Immigration From the past to the Present
If there is one thing about immigration that does not change, it must be work. As Muzaffar Chishtii, the director of Migration Policy Institute at New York University, said, “Immigrants come here to work, not for the quality of life.” The size of the immigrant population in the United States has been increasing every year. There is always a reason why people choose to come to here to work. It is undeniable that this country provides great benefits to its residents such as many job opportunities, excellent health care systems, and other welfares. Many people succeeded in America, but there are also people ended up in disappointment. The United States, a country where its roads were paved with gold, has been an unpredictable journey to many immigrants.
The United States was known as the nation of immigrants, or the melting pot. During the seventeenth century, British and other Europeans began settling in this country. The English, Norwegian, and German were examples of the old immigrants. Most of them were protestant, literate, and skilled. The new immigrants settled in America during 1880 to 1910, and they were mostly illiterate and unskilled. In fact, the Jews, Irish, and Italians were the three major groups that arrived in the late 19th and early 20th century. They came for better life, better economic opportunity, and to escape poverty and religious persecution. They took low-paying and unskilled jobs such as waiters and laundresses. Their wages could only afford them to live in crowded tenements, but they had the choice to stay people from their country and preserve their cultures.
The Tenement Museum is a tour building that restored apartments and family history of past residents during different time periods. A tattered tenement was divided into many rooms to support a few families. A family of ten could squeeze in a tiny three room “house.” The corridor was narrow and had no light. There was also no private sink or bathroom for individual family. During the freezing winter, people had to go outside of the house to bring water in order to finish their housework. Not until 1901, the New York State Tenement House Act was passed and imposed light and proper ventilation systems, indoor bathroom, and fire safeguards into tenements, which greatly improved people’s lives.
Immigrants fled to the U.S. for survival and better lives, but reality didn’t always satisfy them. Many immigrants were unskilled and didn’t speak English allowed the rich to exploit them. The working condition in the U.S. is definitely not heaven-like. The Triangle Shirtwaist Company exploited its immigrant workers under horrible working condition. The factory was located at lower Manhattan and occupied the eighth, ninth, and tenth floor of a ten-story building. It hired mostly recent Jewish and Italian immigrant girls aged from 16 to 23. Nearly all of them did not speak English and they worked in a cramped space at lines of sewing machines. They were paid $7 to $12 a week by working 9 hours during weekdays plus 7 hours on Saturdays, which is equivalent to between $166 and $285 per week in 2014, severely underpaid.
On Saturday, March 25, 1911, around 4:40 in the afternoon, when the workers were already exhausted from a long day of work, a tragic fire started out from a flare in a scrap bin at the corner of the eighth floor. The workers from the lower level were unable to warn the people on the upper floors because there was a lack of safety alarm and other protections. Workers were trapped inside building because the one door was locked and the other only opened inward. They either tried to jam themselves into the elevator or eventually jumped off the building because they could not suffer the burning pain. The fire resulted in the deaths of 146 garment workers. The poor precaution of fire safety revealed corruption between garment industry and city government. After the disaster, New York State created a Factory Investigating Commission to ensure wages, sanitation, and safety in many places. The Triangle Shirtwaist Fire is remembered as one of the most infamous tragedy in U.S. history.
Another tragic group of immigrants was the Chinese. According to Edward Rothstein’s article “Great Job on the Railroad. Now Go Back to China”, “In 1784, a boat called the Empress of China sailed from New York to Canton, bearing furs, lead, wine, 30 tons of American ginseng and Mexican silver dollars to trade for Chinese goods: porcelain, silk, tea.” Chinese immigration to the United States has a much longer history than many people thought. Their merchants had been trading with America since the eighteenth century, but the major flow of Chinese into the U.S. was during the 1849 California Gold Rush. They were pushed by poverty and overpopulation from their homeland to the U.S., and they wished that they could find gold and send money back to their families. However, most of them ended up working extremely low-pay jobs such as laborers, domestic workers, minors, railroad workers, and fishermen. One of their greatest contributions is the building of the Central Pacific Railroad which connects California and Utah.
Very often, immigrants’ great contribution to the society was not appreciated. Chinese immigrants faced a lot of discrimination because the Europeans couldn’t understand how the Chinese could agree to work under such poor condition with extreme low pay. White people saw the increasing amount of Chinese as a threat that might take over all the jobs. The old immigrants tried to oppress the new immigrants by all means such as making laws to stop them from coming. The Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 illegalized Chinese to immigrate for ten years. A few exceptions to this rule were students, teachers, businessman, and Chinese Americans citizens’ blood related children. However, those exceptions still faced serious backgrounds check and long interrogations as they entered America. This law forced paper sons and daughters to purchase fraudulent documentations to prove their identities. Eventually, the act was repealed in 1943 as China became an Allies during WWII.
Time has made the past into history. Immigration is changing, but not necessarily just improving. Laws have improved the housing and working condition for people. However, they did not eradicate immigration problems. Nowadays, immigrants are facing different types of challenges.
In 2014, 13.3% of the U.S. population, approximately 42.4 million people was born foreign. 25 % of foreign born are unauthorized, and half of whom are Mexicans. Many of these people walked for long hours to cross the U.S.-Mexico border to enter this country illegally. One example is Olga Flores, a forty-years-old Mexican woman born in Hidalgo. She claimed that the only purpose of a woman in her country was to get married, have children, and cook for her whole life. Therefore, she chose to illegally enter the U.S. in 1998. She worked several jobs before meeting her husband, David, who is a hardworking and caring guy, very different from any of the Mexican men that she knows. All of Olga’s children are U.S. citizens, but she is still afraid of being deported because she needs to take care of her son, who has cancer. In the United States, her son is able to receive much better health care, and she was less concern about the money issues.
Undocumented workers are needed for the work force, but they are unrepresented by the government and they do not share the same benefits as the ones that are documented. There are ways for foreigners to enter U.S. legally, but they have to wait for years. The process is tedious and after years, your immigration is not guaranteed.
As Mr. Chishtii pointed out, “If we need them, we should allow them to come in legally.” In fact, President Barack Obama had tried his best to improve the situation. One example is the DREAM Act, which provides benefits to undocumented immigrants, such as qualifying them for driver’s licenses. There are also other programs that help documented or undocumented immigrants to walk through their difficult journeys. However, many of the Republicans reacted sharply to Obama’s policies. Jeff Sessions, Obama’s chief adversary in Congress, said, “If everyone who enters the country illegally can stay and become a citizen, that just encourages more people to come illegally.”
Another Republican presidential candidate, Donald Trump, addressed an absurd proposal on the issue of illegal immigration from Mexico. He commented, “They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.” His proposal was to force Mexico to build a wall on the U.S.-Mexico border or give America the money to build it, which was nearly impossible to occur in reality.
