MLS Stadium

Below is a link describing the new MLS team that is to be created knows as the “New York City Football Club.” As the CEO said, “This is not about finding a stadium. This is about finding a home that will be successful from a commercial, and soccer perspective as well as a community perspective.”

“While MLS has been negotiating with New York to build a stadium in Flushing Meadows-Corona Park, near the home of the New York Mets, NYC FC will start play at an interim home and will consider other sites for a stadium.”

http://espnfc.com/news/story/_/id/1455830/man-city-yankees-co-own-mls-franchise-new-york?cc=5901

South Asians in Queens

The growing Southeast Asian community of Queens has many a hurdle to jump through. In Queens alone, the community owns roughly 40% of all immigrant entrepreneurship/businesses, and are considerably higher on the socioeconomic scale than their Caribbean/Latino counterparts.

Despite these significant statistics, the community does face its own struggles. Since the 2008 market meltdown, according to a study by the Chhaya CDC organization, a disproportionate number of Southeast Asian-Americans (immigrant and native) possess college degrees, but are unable to find work. Because of this fait accompli, many are starting their own businesses as an attempt to become self-sufficient, or work in their own family’s businesses. The latter is often looked down upon by the family as well as the community at large, as elder generations do not wish for their children/grandchildren to start from the previous generation’s station (working low-skilled labor for long periods of time).

Queens Triple Play: Willets West, Major League Soccer, and the National Tennis Center

Queens Triple Play: Willets West, Major League Soccer, and the National Tennis Center highlights the major changes that will impact Flushing Meadows Corona Park. Willets West, a 1.4 million square foot mall, is expected to be completed by 2018, which will be constructed in the parking lot of Citi Field’s parking lot. Also Major League Soccer hopes on building a 25000 seat brand new stadium for the new NYC team. The proposed place to build the stadium is the Fountain of the Planets. Lastly, in the West, the National Tennis Center is planning an expansion of 7000 new seats, suites, retail space, and 700 new parking spaces.

The article sums up the effects of these three major proposals – these three projects will change the northern half of Queen’s flagship park into a “car-dependent” and “largely commercialized destination”. The new plans will easily add more than 10,000 parking spaces and the residents are worried about the heavy traffic those cars are going to bring. With these new changes, it would be difficult to implement “green” plan (with new spaces for park being taken away).

Although these changes will bring some positive results, there seems to be major disadvantages too. The biggest concern has to be the massive amount of traffic the projects are going to bring (especially that 7 train line!!). It really is difficult to find the neutral and the fairest method to resolve these problems. Personally, I’m worried about the park. It seems like developments are closing in on the park and the park is losing its chances of expanding because of these proposals (as shown by the statistics in the article – Flushing Meadow Corona Park is labeled in public documents with 1,255 acres of land, including Citifield and its parking lots. However, when non-park spaces are counted out, only 347 acres of the park is open for use )

The Necessity/Usefulness of Community Boards

Whenever issues arise in a community or neighborhood (rezoning, land disputes, infrastructure, etc) which could potentially affect a disproportionate part of the population, there is frequent disagreement as to how these issues should be handled. Often, such issues needn’t be present, as often there is an urge for a sense of organization or unity within a community.

Often, such needs take the form of community boards, which make decisions and influence public policy regarding the going-ons/issues within a neighborhood or a community. However, the actions of these groups are not always effective nor wide-reaching.

As pointed out in Tarry Hum’s essay, despite the good intentions of these boards and their attempted measures to ensure organization and unity within a region on public issues, politics and conflicting interests prevent community boards from reaching solid agreements on key issues within a community. Ultimately, smaller groups, such as church parishes, cultural groups/organizations, businesses and other individually-driven organizations/entities have proven more beneficial to their respective communities. Rather than getting entangled by politics, the members of the communities themselves are the best instigators of change/development, thus they succeed where bureaucratic community boards fail.

From Dump to Glory: The Remaking/Development of Queens

The Northwestern corner of Queens along the shores of Flushing Bay, which comprises of the neighborhoods of Flushing, College Point, Willets Point, Corona and East Elmhurst, has undergone significant development and alteration over the past century. Formerly the site of the mountainous Corona Ash Dump brownfield, the region was cleared and landscaped in the late 1930s to establish the current Flushing Meadows-Corona Park (the second largest public park in New York City) in a campaign led by urban-planning megalomaniac Robert Moses. The purpose of the park’s establishment was, in his own words, to create a more scenic view and atmosphere in the previously deteriorating corner of Queens.

The park is infamous as being the site of the colossal failure that was the 1964-65 New York World’s Fair, as well as its scenic beauty being in close proximity to the polluted, unkempt, neglected brownfield on the Willets Point peninsula.

