Author Archives: hughshin

About hughshin

student

Posts by hughshin

Traffic Congestion and its Future

Chosen Topic: Restructuring NYC’S Transportation to Relieve Stress & Increase Resiliency
Group Members: Justin, Kyle, Jun, Herrick, Hugh
Goal/Aim: Incentivizing decreased use of private transportation in favor of public transportation to decrease stress on transportation in New York.

Why did our group choose this topic?
While discussing, our group realized that raising prices and taxes to reduce congestion is not an effective solution. For the sake of comfort, we believed that people would either pay the higher price, or others who are able to afford the more expensive rates would take their place. In the face of an indefinite increase in population for all the boroughs of NYC, it simply isn’t sustainable to assume that private cars can continued to be used in the way they are. By making people want to use public transportation more, while gradually/systematically weeding out the use of private cars, transportation in NYC can become more resilient to the increasing stress of population growth.

Our end, idealistic goal is for the streets of NYC to be void of privately-owned cars. By allowing the streets to be used for public transportation and other public uses like delivering supplies and transporting trash, there can be a more rigorous system/schedule designed to avoid traffic jams, scheduled in a similar way that the subways are. Realistically, our group would like an integration of reality and our ideas. It may be unreasonable to completely get rid of all private cars, but if we can reduce it enough for public transportation to be a viable means of transportation in NYC and relieve stress on transportation both above and below the ground, the city’s transportation infrastructure would be resilient enough to endure the projected population growth in all of its boroughs. Our project can be divided into a 3-staged approach: analysis of historic transportation and its successes and failures, gradual implementation of decreased private transportation on outer boroughs, and finally the holistic target of decreasing private car-use and opening up the streets of NYC for efficient public transportation (as well as other public services).

How will the research be divided amongst group members?
Our group has 5 members, and the content for our research can be divided as so, although tentative:

  • Historical/background research on techniques on reducing traffic congestion and why they were ineffective. Some research into modern practices of cities completely banning cars, the pros and cons of this and what we can take from it. The person in charge of this aspect will have to research the history of NYC’s transportation system, and other city/countries’ in order to better understand why congestion occurs and how some cities may have managed to solve this problem.
  • Incentivizing the use public transportation (buses), over private transportation. This includes making buses as viable as the subways.
    • Begin by analyzing why solely depending on NYC’s subway system is not sustainable. What stresses are there, can we depend on our subways in the next 50 years with the incoming increase in population?
    • Provide the benefits of not only effective public transportation on the streets, but how it works in conjunction with subways. When your train to New Jersey is suddenly closed for some obscure reason, you have limited options on going back home. And to call an Uber on a Friday evening when the cars flood Holland tunnel, there isn’t much of a choice to begin with.
    • Start on the outer boroughs where congestion isn’t as much of an issue. Slowly works inwards towards most problematic areas of the city. Demonstrate how clearing the streets for public transportation allows for less congestion and allows for more timely transportation (perhaps faster than subways and capable of making closer stops).
    • More effective bus designs; no linked-buses, more double deckers, trolleys? What are the issues from past bus designs and transportation systems that we can learn from? What are innovative ways to relieve congestion and simultaneously increase efficiency of public transportation.
    • The person in charge of this aspect is largely responsible for a list of why citizens of NYC would want less cars and more public transportation on the streets (and how we would start with this project). This section will likely require two members as it is a lengthy amount of research.
  • Ultimate goal of having streets in NYC be mostly for public use (trucks delivering supplies, public transportation, and the allowance of smart cars). The person in charge of this section should outline a concrete image of what our final result should be (working with other members). This section would also include a ‘further considerations’ section that may be obstacles to our project, like what do citizens who already own cars do? What would the policy towards taxi drivers be?
  • Other benefits to our solution: decreased amount of accidents both car-car and car-pedestrian collisions, decreased stress on subway system as people begin to use buses, and environmental benefits of less carbon emissions due to less cars.
    • Can also ensure guarantee schedule of buses that is not always delayed by traffic.
    • Safety is not only for pedestrians, but for bikers who at times have no lanes and navigate dangerously between cars and people.
    • The person in charge of this section of research would identify the many benefits of our project being successful, outside of relieving transportation congestion in NYC.

