In the opera and play version of The Barber of Seville, the plot and scenes remained relatively same. However, one difference in scene is where guards/officers come to check out what the ruckus is when the Count is disguised as a drunken soldier. This scene is shown in the opera version of The Barber of Seville, and in this scene, the Count reveals his identity to the soldiers. (Slayford-Wei)

Also, at the end of the opera version, everyone’s happiness seems to be the main focus. In the opera’s ending, Bartholo is satisfied with the dowry he will be receiving from the Count. (Schaffer) In the play’s ending, Bartholo clearly states that he does not want the money, therefore not being happy in the end. These two different versions with different endings, reveal different characteristics in the characters. Bartholo in the play is shown as someone who loves Rosine not for her wealth, whereas in the opera he does not seem to love her at all since he is satisfied with receiving her dowry.

I believe that the different endings were influenced by the type of genre they are. I know plays as being more tragic from reading Shakespeare, so Beaumarchais’ ending with Bartholo being the only sad character had little effect on me. On the other hand, I view opera’s as more energetic because of their singing. Their presence and energy on stage gave me the feeling that there would be a happy ending for everyone.