Bold Differences

The play of the Barber of Seville and the opera are essentially the same. However, the differences between the two lie in the direction. The opera, due to its musical nature, is much more bold in characters and more animated. The video of Figaro’s entrance made me feel like Figaro was a much bolder character than in the play. In the play Figaro felt more like a whimsical jester, while the opera makes him feel like a more pronounced, witty man. In addition, some of the most obvious changes are the introduction of some characters in different scenes. Berta was not in some of the scenes in the play. Also, Fiorello was not seen in the play version.

Along with the introduction of Fiorello in the beginning, the whole scene in the beginning was different form the play. The Count had his own band playing music in the square, and it made him seem much more courageous in his actions (in the beginning). In the play, he seemed less direct in the opening scene. Also, the Count’s behavior is different in other parts. During the ending scene, the Count pulled a pistol on Bazile to convince him to sign. This was actually alarming to me because in the play he was more refined by giving Bazile a purse of money.

The last difference I noticed was the ending. The opera ending felt more like it was summarizing the love between Rosine and the Countm, while the play had a more witty and funny end by ending it with Figaro saying that what happened was a “Futile Precaution”

Art serving as a textbook?

In Robin Pogrebin article When Applying the Paint Was Spreading the News she discusses how in the past painting was not only a form of art but also a form of recounting history. The painting he was referring to is Return of the 69th (Irish) Regiment, N.Y.S.M. From the Seat of War by Louis Lang. It is a painting that depicts a bunch of men coming back to new york from a fight during the civil war. The painting was found in pieces in 1997 and it was not until 2006 that the decision was made to fix it and put it on display. The painting is finally ready and will be on display at New-York Historical Society’s renovated building, which reopens on Veterans’ Day making it the perfect place to display this painting about men coming back from war. 

The issue I want to talk about is that Pogrebin talks about how “paintings were expressive and descriptive, tools not only to evoke emotions, but also to do the very real work of simply documenting and recounting history.” This is a very interesting idea, I think that this may be a reason we don’t have as many famous painters in recent history. I think good painters need inspiration and nothing can serve as better inspiration than the real world. I think that up and coming painters should try and gain there inspiration from real world situations like painters of old did.   

Friendships

Eric Grode review’s Sylvan Oswald’s “Nightlands” in the article Astrologist Meets Wig Seller in Simmering ’60s. He begins by describing the setting of the play, Oswald’s hometown of Philadelphia during the 1960s, which was a time of racial tension and uneasiness. Grode mentions that one problem that the play has is that it tries to jam too many stories and styles into the production. He then goes on to give the reader a small background of the production. The play is about two main characters who develop an interesting an unusual relationship. Netta Klein, a Jewish wig saleswomen, seeks “respite from her stultifying marriage,” by heading to a predominantly black section of the city for astrology lessons from Ivy Silver, the black host of an astrology show on the radio. The play portrays the development of their relationship during a time in which these relationships were frowned upon.
One thing about the play that really intrigues me is the development of a relationship between people on the opposite sides of the spectrum. Sometimes even when certain things may be right it is hard to pursue them when others view it as unorthodox. However, these two characters do not succumb to that “pressure” and develop a friendship that doesn’t follow the norm of society.

Comparing Play and Opera versions of The Barber of Seville

The play version of The Barber of Seville and the opera version are similar. Both have the same plot of Count Almaviva courting Rosine and putting on disguises to be able to talk to her. In both versions, the Count is assisted by Figaro. In the opera version, Figaro seems more animated. He sings more in the opera version. Another difference between the two versions is that in the play, the female character that the Count pursues  is named Rosine, while in the opera version her name is Rosina. There is also a chorus present in the opera version that is not present in the play. The opera is much more musical than the play. In the opera version, the characters sing their lines, but in the play they read their lines. Both versions deal with fate and how men control it. In both versions, the Count and Figaro are doing things to get Rosine to marry the Count rather than letting fate play itself out. Both versions have the same theme of true love winning in the end. The city of Seville is used more in the opera version. In the play, most of the action takes place inside Bartholo’s house or just outside of it, while the opera uses the city of Seville more. Both versions were very interesting to read and both are well regarded.