In fact, the government had already passed acts to control illegal immigration. The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 was signed into law by Ronald Regan, which illegalizes employers to hire illegal immigrants knowingly. In 1996, President Bill Clinton also increased the penalty on immigrants who violate criminal laws. Because of all these laws, there was a sharp increase in deportation in 1996. Recently, Obama’s opponents had made immigration much more difficult. Just under Obama’s presidency, 2.5 million people were deported from the U.S., the most deportation cases during the past 7 years.
There are gains and losses to immigration. Immigrants always face discrimination in this country. Though many immigrants lived and worked in horrible condition in the U.S., they were able to escape religious persecution, poverty, hunger, and other terrible situations in their own countries. Life in America might be difficult and challenging at the beginning, but immigrants are benefited in many ways as well. There is excellent health care, freedom, better education, better standard of living, living space, transportation, science and technology, and job opportunities in the United States.
Over the centuries, immigration has been changing accordingly. Immigrants have been facing different challenges at different time periods. Laws have been constantly changing the system. But one thing that did not change was work. There is no free lunch in this world. There is a price to everything. Everything is about work, work, and work.
The History of Immigration in America
The United States of America, a nation of immigrants, has endured large influx of new comers at any point of history even before the country came to existence. It is always the country in which the most percentage of foreigners settle. What attracts them to come? Certainly it contains countless domestic and external problems itself, but this fact does not seem to block people from establishing their homes here.
The only factor that did stop them was the legislation, a cause that is totally beyond the consequence of their willing decision. The law of exclusion against immigrants started in late 19th century, anticipating to eliminate people from certain parts of the world from coming –– in the context of what Americans fear at the time. The first of those laws, for example, was the Chinese Exclusion Act (1882) ratified to despise Chinese immigrant laborers. Another conspicuous law in the series was the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, which was approved in fear of the expansion of Communism. Legislation regarding immigration issues in America tended to restrict Asians and Africans but to give preference to northern and western Europeans to come.
Immigrants from the past largely consisted of Italians, Jews, and Irish. Then, the immigrant population became mostly Latinos. Immigration to America finally also appealed to Asians. Different groups of people came for different sorts of reasons. For the most part, they saw job opportunity as the major reason. (“Better quality of life,” though many has mistaken, is not the answer to immigrants’ motive to come.) Despite the racial shifts throughout American immigration history, one thing persists –– the challenges and hardship.
Besides the law as a hindering factor, immigrants do not seem to let hardship and poor living conditions prevent them from settling here. In the past there was the tenement, in the present there is discrimination. The tenement 97 Orchard Street on Manhattan’s Lower East side, now a museum, embraces stories of thousands of immigrants. No lights at the entrance. Nine family members in a room. Little to no ventilation. Thousands of immigrants lived under such circumstances from 1863 to 1988. They probably used to live in a more spacious house with better social connections prior to coming. But they perceived that their hardship right then was the price they must pay for better earnings and opportunities that would come. So they stayed, endured, and tried to thrive. As generations have gone by, their descendants probably are now promising young citizens.
And discrimination is an incessant issue, needless to say. Immigrants are foreigners; They don’t belong here, many natives would say. In other words, foreign-born Americans were excluded not only by the legislation, but also by the unwelcoming people in their neighborhoods. Therefore, they form closer bonding with themselves as a community in defense and support. They might be from different states or provinces of their native country. They might be of ethnic groups that were at odds there. And they might be speaking different dialects in their native tongues. But as long as they are in another country trying to make a better life, they naturally come together. There forms assisting associations and also ethnic enclaves. New York City has Little Italy, Chinatown, and so on. Race-based organizations are countless. They have the same goal to make good fortune, so they are willing to help each other in-group, which also benefits themselves in a long run.
America was seen as a promised land with abundant job opportunities and guaranteed good earnings for anyone who was willing to work hard enough. Immigrants embraced the American Dream. They looked far into prosperity, upward social mobility, and life here. With these in mind, many are fearless and determined to come disregarding safety and the law. The number of undocumented immigrants in the country is at a newer high every year. Right now almost 15% of the United States population is comprised of illegal residents. Every day of their lives is at risk of deportation. Enforcement is even tougher in recent years under Obama administration, which is ironic because he advocated to address problems for the undocumented population during his presidency campaign speech. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) even adopts unconstitutional techniques to seek out illegal immigrants and deport them.
Fortunately, the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program (DACA) and The Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors Act (DREAM Act) provided ample opportunities for eligible unauthorized immigrants to naturalize as citizens. They avoided many cases of family separation and young fellows’ identity crises.
However, the future of immigration in the country is not as hopeful as it sounds. More and more people from all over the world are coming into this country. This brings burden to the government and to the economy. Since new comers are mostly poor, many of them rely on benefits and welfare from the government. For such a large population of them, expenses in these fields could most possibly overwhelm the economy. All in all, for foreign-born immigrants and natives to reside harmoniously in the country, reformation to the immigration policies is a must. The flawed system is very much in need of a change. Many citizens demand address to this issue in the next president administration.
Pros and Cons of Being an Immigrant – Adam Wolfson Final Essay
At its heart, the risks, rewards, and challenges that come with immigration anywhere are those that come with any major change. That’s what immigration is, a fresh start in a new nation. It is also a huge gamble. In this essay I will examine what people hope to find in America, as well of some of the consequences they may encounter in doing so.
Why would anyone want to come here? America has plenty of problems. Well, one answer is that the rest of the world has its own problems too, and if theirs are worse than ours, then coming here might be a good idea. This answer isn’t particularly helpful. What problems are we talking about here? The problem is, what a prospective immigrant might hope to improve by moving depends on where they started. A facet of American life that one immigrant might see as a godsend might simply be the status quo for another from a different place.
Nonetheless, there are some reasons for coming to America that recur through history. A single person is unlikely to have all of these reasons, but it’s likely that they might have at least one. These reasons for coming are the manifestation of forces that drive entire waves of people across ocean to roll the dice on a new life in a new country.
Possibly the most common reason for immigration to America is money. This is the idea behind the concept of the American Dream: come to America to seek your fortune. However, this concept is more complex than the American Dream narrative implies. For starters, not everyone who emigrates here manages to ascend economically. Nor does everyone manage to secure a better life for their children. Does that mean that those people were wrong to immigrate? Not necessarily. The transition from being poor overseas to being poor in America can be an end in itself. America is a first world country with (usually) a functioning economy. While being forced to take exploitative jobs involving backbreaking labor just to afford food is horrible, at least those jobs and food exist. For some people, that can be a major improvement. This is one of the driving forces behind the wave of immigration (legal and illegal) from Mexico today. People aren’t coming to America because the jobs here are easier or pay more; they come come here because there are jobs, period.
