Immigrant Enclaves

Logan and Smith, justify their study with two factors; the continuing trend of globalization and local choices made by individuals in their search for success (41-5). Using these two concepts, they briefly examine the neighborhood and New York City in its entirety before nineteen ninety. They then examine and discuss the nineteen ninety census and subsequently the two thousand one. They recognize the concept of “white flight” where portions of Flushing’s white population leaves for the suburbs, replaced by minorities. In Flushing the Asian and Hispanic populations increase significantly before two thousand. They also discuss in great detail the economic and social draws that made Flushing an attractive choice for these people to live (49-55). After this they consider the racial tension boiling (mostly) beneath the surface. For example many were afraid that the community they grew up in was disappearing, that it would be “Manhattanized.” In general this tension did not lead to physical violence (55-8).

The two thousand census revealed that the Asian population increased dramatically while the Hispanic one stablilized at around twenty percent. In fact, Flushing became the most concentrated Asian population in New York, second only to Manhattan’s Chinatown (59-63). They then examine the Hispanic population and its many smaller enclaves within Flushing. They consider the many factors that encourage these neighborhoods to develop as well as the specific ethnic groups within the community such as Mexican, Puerto Rican etc.

Despite the incredible diversity that they tell us about, Logan and Smith maintain that, for better or worse, these are still societies based on the structure of an enclave. They are not truly integrated, they may coexist but preserve themselves as distinct cultural groups.

Immigrant Labor Markets

In Immigrants, Unions, and the New U.S. Labor Market, Ness explains how most immigrants that enter New York City do so illegally because of the immigration limitations that are put in place.  Most illegal immigrants come up to New York from Latin America, while immigrants from Africa, Asia, and Europe come with a business, student worker, or tourist visa.  In the decade of 1992 to 2002, about a hundred thousand Dominicans came to New York and tens of thousands people came from countries like Russia, Guyana, China, Bangledesh, and Ecuador.  These new residents of New York, illegal or not, of course provided a labor force.  They worked for a lower wage than native residents and worked longer hours because employers knew they could take advantage of their lack of knowledge of American labor markets.  Most immigrants started out in low-waged jobs, like manufacturing factories and the garment industry.  These jobs, of course, did not offer a labor union.  However, immigrants have found a way to overcome this.  As time passed by, the availability of manufacturing jobs was replaced by service jobs.  Immigrants also began starting their own businesses, both formal and informal, around their communities, which gave other immigrants an opportunity to work.  This movement towards independent  job creation gave immigrants a chance to use each other as resources.  They may not have unions to demand better working conditions or better pay to be able to afford a better quality of life, but they did have each other.  Immigrant communities could band together, professionally and socially, to make their work experiences better.  Immigrants of similar race and nationality came together at their jobs and noticed that they had shared experiences and identities and created community solidarity.  As more networks of immigrants were created, the more niches were created for immigrants of the same ethnicity and the more immigrants were able to find jobs.  Immigrants may not be able to initially find higher level jobs with decent wages, but they have found a way to make their work experiences easier for each other.

Remaking Queens (pratt center 2012)

Flushing Meadows Corona Park acts as one of the few open public recreational spaces for the growing populations of Elmhurst, Corona and Flushing. In the coming years three enormous building projects are planned; a 1.4 million square foot mall, expansion of the National Tennis Center and construction of a Major League Soccer (MLS) stadium in preparation for the founding of a NYC based team.

Although these projects seem all well and good, the greater ramifications may be decidedly negative. For instance, in terms of park space alone the projects would block off large swaths of land from public use. Claims that the projects would only deny 8.5 acres of land ring hollow, as new infrastructure to allow for additional car access would also need to be added. The mall would impact small businesses, traffic patterns might be disrupted and other, and some might say more vital, improvement projects might be put on hold indefinitely.

Studies have been conducted to understand the impact of these projects but none that examine their cumulative effect and that is the problem. Even if any of these individually might be beneficial, together they could fundamentally change the character of the nearby neighborhoods.