Van Gogh’s killer

There is a new book coming out next week about Van Gogh’s death called “Van Gogh: The Life”. The article by Pogrebin called “New Biography Says Van Gogh Did Not Kill Himself” talks about Van Gogh’s suspicious death. This book by Steven Naifeh and Gregory White Smith is a biography of the famous artist Vincent Van Gogh and it questions whether Van Gogh really committed suicide or was murdered. The article claims “the bullet entered his upper abdomen ‘from an unusual, oblique angle-not straight on as one would expect in a suicide.’” The article also states “no gun was ever found.” that “Van Gogh had no knowledge of guns” and finally that he never left a suicide note as most people would do.  They say that Van Gogh’s friend’s teenage brother shot Van Gogh, but Van Gogh never accused the boy because “he saw no reason to punish anyone for bringing it about.”(Pogrebin)

I think that this article is a little suspicious that this evidence is coming out so late. Van Gogh died in 1890 and finally after 120 years have we figured out that he didn’t commit suicide. If this is true I wonder how it’s going to change people’s perception of Van Gogh. Van Gogh has now become some sort of saint in my eyes because he was able to forgive his enemy even though he tried to kill him. He was able to accept death and at the same time say there is no reason to punish anyone for bringing it about. (Pogrebin) Also there is a wide belief that “Wheatfield with Crows”, one of the late works signifies his loneliness and sadness. The painting “Wheatfield with Crows” is a somber painting and demonstrates Van Gogh’s misery. Van Gogh may have wanted to die, which is why he didn’t turn in his killer.

From Despair to Delight: Visuals from the Congolese

Every culture has its own enriched history and tale. In the dance recital entitled, “More More More…Future,” the audience is moved to understand and feel the struggles of the Congolese in Africa. Claudia La Rocco writes a detailed and inspiring review on this influential two-hour piece of art at the Kitchen in Chelsea, NYC. Choreographer Faustin Linyekula take the audience on an emotional rollercoaster of a journey through the Congo and daily life of its people. From the traditional sounds of Congolese music to the elaborate costumes of the dancers, the show is both captivating and touching.

Claudia La Rocco does a wonderful job highlighting the grace, passion, and vision of the recital, leaving the reader with an abundance of heartfelt questions and overwhelming emotion. One of the songs in the piece reads, “rather than a glorious past, let us have a future.” Such a phrase sheds light on the depth of despair and sorrow felt throughout Africa, as well as the brutal realities of life. However, it leaves the reader and the audience with a faint sliver of hope. The future may bring peace, happiness, and a better tomorrow. Overall, the review for ” More More More…Future” creates a certain fascination and desire to view the piece of work and see the images and themes portrayed by Claudia La Rocco come to life.

Being Different

Being different always has its perks. An artist in Japan known as Tabaimo creates art that is quite different from what Japan is used to: kawaii art or cute art. In Cutting Through Cute to the Real Japan by Carol Kino, she talks about how different her art is from what everyone is used to.

Tabaimo is a very humble woman, she doesn’t think that her art is extremely special, despite being featured at many museums and exhibits. She stills attends Kyoto University of Art, a very famous art school in Japan. The author says that Tabaimo is found looking like everybody else during the installation of her art. She says that she didn’t start out wanting to do art. However, she eventually stumbled into the field and began to create art.

Many of Tabaimo’s work garners attention from many Japanese people. Many of her pieces of art are very interestingly made and many people are surprised that it came from Tabaimo. Her new art was very creative. Many of them involved normal things that people see. Her art developed a lot after she began. They became more detailed and more abstract and she got better. Art is always changing; modern art has made such significant changes that people aren’t sure if it’s considered art anymore.