Of course, there are other benefits to coming to a financially and politically successful country like America. Healthcare and education are two big reasons. Both American healthcare and the American educational system are widely regarded as being terrible, but that’s in America. American education has big problems, but it’s also free up to high school. That’s not the case everywhere, and could be very attractive to, say, a family trying to secure a better future for their children. Likewise, medical technology exists here that simply isn’t available elsewhere. Regardless of how difficult to afford it is, that could be a huge draw to someone with a dangerous illness, or their loved ones.
Some people, however, immigrate not because of what America has, but what it doesn’t. A significant portion of immigrants are refugees of some sort. The original Thirteen Colonies were built by people fleeing religious persecution, and America accepted a large portion of the Jews displaced by WWII. Violence and warfare have brought many people to America as well. Refuges from the Middle East and Central America fill that role today.
In summary, America has a good enough economic system that even if you’re very poor you’re unlikely to starve to death, has public services that at least exist, usually isn’t fighting a war on its own soil, and won’t persecute you for your religion. Those are good reasons to immigrate, but not unique to America. There are plenty of countries that have these qualifications, yet America has historically been one of the top destinations for immigration. This is, in part, because of its culture. America can be xenophobic and intolerant, but it considers immigration part of it’s culture in a way other countries don’t. Certainly, no other country has an equivalent to the American Dream. This difference can be seen in the way that many European countries have struggled to deal with the recent influx of immigrants from the Middle East culturally, despite ample goodwill.
Of course, immigration is not without its trial and tribulations. For every benefit America can potentially bestow upon the immigrant, it can and will extract its pound of flesh. Happily for the student of immigration, however, the human costs of immigration have been far more consistent across time and space than its rewards.
To start off with, the majority of immigrants are poor. So, on top of other indignities that result from their immigrant status, they have to deal with those that come with poverty. In fact, many of the hurdles that immigrants face have economic origins. Arriving immigrants typically lacked housing and employment, and lack the money and education to shop around.
Immigrant housing has always been terrible. When a lot of people need to live somewhere and can’t pay for very much, it provides a strong economic motive for someone to take advantage by offering really, really terrible cheap housing. After all, it’s not like they can afford to live elsewhere. The most spectacular examples` of this activity were the lower East side tenement complexes. These were built with a design philosophy similar to that used in factory farms: fit as many living sources of revenue into as small a space as possible. They were eventually made illegal, but similar practices still exist, such as a landlord refusing to pay for maintenance because he know his tenants can’t afford to live anywhere better.
Abuses by employers follow the same basic logic. Immigrants, who usually lack the skills or connections to find a good job, are called upon to do the jobs that are too difficult, dangerous, or unpleasant for anyone else. Currently, this mostly consists of agricultural work and domestic services like cleaning. Before America’s economy became service based, these jobs would mostly involve work on assembly lines.
Not all difficulties immigrants face are economic. One of the oldest and biggest is racism. It seems on the surface like racism ought to be relatively new for immigrants, since the vast majority of immigrants used to be white Europeans. Surely they must have been welcomed with open arms? While this line of thought makes sense, it misses the fact that the concept of ‘white’ as an ethnic identity only goes back as far as the Second World War, when most of Western civilisation was forced to work together against a common enemy. Before that, Irish, Italian, French, etc. were considered different races, no less different from each other than we would consider blacks, whites, hispanics, asians, etc. to be today. There was huge amounts of discrimination between these European ‘races’ prior to WWII.
Finally, one of the biggest trials immigrants have to face is culture shock. Changing between cultures means giving up things normally taken for granted. It means giving up the ability to communicate with all but a minority of the people around you. It means losing the unconscious understanding of cultural norms by which we judge others. It means becoming an outsider. Some of these can be overcome by circumstance or time, but they are still a huge part of the immigrant experience.
Of course, the process of immigration continues to change. On the positive side, as hyphenated identities become more accepted and technology continues to shrink the world, the various Old Countries of the world seem less and less far away. On the other hand, the risk of deportation is higher than it’s ever been. Nonetheless, there are some things about immigration that I doubt will ever change. At its heart, imigration, like any change, is about exchanging the familiar for something unknown, hoping to get the better end of the deal. Sometimes it works out and sometimes it doesn’t. But that’s life, in any country.
Harlem: Where It Stands, Where It Stood.
Saying that Harlem is the most iconic neighborhood in the United States, and perhaps even in the world may be a stretch. But I believe it to be true. For decades, Harlem has been the capital of Black America with a very rich and turbulent history. Harlem has often been held as the typical example of the American ghetto. Even throughout the country today, Harlem has a very negative reputation and is often associated with drug use and violent crime. Despite its modern reputation as the problem child of New York, Harlem has had a very dense history that is often overshadowed.
Harlem was founded in the 17th century as a Dutch outpost north of Manhattan. The Dutch were the first to colonize the area. The outpost was generally unstable and the Dutch settlers would often have to flee south when tensions with the Native Americans rose. The farmland controlled by the Dutch, and the remainder of New Amsterdam, was soon taken over by the English in 1664.
Pre-Civil War Harlem was characterized by the rapid urbanization of 19th century America. Many in the area never believed Harlem would change from its then current state – a plethora of farmland estates as well as a country retreat for the rich and powerful. In 1811, the grid system downtown was extended northward into Harlem. Again, very few people actually believed that Harlem would become an urban area for a very long time, and for the most part they were right. Besides the construction of what would become Metro North in 1831, there were very few changes in Harlem. However, in the 1840’s, 50’s, and 60’s the land’s productivity declined and it was much more difficult to farm. Many of the old English, Dutch, and French settlers and estate owners began to sell their properties or just abandon their land entirely. This is one of the many economic downturns Harlem experiences throughout its history.
Throughout this period of economic depression in 19th century Harlem, Ireland was experiencing its Great Famine, also known as the Irish Potato Famine. Between 1845 and 1852, 2 million people emigrated out of the country. Many of these emigrants ended up in Harlem in the form of squatters. They established shantytowns and occupied the abandoned properties, causing bedlam in the traditional community.
Though Harlem enjoyed a short period of prosperity after the Civil War, it grinded to a halt after the Panic of 1873. Just as most economic depressions in the United States, the Panic of 1873 was in a large part the result of over-speculation of real estate and in this case, the over-speculation of the railroads. Too much capital was invested in this industry, and it caused the overbuilding of auxiliary facilities. This also had a cascading effect because the backbone of the economy was centered around the construction of the railroads, which significantly slowed after the economic crisis.
Harlem did not escape this economic meltdown. Property values in Harlem dropped 80% as a result of The Panic, and the city subsequently annexed much of Harlem, up until 155th street. This however, may have indirectly helped the neighborhood and contributed to its growth. Many residences were constructed, as well as a substantial amount of infrastructure in the form of subways and railroads.