Various development schemes are planned for the region to further economic gain/attention for the surrounding neighborhoods of Flushing and Corona, and eventually spill-over into neighboring communities such as College Point and Jackson Heights. These plans include a 1.4 million square foot shopping complex in the CitiField parking lot on the Willets Point peninsula, along with a 25,000-seat soccer stadium on the Northeastern-most corner of Flushing Meadows-Corona Park, and an expansion of the National Tennis Center on the other side of the Park. These plans have been met with increasing opposition from business-owners, cultural groups and community leaders in the surrounding neighborhoods, especially Corona, on the grounds that the parklands are public and ought not to be exploited for seasonal use, denying neighboring regions of of their own various uses of the space.

The Enclave, the Citadel, and the Ghetto

Personally speaking, I have some experience living in/traveling through an enclave, a citadel, and a ghetto.

I work/have family in College Point, on the Northwestern-most point of Queens. Anyone who travels to College Point (especially someone from Bayside like me) often travels through Whitestone to get there, via 14th Ave, a long street which stretches a long portion of land facing the Long Island Sound. Driving down 14th Avenue, it is evident where upper-class, suburban Whitestone/Malba citadel ends and industrial, middle-class College Point begins (the intersection of 132nd St and 14th Ave, just behind the College Point Shopping Center). It is there where the stretches of mansions come to an immediate halt, and are replaced by  immigrant-owned stores, tighter streets, and duplexes. Even within the neighborhood of College Point, 14th Ave serves as a divide between a citadel and a (arguable) ghetto. Everything on and north of 14th Ave features large mansions and expensive homes similar to those of neighboring Whitestone/Malba. Everything south of 14th Ave (roughly 80-85% of College Point) is rugged in terms of infrastructure, relatively unkempt and congested with traffic.

Peter Marcuse’s claims regarding the nature of the citadel, enclave and ghetto are, in my opinion, spot-on. While these types of neighborhoods, where stark signals are given regarding disparity/inequality of wealth, social structure and infrastructure, are present in every major metropolitan city, they are not as damaging to a society as they may seem. People who populate citadels, enclaves or ghettos arrive there by circumstance, and rarely by chance. People of similar economic/cultural/social association tend to stick together in their own little areas; it is not an issue of intolerance nor unwillingness to assimilate into another culture/social structure. No individuals were coerced into living in areas where they are surrounded by people just like them; upper-class families tend to stick with upper-class families the same way Eastern-European immigrant families prefer to remain near other Eastern-European immigrants, as with Caribbean immigrants, or middle-class South Asians, etc.

Immigrant Entrepreneurship

Anyone who goes for a stroll anywhere between Union and Main Streets in Flushing will see and know the impact of immigrant entrepreneurship. Flooding the main sea ports of the United States for economic advantage, disproportionate numbers of immigrants take to the labor market, most demanding low-skilled, low-pay jobs, whilst others take serious risks and start their own businesses. In recent years, as the Eastern seaboard sees a considerable influx of Southeast Asian and Latin American immigrants, the numbers of businesses run by these immigrant individuals has skyrocketed, especially in the neighborhoods of Flushing and Corona in Queens.

Jonathan Bowles discusses the statistical impact of immigrant entrepreneurship, noting their extensive integration in “native” society, with immigrant-owned businesses outdoing their native competitors. Their economic flexibility is noted as well, as they don not solely serve members of the immigrant community, but expand to include (and perhaps to integrate with) the native society/culture as well.

Immanuel Ness’ article paints a somewhat more pessimistic view, arguing for the necessity of unions for immigrant businesses (Bowles mentions the necessity for government assistance for immigrant businesses as well). Starting a business, especially as an immigrant to a new country, is a considerable risk. However, as is the case with business/entrepreneurship, success is a rarity and failure is the norm. There is no guarantee that all immigrant-owned businesses will succeed as much as their native-owned counterparts, but the impact of immigrant businesses/labor is still significant, especially here in Queens.

Immigrant Neighborhoods in Global Cities

In the article, “The Enclave, the Citadel, and the Ghetto: What has Changed in the Post-Fordist US City”, Peter Marcuse defines an “enclave”, a “citadel” and “the ghetto”. He introduces implications of the enclave, citadel and ghetto.. Not only but he also discusses differences, specifically ghetto and an outcast ghetto. According to Marcus, a ghetto is a concentrated area used to seperate and to limit a particular population group treated as inferior by society. This article illustrates that the word ghetto has a more significant meaning that certain groups of people who find this term to be “derogatory” or misleading.

