Winnebago Medicine Rite

According to the dictionary, a Winnebago is a member of a Native American people formerly living in eastern Wisconsin. Rite refers to a ceremony or an act that can be religious. The Winnebago Medicine Rite is a ceremony that gives the initiate a long and happy life on earth and ensures that they will be able to return in the afterlife. The origin story of how the Medicine Rite first began states that the Earthmaker made the earth and other creatures and later made human beings. They were the weakest creatures on earth and not stronger than a fly. As a result of their weakness, they were preyed on by evil spirits and were near extinction. The Earthmaker sent four men to protect them, but when this failed he sent a fifth man, Hare. Hare took a human form and was able to do the job of the other four men and protect the human beings. However, he soon found out that despite all his efforts, like everything, humans were destined to die. Angered at this fact, Hare started to destroy things around him. Hare was sent out of the earth, but Earthmaker felt pity and told him that he was allowed to return and help humans perform a ceremony in which humans would be granted the ability to be reincarnated and live more than one life. In the ritual, the initiate puts a shell in their mouth and pretends to die and then coughs it up to show reincarnation. They are reincarnated when they die and “shed one’s skin and emerge reborn.” All the struggle in the past life would be gone and they would be able to start over, but still have their former being. They would become members of the Medicine Society. Stanley Diamond is trying to say that joy is not a result of the truth or beauty, but of struggling and finally being successful. The initiate finally achieves emancipation after all he has gone through and the joy was a result of the challenge. He argues that joy is only a result of the growth that was caused by pain. What is truly sublime is earning this joy and honor through all the pain, struggle and realization, not through beauty nor the truth.

Origin story: https://books.google.com/books?id=yUvbvgFakkwC&pg=PA73&lpg=PA73&dq=winnebago+medicine+rite+definition&source=bl&ots=yY8JBOsSSB&sig=emdzpTgrBDA7EQmxhwk_MJDGdB8&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi9y67NxInWAhVixoMKHQK2A64Q6AEINTAD#v=onepage&q=earthmaker&f=false

Existential

As stated in Merriam-Webster Dictionary, existential can be defined as “relating to or affirming existence.” When using this specific definition, existence can be referring to anything in the world such as planes, food, streets, and anything else that is in a state of reality. These are all things that exist; however, when analyzing the use of the word in this piece we can see that the author, Stanley Diamond, is only concerned with human existence. This focuses on the philosophical theory of existentialism which emphasizes the free will of an individual person to determine how they will dictate their own existence. In The Beautiful and the Ugly are One Thing, the Sublime Another: A Reflection on Culture, Diamond states that “the existentializing of our human possibilities… represents a struggle that is constant and renewed in each generation… as [individuals] strive to become cultured human beings.” In this quote, the author is revealing that this existence that humans are bestowed with comes with a battle to stay relevant. For every new generation comes new music, new fashion trends, new movies, and all things that create the culture of the present society. Earlier in Diamond’s reflection, he states that there is a blurred line between what is considered beautiful and ugly since cultures are so different and ever-changing. Therefore, we can refer back to the definition of existentialism and come to the conclusion that if people are actually given this free will then they must face the struggle to become more cultured by differentiating between what they consider beautiful and ugly for themselves.

Epigram

At first glance, when we see the word epigram just by itself, one might think that its definition has something to do with weights, as it ends with the suffix gram. But that isn’t true. According to the Merriam Webster’s Dictionary, epigram is defined as “a concise poem dealing pointedly and often satirically with a single thought or event and often ending with an ingenious turn of thought.” In this case, the poem would be Ode on a Grecian Urn by John Keats and the thought or idea would be “Beauty is truth, truth beauty-that is all/ Ye know on earth, and all ye need to know.”

When Stanley Diamond talks about this epigram in “The Beautiful and the Ugly are One Thing, the Sublime Another: A Reflection on Culture”, he says that there are limitations to the ideal mentioned by Keats. In my opinion, I agree with Diamond. This is because he relates beauty with truth, wherein truth is a fact that can’t be changed but beauty is a subjective term because everyone has a different definition of beauty. Diamond does a very good job of explaining how beauty is viewed differently in different cultures and time periods.