New Fusion

Whether it is from London to Tokyo, or Los Angeles to New York, art absorbs the stylistic and cultural influences from where they originate.  However, these styles are not immune to change, and that is the underground rapper ASAP Rocky’s quest. In Jon Caramanica’s article he talks about and highlights the upcoming debut mixtape of ASAP Rocky, as well as ASAP Rocky’s rap style.

While this article is not a review, Caramanica basically analyzes and compliments ASAP Rocky’s unique mission to break free from rooted styles of NYC rap and to integrate rap styles from all over the country. He emphasizes that, for generations, NYC rap has donated its style to several rappers through the US, but now is the time to take these evolved styles from around the country and improve on NYC’s rap scene. Caramanica thinks that ASAP Rocky’s mission will change the future of the NY rap scene.

Although I am not a fan of ASAP Rocky’s music, his ideas of integrating new styles of rap to create a new New York style are very interesting. If art experiences the merging of more cultural styles, or even new techniques, then art will evolve and grow into something fresh. Would it not be interesting to see a fusion of Kabuki theater and something western? Currently, I think we can see a similar growth in art with the fusion of traditional art and modern technology. From musicals to art installations, technology creates new artistic experiences – something fresh like ASAP Rocky’s own music.

However, I do have one problem with ASAP Rocky’s idea. Many people respect and enjoy the New York style, and there are many people that do not welcome change. Also, according to the article, ASAP Rocky’s mixtape has many song styles, except one from New York. Is it right to suggest that this is “progress”?

Paradance

When one experiences happiness, another expects a smile. When one feels shy and holds his tongue, another expects inward submersion and a crooked posture. Case in point, society often correlates emotion and/or speech with body language. Gia Kourlas’ Telling A Tale Using The Body’s Language dismally relates the showcase of Ralph Lemon, an “elusive artist” who “thrives on producing more than just a singular work but also a web of ideas that splinter off to awaken more possibilities [such as the disassociation of speech and movement].”
The title of the film, “A Paradance: The inherent protest and émigré nature of performance (and how it could belong nowhere),” plays off the term “paratext,” which refers to “the materials in a work that accompany the book, from the introduction to jacket blurbs.” In a theatrical sense, the “paradance” is the development of stage elements vital to the plot. Kourlas spares no detail in describing the oddities of Paradance, such as the “image of a dog” that “appears on one side of the auditorium, a giraffe on the other.” Kourlas, however, fails to elaborate on the significance of the animals and leaves readers questioning their purpose. Mr. Lemon takes the stage thereafter and “talks about the body and what goes into creating the language of movement, saying one thing and then giving it a twist.” Yet again, Kourlas comes up short as she neglects to illustrate an example of Lemon’s speech and subsequent “twist.”
Holistically, the review manages to perplex and exacerbate; it requires several readings and vaguely communicates the main ideas of the performance. The plot remains murky, at best, and the obscure reference to “Meditation,” a similar film, proves superfluous. Lastly, I’m not sure whether to refer to Paradance as a film, performance, or showcase, yet I have written all three to avoid potential criticism.

 

Individual Conferences sign up

My office is on the 7th floor, room 235. If the department door is closed call 646-312-4066 so that I can let you in.

Oct. 13 @2PM Abhinaya Swaminathan

Oct. 17 @1PM Ngawang Tsetan; @4PM Semyon Toybis; @4:30 Jessica Lin; @5:30 SharonLin

Oct. 18 @3PM Quan Vu; @3:30 Devon Khan; @4PM Camille Studer

Oct. 20 @12:30PM Serge Sorokin; @1PM Mark Stone; @1:30OM Derek Ku; @2PM Steven Sklyarevskiy

Oct. 24 @1PM Kenny Vu; @4PM Michael Zaslowsky

Oct. 26 @1PM Raymond Wang; @4PM Anna Mai; @4:30 Keith Stegner

Oct. 31 @4PM Sion Siyanov; @ 4:30 Isadore Betesh