Before Harlem became the capital of black America, it actually was home to a fairly large amount of European immigrants who were mainly Jewish. Eastern European Jews and Italians moved into Harlem due to the new construction and falling real estate prices. Incredibly, by 1930 there were only 5,000 Jews in Harlem, but many Italians remained in East Harlem where the Italian mafia became famous.
How did the demographics of Harlem shift so rapidly? Well, black residents began to move into Harlem in the late 1800’s. The population of blacks spiked in Harlem due to another economic downturn. Cheap and affordable housing opened up in Harlem, largely because landlords could not find white renters for their properties. Black churches began to follow their parishioners and established congregations in Harlem.
One of the main contributing factors to the rise in black populations in the North was the Great Migration. Even though the Civil War had ended atrocities such as sharecropping, Jim Crow laws, and the Ku Klux Klan made the South incredibly oppressive to live in for black Americans. As Black Americans migrated north to Harlem from southern states such as North Carolina, Virginia, and Georgia many whites left Harlem. The phenomenon was an early version of the term known as white flight, the large scale migration of whites from racially mixed urban regions to homogenous regions, generally suburbs.
In the 1920’s the artistic movement which would later be known as the Harlem Renaissance began. This period was in a large part affected by the Great Migration and the new African-American culture being formed in the roaring 20’s, one of the most successful decades in American history. The rippling effects of the Harlem Renaissance are vast and far reaching. Many believe that the Harlem Renaissance created a united black identity that led to the Civil Rights movement of the 1960’s. The Renaissance also exposed other races to black culture. Certain performers such as Duke Ellington drew massive crowds of difference backgrounds and ethnicities.
Even though the country was experiencing a large amount of economic success, Harlem was becoming a slum. High rent caused families to illegally lodge people in order to pay their rent. When the Great Depression hit, Harlem was hit especially hard. Unemployment was at 25%. Race riots drove away many white investors and audiences formerly captivated by the Harlem Renaissance. These race riots turned into rent riots which turned into more race riots, giving Harlem a very negative reputation in the press.
Because of the unrest and headlines in Harlem, the neighborhood became an important spot for Civil Rights leaders such as Martin Luther King Jr and Malcolm X, who was later assassinated in Washington Heights.
Even after the Civil Rights movement, Harlem still experienced more economic hardship. The population of Harlem declined rapidly due to crime and economic hardships, and the only people who remained were the most impoverished out of all of the residents. Government funding did not do anything to solve issues. Drug addiction, violent crime, and illness ran rampant throughout the neighborhood. The economic system was totally destroyed in the community. A majority of the economy either ran on illegal lottery rackets or the illicit drug trade.
In the 1970’s the phrase “War on Drugs” was popularized after Richard Nixon gave a speech in which he said that drug abuse was public enemy number 1 in the United States. Later, in 1994, Nixon’s White House Domestic Affairs Advisor, John Ehrlichman claimed that the War on Drugs was targeting black people. He said, “The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I’m saying? We knew we couldn’t make it illegal to be either against the war on black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities.” Ehrlichman’s sentiments also have historical precedent. When the Chinese began to immigrate to California, they competed for many white people’s jobs. So the Californian state government knew they couldn’t make it illegal to be Chinese, but they could make it illegal to smoke opium, so California was the first state to have opium regulations.
Minority communities such as Harlem were also hit hard by mandatory minimums as well as sentencing disparities. Mandatory minimums keep nonviolent criminals in prison for long periods of time, despite the details of the case. A judge’s discretion is limited, because mandatory minimums force judges to sentence offenders to at least a certain amount of time in prison.
In 1986, the U.S. Congress passed laws that created a 100 to 1 sentencing disparity for the possession or trafficking of crack-cocaine when compared to powder cocaine. Even though these two substances are essentially the same, (crack is just a free base form of cocaine that can be smoked) this means that 5 grams of crack cocaine carries the same mandatory minimum sentence as 500 grams of powdered cocaine. Even though with recent legislation passed by Obama closing the gap to 18 to 1, many believe that these laws target the black community, where crack was prevalent.
Arrests, incarceration rates, and conviction rates all disproportionately affected black communities from the 70’s up until the present day. These laws and their effects create devastating economic effects in black communities such as Harlem. Taking such a large chunk of individuals out of a community has dangerous effects on it. When these individuals are forced to lead a life of crime because of their record, it creates a cycle of crime. Forty years later, many world leaders recognize these effects and are very vocal about the failure of these policies.
In spite of all of this, by the late 90’s Harlem had improved its community in many ways. Many new businesses began to open up all around the neighborhood, and even national chains began to open up along 125th. The city improved the infrastructure of the area by doing things like repairing roads, replacing streetlights, and building sidewalks. However, even though Harlem seems to be cleaning its act up by this point, rapid gentrification began in the late 90’s continuing into the present day. Many renters and residents are getting pushed out of Harlem due to rising costs of living. This unfortunate reality leads to radical leaders opposing gentrification by advocating violence.
My experiences in Harlem have been reasonably limited, but have been incredibly eye-opening. At the beginning of my first semester I moved to Harlem from a town on Long Island. This means striking differences across the board. My interactions with members of the Harlem community are much different than members of my town on Long Island. I feel as though Harlem is more personal and connected as opposed to my hometown. Of course I’m not saying one is better than the other, but a diverse urban community with such a deep history will be different than my Irish-American suburban community. I have one story in particular from this past year that will stick with me for a very long time.
On New Years Day, I was with a group of my friends watching the fireworks from Harlem. We had a very good time and a small party that was mostly just a group of our friends. We ended up going to a Dunkin’ Donuts at around 5am off of 125th street. While in this Dunkin Donuts, I was approached by two guys who said they were from Kosovo, and were impressed that I knew where that was. We were having a great conversation and I was listening to one of the guy’s music through a headphone. They were a little intoxicated, but I wasn’t too surprised considering it was 5 a.m. on New Years. All of the sudden, our conversation was interrupted by a Hispanic woman who claimed that the two black men, from Europe, were “pressing me.” I’m not entirely sure what she meant, but the confrontation escalated, she ended up screaming, and caused a huge scene. This made the entire situation incredibly uncomfortable. Not wanting to get involved in a fight on New Years and probably having to deal with police, I pulled my friends out of the Dunkin Donuts and we retreated back to the campus dorms. Reflecting on the situation, it all seemed very sudden. There was absolutely nothing wrong with what was happening, but this woman had to make a very big scene about it. In retrospect, it likely was about the color of not only his skin, but mine as well. Very simply, this was a result of a neighborhood that is currently being gentrified and is very diverse, as well as stereotypes. I’m sure that as an outsider, a young white man talking to two reasonably older black men late at night in Harlem would cause a speculative imagination to come up with many reasons for that situation, which is an unfortunate reality.
The culmination of this piece will be two interviews with local residents of Harlem, Jamie and Raymond, and my closing thoughts.