Marcuse stated that people do not voluntarily live in ghettos, whereas people voluntarily living in enclaves. However, Black people have a right and the option to live wherever they want, even though they pick the “ghetto” areas.  The reason is because other blacks are concentrated in the “ghetto” areas so they feel comfortable living in that area.

Marcuse did a good job of characterizing ghetto, enclave and citadel by economic condition and the economic relations they play with their surroundings.  Also, we can see the residential segregation that exists among “ghettos”, “enclaves”, and “citadels.” n example of a “citadel” would be the luxurious apartments on Manhattan’s Upper East Side.  Certain areas of Manhattan and Bronx would be the “ghetto”  because of their large Black population whereas Chinatown is considered to be the enclave because with thriving immigrant population.

As a result of Marcuse’s article, I’ve gained knowledge and learned that race as well as ethnicity is very important in creating the “areas” such as the ghetto, citadels, or enclaves, that make up the city for what it is now.

Why Immigrants Organize

Immanuel Ness’s book, Immigrants, Unions, and the New U.S Labor Market discusses why and how immigrants organize. In short, according to Ness, immigrants, regardless of their immigration status are able to organize because they have strong community solidarity. In reverse, non-foreign born Americans do not organize because they lack community solidarity. I wrote a paper on Ness’s (and Hum’s) papers but there is one issue I did not address there that I would like to cover more in depth. This the issue of why native born Americans lack strong community solidarity? There are several answers to this question.

One reason is that immigrants, because they are so dependent on the help they receive from friends, families, and connections in the U.S. are automatically inclined, or even forced to maintain close ties with their network. It is necessary for their acclimation to life in America. Native born Americans, on the other hand, do not require such assistance and are therefore less inclined to maintain and grow their community networks and thus have lower levels of community solidarity.

Another source of communal solidarity for immigrants is with their coworkers. Immigrants often work very long hours with the same people in small businesses. This is an optimal environment for employees to bond. Immigrant employees not only share the common immigrant experience but also share the common experience of long, hard work and the feeling of being exploited. Native born American workers, on the other hand, often work in larger retail outlets, such as Walmart and Target. These businesses which are huge both on the local and national level offer little to no opportunity for employees to bond, especially considering that such workplaces have a tendency to rely on a fluid and often changing labor force, meaning that the same people are often not working together for long.

In addition to facing a constantly changing labor force, native employees in large chains are also less inclined towards community solidarity for another reason: they feel they have more options. So, for example, if the job as a cashier at Walmart doesn’t work out they have no problem with leaving and getting a job as a waitress at Applebees. In other words, they don’t stay at one job long enough to form strong and meaningful bonds with their co-workers. Immigrant workers, on the other hand, weather due to their insecurity about murky immigration statuses or because they feel their skill set limits them to one job for one business, are more likely to stay at one job for as long as possible. When conditions at one job are poor they are much more likely to strive to improve those conditions as opposed to changing jobs. As a result, they are more likely to stay with the same group of workers longer, allowing them to form strong bonds with co-workers and thus the community solidarity that stimulates and allows immigrants t succesfully organize.

South Asians in Queens

Chhaya CDC (community development corporation) is an organization whose goal is the maintenance of stable communities among New Yorkers of South Asian descent. In pursuit of this objective they conducted a needs assessment study of this community.

The current economic downturn has significantly impacted this community. For example, despite the fact that forty seven percent of surveyed individuals possessed college educations, only eight percent worked in professional or technical jobs. The language barrier has played a major part in this particular disparity. Other economic difficulties result from housing. Most of the community lives in rented spaces and many have been exploited. Renting without lease and therefore with risk of displacement and illegal price gouging are just two problems in a much bigger issue. Homeowners haven’t fared much better due to the recent housing crisis and bureaucratic issues.

 

Chhaya also suggested many initiatives to help combat these problems including increasing the number of English language classes, allowing prior certification to apply here and allowing immigrants more access to public programs.

Immigrant Enclaves

Logan and Smith, justify their study with two factors; the continuing trend of globalization and local choices made by individuals in their search for success (41-5). Using these two concepts, they briefly examine the neighborhood and New York City in its entirety before nineteen ninety. They then examine and discuss the nineteen ninety census and subsequently the two thousand one. They recognize the concept of “white flight” where portions of Flushing’s white population leaves for the suburbs, replaced by minorities. In Flushing the Asian and Hispanic populations increase significantly before two thousand. They also discuss in great detail the economic and social draws that made Flushing an attractive choice for these people to live (49-55). After this they consider the racial tension boiling (mostly) beneath the surface. For example many were afraid that the community they grew up in was disappearing, that it would be “Manhattanized.” In general this tension did not lead to physical violence (55-8).

