World of Dance Tour

Over the weekend, I was invited to my best friend Denasia’s open dance rehearsal in Brooklyn. She is currently one of the members of a dance crew named Vanity Force. She, along with six other members, performs in shows and participates in competitions. After watching what was a truly amazing and captivating rehearsal, I was inspired to not only continue following my own dance passions, but also to research the competition that she is participating in next weekend in California. (World of Dance)
“World of Dance Tour is the largest International Urban Dance Competition” that takes places in 14 major cities across the globe. San Diego, Boston, Chicago, and Hawaii are just a few of the locations in which events will be held. Although the title of the tour is World of Dance, don’t let it fool you into thinking that it is only dance performances because you’ll be inaccurate. The tour also presents fashion, music, and celebrity performances and allows over 500 select fashion brands to sell, promote, and showcase their newest designs to over 5,000 attendees per event.
Doing this research, seeing my best friend prepare for the tour, and my own interests in art, dance, and fashion make me crave attending this event. If only I had the opportunity to go!

Link: http://www.worldofdancetour.com/san-diego-10152011/

Metropolitan Museum of Art Reaction

The Metropolitan Museum of Art is most certainly not a museum that a person can visit only once. Due to the large amount of works and its extravagance, it calls for further exploration and thinking. The MET is different than most museums because its entire collection is personally owned. This means that all of the works found in the exhibits are the MET’s. It is contrary to what other museums do, which is borrow art works for their exhibits. The exhibit that I recently attended was one that showcased the work of Frans Hals.
Frans Hals (1582/83 – 1666) was a 17th century Dutch Painter who specialized in portraiture and genre painting. Genre painting, which depicts every day scenes, was revolutionary in his era. Hals primarily created individual portraits using oil on canvas and, in fact, he stopped painting every day scenes after 1630 and created only portraits for the rest of his career. Many of these portraits were displayed in this exhibit.
My three favorite paintings created by Hals are: Merrymakers at Shrovetide (1616), Boy with a Lute (1625), and Portrait of a Bearded Man with a Ruff (1625).
Each painting has its distinguishing characteristics that add to their value. Merrymakers at Shrovetide is actually one of the few paintings that have more than one figure illustrated. It is humorous and symbolic. It expresses lost potential regarding amorous relationships, jokes against religion, and the enjoyment of life and celebrations. Hals does a great job of showing his liking of “in the moment” art. Boy with a Lute shows continuous enjoyment by portraying a boy that is calling for another drink and playing his instrument. Last but not least, Portrait of a Bearded Man with a Ruff was my all-time favorite painting done by Hals. It was very realistic, sincere, detailed, textured, and emotion evoking. The figure seems very apologetic and as an observer, you can’t help but wonder what the story behind the painting is.
Hals shows off his skills of layering in this painting, as well as others, by exposing the mid layer of the painting. He also uses soft backlight on all of his portraits in order to emphasize and focus on the model of the painting. After this exhibit, I came to appreciate Hals and recognize him as a talented artist.
After exploring Hals and his work, I decided to visit another exhibit that displayed art from the same century. This enabled me to observe the differences and similarities between different artists and their work from the same time period. The exhibit I chose to visit was a collection from the artist Chih Lo Lou (17th century: China). The focus of this exhibit was calligraphy art and hanging scrolls that were done with ink and vases and sculptures. Comparing the two exhibits, I noticed that both are extremely detailed and they both show the artist’s perspective of beauty. Frans found celebrations to show life’s greatness while Lou thought life’s greatness was found in nature. Differences were found in their focuses, their media, and their philosophies. Both artists created works that were phenomenal and representational of the world around them. This experience gave me some valuable insight, but essentially it raised more questions that I will need to pursue in future visits to the museum and I look forward to doing so.

Drive: Movie Reaction

On September 16, 2011, I witnessed a genial work of art, which also happened to be a movie. I previously heard good reviews about the movie Drive but I decided that I needed to experience it for myself. The furthest thing I feel is regret for seeing it because it was phenomenal from beginning to end.
Even from the beginning, the movie has an element of suspense and catches the audience’s attention. The very first thing I noticed about the movie besides for the pink lettering, which still raises questions for me, was the extremely clear and vivid picture. It was like nothing I’ve ever seen before! The beginning depicts the persona of the main character, played by Ryan Gosling. He portrays a very modest and direct character whose living springs from driving, hence the title of the movie. The plot begins with a slow romance between the main characters. At some points their shyness and awkward silences bothered me but overall the romance was adorable. It was definitely more realistic than those movie romances that try too hard.
As the movie progresses, we see issues start to arise and foreshadowing come into light. By foreshadowing, I’m referring to the meeting of the main character and the investor. The main character doesn’t want to shake hands when greeting because he claims that his hands are dirty (from driving), however the investor replies that his hands are dirty too. In the investor’s case, it’s a metaphor for the immoral lifestyle that he has lived, which later will become evident. There is also the issue present in the beginning of the movie revolving around the romance. The female character has a husband that was in prison when they met but has now returned. Surprisingly enough, the male character (Ryan Gosling) does not pursue despite his attraction for the girl. He is not the type to create problems. He only tries to find solutions. The main character even attempts to assist the husband in escaping the trouble that he finds himself in. He was not obligated to help and it didn’t give him any benefits but he chose to do so out of his own good will and to protect the woman he liked and her child. Unfortunately, his attempt to help was shot down, literally. That scene was like opening Pandora’s box. After the first death, everyone was dropping dead. The violence was so overwhelming that it brought tears to my eyes but it was a necessary part of the movie. To be honest, I never would’ve predicted the strategies and aggression that the main character used throughout the movie, but it did help him accomplish the mission. Without giving too much away, I will conclude by saying that the ending of the movie is quite surprising. It leaves the audience to infer their own conclusion. If you want a movie that will keep you on the edge of your seat the whole time, then this movie is for you!

Requiem For A Dream: Clint Mansell as discussed in class and one of my all time favorites.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vl5McGN2L-E

When you showed us the Mozart requiem, this piece instantly popped into my mind due to the similarities and due to my personal interest. Both pieces convey a strong sense of emotion through music, however the Mozart piece included chorus while this piece was purely instrumental. I would love to hear opinions on this audio clip so please feel free to add comments!