Jamie is currently happy with her neighborhood. A mother of two, Jamie is satisfied with the police presence in the past 5 years. The schools are improving, and most of all are happiest with the fact that they are getting safer. However, she doesn’t believe the neighborhood is completely safe. Her most important concern with the neighborhood is the drug use.
“125th street is the worst; I tell my kids not to go on up there. There are constantly people standing around. The mental illness is an issue as well. Getting approached by crazy, maybe drug addicts, is and has been a concern for 20 years in this neighborhood.” Jamie said
Raymond is also concerned with the homeless problem on 125th street.
“It’s so gross to walk by all the homeless. Sad, but still gross. They really needa clean up the street, it’s been a problem for years. More cops but no improvement in the community.” Raymond said.
Jamie and Raymond echoed concerns of many long time residents. Both are blue collar workers who are struggling with rising costs of living because of rising rent and gentrification.
“We can’t afford the rent anymore. It’s finally gettin cleaned up, and all of the sudden we’re getting moved further into the ghetto, now that the Harlem isn’t a ghetto no more. I’ve lived here my whole life, and they gonna take that away from me.”
These two residents reflected common sentiments of many in the community. Often, they care less about who is moving into the community race wise, and more who is moving into the community wealth wise.
Harlem today looks a lot like many diverse and changing neighborhoods. But now that I’ve gone through the history, had my own experiences living there, and having interacted with many residents, I believe it’s more accurate to say that Harlem hasn’t changed much at all. Harlem has always been characterized by struggle and hardship. If there weren’t racial tensions, there were economic tensions, and if there were not those tensions there were drug and safety problems. Even culturally black music, rhythm and blues and traditional hip hop, are based in struggle and fighting through adversity.
Living in Harlem has with no doubt changed my life. Coming here at a very formative period in my life and forcing myself to see the perspectives and needs of those living in Harlem which are very easy to ignore when you haven’t lived in a minority community. I’m very fortunate to be able to do a project on a community I have come to know and love while learning all about the roots of not only Harlem’s history but the history of blacks in America as well.
Sources
Gill, Jonathan. Harlem: The Four Hundred Year History from Dutch Village to Capital of Black America. New York: Grove, 2011. Print.
The House I Live In. 2012. Web. (I highly recommend this film)
Neighborhood Portrait of Washington Heights
I originally chose to write about Washington Heights because I knew that my parents and I were moving there next summer. At the time, all I knew about the neighborhood was that it was uptown, a little less gentrified than what we were used to, and had a large Dominican population. Since that time, I’ve learned a lot about a quirky and unique neighborhood up where Manhattan starts to look like it needs to be ironed before it can be put away. It has an interesting past, and possible an even more interesting present.
Washington Heights takes its name from Fort Washington, which was built during the Revolutionary War. The fort was built on the highest point in Manhattan for strategic reasons, the area not really having been settled at that point. The fort was pretty much a failure from the strategic perspective (it got captured by the British), but it enjoys modest fame today as a tourist attraction, so that’s something. The area wasn’t permanently settled until the early 1900s. There were certainly structures built there before that, but for the most part they were the summer retreats of the wealthy New York elite, rather than permanent residences.
Washington Heights has been an immigrant/minority community as long as it’s been a community at all. The first people to settle there permanently were Irish immigrants, and the trend they started continues to the present day. They were joined by other Europeans, but the area didn’t change substantially until WWII, when Germanic Jews flooded into the neighborhood, fleeing the ascent to power of the Nazi party. Their numbers and influence transformed the area, to the point that it came to be known as Frankfurt-on-the-Hudson. This remained the defining character of the area until the 1970s, when immigrants from Soviet Russia redefined the neighborhood once again. They were in turn followed by the Dominicans and other Hispanics who currently define the neighborhood.
This latest transition, which only recently came to a close, was readily apparent in the first few people I interviewed: an elderly Russian couple and a young Dominican high schooler. They had very different perspectives on the neighborhood. Anna and Vladamir Shevel left Russia behind thirty years ago due to anti-Semitism. They worked and retired in Washington Heights, and their favorite thing about the about the neighborhood was its aesthetics; they simply thought it was a beautiful place. This contrasts with the fifteen year old Walder. He came to Washington Heights when he was six, his parents having decided to leave the Dominican Republic in search of better education for their children. He seemed surprised by the question of what made Washington Heights special, saying he viewed it as a pretty typical neighborhood.
The most common responses I got to such a question, though, involved the neighborhood’s ethnic makeup. A man walking his dog said that what impressed him most about the place was its diversity and tolerance, which he considered impressive even by the standards of New York City. A woman from California said the strong Latino culture reminded her of home. This is backed up by my research online, as the strong Hispanic/Latino/Dominican/Caribbean culture is invariably one of the first things mentioned about the neighborhood. This was visible even in the relatively short time I spent in the neighborhood. Just while interviewing people in Fort Tryon Park I saw two separate instances of people playing guitars while singing in what I assume was Spanish, which is probably the only ‘ethnic’ activity I would be able to identify at a glance. More seriously, the description from the man with the dog (whose name was actually Luke) was also borne out. Just walking around the park, I saw an enormous degree of diversity. I expected to see White and Hispanic people, but I was surprised at how many people I saw who looked like they might be Asian or Indian Americans. Running into representatives of every continent on a walk in the park isn’t that unusual by New York standards, but it still made an impression on me.
Sadly, I didn’t have time to visit every part of Washington Heights in order to understand regional variations between sub-neighborhoods. Fortunately, the internet is a wonderful thing, and I managed to find the information I needed by a less direct route. The most significant distinction I found is between Washington Heights as a whole and the smaller area of Hudson Heights. Hudson Heights is basically a richer, whiter, version of Washington Heights proper. Hudson Heights is 43% Hispanic, whereas Hispanics are the majority in Washington Heights as a whole. In addition, most of the apartments there are co-ops, and tend to be more expensive than in other parts of the neighborhood. It occupies the highest part of Washington Heights, overlooking the Hudson River.
My first thought after learning about Hudson Heights was how similar it was to the Grand Concourse in the Bronx, which we learned about earlier in the semester. They are both more expensive and prestigious than the areas around them. They are both located physically higher up than the areas around them, creating sought-after views. They are both part of immigrant communities and, most importantly, they both hold (or held) onto the previous generations of immigrants long after they have ceased to be the dominant factor in the neighborhood at large. The Grand Concourse remained largely Jewish long after the rest of the Bronx had become predominantly African-American and Latino. Whites are still the largest demographic in Hudson Heights, even though Washington Heights as a whole has long since had a Hispanic majority.