Also, if we look at this in a philosophical manner, then there is this question of what is truth? And does it really exist? And if does exist, then how does one know that it exists? This is because everytime an incident takes place, there are three versions of truth: my version of the truth, other people’s versions of the truth and the real truth itself. But no one knows what that real truth actually is because everyone has their own version. So, if we can’t even define what truth actually is, then how would we know that something like beauty, which is subjective, equates to the real truth.

Dilemma

According to the Merriam-Webster Dictionary, a “dilemma” can be defined as “an argument presenting two or more equally conclusive alternatives against an opponent”.  To me it is a complex problem involving multiple solutions, thus making it difficult to resolve. The first time I read the article, it didn’t strike to me as such a huge deal that Western poets were struggling with the ideals of romantic consciousness and I wondered why Diamond had used “dilemma” rather than a simpler term such as “challenge” or “problem”. After rereading it a few more times, I realized that the “dilemma” that the dilemma encountered is not just about the inability for Western poets to  capture the main romantic consciousness, but also the complexity of what beauty is. Diamond previously stated that “beauty is ethnocentric”, meaning that it is different to different cultures. Further along he describes the various aspects that can be attributed to beauty such as exaggerated features, or suppressed features, harmony and disharmonies, etc. All these different features make up what beauty is, however this does not mean that beauty itself has a certain standard, or “form” as Plato would have once said. What I mean by this is that beauty has certain qualities that appeal to us, but it does not have a certain essence or image that pops into your head when someone says “beauty”, as is the case with more ground objects like a table or a home. This complexity is what the “dilemma” refers to in the overall text.

Romanticism

A mellow scene from a movie. Alluring lyrics of a song. The gentle warmth of a person. These are the things that may pop into our heads when we hear the word “Romanticism.” Because the word romance has the overtone of lovey-dovey feelings, a lot of us quickly relate the word romanticism into state of being romantic. However, in many cases we interpret the word incorrectly. According to the Merriam Webster dictionary, romanticism is a literary, artistic, and philosophical movement originating in the 18th century which puts emphasis on the imagination and emotions.

In this article, The Beautiful and the Ugly are One Thing, the Sublime Another: A Reflection on Culture, the author, Stanley Diamond, uses the word romanticism to characterize Keats’ epigram of “beauty is truth, truth beauty.” By categorizing Keats’ idea as romanticism, the author is criticizing Keats’ remark as an imaginative paradox that needs to be argued against.

I agree with the author. Keats argue that beauty equals truth and truth equals beauty, but I believe that more often than not, beauty is established by deceits. What may look pretty on the outside may be unattractive on the inside. Also, the truth does not have to be pretty. The common phrase, “ugly truth” speaks for itself.

Janus-Faced Trickster

    General definitions of the adjective Janus-faced, as given from Dictionary.com all contain aspects which apply to the phrase from the text The Beautiful and the Ugly are One Thing, the Sublime Another: A Reflection of Culture:

  1. Having two faces, one looking forward, one looking backward, as the Roman deity Janus.
  2. Having two contrasting aspects, as the alternation of mood in a capricious person.
  3. Two-faced and deceitful.
  4. Aware of or concerned with polarities; seeing different and contrasting aspects.

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/janus-faced

   Trickster (as a noun) – the one who tricks and deceives, a cunning or deceptive character appearing in various forms in the folklore of many cultures.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/trickster

   Based on what the definitions give and after analyzing the text, it can be concluded that beauty is ethnocentric and is always double sided, which then relates to the two-faced and deceitful identity of the Roman god Janus. This shows that the same person or object might have contrasting personalities and appeals to the eyes of different beholders. What society currently considers beauty can be turned into embarrassment in the future. The noun trickster in “Janus-faced trickster” shows the deliberate deceptiveness of beauty by having the fine line between beauty for one, and the ugly for other. As said from the sentence where the phrase is found from the text  “The Beautiful and the Ugly are One Thing, the Sublime Another: A Reflection of Culture” by Stanley Diamond: “The trickster may appear as the supreme creator… In the Janus-faced trickster, the beautiful and the ugly spring from the same body.”

