Le nozze di Figaro Review

Le nozze di Figaro is a funny and captivating storyline, transformed seamlessly and beautifully into poetic prose, and performed effusively and impressively at the Metropolitan Opera.

The storyline is not a cliche romance or tragedy, as many (I) would expect coming into an opera written so long ago. Instead, there are many comical events, many of which include miscues and ironic discoveries, such as those between the Count and Cherubino, who was masterful at playing a jester of sorts, drawing out many of the audiences laughs while not being too “over-the-top”.

The set was brilliant. While being clean and classical, it did not fail to engage the viewer with its vibrance. Like many other features of the performance, it was appealing and engaging, but most importantly served its purpose in complementing and magnifying the characters and their situations. With sets often cluttered with people hiding and running about, simplicity was absolutely a well thought out route.

The ending though, is a poor one. The Count spends over 3 hours betraying the Countess, and then, as if with the flick of a switch, the audience is expected to believe he has fallen back in love with the Count. Though playing up the satirical aspect of the opera, it is none the less too much of letdown for the casual viewer.

The tone is one of melancholy and lightheartedness, save for a few select moments magnifying a few of the characters emotion. The most notable of which takes place in Act 3, in which the Countess wonders what happened to the love between her and the Count and laments at its loss. Her voice is low and her movements work in complete synchronization with her singing, as she slowly drops to the floor, taking the viewer down with her in sympathy, as her voice drips with sorrow. Indeed the performances of the Countess and Rosanna were spectacular, both of whom playing their emotions with an understated tastefulness that was truly convincing.

The ending though, is a poor one. The Count spends over 3 hours betraying the Countess, and then, as if with the flick of a switch, the audience is expected to believe he has fallen back in love with the Count. Though playing up the satirical aspect of the opera, it is none the less too much of letdown for the casual viewer.

Nonetheless, I would certainly recommend Figaro to anybody, both experienced opera-goers and the not, as its greatest strength is its ability to entertain, a quality brought out by its comical and lighthearted nature.

Housekeeping

I was browsing through out Media Library and noticed that there are some duplicate images uploaded to our site. I’ve deleted any duplicates, but in the future, make sure that you only upload the image once. If you made a mistake when uploading, make sure to delete the old one before adding a new one. This will help us conserve space.

Also, while you may use the Media Library to upload your images, the NextGen gallery is a preferred method if only because it allows you to keep your images in specific folders and makes it easier to keep track of where things are. Also, if someone else had uploaded an image that you want to use, you can easily locate it and use it, rather than upload a duplicate (case in point: the Hassam images).  Just follow the instructions posted here on how to upload images using NextGen: http://eportfolios.macaulay.cuny.edu/weinroth2009/class-site-faq/#uploadimage

I know this seems tedious (and that I’m being anal!), but I want to make sure the website is well-organized and works for all of you!

9/24 Lecture notes


American Culture From Mozart to Bernstein and back

Definition of “Great” Art

Differences and similarities between Musical Theater and Opera

Bernstein on Opera:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ni0epRutZZI

Bernstein on Musical Theater:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ra3zyMcTKX4

Bernstein West Side Story rehersal:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-i0IXn9M6Q&feature=related

In our Book:
“STREET MUSIC” p.49 -61 Will Eisner “New York The Big City”

Assigned work:

*Check the Alvin Ailey site before our event on the 3rd.  Be familiar with the history of the company.
*How to read a score (Due October 8th in class after our visit to the Jazz museum)
*Write a review to post of either the Opera or the Modern Ballet we have seen (Due October 14th)

Musical Experience Project

Select a short musical section from the music of the Marriage of Figaro. Either an Aria or a passage. Look through the score and see if you can match the music score to the sound recording. Be prepared to guide us on the page or on the screen. You may get into groups of up to Five to collaborate.
You can chose to use a DVD, CD, a Library score book or an on-line score library (Canadian).

Renaissance Art

Renaissance Art finds itself emerging between the 14th and 16th centuries A.D. Within this period the Renaissance movement itself, along with all that lead up to the actuality of the movement influences all of its art. Painters and sculptors are influenced by humanism and secularism respectively. Unlike the Middle Ages (period before it) human thought was focused away from God, heavenly saints, and it began to examine the natural aspect of living on Earth. As Greek and Roman scientific methods began to be revived, artists began to be perceived as knowledgeable, respected figures in society and no longer artisans or craftsmen. A profession in the visual arts called for knowledge of mathematical perspective, optics, geometry, and anatomy. It was this exploration of fields in science, biology, architecture, mathematics, and engineering lead art of the Renaissance to be distinct from its predecessors. By solely using “secular humanism” as a means to identify art of this period we see changes in the depiction of saints and/or individuals of religious importance where halos become to disappear and the size of such figures actually are more scaled to look like ordinary people.

During the Renaissance we also see paintings transform in their presentation. Oil paints were used for the time, and the mixing of egg yolks for pigmentsis replaced. With oil, paint became translucent and more vivid colors were used, as well as more depth in paintings. The works of art that were a result of the Renaissance were made with attention to detail, and have a natural essence to them-which is exactly what artists intended. Evidence of this lays in well-known examples from this period of time such as the “Last Supper” and the “Mona Lisa” by Leonardo Da Vinci, as well as Michelangelo’s sculptures and his artwork on the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel.

Image of Michelangelos Ceiling of the Sistine Chapel

Bibliography:

“Renaissance Art.” History Department, Hanover College. Hanover.edu. Web. 24 Sept. 2009. <http://history.hanover.edu/courses/art/111ren.html>.

“Renaissance Art Gallery.” Renaissance Art. Www.csun.edu. Web. Sept. 2009. <http://www.csun.edu/~aee52628/files/pdf/Renaissance/Ren.Art.Gallery.pdf>.

Sistine Chapel . Hanover.edu. Web. Sept. 2009. <http://history.hanover.edu/courses/art/micsis2.jpg>.

Witcombe, Prof. Christopher. “What is Art?…. What is an Artist.” Arthistory.sbc.edu. Department of Art History: SBC Virginia, Fall 1997. Web. Sept. 2009. <http://www.arthistory.sbc.edu/artartists/renaissance.html>.