the lack of education also means a lack of high skilled labor, causing a barrier for socio-economic mobility.
Jamaican Admissions
Source: The Newest New Yorkers (2004)
When racial quotas from the 20’s were lifted and the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was passed, America was the place where Jamaicans and other immigrants wanted to be. Jamaican families could trace back their legitimacy for the family preference system. The Hart Celler Act of 1965 repealed the quota system and allowed immigrants to immigrate mainly due to family ties and skills. The family ties part of the Hart Celler Act primarily explains why over 90% of Jamaicans come through family because starting in the late nineteenth century, Jamaicans have been building close-knit communities throughout New York City primarily around the Flatbush area of Brooklyn. Most Jamaicans immigrate to be with their families – the two categories on the graph are “family preferences” and “immediate relatives.” With 93% of Jamaicans immigrating to America because of these family relationships, clearly the Jamaicans had ties here before coming, although there is a small percentage that came for other reasons, including employment, which can also explain some of the economic advantages America offered.
Educational Attainment of Foreign-Born Jamaicans in NYC
As shown in the graph, in 2000, 28.2% of the foreign-born Jamaican population graduated high school only in New York City. This is actually a higher percentage of high school graduates than NYC’s collective foreign-born population, 23.5%, and more surprisingly the native-born population, 25.1%. Although this may be due to high English proficiency compared to other immigrant groups, foreign-born Jamaicans might also be placing more emphasis on the obtainment of a high school diploma to succeed. The percentage of college attainment or more might still be low, but this may change as they integrate into society. After all, with no language barriers and high school degrees, foreign-born Jamaicans will be able to find employment much more easily and have the basic skills to climb the socio-economic ladder.
Statistical Profile on Dominicans
As seen in the first graph, based on information compiled in The Newest New Yorkers 2000, about 98 – 99% of all Dominican immigrants entered NYC through family-based visas and immediate relative preference visas while the remaining percentage of immigrants entered mostly through employment-based visas. As seen in the second graph, which depicts the means of entry for Dominican immigrants who obtained legal permanent status to NYC in 2011, 98 – 99% of the 46,109 Dominicans came to NYC on family-based and immediate relative preference visas. These results are comparable to the result depicted in the first graph, despite the fact that the sample size in the second graph is smaller than in the first graph. But bear in mind that the first graph considers all of these Dominican immigrants who came to NYC through the entire 1990s, whereas the second graph only depicts one year of this immigration (2011 Yearbook of Immigration Statistics). Nevertheless, the results are similar. Like in the first graph, the second graph shows that a majority of Dominican immigrant families come to NYC after at least one member of the family has gained permanent residency or citizenship. The New Economics of Migration Theory can explain this trend because it shows that migration is a family decision that is perpetuated by economic opportunities and lives of modern urban comforts in NYC.
Sources:
The Newest New Yorkers 2000. Rep. New York City Department of Planning, Oct. 2004. Web. 20 Mar. 2013. <http://www.nyc.gov/html/dcp/pdf/census/newest_new_yorkers_2000.pdf>.
“2011 Yearbook of Immigration Statistics.” Dhs.gov. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Sept. 2012. Web. 24 Apr. 2013. <http://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/immigration-statistics/yearbook/2011/ois_yb_2011.pdf>.
The Jamaican Language
As shown in the graph below, the proportion of foreign-born Jamaicans five years and older that are fluent in English greatly exceeds other foreign-born immigrant groups. In 2011, about 97% of foreign-born Jamaicans were found to speak English well at their homes (ACS 2009-2011.) With the exception of the language Patois or Patwa, which is a mixture of English and African dialects, Jamaica is an English-speaking country. By having English as the official language, generations of Jamaican families use English to communicate with their newly arrived family at home instead of a foreign tongue that most immigrant groups use to communicate at home. Thanks to this, Jamaicans having a strong fluency in English will lead them to having a much faster integration into American society because the linguistic barrier will be removed.
Employment Among Foreign-Born Mexicans as Compared to other Foreign-Born Groups
The working force among foreign-born Mexicans seems to be very different then other foreign-born Latino groups and all other foreign-born people living in New York City. As the data shows, the percentage of working males among foreign-born Mexicans is almost the same as the amount of males who are of working-age; this is very different than the foreign-born Latino and all foreign-born groups, who’s statistics are very similar. A larger percentage of male Mexicans are working than all other foreign-born groups. Yet female participation in the labor force among foreign-born Mexicans is a full 12% less than all other foreign-born groups. Part of this may be attributed to the fact that there are less Mexican females of working age among the foreign-born population, but still, there is a higher percentage of the foreign-born Mexican population of females not in the labor force compared to those in the labor force. The Mexican tradition of patriarchy also supports this data, yet other foreign-born Latino groups show to be more in line with other foreign-born groups, showing a trend of assimilation.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau. 2009-2011. American Community Survey, 3-year estimates 2009-2011. (IPUMS data analyzed by John Mollenkopf).
Chinese-born Immigrant Visa Admission Categories to New York City from 1990-1999
The pie charts above illustrate trends in visa category admissions to New York City. Figure A represents the percentage break down of the total foreign-born population entering New York City from 1990-1999; this graph speaks for 7,578,530 immigrants. Figure B shows a similar break down for solely Chinese-born immigrants migrating to New York City during the years 1990-1999, a population of 111,271 people. Both charts are calculated from information published in the New York City Department of Planning’s book, The Newest New Yorkers.
Comparative to the total foreign-born population, a larger percentage of Chinese immigrants were admitted to New York during this time under family preference category—nearly 20 percentage points more. Over sixty-eight percent of the Chinese foreign-born population was granted visas under a combination of the family preference and immediate relatives categories, while the total foreign-born population had 63.7 percent of their visas granted in these categories. Chinese immigration to New York during the years 1990-1999 was largely family based.