The two thousand census revealed that the Asian population increased dramatically while the Hispanic one stablilized at around twenty percent. In fact, Flushing became the most concentrated Asian population in New York, second only to Manhattan’s Chinatown (59-63). They then examine the Hispanic population and its many smaller enclaves within Flushing. They consider the many factors that encourage these neighborhoods to develop as well as the specific ethnic groups within the community such as Mexican, Puerto Rican etc.

Despite the incredible diversity that they tell us about, Logan and Smith maintain that, for better or worse, these are still societies based on the structure of an enclave. They are not truly integrated, they may coexist but preserve themselves as distinct cultural groups.

Immigrant Labor Markets

In Immigrants, Unions, and the New U.S. Labor Market, Ness explains how most immigrants that enter New York City do so illegally because of the immigration limitations that are put in place.  Most illegal immigrants come up to New York from Latin America, while immigrants from Africa, Asia, and Europe come with a business, student worker, or tourist visa.  In the decade of 1992 to 2002, about a hundred thousand Dominicans came to New York and tens of thousands people came from countries like Russia, Guyana, China, Bangledesh, and Ecuador.  These new residents of New York, illegal or not, of course provided a labor force.  They worked for a lower wage than native residents and worked longer hours because employers knew they could take advantage of their lack of knowledge of American labor markets.  Most immigrants started out in low-waged jobs, like manufacturing factories and the garment industry.  These jobs, of course, did not offer a labor union.  However, immigrants have found a way to overcome this.  As time passed by, the availability of manufacturing jobs was replaced by service jobs.  Immigrants also began starting their own businesses, both formal and informal, around their communities, which gave other immigrants an opportunity to work.  This movement towards independent  job creation gave immigrants a chance to use each other as resources.  They may not have unions to demand better working conditions or better pay to be able to afford a better quality of life, but they did have each other.  Immigrant communities could band together, professionally and socially, to make their work experiences better.  Immigrants of similar race and nationality came together at their jobs and noticed that they had shared experiences and identities and created community solidarity.  As more networks of immigrants were created, the more niches were created for immigrants of the same ethnicity and the more immigrants were able to find jobs.  Immigrants may not be able to initially find higher level jobs with decent wages, but they have found a way to make their work experiences easier for each other.

Remaking Queens (pratt center 2012)

Flushing Meadows Corona Park acts as one of the few open public recreational spaces for the growing populations of Elmhurst, Corona and Flushing. In the coming years three enormous building projects are planned; a 1.4 million square foot mall, expansion of the National Tennis Center and construction of a Major League Soccer (MLS) stadium in preparation for the founding of a NYC based team.

Although these projects seem all well and good, the greater ramifications may be decidedly negative. For instance, in terms of park space alone the projects would block off large swaths of land from public use. Claims that the projects would only deny 8.5 acres of land ring hollow, as new infrastructure to allow for additional car access would also need to be added. The mall would impact small businesses, traffic patterns might be disrupted and other, and some might say more vital, improvement projects might be put on hold indefinitely.

Studies have been conducted to understand the impact of these projects but none that examine their cumulative effect and that is the problem. Even if any of these individually might be beneficial, together they could fundamentally change the character of the nearby neighborhoods.

Remaking Queens

“Queens Triple Play: Willets West, Major League Soccer, National Tennis Center” talks about the three new additions that will be built in Flushing Meadows Corona Park. While this project is not immediate, residents and business owners will slowly be displaced over the next twenty years. While the idea of a mall, soccer stadium and tennis stadium sound nice in theory, many other projects come with these three. For example, parking lots must be created for each of the projects. Many residents of Willets Point will find that either their homes are in the way of these plans and therefore must move or that their way of life will be drastically changed. A sudden influx of tourists, sports fans and shoppers will crowd the streets surrounding the area and the residents will have to suffer for it. Suddenly, there half hour commutes turn into a few hours just to make it to the crowded train station on game nights.

The construction of these three projects will almost completely deplete what is left of the park. It is already hard enough to find a small lot of grass in the vast city but after these projects, it will be difficult to even call the space a park. Small patches of grass separated by large stadiums and parking lots offer very little peace and quiet to that resident who just wants to spend their lunch break in nature. Many residents are outraged and have every right to be when their backyard, playground and peace are being disturbed.

Remaking Queens: A Right to Inhabit a Space

Northern Queens has had a rich history in terms of developmental progress in the 20th century. As far back as 1939, Queens has drawn attention from major capitalist investors as a use of space. Originally, the Flushing Meadows-Corona Park was renovated as the location of the World’s Fair of 1939. The same area is drawing contemporary attention in serving as a major center of attraction, housing the largest mall in the city alongside three major sports arenas. Though the same area is being contested, there are significantly different implications in the modern proposal concerning the immigrant populations in the surrounding areas. The mid-20th century saw an influx of Asian and Hispanic immigration, significant numbers of which settled in the county of Queens. However, these groups have been marginalized in the discussion of these proposed projects and their best interests have not been taken into account.

