However, once the student started explaining to me everything on the poster, it was really interesting. She said that Norilsk is a city in Russia and one of the world’s most polluted cities. That was due to the nickel factory in middle of the city, which happens to be the biggest employer in the city as well. She spoke about the effects of the pollution and the challenges with mitigating it. One thing that really stood out to me is that the life expectancy for the people who live there is 36 years old. To put that into perspective with her words; “we would be middle aged right now.” From what I understand, it is a very complex situation.
The group made some proposals to help the city, which ranged from a bacteria that filters pollution to Americans lobbying for funding to better the city’s conditions.
The student really knew a lot about her research. The poster had really great pictures and graphs, which she pointed to ask she was explaining. That just shows that Professor Branco is right… the posters should not be so wordy. I didnt want to approach the poster, but when I had, I did not read any of the words on the poster, and the information that was relayed to me was great nonetheless!
I think this group won in one of the categories but I’m not sure which one. Their research was very thorough and clear. It was quite intriguing.
It was interesting to read your account of this poster, particularly that you would have passed it by due to the large number of words on the poster. This is the award that they won:
Best Poster Pitch—Norilsk Nickel Factory: Transforming the City of Horror. City College. Prof. Lampousis.
It seems to match your experience. They pulled you in and then engaged you, which became a positive experience. Hopefully someone provided them with some constructive criticism about how to make their poster more appealing without the initial pitch.