8: What storytelling devices (e.g. dialogue, description, first-person narrator, character POV, storyboarding i.e. sequencing of scenes in time, mise-en-scène, symbolic use of color…) do you find particularly effective here

Arts in NYC Forums In America 8: What storytelling devices (e.g. dialogue, description, first-person narrator, character POV, storyboarding i.e. sequencing of scenes in time, mise-en-scène, symbolic use of color…) do you find particularly effective here

Tagged: 

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1052
    Kelly
    Keymaster

    What storytelling devices (e.g. dialogue, description, first-person narrator, character POV, storyboarding i.e. sequencing of scenes in time, mise-en-scène, symbolic use of color…) do you find particularly effective here

    #1106
    Jane Ekhtman
    Participant

    In my opinion one of the more effective storytelling choices is the sequencing of scenes (when different scenes are spliced together).
    This technique first becomes noticeable when Johnny and Sara conceive their child, about 30 minutes into the movie. The movie cuts between the conception scene, Mateo, and Christy and Ariel sitting in “Heaven” as thunder begins. Whereas Johnny and Sara are seen creating a new life, Mateo is seen destroying his painting by slashing it with a knife. The sudden thunder and name of the parlor serve as a background for these two scenes, which I thought implied some sort of mysticism is linking the conception of the baby and Mateo’s life, symbolic of the cycle of life. Mateo uses “blood” to create a handprint on a clean canvas, just as Sara and Johnny finish creating the baby and the thunderstorm reaches a climax. The idea that Mateo’s fight with death is linked to the birth of the new baby is really highlighted by how fast the movie cuts between each scene and how the music builds up the suspense until everything is released.

    Later on, the same technique is used when the baby is born. We see her unresponsive and unable to cry, and then we cut to Mateo who is on the verge of death. As Mateo utters his last words, it’s almost as if he breaths his last bit of life into her, waking her up from death while he enters it. As Johnny and Sara hold the baby’s hands, the baby, Mateo, Johnny, and Sara all seem to be connected by some mystical force, until Mateo and the baby both let go, finally descending into their worlds. Once again, the sequencing of films helped emphasize the connection between life and death, as well as this new baby and Mateo.

    Another effective storytelling device was the utilization of character POV, specifically with Christy and her camcorder. At one moment, Johnny and Sara are having a conflict about whether to tell the girls about the baby’s health. Through Christy’s camcorder, we see Sara lie that the baby is kicking, while Johnny tells the girls he can’t feel anything. We see a zoom in of Johnny and Sara’s faces; there’s anger in her face and disappointment in his. The use of Christy’s camcorder as a POV should theoretically represent childhood innocence, but her view is often tainted because of the reality of the conflicts her family faces. I think this scene help show how mature Christy is, and builds up the tension between Johnny and Sara as well.
    (430 words).

    #1108
    abassadams
    Participant

    @Jane Ekhtman
    I like that you mentioned Christy’s camcorder. I think that you’re right, it does serve to show her point of view in many of these situations. The other method I saw her perspective represented through is her three wishes she believes she has from her brother’s angel. These three wishes, and the scarcity with which they’re used, indirectly shows the audience what Christy values. She uses her first wish to “save” the family’s rent money at the street-fair game, by wishing that her father’s throw would be accurate. This shows that she’s perhaps inherited some of her father’s more logical focus on money and safety. In her wish, however, we also see a contrast between her POV and her father’s. Her father is the one arguably acting like a child- he gambles their rent money and doesn’t seem to be able to stop himself in the game. Christy’s POV is the more “mature” one, desperately hoping the game ends with her family keeping their money, and using one of her wishes to that extent. It’s a strange shift in perspective, from what we usually see in the movie. I think, however, Christy also clearly values her family and their emotions, and we also see a POV which is very family oriented. She uses her final wish for her father, asking Frankie to let him “say goodbye” and move on. In an extremely touching moment, we see the way Christy has always valued her family first, and places her father’s emotional wellbeing above anything else the wish could be used for. By letting us see what Christy uses her wishes for, the movie does a great job of presenting her point of view to the audience.

    #1110
    annakaur
    Participant

    I also thought that the sequencing of scenes was a strong storytelling device throughout the film: the conception scene, especially. Watching that scene, there were so many emotions jumbled into one tiny part of the movie; there was love and passion from Johnny and Sara, there was anger and hopelessness from Mateo, and then there was innocence and oblivion from the daughters. I thought it was interesting that the director chose to juxtapose the creation of life with the destroying of art. The scenes of the girls at the ice cream parlor seemed to serve as a very neutral, balancing side to such strong, emotion-filled scenes from Johnny, Sara, and Mateo. I also enjoyed the use of the camcorder throughout the film to show Christy’s POV. I definitely believe there was innocence found in Christy and her sister from the way they treated Mateo without prejudice, but I also agree that Christy’s view was tainted from the trauma she’s experienced. She was evidently the maturer sister, which may have been impacted by everything she’s been through and being the older sister. Overall, I think this was a very insightful analysis, Jane!