Where joy is found

[by Tasmim]

Stanley Diamond creates an argument against Keats’ idea of joy being only derived from beauty and truth. Diamond describes Keats’ perception of joy as platonic, which google defined as an intimate and affectionate love or friendship. Platonic love is a deep appreciation of ideal beauty that two individuals can have for one and other without desiring a physical relationship. I believe Diamond uses the word platonic to describe Keats’ idea because throughout the article, The Beautiful and the Ugly are One Thing, the Sublime Another: A Reflection of culture, Diamond stresses that joy can not only come from the good things in life, but also the hardships one faces as well. Some synonyms of platonic are ideal and utopian, which further explains Keats’ perception of joy and the essence of truth coming from a place where there are no difficulties or challenges¾only beauty. However, Diamond refutes Keats’ argument; according to him joy can be found in a place where there is experience and growth. A place where one conquers their own challenges, achieves emancipation from bondage, and overcomes any kind of obstacles blocking their path. These experiences Diamond described are what he believes makes a person grow. This growth comes from both good and bad experiences in life, and together they create joy.

Oedipus

Oedipus is best known for his roots in Greek mythology in the story Oedipus Rex where he kills his father and marries his mother. Merriam-Webster defines Oedipus as a complex in which a child feels sexual desires toward the parent of the opposite sex along with jealous feelings toward the parent of the same sex. In summary, Oedipus at Colonnus, Sophocles exaggerates the culmination of the tragic hero’s life and his mythic implication for Athens. During the course of the play, Oedipus experiences a transformation from a hopeless drifter, expelled from his city because of his evils, into a symbol of immense power, capable of extending divine blessings. In conjunction to Stanley Diamond’s, The Beautiful and the Ugly are One Thing, the Sublime Another: A Reflection on Culture, Oedipus Rex is used as an example to measure joy within cultural realization. It describes a culture’s struggle as being something against all forces that reduce people to productive social mechanisms. A society’s needs can be simplified to routine as symbolism and are turned into behavior. Here, culture no longer serves as an expression. That realization is in the words and description that Sophocles uses when Oedipus shuffles off the guilt for his sins. The language used in this play transcends the norm and basic. It is in works like Oedipus Rex and King Lear in which culture was no longer mere functionality but transcends the norm. It is in cases like that where joy “exists”.

Sublime

It’s funny how I assumed that “sublime” somehow had something to do with slime or a part of a lime, and I never bothered to actually look up the word itself. I guess this assignment turned out to be a great reason for me to look it up for the first time. According to the Merriam-Webster Dictionary, “sublime” is defined as (a) lofty, grand, or exalted in thought, expression, or manner; (b)  of outstanding spiritual, intellectual, or moral worth; (c) tending to inspire awe usually because of elevated quality (as of beauty, nobility, or grandeur) or transcendent excellence. Basically, sublime is when something is A+ or tremendously astounding or astonishing. I did find it interesting, though, that sublime could also mean complete or utter, which I think could be a better definition in “The Beautiful and the Ugly are One Thing, the Sublime Another: A Reflection on Culture.” I think it’s interesting how the word sublime is even in the title, but I know it is no accident. The article discusses in detail the difference (or the lack of) between the beautiful and the ugly, and I think Diamond believes that neither the beautiful nor the ugly can achieve completeness or outstanding worth, which makes a lot of sense given the arguments Diamond makes in this article, especially the point that what one culture finds beautiful, another culture might find ugly; what is beautiful one day might be outrageous the next. Sublime is a much deeper word than I thought!

Transcendental

Stanley Diamond argues that the statements made by Keats in his poem are flawed as Keats asserts that “a thing of beauty is a joy forever”.  Keats is trying to explain that beauty has the power to affect people, as it can change their emotions for the better not just temporarily but “forever”, meaning that this pleasure is never-ending. Diamond believes that this assertion is “forced” and that joy can be related to much more than just beauty. He argues that this claim creates a spiritual problem. Not only is this problem evident in Keats writing but also in the other authors that write in the romantic style.  Romanticism focuses on intense emotion, particularly of the individual. As Keats shows great appreciation to beauty he suggests that beauty has a spiritual source. Thats where Diamond attests that this is not only flawed but also dangerous. Transcendental is defined as something that relates to a spiritual or a nonphysical realm, Diamond believes that poems such as Keats which relate to spiritual beliefs can prove to be dangerous to ones inner self, as it could cause someone to fall into despair.  And he proclaims that Keats is not the only one in making such claims about spirituality but one of the many “Western poets” whom bring up similar themes.