Remaking Queens

“Queens Triple Play: Willets West, Major League Soccer, National Tennis Center” talks about the three new additions that will be built in Flushing Meadows Corona Park. While this project is not immediate, residents and business owners will slowly be displaced over the next twenty years. While the idea of a mall, soccer stadium and tennis stadium sound nice in theory, many other projects come with these three. For example, parking lots must be created for each of the projects. Many residents of Willets Point will find that either their homes are in the way of these plans and therefore must move or that their way of life will be drastically changed. A sudden influx of tourists, sports fans and shoppers will crowd the streets surrounding the area and the residents will have to suffer for it. Suddenly, there half hour commutes turn into a few hours just to make it to the crowded train station on game nights.

The construction of these three projects will almost completely deplete what is left of the park. It is already hard enough to find a small lot of grass in the vast city but after these projects, it will be difficult to even call the space a park. Small patches of grass separated by large stadiums and parking lots offer very little peace and quiet to that resident who just wants to spend their lunch break in nature. Many residents are outraged and have every right to be when their backyard, playground and peace are being disturbed.

Remaking Queens: A Right to Inhabit a Space

Northern Queens has had a rich history in terms of developmental progress in the 20th century. As far back as 1939, Queens has drawn attention from major capitalist investors as a use of space. Originally, the Flushing Meadows-Corona Park was renovated as the location of the World’s Fair of 1939. The same area is drawing contemporary attention in serving as a major center of attraction, housing the largest mall in the city alongside three major sports arenas. Though the same area is being contested, there are significantly different implications in the modern proposal concerning the immigrant populations in the surrounding areas. The mid-20th century saw an influx of Asian and Hispanic immigration, significant numbers of which settled in the county of Queens. However, these groups have been marginalized in the discussion of these proposed projects and their best interests have not been taken into account.

As well articulated in the Pratt Center report, “though the three projects are being proposed separately, their sites are contiguous, and they would collectively transform the under-maintained but heavily-used northern half of Queens flagship park into a car-dependent and largely commercialized ‘destination’ serving a citywide audience.” Effects would include the creation of 13,000 parking spaces, the displacement of over 60 local companies and business and hundreds of workers, increases in traffic and congestion, severe overcrowding on the #7 line, and most of all, the loss of a well-used public space.

Bearing in mind these proposed changes, one must also examine the ongoing ones to evaluate and predict the outcomes of these future projects. Construction has begun on Flushing Commons, which transforms a five-acre municipal parking lot into “235,00 square feet of small-scale retail, 185,000 square feet of office space, about 600 condos, a 62,000-square-foot YMCA, a one-and-a-half-acre park, and, to make up for the lost parking lot, 1,600 underground parking spaces.” Furthermore, the Sky View Center, an 800,000-square-foot mall is located on the Flushing waterfront, already serves as home to several big-box stores and Sky View Parc, the attached luxury condo towers, is severely under populated. With this much commercialization and development in Flushing, the question is raised of why further development is needed in the adjacent Willets Point area, and who these developing areas will serve, as “the local economy is Flushing is very strong.”

Furthermore, Flushing Meadows-Corona Park is already serving the variety of immigrant groups that consider Queens home. As Sarah Goodyear reports, “Flushing Meadows may not be the most beautiful park in New York—it is mostly flat and featureless, surrounded by highways and short of amenities—but it is one of the best used.” It is home to the Queens Museum of Art, the New York Hall of Science, the Billie Jean National Tennis Center, all of which are affordable destinations for local residents. But at its core, Flushing Meadows is “a true people’s park.” In serving Flushing’s increasingly diverse immigrant population, the park is home to cricket matches, soccer rivalries, volleyball games, and barbecues. Although being comprised of 1255 acres of land, only 347 acres are open to the public today. Despite this shortcoming, parks like these are a major component of the immigrant enclave. As Arturo Sanchez says, “Dense immigrant networks are an important reservoir of for accessing scarce economic, psychic, and informal resources that support migrant civic engagement.” Essentially, what he his saying is that something like a Mexican immigrant soccer club can “promote interpersonal contact, mutual assistance, and lubricate migrant civic incorporation.” Park space can act as a social center and information source, and therefore engage residents in community building.

