5. Choose a secondary character & define his/her/their role in the story.

Arts in NYC Forums In America 5. Choose a secondary character & define his/her/their role in the story.

Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1060
    Kelly
    Keymaster

    Choose a secondary character & define his/her/their role in the story.

    #1127
    Zara McPartland
    Participant

    Frankie is a looming shadow, blanketing the past, present, and future of the Sullivan family. Despite having died before the film’s narrative begins, he heavily influences the mindset of the main characters. The experience of losing a young child weighs on the family, constantly invading their happiness. This grief is emphasized by each intricate detail, to the point where you can almost visualize the deceased child.

    When tensions rise, Christy always holds Ariel; this behavior is a physical reminder of life and safety. She wraps herself around her younger sister and speaks in reassuring tones. This is Christy trying to do all of what she couldn’t do for Frankie now in the present. Her guilt hangs unresolved and unnoticed until her meaningful conversation with Johnny.

    In the movie, there is emphasis on Ariel’s struggles with transitioning from Ireland to America. This emphasis disguises how the young girl copes with her brother’s death; many of her problems and complaints are relegated to issues with the move, rather than the culmination of frustration and sorrow. She releases some of her burdensome emotions at the ice cream parlor, but the moment is fleeting and relatively meaningless. Ariel struggles with these emotions until she finds proper outlets, such as spending time with Mateo.

    Sarah is traumatized by the loss of Frankie; she consistently struggles to reconcile personal guilt and blame throughout the movie. When pregnant, she is consumed by the desperate instinct to protect her child. Sarah is persistent: she is adamant in carrying the child to full-term even if it could kill her. She becomes extremely protective and defensive, creating strife between her and Johnny. Sarah’s desire to provide her family with a child overwhelms any sense of self-preservation, demonstrating the depth of grief created by Frankie’s death. In an attempt to fill the void left by Frankie, she willingly risks leaving her two daughters motherless. This gamble is a great source of anxiety and frustration, only relenting after the child survives.

    Johnny turns his anguish into perseverance; he relentlessly tries to provide for his family, only to feel the cumulative effects of crippling failure. He fails to save his son, he fails to provide the children with a safe environment, he fails to land an acting job, the list goes on and as a result, Johnny withdraws from his family. He becomes absorbed by his feelings of incompetence, and even his daughters notice the shift in their father’s demeanor.

    Frankie’s death defines the Sullivan family; he influences their dispositions, fears, and mentalities. While not physically present in the storyline, the consequences of his death resonate through each family member. Frankie’s role is intangible, yet it is one of the most compelling forces in the film.

    #1144
    Liam Lynch
    Participant

    I hope it’s ok if I diverge slightly from the prompt, but I want to discuss two characters whom I found to be connected in such a way that it would be incomplete to talk about only one of them. Frankie and Mateo, while the former only shows up physically once, and the latter is on death’s door for a good amount of time, are the two most influential characters in In America.

    In this sense they are both secondary or auxiliary characters. They are largely defined by their illness and its impact on the family, as the movie is from their perspective. Frankie’s was in the past, and now they are dealing with his death, each in different ways. It ravaged John, and he is unrecognizable, his wife needs to have the baby because she feels like she can’t let the same thing happen again, and Christie is forced to be strong, for the whole family, but most of all for her little sister. At the end, Christie realizes that she can’t remember Frankie by his illness.

    Mateo is a beacon of mottled light for the family, but he soon begins to feel like a tragic déjà vu. However, this is not the case, and instead in his death Mateo helps them deal with Frankie’s, and as they get their closure with him, they get theirs with Frankie, as they wave goodbye to both of them up on the moon.

    This final goodbye is only possible through the other main influence of the characters, which is their magic. Immediately as Christie narrates, she mentions the three wishes that Frankie gave her, and she uses them sequentially throughout the movie. Mateo also teaches them magic, when he talks about speaking to ghosts or when he instills confidence in Sarah that the baby will bring good luck. John is angered by this as while all the other characters have the ability to believe, he has been made completely un-superstitious by Frankie’s death. Then, on the precipice of calamity, John asks him for a miracle, and everything falls into place. Most significantly, as he lies dying, he chants and transmits his own life into the baby.

