Author Archives: Joanna DeJesus

Questions on the Reading 4/30

First and foremost, I can’t help but wonder why it is that Koreans are the entrepreneurs in managerial positions hiring Latino immigrants for the low-level jobs and not vice versa. Why aren’t Latinos starting their own businesses? I know that Puerto Ricans used to be the number one owners of grocery stores, or “bodegas”, but that has shifted and I wonder what the cause of that was.

Chapter 3 from One Out of Three discusses the concerns surrounding the effect of immigration on some US-born workers and the article by Dae Young Kim states that “employer discrimination interacts with social networks that are outside of native minorities to reduce their employment opportunities” thus creating competition between native born minorities and immigrants. Is this because immigrants accept lower wages and other bad working conditions that native born minorities may not? How does this specifically impact the community? In what ways can native born minorities work to get the upper hand in a situation like this?

Also, a question about time, is this a phenomenon that is still happening? Has their been another shift in immigrant employment since 1999? I think that would be interesting for us to observe.

Their Hard Work, Our Nourishment

A review on U Roberto Romano’s eye-opening documentary, The Harvest/La Cosecha.
Rate: 4.0/5

“They don’t know what they eat, what they have in the table, its picked up from migrants. I bet you they don’t even know.” – Perla
Have you ever taken the time to think about where the food that you eat comes from? My guess is probably not, and if you were asked to guess, you never would have said from the hands of a child. U Roberto Romano makes it hard to turn the other cheek on the issue of child labor in agriculture with his documentary The Harvest/La Cosecha. Following three children and their lives as migrant field workers, this documentary takes viewers into a world of struggle that many, particularly those of us from the city, would not even think still exists. Romano makes it evident that child labor in agriculture should not be legal in our country, as we learn that kids as young as seven years old are put to work in the dangerous conditions of a field full of toxins. US Senator, Tom Harkin states, “A child ten years old cannot work at McDonald’s. A child cannot work in hazardous occupations. But in agriculture they can work it ten hours a day seven days a week. They have no proctiection. And that is legal in America today.” How is it that we allow something like this? The Harvest/La Cosecha alsoshows viewers how farmworker families live, most if not all of them well below the poverty level. The documentary shows these kids wanting to help their struggling families. The children voluntarily leave school at an early age to go to fields all over the country in order to receive wages for their families.

Romano’s use of personal accounts from three very hardworking children coupled with the statistics that permeate the documentary prove to be very effective in drawing attention to the issues of poverty among farmworkers and child labor in agriculture. With the subtitle, “The Story of the Children Who Feed America”, this documentary successfully forces viewers to appreciate not only their lives, but also where they get their fruits and vegetables as we see kids working hard and hot days to pick what we consume. Romano combines emotional, often times heartbreaking, stories with statistical evidence, like the fact that over 400,000 American children are migrant farm workers, to draw viewers into a tale, making it difficult not to want to take action to help farmworker families. The images of successful individuals that were once farmworkers at a young age featured at the end of the film are an attempt to create an effective full circle effect, proving that these migrant families contribute as much to this nation as any other American. However, those same images also seemed to serve as something similar to the “model minority myth”, sending the message that if those individuals could become successful, why can’t others? I also think that this documentary could have been even more moving if it included other cultures. I know there are other migrants that are not from Spanish speaking countries and having their stories would have been more inclusive.

U Roberto Romano successfully addresses several themes discussed in our class, including identity, social change, and immigration/migration. Seeing the way in which many migrant farmworkers live allows viewers to get a better understanding of their lifestyle and thus their identity as migrants. The young man’s family had also immigrated from Mexico and faced many issues with the immigration papers, making it difficult for his family to stay together. This documentary gives viewers an insight on the struggles of immigrants, particularly Latinos, upon arriving in the United States and trying to make a living for themselves and their families. Hearing the perspective of children gives us get an understanding of how the entire family is affected. The Harvest/La Cosecha is also a call for help, to change the child labor laws in agriculture and protect those children in a way that will also help their families that are struggling with poverty. Anybody can really learn and be impacted by the documentary as it is very moving, but I know that anybody that wants to help families in need could really benefit from this documentary. It provides specific issues and ways to help, which people that do not know where to start may need, a push in the direction. Another great source of information is the website that accompanies this documentary. Theharvestfilm.com is a great website that includes information not only about the film, but also about the issues that the film discusses with links to contact Congress and spread the word.

Tradition

The title of this unit is Tradition. While reading the article about Foodmaps I began to wonder what tradition means. Is it defined by one family’s traditions or that of an entire culture? Does Elsa’s preparation of la bandera, for example, change its value as a tradition?

The reading, Livin’ la Vida Sabrosa focused on the Latin aesthetic utilizing all the senses, making it seem as though other cultures do not value such extensive use of the senses. Why is that? In what ways do other cultures incorporate all of the senses? Are their other culturally specific names for this? (Also used in presentation.)

The Impact of Violence

First off, why in the world did women set the food on fire and destroy it all instead of keep it?

Food Riots Brownsville: We know that rioting has happened many times in this city, but I wonder what is the significance of such violence (e.g. beating up innocent women that bought the chicken or “shooting the messenger” who I believe in this case is the pushcart owners)? Is violence in fact more effective in getting the attention of and sending a message to our political leaders? Or do examples like Martin Luther King Jr. and the power of his speeches prove that peaceful resistance can be just as successful?

Pushcart Peddling: Can you guys imagine New York without pushcarts and street merchants? I really love the idea that pushcarts were a key aspect of bringing ethnicity to the Lower East Side because I think its true. If we just look at QC we have quite a few carts around campus that bring different foods to our little community, so what if we did not have them? Do you guys think pushcarts encourage an openness to exotic and different cultural foods that we may not otherwise have?

 

97 Orchard

While reading about the Rogarshevsky family and the amount of people that were detained on Ellis Island, I wonder if there was any other type of cultural mixing that occurred in passing Ellis Island?  For example, I know that often times names changed which definitely can affect families. What else changed due to detainment and interaction with immigrants from other countries? Maybe words in languages? Or styles of clothing?

Diaspora and Sugar

In Food and Diaspora the author writes, “When food objects, processes- even ideas – spread from one society to another, the receiving society is likely to modify, often to misunderstand, and usually to redefine what it has received.” I find this a very interesting concept, especially if we consider Jorge Torres’ story and the sugar cane travel. Sugar cane was not native to places like Puerto Rico, but when it was brought there it became such a key part of the culture. How do you think the use and importance of sugar cane changed when integrated into their culture? How does the quote relate to Torres’ story?