Remaking Queens: Mega-Development

The article “Queens Triple Play: Willets West, Major League Soccer, National Tennis Center” highlights the upcoming plans and changes that are being attempted to made. These plans look to increase the value of Queens and create a mini-city within the area of Citi Field, USTA, as well as part of what they plan to make a MLS stadium. Throughout this expensive, yet promising task, this article addresses the pros and cons for each of the developments.

With the newly created baseball stadium, Citi Field, comes with garage areas where cars can be fixed (Willets Point). However, with the Queens Triple Play, there is going to be the largest mall in Queens, that is aimed to be created South of Citi Field as well as hotels on the north side. Not only, but also there is going to be an expansion in parking. However, with the addition of the mall and hotels and parking, many tenants, workers, and residents will be negatively effected. Residents would be displaced, certain businesses will have to move, and workers will have to look for new jobs since the mall will look for “low-wage” workers.

On the north east side will be the site of the new, 25,000 seat MLS stadium. As a result, 7.5 acres of land will be needed to construct this stadium, which will probably include park land. This will allow professional soccer to expand in the city and also allow MLS to rehabilitate various soccer fields, wetlands, and surrounding park areas. Through previous research, the stadium will have a positive impact on the surrounding areas in which local businesses will benefit. However, for this 3-5 year construction period, soccer fields will not be available for the public. The last development would be the expansion of the USTA tennis center.

In total, 60 companies and hundreds of workers will be displaced and a good amount of money will have to be given in from companies and organizations to support the Queens triple play. Although the idea of these expansions and developments may sound appealing, they also have downsides. That being said, the creation of all these new sites will lead to a large influx of immigrants/people around Queens to observe these new developments and will increase traffic surrounding that area, which is a negative factor to this plan.

Who Really Benefits From Flushing Waterfront Revitalization

In “From Dump to Glory”: Flushing River and Downtown Transformation, Tarry Hum explains the plan Bloomberg has in store for the area around Flushing waterfront. The revitalization plan is to lessen the traffic in the area, clean up polluted lands, and generally beautify the area. Luxury condos, a soccer stadium, tennis courts, and large shopping centers are to be built in these areas and will definitely displace lower-income residences such as those in Bland Houses and small, mostly immigrant-run businesses. Yet, despite taking place near their homes and businesses, nearby residences are largely unaware of this revitalization plan and the opinions of immigrant stakeholders don’t seem be heard by the government.

The question is who exactly will benefit from this plan? Real-estate prices will go up and perhaps it will be better for New York City’s economy, but what about the residents and businesses that may be displaced because of increased rents? People would lose jobs and homes. These people are probably immigrants who flocked to ethnic neighborhoods for jobs. What will happen to them? Will they receive help in finding new jobs and homes? These people are probably working long hours for minimum (or not even) wage. They probably won’t benefit very much from this plan and won’t even be able squeeze the money out for tickets to see games in the stadiums that are to built. As Hum and Sanchez describe in their writings. These are the people who will be most effected by this plan and yet they aren’t even aware of what’s happening and their voices aren’t even heard by the government.

Will the time, money, and efforts invested in this plan really pay off in the end? The area will become extremely commercialized. This will displace many immigrants and businesses. As result of the entering of large nation-wide stores such as Target and the exiting of small immigrant-run businesses, the entire area will lose its ethnic personality and become a generic form of commercialized areas such as Times Square and Roosevelt Field Mall. What exactly can be done to prevent this generalization? Is there anything that can be done? If the area does become commercialized, Queens may tragically lose some of its uniqueness and diversity.

Three Big Projects, One Common Goal

Willets West Shopping Mall, Major League Soccer Stadium, and National Tennis Center expansion all in one area, coincidence? These are three big projects set to take place in the same area, Flushing Meadows Corona Park, over a span of the next twenty years. Imagine walking through Flushing Meadows Corona Park twenty years from now, and it being completely different from the way you once knew it, that’s exactly what is going to happen here. Why Flushing Meadows park of all places? When you look at the numbers, only 28% of the lands 1,255 acres of land is available for public use and to take more of that could prove costly for the people living in the area. And the ones most likely to be affected the most is the residents of Willets Point. The temporary parking needed to replace what Citi Field would be losing with the creation of the Willets West Shopping Mall would cause many of the residents of Willets Point to be displaced many years before the proposed restructuring of Willets Point, which includes new housing and schools, will take place. The biggest tradeoff facing the residents is the prospect of new jobs versus the public space they have grown accustomed too. These issues may not be resolved while Bloomberg is in office, so voters must beware of a mayoral candidate promising to bring new jobs to New York City, because in the end you may just get what you wish for.