Upon further reflection, Washington Heights has a lot in common with the Bronx in general, even leaving aside the Concourse all together. They are both immigrant neighborhoods that exchanged their European immigrants for a population of Blacks or Latinos during the fourth wave of immigration. I hesitate to say Black or Latino immigrants because many of the people traveling to the Bronx were technically coming from within the same country. Nevertheless, they both became destinations for working class or poor members of minorities, so the semantics are beside the point. I have been unable to find descriptions of the severity or lack thereof of the ‘white flight’ phenomenon in Washington Heights. However, the rapid transition of the neighborhood away from ethnicities falling under the category of ’white’ strongly suggests that it must have happened to some degree, as in the Bronx.
Now, Washington Heights never burned quite the way the Bronx did. Exactly why it sustained less physical damage and recovered more quickly is a difficult question to answer, given that it isn’t really certain what caused the Bronx to turn out the way it did in the first place. That Washington Heights lacked the particular combination of legislative and economic factors that created a strong incentive toward arson seems like a good guess, but it’s hard to say for certain. Whatever the reason, though, most of Washington Heights’ multitude of pre-war buildings still survive today, untouched by arson.
That is most certainly not to say that Washington Heights was not affected by the wave of crime and drugs that swept over the United States in the 1980s. Washington Heights was hit very, very hard by the crack epidemic, thanks in part to a gang called the Wild Cowboys. In fact, Washington Heights was at one point considered the largest center for the distribution of drugs in the Northeastern United States. The neighborhood also had severe problems with homelessness during that time. So Washington Heights did manage to compare with the Bronx in sheer amount of crime for a while, just not as far as damaged infrastructure is concerned.
Ultimately, Washington Heights is a neighborhood with a long and complex history, and a staggering amount of diversity, even for New York. Learning the facts described in this essay has definitely changed my perspective on the place. While I can’t say I’m now totally behind the move (I’m one of those people that reacts to change the way cats react to a thrown bucket of water), I can definitely say that there are things I’m looking forward to exploring. I know for sure that everything I’ve done so far has only scratched the surface of what there is to know about Washington Heights. If you’re even in the neighborhood next summer, feel free to say Hi. I’ll be the guy trying not to trip and fall in the Hudson.
Sources:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washington_Heights,_Manhattan
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hudson_Heights,_Manhattan
https://www.airbnb.com/locations/new-york/washington-heights
http://www.nycgo.com/articles/neighborhood-spotlight-washington-heights
http://pix11.com/2015/11/11/washington-heights-community-faces-issues-of-racism-through-theatre/
http://www.artstroll.com/
“Little Russia” in New York (Brighton Beach)
The existence of “Brighton Beach” in Brooklyn has allowed people to travel from the Russian Federation to the place that is regarded by local people as “Little Russia” or “Little Odessa” in New York. Preservation and use of the Russian language have always been the contributing factors in attracting newcomers and returning guests to the neighborhood. Brighton Beach is one of the very few places that help Russian-speaking immigrants avoid the experience of a cultural shock upon coming to the United States. Reduced assimilation time and familiarity with the atmosphere and the people combine to create a feeling of momentum that can be sensed in the air – the pride from being home, so far away from home. You are naturally and unanimously accepted…
The answers to the questions about the origin and history of Brighton Beach are rooted in the actions of the German-American railroad magnate William Engelman. Austin Corbin, a wealthy railroad developer of the 1870s, was the one who fueled and financed the development of Manhattan Beach. It was interesting to find out that one of the key reasons for Corbin’s desire to invest and develop the area was his son’s health. The doctor said that the best remedy for his son would be to live by the ocean, and Corbin immediately decided to provide resources for the construction and development of a neighborhood by the ocean (Simpson, para. 3). At the moment, William Engelman was already rich enough – he owned the Ocean Hotel, and Corbin was once a guest at the hotel. Knowing that Corbin was taking over the territories and turning them into resort destinations, Engelman could not ignore the fact that the bright activities of Corbin forced him into the pale background…
Engelman created his own resort, and he called it “Brighton Beach.” The Ocean Hotel, which was located at what today is the intersection of Brighton 4th street and Brightwater Court, was gaining popularity with the extension of Ocean Parkway, since the road led the carriages to the doors of the hotel. Engelman continued the development of Brighton Beach by creating the 2-story Brighton Beach Bathing Pavillion and Ocean Pier in 1878. Engelman died in 1884, and in 1905 a mile-long boardwalk was opened (Simpson, para. 5). “Brighton Beach Baths” club was opened in 1907, offering access to the pools, tennis, handball, and miniature golf courts, card playing, and even a nude beach. However, it was closed in 1994 due to community protest. It was replaced by the Oceana Condominium and Club, which offers luxury apartments even today, extending to the beach from the intersection of Coney Island Avenue and Brighton Beach Ave (“Our Brooklyn – Brighton Beach,” para.7).
Even though Engelman shared Corbin’s anti-Semitic attitudes, Jews from Brownsville, Lower East Side and East New York were moving to Brighton Beach, forming numerous societies for the improvement of the neighborhood. The beginning of 1930s to the end of 1940s was the crucial period in the formation of the neighborhood’s ethnic structure. People from Europe were escaping the harshness and oppression of the Nazis and the Fascists during World War II. Immigrants arrived from Vietnam, China, Mexico, Pakistan, and Russians arrived mostly after the war. Another wave of Jews settled on Brighton Beach between 1948 and 1958. They were the survivors of the death camps coming from Romania, Germany, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, and different cities of Poland. They were all hoping to get support on Brighton Beach (Rangel, para. 17). A wave of Ukrainians and Ukrainian Jews arrived with their families in the 1970s, during the period of relaxed Soviet Union immigration policies, and that is when Brighton Beach acquired a nickname “Little Odessa.” (D’Onfro, para. 3)
The total population of Brighton Beach is approximately 80,285 people. Males account for 52.5% of the population, while 47.5% are females (“Brighton Beach Demographics & Statistics”, Figure 1). There are about 34,208 households in the neighborhood, almost twenty thousand of which are family households, making it an average of about 2.3 people per household (Figures 2 and 3). The overall education level of Brighton Beach is fairly high, since less than 10% of the population did not attend high school, and almost 40% of the people have Bachelors degree (Figure 4).
Average household income is approximately $60,900, and average total expenditure per household is close to $50,000 (“Brighton Beach Demographics & Statistics”, Figure 6). Brighton Beach is a relatively poor neighborhood with the beautiful Oceana Condominium on Coney Island Avenue that gathered the wealth of the neighborhood, which explains why Brighton is considered a slightly above average income neighborhood. Overall, the consumer spending in Brighton Beach is slightly below average (Figure 8).
