Sorry to post my response to the “Great Issues Forum: Political Power” so late.

I found the event extremely insightful and educational touching on numerous topics ranging from the war in Iraq, to the Israeli- Palestinian issues, genocides around the world, climate change, the upcoming elections in the United States and the changing role of the United States in the global arena.

When asked about the role of the United States in the conflicts around the world, all three speakers stressed the importance of multilateral coalitions and open dialogue. I completely agreed with this assessment. In order for the United States to resume its role as a world leader, it is important for the country to engage in dialogues and discussion with other countries. It cannot act without any cooperation or approval from other countries. Mary Robinson made an important distinction between the war in Iraq and war in Afghanistan in terms of human rights violations. She said she supported the war in Afghanistan but the war in Iraq was a violation of human rights and it was necessary to be condemned as such. It raises the question of when invading another country is deemed okay and when military force is condemned by the international community.

Regarding the biggest issue that needed to be addressed in the near future, Brzezinski indicated the over-consumption and the general lack of responsibility that pervades the American society as a major problem. He discussed the irresponsibility in the government. Over-consumption has always been an American way of life, which Brzezinski believes has contributed to the current economic crisis.

Mary Robinson and Kristoff both pointedly said that humanity shines the brightest in the midst of abject violence, poverty, and conflict (Malushka also mentions this in her review). This humanity is what helps them both overcome and change the grim and often hopeless situations into something, which could be resolved with persistence, faith, and determination.

I really enjoyed this event. The speakers had clear, blunt, and precise if sometimes a differing view on the path America should follow, especially after the election of a new presidency.