The people of this area have legitimate concerns, there is no questioning that. The streets and the 7 line is crowded enough as it is, will even be more so after these projects are introduced. Consequently, this could eventually lead to using more park space or empty land to build more streets or expand subway lines to accomodate the four big attractions that will have now settled in that area. What does the future hold for the park, and the residents of nearby neighborhoods? Will we see a big victory for public opposition, or will we see the biggest land grab ever to occur in Queens?

Corporate Intentions v. Neighborhood Realities

Generally, I am somewhat suspicious of the seemingly good intentions held by large corporations. Even if a corporation honestly means to do good for a community, the leaders are usually out of touch with the needs and demands of the residents. I believe that this is the case with the proposal for an MLS soccer stadium in Flushing Meadows Corona Park.

Officials with the MLS claim that they want to create jobs for the surrounding communities. MLS has also offered aid to help maintain the park and some aspects of the surrounding neighborhoods. In their proposal, they claimed that the presence of a soccer field in FMCP will bring increased business to local shops and restaurants. This is, of course, assuming that those who come to the games will stay around neighborhoods like Corona afterwards. This idea is very top-down, that is, it assumes that placing one economic engine in a neighborhood will somehow revitalize the entire neighborhood.

This way of thinking is incorrect. There is no way that the presence of one business can aid dozens and dozens of others. Besides that, what about other business types that have no sort of association with the demands of soccer fans? What do they have to gain? Also, what about the residents of Corona who work outside of it, but make use of the open space in FMCP as it is?

The lack of resident inclusion in the decision making process here is alarming. A company cannot honestly say that they are looking out for the needs of the people if they aren’t reaching out to the people. What do a few executives at the top know about neighborhood dynamics and the true needs of its residents? Little to nothing, most likely.

Hopefully, one of three things will happen here: the MLS will realize that they are not truly catering to the needs of the public and they will create new proposals that will be more inclusive of the residents, the city will hold them accountable for their claims of improving the surrounding neighborhoods, or the people of the surrounding neighborhoods will raise their voices and let the MLS know what they really want, or that they want to be included in the decision making process. If none of these things happen, the residents of Queens just might remember this year as the year they let themselves get taken advantage of for the financial gains of others.

Remaking Queens

The Pratt Center did a report called Queens Triple Play: Willets West, Major League Soccer, and the National Tennis Center that describes the different proposals for park space in Corona, Queens.  The first plan is a continuation of a project that started in Willets  Point and was supposed to revamp that area.  However, a mall, Willets West, and other commercial buildings are set to be built on the parking lot of Corona’s CitiField.  This disrupt the lives of Corona residents because of the additional amounts of traffic, both vehicles and people, that would develop around that area.  The project does call for demolishing commercial buildings in Willets Point to make space for parking, but that does not compensate for the new commercialization that will surround CitiField.  The second proposal is for a soccer field in the Flushing Meadow Corona Park.  It was originally proposed to be built on Pier 40 in Manhattan, but was rejected because of the community opposition.  On the west side, a tennis center is to be built, as well as more seats for the soccer stadium, retail spaces, suites, and parking space.  Although this proposal has moved locations, the same reservations are prominent in Corona.  The first, and biggest problem that residents of Corona have is the fact that the stadium is going to be built on park land.  It may not be the most maintained area, but it is one of the few park spaces that Queens has and residents are not ready to lose it.  They are also concerned with the amount of traffic that come from adding yet another stadium with commercial properties around it.  If these three projects are finalized, the only people that will benefit are the businesses that are in charge of the projects.  The residents and local businesses would most likely be negatively effected because of the spaces that would not be open to the public and the businesses that would be displaced.