[Summary of Research]
->What have cities done in the face of traffic congestion that has and has not worked?
->What are the benefits of increasing public transportation use? What can we do to make public transportation more effective and comfortable to use?
->What are the issues with how things are at the moment? Can we continue to rely on the systems we have right now, or will an increased population be too much of a stress on NYC’s transportation?
-> What is the final result that our group wants to see? What are realistic obstacles that must be considered for this project?
->What are additional benefits in implementing our project?

[Tentative Deadlines]
[Mar. 12th] Submission of group proposal, discuss together and outline other possible issues we may face in our research. Agree on who will do which research parts.

[Mar. 18th] Have all sources we want to use chosen. Have a rough draft of our sections printed and ready to share. Read each other’s parts and make changes to make project cohesive. Do research together if necessary. Information should be on Google Drive.

[Mar. 29th] Put together all parts into a cohesive project. Revise and make sure that all aspects of the project have been considered.

[Apr. 9th] In-class working session. Outline presentation and be ready to rehearse.

[Apr.16th + 30th] Powerpoint should be finished, with each group member well-rehearsed in their part, but also knowledgeable in the entire project.

[May 4/5th] Conference Date

NYC in a Box

When I wrote my first post for this class, I wrote what I felt. Edgy, sad, I thought that portraying New York City as anything other than the glamorous city it’s seen as by the world would accomplish something. Trigger a reaction, make me reconsider my own perspective, perhaps just make me seem cool. But I quickly realized that many of my classmates echoed the same sentiment, the things I pass every day that cause me to quicken my pace and avoid eye contact was something every New Yorker was experiencing, and it was relieving to know that I was not alone. It made me wonder what it was that gravitated not only me but others towards the trash on the streets rather than the countless beauties hidden between the building walls.

I found my wondering satisfied only when I left the city. The picture I took was really interesting because the beautiful skyline that is marveled worldwide looked like its caged inside. Of course it was just a coincidence that the picture lined up in the way it did, but I felt it symbolic. A lot of people grow up in NYC, go to school here, and build their career. In a sense, the city is the world to some people, not only in a metaphoric manner, but quite literally in scale. And when your world is always full of dirty trash and the trees are always fading, it can make a person pessimistic. This relates to the subject of this IDC course. It’s the ‘future of NY’ yet rather than fantasizing about fantastical possibilities, we’re stuck with very real problems that seem very hopeless to solve. World hunger, climate change, loss of biodiversity, we keep asking “what’s the solution”, well knowing that such a question simply invites pessimism. In a sense, we cannot solve such problems. Not by ourselves in such a large scale. We try to tackle on the world’s problems not knowing how big our world is to begin with, nevertheless how monumental and complex its ailments are. In the same way, how can we expect us to believe in ourselves to save NYC when it is, in scale, the world to us? Suddenly one city seems like a thousand webs intertwining with a thousand others, each thread a problem to solve, and the more you try to unweave them, the more they get tangled.

It helps to take a step back then. Like I did on the shore of New Jersey looking out at the NYC skyline, it made me realize how my mentality had caged itself in, making the city my world and its problems seemingly endless. But once I realized that it was but a city that could be observed so easily from just a short distance away, it made the city smaller, its problems more manageable, and myself a bit more optimistic. And this is how I think we can find a solution. Not by trying to overwhelm ourselves from the beginning and become discouraged, but to take things little by little, until one day we really do end up solving the world’s problems.

Project Idea: The Future is Up

New York City began by growing horizontally, increasing the borders of the city and adding more and more buildings and streets. But at some point, the geographic limitations caused a sort of architectural evolution, to go upwards. Not a new spectacle of any sorts, but the skyscrapers and the fame the New York City Skyline is a result of alleviating the stress of an increasing population in the same area of land. This relates to what we discussed in class regarding resiliency and sustainability; continued stress will decrease resilience, with each consecutive stress having a harsher impact.

I wanted to look at what others had proposed as their projects and it seemed like there was a recurring theme, congestion, environmental stresses and its effect on the city’s resiliency. I wanted to combat NYC congestion for my project, but congestion is complex. It isn’t simply too many cars and people, not enough road space and public transportation. Its based on a fundamental issue of a seemingly infinite increase in population in an already finite set of resources; electricity, gas, water, food, and most importantly, space. Therefore, the only solution is to go up. There’s a thing called skyways, which are bridges between buildings that can alleviate sidewalk congestion and have other positive applications. There are cons as well that I wish to investigate, but I believe these skyways have multiple applications. From surveillance to reduce crime activity in the city, to reducing congestion, I think it would be really interesting to do a close-analysis on how skyways would both positively and negatively impact the city and future architecture. My father is an architect who has talked about how there’s purchaseable ‘air space’, the space above a building roof in cities that actually needs to be purchased if an adjacent building wants to build a much taller building. With this legislation already existing, there can be further monitoring to ensure environmentally-friendly protocols.