Brighton Beach has more Russian and Ukrainian people than any other neighborhood in the United States. With 20.6% of the residents having Russian ancestry and 8.5% having Ukrainian ancestry, the population of Brighton Beach is united by the spoken language. Other groups include: 2.1% Asian ancestry, 2.7% Irish, and 3.5% Polish (“Brighton Beach”, Section 2, para. 5). About 63% of the residents speak Russian at home from childhood, which is the highest percentage among all the neighborhoods in the United States (“Brighton Beach”, Section 2, para. 7).
Most of the Brighton Beach residents take the train to get to work. Even though I own a car for personal transportation, I still prefer taking the train, since it is a fast, efficient, and pollution-free way to commute. About 53% take the train to work, while 29.5% drive in private automobiles, and 8.1% of residents ride the bus (“Brighton Beach”, Section 4, para. 1).
Even though the crime rate in Brighton Beach is slightly above the national average with a high robbery risk (“Brighton Beach Demographics & Statistics”, Figure 9), I did not find that to be noticeable after living on Brighton Beach for almost two years. About once a week two or three NYPD vehicles stop on Brighton 5th street and Brighton Beach Avenue. A group of police officers would knock at the doors of our Mexican neighbors and go in, I am almost certain, to check for presence of any illegal substances. I saw some of the people being detained and arrested right in front of the building I live in. There was only one occasion of robbery that I know of, and that was when my friend forgot to lock the car at night, and his stereo system was stolen. However, even though this is unethical, I do not consider this a robbery, since it was provoked in a way. Overall, I would definitely say that tranquility in terms of safety is one of the key characteristics of Brighton Beach Avenue. Living under the above-ground subway station doesn’t allow me to use the word “tranquility” in describing the noise levels on Brighton Beach. I still close my ears with my hands every time a train passes by, screaming and roaring to wake up the slowly-walking people on the street.
When I first came to Brighton Beach, I completely lost the feeling of living in a new country. Being a Jew, it was exciting to move into a neighborhood that was established by a German magnate with anti-Semitic attitudes. I simply moved into a smaller town in Russia with new people and places. Very few buildings on Brighton Beach resemble luxurious condominiums. In fact, the only place that can be categorized as “for rich people” is the Oceana Condominium. My uncle lives on the first floor in one of the buildings. He can go to the swimming pool outside directly from the balcony. Every resident gets access to the Oceana Club and can participate in different academic and athletic activities for free.
Outside of the Oceana is, what I call it, “the true Brighton Beach.” Brighton Beach Avenue starts at Brighton 1st street, and that block is filled with different clothing stores that sell mostly female apparel. Most of the stores look old and somewhat run-down, and none of them have more than two levels above ground. The next block, between Brighton 2nd and Brighton 3rd streets, has lots of electronics stores that I visit very often. I like building electronic devices, and very often I would spend hours in a single store, reading the specifications of a computer processor. However, I rarely buy anything in those shops, since the majority of the merchandise can be bought for a cheaper price online.
The block between Brighton 3rd and Brighton 4th streets is the one that I always try to avoid. It is the center of food stores and bakeries. Most of the people living on Brighton Beach are above 45 years old, and food seems to be the focus of the Brighton Beach’s population. Every time I walk through this block, I have to suffer from an internal conflict, since these old grandmothers and grandfathers are walking slowly with the walking canes and enjoying each other’s company, and it would be disrespectful to just speedily go around them to get through the block. Very often, a couple would notice me patiently walking behind them and stop their conversation, trying to clear the way for me, which makes me feel guilty. I understand that at some point in the future I will be in a similar physical state, and I am trying my best to show my due respect for them.
The next three blocks are packed with banks, immigration offices, notary publics, and Internet cafés. There is always that homeless violinist with long hair and a beautiful suit that plays in front of the Chase bank to earn money for food. Sometimes he takes the “B” train in the morning and keeps playing until the train arrives at 145th street from Brighton Beach. He is always around…
An old man on Brighton 12th street told me that “people come here to avoid the rush, to get old, and just enjoy life with no worries, since the government provides health and financial assistance for the majority of the people on Brighton Beach.” As I was listening to him, several drivers started yelling at the man leaving the Chase bank for double parking and blocking one lane. I thanked the old man and started walking towards the boardwalk and the ocean, thinking about myself in the future. I raised my head and looked to the left. Oceana… This beautiful Oceana… It shouldn’t be here… It is not a part of Brighton Beach…
Works Cited:
“Brighton Beach Demographics & Statistics.” Demographics & Statistics. Point 2 Homes, n.d. Web. 6 May 2016.
“Brighton Beach.” Brighton Beach 11235 Brooklyn, NY Neighborhood Profile. Neighborhood Scout, n.d. Web. 6 May 2016.
D’Onfro, Melia Robinson and Jillian. “WELCOME TO ‘LITTLE ODESSA’: Inside The Brooklyn Neighborhood That’s A Miniature Version Of Russia.” Business Insider. Business Insider, Inc, 2014. Web. 7 May 2016.
“Our Brooklyn – Brighton Beach.” – Brighton Beach History. Brooklyn Public Library, n.d. Web. 6 May 2016.
Rangel, Jesus. “IN BRIGHTON BEACH, ANOTHER TIME OF CHANGE.” The New York Times. The New York Times, 1986. Web. 5 May 2016.
Simpson, Willie. “The History Of Manhattan Beach And Brighton Beach – Sheepshead Bay News Site.” Sheepshead Bites. N.p., 2013. Web. 6 May 2016.
Brighton Beach
The Brighton Beach neighborhood is one of the most exciting scenes in New York. Located on the southern end of Brooklyn, Brighton is situated directly along the Atlantic Ocean, giving its residents immediate access to one of the most beautiful beaches in New York City. The Boardwalk is lined with first-class restaurants, bars, and amusement parks. Perhaps more defining to Brighton Beach than its vibrant beach scene is its huge population of Russian speaking immigrants. Often called “Little Russia by the Sea,” I truly feel like I enter an entirely different country whenever the subway brings me to Brighton Beach. As soon as you step off the subway platform you will notice that English is no longer the common tongue on Brighton Beach. In fact, I am often surprised if a person approaches me speaking in English while I am working or grocery shopping in Brighton Beach
Under the tremoring subway platform that runs along Brighton Beach Avenue are several ethnic Russian establishments including food bazaars, Russian book stores, and much more. More than half the stores on Brighton Beach Avenue are owned by immigrants that were once part of the Soviet Union, according to the New York Times. As for the night life in Brighton Beach, restaurants like Tatianna’s delight its patrons with authentic Russian cuisine and live Russian singing and dancing. Karaoke bars allow Brighton goers to enjoy all the latest Russian pop- culture (Kusnyer).
Brighton Beach is also home to one of the most legendary performance centers: The Millennium Theater. The Millennium Theater has featured numerous performances that reflect the Russian culture of Brighton Beach, like genius Russian violinists Vladimir Spivakov and Yuri Bashmet, Russian Ballet performances, and classical Russian theater productions. The Millennium theatre is versatile as it is ethnic, having performances by Ray Charles and several world Championship Kickboxing events on top of the authentic Russian culture it’s known to showcase (Mastertheater.com).