    #1115
    Varin
    Participant

    The brilliance of Jim Sheridan’s narrative film, In America, comes not from bold symbolism or a larger than life plot, but from its subtle acknowledgement of the personal mental, physical, and emotional toll of surrendering identity in the face of the first world standard. Indeed, a sad reality many immigrants face is the inevitable loss of parts of their culture and philosophy during the processes of self-transformation and universal acclimation. But key to this film is the heartfelt, individual crusade taken by each member of the Sullivan family, as exhibited by the first person perspective of Christy, whose reserved sentiments and naive optimism characterize the narrative as a whole. The very first glimpse of the characters is through Christy’s camcorder, which is the literal embodiment of the raw and non-discriminating perspective marked by her innocence and bewilderment. Christy is the ideal narrator for this story; she bridges the gap between the past and present. Both the past and future are distant to her, but she brings them together through her memories of Frankie and the three wishes he bestowed. Christy’s silence upon being questioned by the border officer perhaps signals timidity, distrust, or detachment, but we are quick to understand her passive dissent of the seemingly hostile and foreboding new life that America holds.

    In the film, the camera makes itself known by individualizing shared experiences; the characters are cleverly blocked in each scene, with the principal subject in the foreground while the other characters remain out of focus. Christy herself says that people in New York all seem like actors. Nonetheless, she finds solace through her observations, which gradually reveal a growing sense of maturity. Christy’s newfound independence serves as an indication of her dynamic persona; at the end of the film she manages to put her camcorder down and embraces the present. So effective is her emotional storytelling that we are able to feel the immense void left by Frankie’s loss even before truly understanding the circumstances of his death, and are capable of letting go of him without intense retrospect. With the firsthand perspective of a child we are challenged to resist the inevitable routines of judgment, persuasion, and animosity spawned from the irreverent plateaus of stereotypes and moral ambiguities that consume the American social landscape. The blind nature of this approach to the environment is invaluable, for without it, neither Christy nor her sister would have befriended Mateo and maintained a deep connection with him that irrevocably altered his outlook until his very last breath. With Christy’s first person perspective comes a sense of refined silence; the most touching moments from In America arise from the beauty of human interactions in a strange and desolate world.

    Word Count: 450.

    • This reply was modified 3 years, 9 months ago by Varin.
    #1156
    Javier Jbara
    Participant

    @Varin

    I find your interpretation of the camcorder as symbolic of Christy’s “non discriminating perspective” as a unique observation. I think many times the physical props themselves are taken for face value. This is probably because in everyday life people do not look at the symbolic value of their items but for the functionality of the items. However, film is art and not reality so each of these items was carefully chosen to represent an element of the story. What other props do you think have a symbolic meaning as opposed to a functional one? For example, I would say that the air conditioner was a function of the story because of the intense NYC summer. On the contrary, Matteo’s paint is symbolic of his transformation through the movie into a person with depth.

    #1164
    Leonidas Kalpaxis
    Participant

    I agree with everyone that Christy’s narration is key to the success of the movie’s story telling. It’s interesting that Christy is using a camcorder to record events, as if looking at the events separate from the time and place, yet all while remaining present. This could be seen as somewhat of a parallel to the many sorts of looming shadows over the characters in the movie. Such shadows include the recent death of Frankie but also the pressing need at the beginning of the movie for the Sullivan family to find a means to successfully survive. Similarly, Christy’s perception of the events taken place are viewed through the camcorder, and we the audience are looking at what Christy sees. Thus the audience is much more engaged in the story.

    #1172
    Kristen Aloysius
    Participant

    @Jane, your response was really insightful, and it definitely made me reconsider some of my initial impressions of the movie and its characters. As you said, the frequent cutting between simultaneous scenes emphasized the mysticism and cyclic nature of life and death that was developed through the film. In addition, in terms of Christy’s narration and camcorder, I previously thought that her perspective captured the innocence of childhood. However, after reading your reflection and looking back on the film, I see how easily she discerned and took on the conflicts within her family. This was upsetting to watch but, at the same time, it was essential in revealing the reality of the situation the family lived in. It also made me wonder how the film might have appeared from a third person omniscient point of view.

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.