As well articulated in the Pratt Center report, “though the three projects are being proposed separately, their sites are contiguous, and they would collectively transform the under-maintained but heavily-used northern half of Queens flagship park into a car-dependent and largely commercialized ‘destination’ serving a citywide audience.” Effects would include the creation of 13,000 parking spaces, the displacement of over 60 local companies and business and hundreds of workers, increases in traffic and congestion, severe overcrowding on the #7 line, and most of all, the loss of a well-used public space.

Bearing in mind these proposed changes, one must also examine the ongoing ones to evaluate and predict the outcomes of these future projects. Construction has begun on Flushing Commons, which transforms a five-acre municipal parking lot into “235,00 square feet of small-scale retail, 185,000 square feet of office space, about 600 condos, a 62,000-square-foot YMCA, a one-and-a-half-acre park, and, to make up for the lost parking lot, 1,600 underground parking spaces.” Furthermore, the Sky View Center, an 800,000-square-foot mall is located on the Flushing waterfront, already serves as home to several big-box stores and Sky View Parc, the attached luxury condo towers, is severely under populated. With this much commercialization and development in Flushing, the question is raised of why further development is needed in the adjacent Willets Point area, and who these developing areas will serve, as “the local economy is Flushing is very strong.”

Furthermore, Flushing Meadows-Corona Park is already serving the variety of immigrant groups that consider Queens home. As Sarah Goodyear reports, “Flushing Meadows may not be the most beautiful park in New York—it is mostly flat and featureless, surrounded by highways and short of amenities—but it is one of the best used.” It is home to the Queens Museum of Art, the New York Hall of Science, the Billie Jean National Tennis Center, all of which are affordable destinations for local residents. But at its core, Flushing Meadows is “a true people’s park.” In serving Flushing’s increasingly diverse immigrant population, the park is home to cricket matches, soccer rivalries, volleyball games, and barbecues. Although being comprised of 1255 acres of land, only 347 acres are open to the public today. Despite this shortcoming, parks like these are a major component of the immigrant enclave. As Arturo Sanchez says, “Dense immigrant networks are an important reservoir of for accessing scarce economic, psychic, and informal resources that support migrant civic engagement.” Essentially, what he his saying is that something like a Mexican immigrant soccer club can “promote interpersonal contact, mutual assistance, and lubricate migrant civic incorporation.” Park space can act as a social center and information source, and therefore engage residents in community building.

Remaking Queens: Mega-Development

The article “Queens Triple Play: Willets West, Major League Soccer, National Tennis Center” highlights the upcoming plans and changes that are being attempted to made. These plans look to increase the value of Queens and create a mini-city within the area of Citi Field, USTA, as well as part of what they plan to make a MLS stadium. Throughout this expensive, yet promising task, this article addresses the pros and cons for each of the developments.

With the newly created baseball stadium, Citi Field, comes with garage areas where cars can be fixed (Willets Point). However, with the Queens Triple Play, there is going to be the largest mall in Queens, that is aimed to be created South of Citi Field as well as hotels on the north side. Not only, but also there is going to be an expansion in parking. However, with the addition of the mall and hotels and parking, many tenants, workers, and residents will be negatively effected. Residents would be displaced, certain businesses will have to move, and workers will have to look for new jobs since the mall will look for “low-wage” workers.

On the north east side will be the site of the new, 25,000 seat MLS stadium. As a result, 7.5 acres of land will be needed to construct this stadium, which will probably include park land. This will allow professional soccer to expand in the city and also allow MLS to rehabilitate various soccer fields, wetlands, and surrounding park areas. Through previous research, the stadium will have a positive impact on the surrounding areas in which local businesses will benefit. However, for this 3-5 year construction period, soccer fields will not be available for the public. The last development would be the expansion of the USTA tennis center.

In total, 60 companies and hundreds of workers will be displaced and a good amount of money will have to be given in from companies and organizations to support the Queens triple play. Although the idea of these expansions and developments may sound appealing, they also have downsides. That being said, the creation of all these new sites will lead to a large influx of immigrants/people around Queens to observe these new developments and will increase traffic surrounding that area, which is a negative factor to this plan.