    The magic of these two characters is extremely important to the movie, but it also raises the question of its own truthfulness. Are these acts of magic real or imagined? They may be just a coping mechanism to deal and counter with the harshness of reality with some imagination. In fact, this is their function for Christie, as they give her a feeling of control, and this is also the function of their goodbye to the moon. On the other hand, the real effect of magic does not necessitate that they are really imagined, and as the movie frames them, often magic is more plausible than plain coincidence.

    But it doesn’t matter. As Sarah says, none of this is real, not even what is in our heads is real, the most real thing to us. To a certain extent you can choose what you think, or what you believe, as is the case with magic. And we see that when characters believe, things are magical, whether or not magic is the cause of their nature. The movie ends on a fitting note from this respect, as Christie acknowledges that we, the audience, are the true reality, and she is to us as Frankie (or Mateo) is to her. Thus, as they made her believe in magic, maybe we should believe in magic from her, as if we believe it becomes real.

    #1145
    alexander
    Participant

    You have an amazing point Liam! Truth, lies, magic, none of it matters as much as its effect it has on others. The lemon drops might not have magical healing properties but that’s no indicator it didn’t help Mateo feel better. Often times our own perception of an objects effect is greater in contribution than the object in question. When I was younger, I used to have a lucky pencil. Whenever I was taking an important exam, I would use it. The confidence it granted me likely helped me time doubting myself. The pencil itself was just a regular pencil which I had fooled myself into believing it lucky, but in the end the lie ended up being a comfort to me. In the film the most opposed to white lies was Johnny. Johnny often outright refused to provide or believe in these comforts, even when it was to calm his own children. He was painfully aware of reality, unwilling to take comfort in fantasy- an unorthodox mindset for an actor to be sure. When they all are waving goodbye, it was Johnny who had initiated the white lie. After so much stress over financial burdens Johnny had accepted Mateo’s magic, the strength of comfort, and finally said goodbye to Frankie. So, I agree. Truth, white lies, or anything in between. We’ll never be able to understand reality so why not allow refuge in fantasies?

    #1153
    coryweng
    Participant

    I agree with you Zara. I believe Frankie plays an important role in the movie despite not being physically there. Even crossing the border, we see how the family was still struggling in knowing how many children they have. There is definitely a void in the family, with Frankie gone and the family has to deal with this loss, which will have a perpetual impact on the family. Frankie has been and will always have a role in the family’s story. Frankie also impacts the family dynamics and relationships between Johnny and his wife as well as his daughters. Maybe that’s why Johnny is very close to his daughters and so supportive of them.

    #1167
    elange
    Participant

    Hi Zara,
    Frankie is not a secondary character but the main character of the story, so much so that the movie title could have (and I think should have) included Frankie. He is always the elephant in the room, and even at the end of the movie when Johnny finally allows himself to grieve, Frankie is still a hard name for the whole family to say out loud. Frankie is integral to every character’s story arc, even Matteo who is not even related to Frankie. He feels for the Sullivan family, especially since they are grieving their loss of Frankie and he is grieving his own soon and inevitable death. Also, the movie can be split into sections by who is taking the blame for Frankie’s death, as guilt is tossed around from Sarah to Johnny and even to Cristy. He even contributes to the story from the grave through “granting” wishes for the family such as Johnny winning the ball-throw. Protagonist himself, Frankie is the story of In America.

    #1168
    Katherine Hunt
    Participant

    Liam, I like the fact that you tied both Frankie and Mateo together in your post. Aside from how they ended up being connected at the end, with the death of Mateo and Johnny’s attempt at letting go of how he feels at fault for Frankie’s death, I never connected Frankie and Mateo as characters throughout the movie. As they were moving in, the family certainly was scared and definitely felt out of place in their dilapidated apartment building full of unfriendly people and drug addicts. While he may have appeared very threatening at first, Mateo was certainly the “beacon of mottled light” that you describe him as. He made the family feel more in place and at home. I like the question that you posed about the magic between the characters. Though I did feel like Frankie’s “magic” was too coincidental to be purely imagined, I think the belief in Frankie as another beacon of hope just helped to explain some moments that went right for the family when they were destined to have gone terribly wrong.

Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.