Last class, we questioned the U.S. or specifically the New York and New Jersey governments, wondering how they allow people to build and reside in high-risk areas? Shouldn’t they practice eminent domain or retreat development in coastal areas? However, Botzen and Aerts shed light on the fact that there are 252 “vital infrastructures, ” including schools, police stations, and power plants in 1/100 flood zone and even NYC subways are vulnerable to serious flood damage. With that being said, how can we expect the government to exert control over residents when their own infrastructures are in irresponsible locations? A city has never preemptively retreated in such a highly populated and developed area such as New York City. Such an act would angrily displace so many homeowners, and interfere with the economy and transportation. Also, sewer and transit systems would remain below ground regardless.
However, this does not call for stagnation. There are other measures that could be taken to minimize environmental hazards. While I agree that everyone should protect themselves with insurance, it is less of a preventive measure and more of a superficial measure. Yes, it will prevent individuals from spending less money, but the same damage will still occur. The problem must be addressed more deeply.
I was surprised to learn that NFIP buildings standards or FEMA flood maps do not address climate change, leaving people unprepared for future floods. Therefore, building code and insurance regulations should apply to buildings based on future projections of flood zones that could potentially affect them in their lifetime. This policy change would perhaps serve as a warning to owners that their building is in danger. Fear accompanied by action could go a long way in mending the problem. If society begins to fear potential floods enough to sell or not to purchase a building in vulnerable flood zones, real estate would eventually become less desirable and valuable, and new projects deterred. Unfortunately, humans do this odd thing where they prioritize luxury, materialism, or short-term pleasures before their own wellbeing. That is why people smoke, visit tanning salons, cheat, and live near vulnerable waterfronts.