Who Really Benefits From Flushing Waterfront Revitalization

In “From Dump to Glory”: Flushing River and Downtown Transformation, Tarry Hum explains the plan Bloomberg has in store for the area around Flushing waterfront. The revitalization plan is to lessen the traffic in the area, clean up polluted lands, and generally beautify the area. Luxury condos, a soccer stadium, tennis courts, and large shopping centers are to be built in these areas and will definitely displace lower-income residences such as those in Bland Houses and small, mostly immigrant-run businesses. Yet, despite taking place near their homes and businesses, nearby residences are largely unaware of this revitalization plan and the opinions of immigrant stakeholders don’t seem be heard by the government.

The question is who exactly will benefit from this plan? Real-estate prices will go up and perhaps it will be better for New York City’s economy, but what about the residents and businesses that may be displaced because of increased rents? People would lose jobs and homes. These people are probably immigrants who flocked to ethnic neighborhoods for jobs. What will happen to them? Will they receive help in finding new jobs and homes? These people are probably working long hours for minimum (or not even) wage. They probably won’t benefit very much from this plan and won’t even be able squeeze the money out for tickets to see games in the stadiums that are to built. As Hum and Sanchez describe in their writings. These are the people who will be most effected by this plan and yet they aren’t even aware of what’s happening and their voices aren’t even heard by the government.

Will the time, money, and efforts invested in this plan really pay off in the end? The area will become extremely commercialized. This will displace many immigrants and businesses. As result of the entering of large nation-wide stores such as Target and the exiting of small immigrant-run businesses, the entire area will lose its ethnic personality and become a generic form of commercialized areas such as Times Square and Roosevelt Field Mall. What exactly can be done to prevent this generalization? Is there anything that can be done? If the area does become commercialized, Queens may tragically lose some of its uniqueness and diversity.

Three Big Projects, One Common Goal

Willets West Shopping Mall, Major League Soccer Stadium, and National Tennis Center expansion all in one area, coincidence? These are three big projects set to take place in the same area, Flushing Meadows Corona Park, over a span of the next twenty years. Imagine walking through Flushing Meadows Corona Park twenty years from now, and it being completely different from the way you once knew it, that’s exactly what is going to happen here. Why Flushing Meadows park of all places? When you look at the numbers, only 28% of the lands 1,255 acres of land is available for public use and to take more of that could prove costly for the people living in the area. And the ones most likely to be affected the most is the residents of Willets Point. The temporary parking needed to replace what Citi Field would be losing with the creation of the Willets West Shopping Mall would cause many of the residents of Willets Point to be displaced many years before the proposed restructuring of Willets Point, which includes new housing and schools, will take place. The biggest tradeoff facing the residents is the prospect of new jobs versus the public space they have grown accustomed too. These issues may not be resolved while Bloomberg is in office, so voters must beware of a mayoral candidate promising to bring new jobs to New York City, because in the end you may just get what you wish for.

The people of this area have legitimate concerns, there is no questioning that. The streets and the 7 line is crowded enough as it is, will even be more so after these projects are introduced. Consequently, this could eventually lead to using more park space or empty land to build more streets or expand subway lines to accomodate the four big attractions that will have now settled in that area. What does the future hold for the park, and the residents of nearby neighborhoods? Will we see a big victory for public opposition, or will we see the biggest land grab ever to occur in Queens?

Corporate Intentions v. Neighborhood Realities

Generally, I am somewhat suspicious of the seemingly good intentions held by large corporations. Even if a corporation honestly means to do good for a community, the leaders are usually out of touch with the needs and demands of the residents. I believe that this is the case with the proposal for an MLS soccer stadium in Flushing Meadows Corona Park.

Officials with the MLS claim that they want to create jobs for the surrounding communities. MLS has also offered aid to help maintain the park and some aspects of the surrounding neighborhoods. In their proposal, they claimed that the presence of a soccer field in FMCP will bring increased business to local shops and restaurants. This is, of course, assuming that those who come to the games will stay around neighborhoods like Corona afterwards. This idea is very top-down, that is, it assumes that placing one economic engine in a neighborhood will somehow revitalize the entire neighborhood.

This way of thinking is incorrect. There is no way that the presence of one business can aid dozens and dozens of others. Besides that, what about other business types that have no sort of association with the demands of soccer fans? What do they have to gain? Also, what about the residents of Corona who work outside of it, but make use of the open space in FMCP as it is?

The lack of resident inclusion in the decision making process here is alarming. A company cannot honestly say that they are looking out for the needs of the people if they aren’t reaching out to the people. What do a few executives at the top know about neighborhood dynamics and the true needs of its residents? Little to nothing, most likely.

Hopefully, one of three things will happen here: the MLS will realize that they are not truly catering to the needs of the public and they will create new proposals that will be more inclusive of the residents, the city will hold them accountable for their claims of improving the surrounding neighborhoods, or the people of the surrounding neighborhoods will raise their voices and let the MLS know what they really want, or that they want to be included in the decision making process. If none of these things happen, the residents of Queens just might remember this year as the year they let themselves get taken advantage of for the financial gains of others.

