Derek Lee and Belinda Wong
[mapsmarker layer=”16″]
Month: March 2017 (Page 1 of 4)
[mapsmarker layer=”9″]
[mapsmarker layer=”2″]
Eddie Farhi and Eli Catton
Prezi:
Hi class,
Please upload your Prezi and maps to the same post on the website. To put your Prezi online, just type the shortcode [prezi id='your id'] into your post. Remember, your id is the combination of letters and numbers that follows prezi.com/ in your URL browser bar.
If you have already uploaded a map, just edit the post and add in the Prezi shortcode. If you have not yet uploaded a map, create a new post and be sure to use the category “Presentations.” And if you have made a post but didn’t give it the correct category, just edit your post and change the category to “Presentations.”
If you have any issues with this, please let me know.
-Jake
http://prezi.com/l0h1jnyapezz/?utm_campaign=share&utm_medium=copy
[mapsmarker layer=”5″]
[mapsmarker layer=”8″]
Press Link:
Interview Link:
Katherine Dorovitsine and Brianna Gelsomini
Neighborhood Project
[mapsmarker layer=”4″]
This past Monday professor Rosenberg took a bit of a detour in the class discussion. He pulled out a topic that I have been recently enjoying more and more because of the law aspect that this particular case brings. We discussed the issues of two laws colliding with one another. One of them being a constitutional amendment and the other being recently added to the liberties of individuals in America. The collision of freedom of religion and civil liberties is a topic that intrigues me mostly because truth, I really don’t know which side is correct.
We brought several different cases and discussed the scenarios of a priest, a baker and a dining hall and if they would be required to perform their duties if they were against the marriage that was to be carried out. It’s even more interesting because my religion has no tolerance for gay marriage and so it really is a conflict that I can personally visualize. Even after the discussion we had in class I still don’t know which side the law would favor with. In a case of racial differences however , for example, if a baker wouldn’t bake for a mixed race marriage, that I think is wrong and the baker must perform his duties. Because of the racial case I’m extremely interested in where the line is drawn. I can’t seem to figure out if the gay marriage should also have the racial point of view or it’s a case entirely separate. Where is the line drawn?
Recent Comments