Hugh Shin’s LWT Article for 3/5

Main Article:
https://newyork.cbslocal.com/2019/02/27/rethink-food-nyc/

Supporting Articles:
https://www.nrdc.org/experts/margaret-brown/new-york-city-continues-lead-food-waste-recycling

https://www.usda.gov/oce/foodwaste/faqs.htm

https://www.foodaidfoundation.org/world-hunger-statistics.html

https://solutions.rdtonline.com/blog/the-cold-hard-facts-about-food-waste

https://www.thinkeatsave.org/environmental-impact-of-food-waste-in-the-us/

‘apocalyptic zoo’ is a very dramatic way to phrase it

The last thing you expect to see when you visit a zoo are a bunch of dead animals. Rather, you expect to see animals. Lively and spright, and definitely not dreading the enclosed environment that keeps them from ever being able to freely run and roam. My mother mentioned how many zoo animals have gone insane from being in the same small room for their entire lives, kind of like how patients of insane asylums become. I don’t know how true this was, but it brought a bittersweet taste to our visit to the Bronx Zoo, and it definitely was a cherry on the top when we saw a field full of tombstones in the middle of the zoo.

The image you see is an animal cemetery. But the tombstones aren’t for specific animals, they’re for entire species that have gone extinct. If a cemetery for entire species does not scare you, I don’t know what’s up. As we discussed in class, we are currently in our 6th great extinction, our last one being the extinction of most life from meteors. The problem only gets juicier as we learn that anthropologic emissions have only helped to accelerate the process. Fluctuations in climate, geography, and biodiversity is normal. But we have severely sped up the loss of biodiversity, especially from the destruction of the Amazon Rainforest that holds over 50% of Earth’s biodiversity. These facts don’t normally impact us, the consumers at the end of the long chain of resource-gathering, processing, and selling. All we see are neatly-packaged goods that are conveniently priced, in conveniently-placed stores, for our convenient use. And I’m guilty to say that when I went to visit the Bronx zoo, this is exactly what I expected. Neatly-packaged animals living in neat and clean boxes so I could watch them as they kind of just… stood there. Gripping aspects of the inconveniences of our reality often come when we least expect it. And seeing the lifeless animals wander around, with a cemetery that spelled every species’ inevitable fate sure put me in a morbid mood. There must be more ways to connect the common public demographic to these realities. Scary because its real, the destruction of our Earth and its inhabitants is reaching a tipping point and we as individuals must do our best to spread awareness and do our part.

one man’s trash, another man’s… inconvenience of seeing it everywhere he steps

Not only as students but as human beings, we are constantly striving for more. We want better things, we want to improve things, and therefore our eyes are always set on the ongoing horizon. A destination that can’t be reached but a goal that we keep going for. We are trained to be competitive and to look forward only at our goals, going full speed ahead and stopping for nothing.

Ever since high school, I’ve felt troubled by this notion. I am privileged enough to receive high quality education and I almost felt brainwashed into a mentality of ignorance. I was like a competitive animal, scrounging to secure a future in a world I knew nothing about. So when I came to New York City to attend college, the real world showed its ugly face along with the bright and polished shops filled with exquisitely useless trinkets. I used to always be as considerate as I could. Give money to those on the streets, help those that are lost, give my time to those people who claim to be from Greenpeace but then ask for your credit card information after a 20 minute talk. But after several scams, racist remarks, and other unpleasantries, my 15 minute walk from my station to Baruch became a 10 minute walk. Subtle, but it wasn’t like I was going any faster. My perspective had become a straight line, to Baruch and back. I no longer looked at those sitting on the streets or people needing help with this or that, I looked forward. Determined to reach my goal and achieve my dreams, whatever they were.

