Tag Archives: poster sessions

Who needs Psychologists When You’ve Got Teachers

While politely waiting to pass through a crowded area in the basement of the Macaulay building I had been attracted to this poster. The student who was in the middle of a presentation had been very animated and enthusiastic about her project. That, combined with the fact that I had nowhere else to go, caused me to listen in on her poster presentation.

20151206_110133

Rebecca Kurtz and her group mate Karen Goldbeger had chosen to focus on the coalition between educational experiences and ADHD diagnosis. Inspired by the rising “ADHD epidemic” they decided to use statistics to see if there were any trends with ADHD diagnosis. When viewing a map of all of the cases of ADHD in America it is easy enough to see that most cases were concentrated around urban areas while the rural parts of America had very few ADHD cases. Rebecca and Karen wanted to see if quality education and understanding environments provided by psychologists and teachers could decrease the amount of ADHD cases, or if they could at least have a positive influence.

This topic was extremely intriguing to me since I had worked with students with ADHD throughout high school as a Spanish student teacher. Rebecca’s data was very thorough, almost too thorough. She had called the APA for the exact number of psychologists in each state. She then used that data in combination with the amount of ADHD diagnosis in a given area to see if there was any real relationship between the two. She repeated the graph, replacing the number of psychologists with the quality of education in a given area. In my opinion the second graph is subjective, because the variables that make up a school ranking can not cover everything that would be considered a “quality education”.

They used a complicated statistical formula to ultimately answer their question, and no there was no clear relationship between the three variables. However, some of the data is subjective so there wouldn’t have been a clear answer either way.

I really liked their poster it had a good balance of visuals and words. Rebecca’s presentation was engaging and her answers to my questions were very thoughtful.

Do you have worms in your water?

“Maybe,” answered a pair of presenters at the 10–12:00 Sunday (12/6) poster session. Samuel Berger and Lisset Duran of John Jay College of Criminal Justice looked through logs of 311 complaints about the city’s water quality. (The database saved complaint locations as coordinates [rather than as addresses or names of buildings], and going through the data proved tedious as each point had to be then put on a map.) Most of the complaints were regarding the smell of the water, which the group then further broke down by type of odor described. They also looked at the number of callers by borough, though noted that Brooklyn, Manhattan, and Queens likely had the most callers because of their greater populations. The graphs were laid out well and were clear in showing the main points of the poster.

One of the medium-level1 311 complaints, however, was of worms in people’s water. And when the group tried calling 311 to ask about said worms, the response was along the lines of “oh, that happens sometimes,” and to not worry about it. That reveal was somehow both surprising and expected, and the duo’s delivery made it even better. A key reason I enjoyed this poster so much was that the presentation was simultaneously informative and entertaining; I’d never considered the thought of worms in my water — much less encountered any — and the group did an excellent job of balancing potential squeamishness with a sense of levity. Their pitch made me laugh at times (which I appreciated), provided an insight into how the city 311 complaint system works, and overall was just really fun.

Image of poster: Do You Have Worms in Your Water?
“Do You Have Worms in Your Water?: Analysis of Water Quality Complaints from 2011–2015 in New York City”; pictured: Lisset Duran and Samuel Berger.

Another poster whose title caught my eye was “Greenery vs. Immorality in Manhattan” by Ansh Jain, Nazir Jalili, Dennis Mejia, Gustavo Ramirez, & Ben Stannis of Hunter College. The pitch was engaging; they’d found that despite hypothesizing that there’d be more crime in areas with fewer trees (more “urbanized” areas), there was a slight positive correlation, albeit statistically insignificant, between the number of trees and crime rate. When I first saw the title I hadn’t realized the poster was about crime rates, and had almost expected them to be trying to connect amounts of greenery with people’s morals.

Image of poster: Greenery vs. Immorality in Manhattan
Not “immortality,” as a presenter was quick to note.

 

Green & Mentally Clean

When I came across this poster on Sunday morning, the title, in specific caught my eye. “Green and Mentally Clean.’ I wondered to myself, what exactly can this mean.

Thoughts ranged from the slogan “Reduce, Reuse, Recycle,” and the correlation between cleaning the environment via recycling and a healthier lifestyle, to the effects of food diets rich in greens and clean eating habits on health, and the effects of ‘Going Green’ & preserving energy on costs which can eventually affect mental health.

However, following the pitch made by the group members, I discovered that their aim was centered around the effects of nature on stress levels, especially while working and studying.

I was especially interested in this poster due to the title, color schemes, great visuals, and limited words. Many of the other posters did not necessarily follow the guidelines of limited wording and so I was forced to walk away after a slight glance, avoiding the heavy reading that would have to be done if I were to study the poster.

However, this poster was perfect. The title was eye catching, the color schemes were shades of green, the layout was easy to follow, and the main graph was centered. Additionally, actual photos were taken during their experiment, where they tested stress levels of those studying on campus, surrounded by the greenery, and those studying while facing the busy streets of Flatbush avenue.

What I liked most about this poster was the fact that the information was so applicable to us students. I walked away nodding my head, saying “yes, this is true.” I, personally, feel less stress and tend to accomplish way more when studying or working in a park, or on a beautiful day, than studying in a closed off room, on a rainy and dark day.

The poster clearly stated the hypothesis, “Spending time in nature can improve a person’s momentary mood,” then stated their experiment using the Brooklyn College Campus and Flatbush Avenue, and lastly, their clear and, I would say, accurate conclusions.

Take a look,

IMG_8695

Impressions of a Poster Session

After a hellish commute, I arrived at the Macaulay Seminar 3 Poster Session this morning (Sunday, December 6th 10:00-12:00) with excitement to learn more about science in New York. As I was walking the length of both poster galleries, one poster in particular caught my eye.

IMG_4985

“Why the Wealthy Aren’t Healthy” had a color scheme that demanded attention. I was intrigued by the title and by the variety of data that was presented, so I began to ask the presenters some questions. That map that is shown there details all of the locations one can buy food in on the Upper East Side as categorized and observed first-hand by the presenters. They came to the conclusion that wealthier people are more likely to be obese because there are more funds for food so wealthier people choose to eat out more often. The most shocking piece of information I saw to corroborate their conclusions was that of all of the places to purchase food in this zipcode, only 1% were fruit and vegetable and 37% were restaurants.

I was very impressed by the energy this team had while presenting their poster, as well as by the overall oral presentation. This poster was in good company, as many of the posters from this morning deserve attention, but there was something about this group’s work that stayed with me throughout the day.