Remaking Queens

The Pratt Center did a report called Queens Triple Play: Willets West, Major League Soccer, and the National Tennis Center that describes the different proposals for park space in Corona, Queens.  The first plan is a continuation of a project that started in Willets  Point and was supposed to revamp that area.  However, a mall, Willets West, and other commercial buildings are set to be built on the parking lot of Corona’s CitiField.  This disrupt the lives of Corona residents because of the additional amounts of traffic, both vehicles and people, that would develop around that area.  The project does call for demolishing commercial buildings in Willets Point to make space for parking, but that does not compensate for the new commercialization that will surround CitiField.  The second proposal is for a soccer field in the Flushing Meadow Corona Park.  It was originally proposed to be built on Pier 40 in Manhattan, but was rejected because of the community opposition.  On the west side, a tennis center is to be built, as well as more seats for the soccer stadium, retail spaces, suites, and parking space.  Although this proposal has moved locations, the same reservations are prominent in Corona.  The first, and biggest problem that residents of Corona have is the fact that the stadium is going to be built on park land.  It may not be the most maintained area, but it is one of the few park spaces that Queens has and residents are not ready to lose it.  They are also concerned with the amount of traffic that come from adding yet another stadium with commercial properties around it.  If these three projects are finalized, the only people that will benefit are the businesses that are in charge of the projects.  The residents and local businesses would most likely be negatively effected because of the spaces that would not be open to the public and the businesses that would be displaced.

The Fate of Flushing Meadows Corona Park and Willets Point

The article, “Queens Triple Play: Willets West, Major League Soccer, and the National Tennis Center”, gives the readers a glimpse of the fate of Flushing Meadows Corona Park.  As the article points out, there are several pros and cons in regards to the construction of the “largest mall in Queens” on the Citifield parking lot, the Major League Soccer (MLS) stadium and the National Tennis Center. The construction of a large mall and new stadiums will attract more customers and fans to the neighborhood, which in turn will have a positive impact on local businesses such as restaurants and bars. In class, we previously discussed that Willets Point is not much of a residential area and lies on the outskirts of New York City. Also, as Prerana Reddy discussed in our visit to the QMA, Flushing Meadows Corona Park does not have as many employees as Central Park in Manhattan does. Therefore we can see that the Flushing Meadows Corona Park is not as well maintained as Central Park. Such differences occur due to the parks’ location. Central Park is located right in the middle of Manhattan while Flushing Meadows Corona Park lies on the outskirts of the city. In class, we previously discussed that the surrounding neighborhood of Willets Point is not much of a residential area either. So by building a stadium or a large mall in the area, the neighborhoods surrounding Flushing Meadows Corona park will get citywide attention. Local businesses will thrive and the neighborhood aesthetics will improve in order to attract a larger crowd to these huge centers of entertainment.

Although these benefits sound great, the use of public park space to build such huge complexes is detrimental to the lifestyle of the local neighborhoods’ residents. According to the article, the public space in Flushing Meadows Corona Park is the only open space where residents can come to participate and enjoy outside recreational activities. If this space is taken over by malls and sports centers, residents will not have the open park space to enjoy anymore. Also, the surrounding neighborhoods of Flushing, Corona and Elmhurst are already experiencing rapid population growth and the construction of such crowd attracting centers will only make the problem of overcrowding in homes and on the number 7 train line worse. Traffic will also be a huge contributor to the overcrowding issue. Although businesses such as restaurants and bars will thrive, small local businesses will be replaced by huge chain stores in the large shopping mall.

Also, it is interesting to note that the project to create more housing units in Willets Point was pushed back to as far as 2028 while the three projects (which is the construction of a large mall, MLS stadium and the National Tennis Center) will only take about four to five years to complete. It is easy to see that the focus right now is on the completion such extravagant projects (which may cause more harm to the local communities than actually benefitting them). Meanwhile the projects (such as the construction of housing) that will directly benefit the local communities have been put on hold. Although the construction of these major projects is not complete, we can pretty much predict the detrimental impact of these commercialized projects on Flushing Meadows Corona Park and the surrounding neighborhoods.

Queens Triple Play: Willets West, Major League Soccer, National Tennis Center

The reading “Queens Triple Play: Willets West, Major League Soccer, National Tennis Center” provides a detailed description of the upcoming plans for the area near Flushing Meadows Corona Park that are sure to have a major impact on the surrounding communities. After reading this article, I was shocked about the proposals that are currently being discussed. Being a resident of Flushing myself, I have gotten used to the outlook of the Willets Point area of Queens. I remember visiting Shea Stadium all the time with my family and I can’t imagine that area being as commercialized as the article indicates that its going to be.