I find it sad how busy student lives can be. While I feel guilty for not being a good samaritan, the student life barely allows any flexibility (in between studying, interns, jobs, clubs, etc). This picture kind of portrayed the sadness I felt, it felt representative of the emotions that stirred every time I passed a homeless man, woman, or child. Our world wants to seem polished, organized, someone spent time designing that trashcan so it could be used. But what we end up is trash still on the streets. This photo may not impact you the same way it does, but a homeless woman used to always sit here. I don’t know where she’s gone but sometimes, I wish I had stopped to say hello. New York City boasts its technological and cultural prowess, but progress must be made as human beings, not machines. We need to look left and right and see the people and trash, sometimes indistinguishable, and understand that in our journey to the future, we are leaving some behind.

Hugh’s Bio

Hello. My name is Hyosik Shin but Hugh is a lot easier to pronounce. I’m the guy to the right of the image (left is my dad). I’m not a fan of pictures so I unfortunately didn’t have a picture of just me. I was born in Korea and am a sophomore. I am in the process of applying to Cuny BA to “major” in psychology and computer science. I want to work in virtual reality therapy in the future and find innovative, specialized means of treating those struggling with various mental issues.

I am currently an Honors and Macaulays ambassador, a writer for the Ticker, and the treasurer and chair of events for Conversation Partners. In my free time I like to play video games and read. However when I have a lot of time, I like to compose and aspire to produce music as a hobby. I’m really into music and love to play, listen, and make it. I’m also a big Lego fan.

Comments by hughshin

".-."
--( posted on Apr 16, 2019, commenting on the post and the city blooms )
 
"The prospect of making change in problems deeply rooted and complicated by time can always seem like a daunting task. Where to task? How big of a scope should we aspire to change? How much do we have to get rid of, how much do we have to bring in, it's the easiest phase to become discouraged. The tracks of NYC is no exception to this as well. To a city that seems to be beaming with innovation and creativity, our infrastructure is held together by old and failing systems, hopelessly incapable of supporting an even further-growing population. But I believe the key is to begin. One train line at a time, one stop at a time, even one person at a time. It takes time and effort to make change, which is why I remain hopeful that we're not too far (in terms of traffic congestion, but environmental issues as well) and can still make impactful changes."
--( posted on Mar 31, 2019, commenting on the post Focus )
 
"Very mysterious in the way you phrased your post. I wonder how much pollution actually is hidden from the public eye. It would seem that carbon emissions and other contributors to climate change are obvious and plain to see. But maybe there is something else we're missing. Some big contributing factor that if we identified, isolated, and resolved, could give major steps towards receiving the effects of climate change."
--( posted on Mar 16, 2019, commenting on the post Imagine the things we don’t see )
 
"I didn't really realize this when I first came to NYC, but its becoming more and more of an issue as every restaurant just piles trash in front of their shop on the street. This plus the pipes set up for construction really limits where you can actually walk. I wish there was regulation in the city where cities just have to store their trash within their building until around 9PM or something, a set time where trash could be collected. In a situation where there's no space to spare, I can understand why businesses have no option but to pile trash onto the streets. But its definitely an issue that needs to be addressed."
--( posted on Mar 9, 2019, commenting on the post Trash at every turn )
 
"It's always interesting to compare the standards and expectations of different countries. You may be right that there needs to be a more inventive and rigorous way to protect these young trees so that they can reach maturation. Other than the ironic use of wood cut from another tree to protect a tree, these kinds of efforts would rarely if ever be seen in Korea, where I lived for a bit of my life. Now Korea has efforts to be more environmentally friendly, planting trees and encouraging the use of public transport. And whenever we're not blaming our pollution on China, it's nice to see trees line the streets of small avenues, which small flowerbeds and bushes filling all these nooks and crannies. But what's weird is that you never see an 'ugly' tree, a young or old plant, a wilting flower. Almost as if they're made of plastic, the nature I passed by everyday remained utterly unchanging, other than the changing color of ... flowers? It was then I realized that for the sake of looks, flowers, bushes, and trees would constantly be cycled out. Trucks would arrive once every 2 to 3 months to rip out plants that had lost their liveliness, and replaced with new ones purchased from somewhere else. The illusion of a healthy earth was merely supported by the constant destruction of nature and replacing it. I hope that Korea can become more environmentally conscious than it is now to the point where we can one day worry about better ways to protect out environment, rather than pondering if we should protect our environment to begin with."
--( posted on Feb 23, 2019, commenting on the post Tree Guards Protect Their Own )