According to the reading, a 1.4 million square foot acre mall is to be constructed on the parking lot of Citifield. This mall will be the largest in Queens. Furthermore, MLS wants to construct a 25, 000 seat soccer stadium across the #7 subway line. Lastly the National Tennis Center is proposing to add over 7,000 seats and luxurious suites and parking spaces.

There are some benefits to the these proposals. For example, the MLS is promising to rehabilitate existing soccer fields, wetlands and surrounding park areas. They also plan on contributing to the construction of new public soccer fields, cricket fields and volley ball courts. The soccer stadium will cater to the large hispanic communities in the areas which are an integral part of MLS’ fan base.  Also, the Willets Point mall is sure to be one of the largest in Queens. These three proposals are sure to bring new visitors and residents to this area of Queens, and will surely allow Flushing to further prosper. However, in my opinion, despite the fact that I would enjoy having these developments so close to where I live, I believe that the cons to these plans greatly outweigh the cons.

According to the reading, about 1 acre of the Flushing Meadows parkland is to be alientated for the tennis center and about 7.5 acres is to be alienated for the soccer stadium. In my opinion, Flushing is already greatly lacking in parkland. In the past few years, there have been many new developments, especially in the Main Street area of Flushing. All these projects have been either new businesses or new residential developments. Flushing Meadows is one of the only “areas of green” that we Flushing residents have. I think that instead of focusing on commercializing the area, the government should focus on providing this area of Flushing/Corona with the public space and parkland that they supposedly should have (according to the public documents which falsely state that the Flushing Meadows Park should consist of 1225 acres of land – but in reality only about 346 acres are open to the public for public use). Instead of following the Strategic Framework that was discussed for Flushing, that was going to renaturalize water bodies and enhance green spaces, the developments are instead going to further demolish the public spaces available for residents.

Besides doing away with the grassland, these proposed projects are also going to have a detrimental impact on the lives of the residents. Although the new businesses that are going to be opened are going to provide jobs workers in the area, these business workers are going to be displaced for a good few years until the new businesses are actually constructed and opened. Furthermore, who’s to say that the residents in the surrounding communities are even able to afford such luxuries such as going to the tennis or soccer stadium or even to the mall? Instead on focusing on creating such things, I believe developers should focus more on the actual communities of Flushing, Elmhurst and Corona and focus on how to improve its existing conditions. For example, they could put more effort into improving the poor school systems in the those cities that often drives residents to send their children to schools elsewhere. They could also focus on creating more public spaces that would allow the residents to interact and further develop their sense of a community.

The Organization of Immigrant Laborers

Both of these article addressed the differences between the labor patterns of native-born employees and immigrant employees in New York City. The article, “Why New Immigrants Organize,” presented a view that went against my previous understanding about immigrants organizing to fight for better working conditions. Ness presented the view that immigrants are more likely to organize than workers who were born in this country. He gave examples, such as the East Nature grocery incident. Mexican workers had organized so affectively that the store was not allowed to stay open unless it bettered the working conditions and wages. This in turn, caused a whole wave of Mexican workers to organize, as they saw the impact these other workers had. This article talked about the fact that many of the recent immigrants are illegal. Based on our past readings, I was under the impression that illegal immigrants were very weary about complaining over conditions. For example, in the article about immigrant activism and migrant civil society, migrant civil society had to step in, in order for the day laborers to have a voice. It was not the migrant workers organizing themselves because they feared being deported.

One answer the Ness piece has about the reason immigrants are more likely to organize is that they are more likely to live in concentrated ethnic enclaves. Therefore, after they return home from work, they socialize with people who are working jobs in similar conditions and they discuss their hardships, so the workers get the sense that they are not being treated right. On the other hand, people who aren’t immigrants may not be coming home to this community. Also, immigrants in general work longer hours than non-immigrants and therefore are spending more time with their fellow workers, so there is a greater chance of organizing.

I was wondering if the fact that the types of jobs differ for immigrants and native-born people affects the frequency of organizing. In the Hum, article it was established that there is clear divide between the types of jobs immigrant Latinos and Blacks and their non-immigrant counterparts work. In the private sector, a larger percentage of immigrant Latinos work construction, production, and building jobs, while native born Latinos are more likely to work office, administration, and sales jobs. Maybe the jobs the immigrants have just happen to be jobs where people are exploited more, not even due to the fact that it is immigrants working the jobs. On the other hand, maybe it is that employers are more likely to exploit immigrants due to the not true(according to Ness) conception that they will be passive. The exploitation caused by the incorrect assumption leads immigrants to organize.