The influx of Russian immigrants to Brighton Beach started to occur during the 1970’s. The Soviet Union started to adopt a laxer emigration policy for its Jewish citizens. Many of the Jewish Soviets faced constant discrimination and antisemitism. Applying for anything in the Soviet Union required citizens to present their passports: those that were labeled “Jewish” were often put at a disadvantage (Lewin). “Sometimes I went to school and the kids would throw things at me and yell ‘Jew!’”, said Sasha Lyubarov. He faced a constant stream of anti-semitism. All the high-paying jobs were denied to him on the basis of his Judaism.
In addition, many Uzbeks and Soviets from the “Stan” nations came to America because of the economic conditions in the destabilizing Soviet Union. They thought they would find more opportunity and prosperity in America. Igor Sultanov, who I met during my afternoon shift at the Shorefront Y on Bright Beach Avenue said, “In Russia, there is always crisis. I used to have a big gym where everyone would come and exercise. All the [weight lifting] champions came to my gym but making a business in Russia is always very difficult.” This is what brought Igor to settle in the Brighton area in 1992.
Brighton Beach initially had little to offer its Russian Speaking immigrants in the beginning. Brighton Beach was stricken with poverty, arson, and drug trade during the period following World War II. Indeed, it was not Brighton’s liveliness that attracted the plethora of Russian-speaking immigrants that live there today. But just as they were in the Soviet Union, the Russian-speaking immigrants were unified by their knowledge of the Russian language (Kordunsky et. al.). Truly it would be hard to feel far from home when all your neighbors spoke the language of your home country. Finding work and networking was made easier for immigrants; the commonality found in knowing the same language made Brighton a tightly knit community. “I came here with only my suit cases with clothes in them. I did not know English,” said Lyudmilla Buda, the head lifeguard at the Shorefront Y for 22 years. “My whole life I taught swimming in Russia but here I had nothing. I made friends and they helped me get my license to work.” For Lyudmilla, the familiarity of the Brighton culture made it easy to adjust and assimilate into life in America.
Since the large influx of Russian immigrants arrived in the Brighton Beach neighborhood, it has seen much better days than its previous, crime ridden state. Since 1993, the 60th police precinct saw a 72 percent decrease in major crimes in Brighton Beach (60th Police Precinct). As poverty in the area dropped, the luxury condominiums Oceana were built in the early 2000s and became iconic parts of the Brighton Beach neighborhood. These high-income beach homes of course attracted the wealthy businessmen and performers of what used to be the Soviet Union (Wikimedia). Brighton Beach had almost been completely revitalized.
Life in Little Russia by the Sea is now much different than the life these immigrants had in the dying Soviet Union. Many former Soviets have stories of the everyday struggle of simply trying to acquire the most basic of food items in Russia. “I would get up very early in the morning just to wait on line at the store,” said Eliot Milskiy who emigrated from Russia in 1988. “I would wait for hours and when I finally got inside there was nothing. Some stale bread and some carrots on the shelf in the corner.” Now Eliot buys his food at the local Bazaar. To his great appreciation, the food in Brighton is plentiful and he does not need to awake in the early hours in the morning for fear that the food will be gone later in the day.
Many are appreciative of the work they have found in Brighton Beach when juxtaposed with the kind of work available in their former home lands. “My father worked in the mine for many hours a day,” said Kapiton Karabanov, who grew up in Siberia before moving to Moscow and then to the United States. “He would leave in the morning before I woke up and come back at night.” Mining in Siberia was a very arduous and dangerous profession. The mines were dark and it was hard to breathe. The risk for injury is high in the unpredictable mining setting where cave-ins are not uncommon. Kapiton, now a karate instructor, is happy to have taken the opportunity to emigrate from the Soviet Union.
Of course there is still much to be improved on, as with any New York neighborhood. Most of Brighton Beach Avenue, with all of its colorful and authentic Russian stores, lies underneath the loud and dirty subway Brighton Beach subway platform. “If I could get rid of one thing, it would be the train,” said Elizabeth Mestechkina who spent her whole life in the Brighton Beach area. “Every 10 minutes the ground starts shaking and there’s loud screeching noise from the train… the sun can never touch the ground because it is blocked by the train platform.” Many complain that the subway ruins the Brighton Beach atmosphere.
The wage gap in Brighton Beach has also been a cause for complaints amongst its inhabitants. Housing in the Brighton Beach consists of two different extremes: the luxurious Oceana upper class housing versus the remaining affordable housing, built when Brighton was struggling with poverty and crime. Oceana goers can enjoy beautiful views of the beach from their balconies, various amenities, and large, spacious living spaces. However, living in affordable housing is a much different lifestyle. “The building I live in is very horrible. It’s really tiny and its always very cold,” says Lior Agaronov, who lives in an affordable housing compound on Brighton 5th St. “The walls are made of really cheap material I think because they’re always breaking. I always have problems with the equipment like the lights and the elevators and we are always receiving very outrageous bills. The subway is always really loud and it wakes me up when I’m asleep.” Many of these problems are not present in the small community of Oceana. Oceana was built far from the subway platform and is far more aesthetically pleasing as a result. The buildings are new so residents face much fewer problems with utilities.
Despite the issues the Brighton Beach area has, according to its residents, it has seen much improvements since its earlier days of crime and poverty. Many of the people living in Brighton see a bright future for it and believe Brighton will continue to improve as it has in the past. However, its relatively homogeneous Russian community may slowly start to fade away. The number of people who qualify for immigration from Russia and other Russian speaking countries is steadily dropping. In addition, many of the later generations of Russian speaking immigrants are leaving the Brighton area. On top of this, Brighton has seen immigration from people coming from countries like Pakistan and India. All of these sudden changes lead many to believe that Brighton may not remain an all-Russian community in the future (Lewine).
Works Cited
Kordunsky, Anna, Ariel Stulberg, Bingling Liao, and Michael Larson. “Changing Face of Brighton Beach.” Forward. N.p., Sept.-Oct. 2012. Web. 5 Apr. 2016.
Kusnyer, Laura. “Guide to Brighton Beach in New York City – Russian Restaurants, Stores and Entertainment.” Nycgo.com. NYC and Company, n.d. Web. 10 May 2016.
Lewine, Edward. “From Brighton Beach to America; The Wave of Immigrants Began 25 Years Ago. Soon Russian Filled the Streets. Now, the Tide Is Ebbing.” The New York Times. The New York Times, 13 Mar. 1999. Web. 10 May 2016.
“DNAinfo.com.” DNAinfo. 60th Police Precinct, n.d. Web. 10 May 2016.
“Master Theater.” Mastertheater.com. N.p., n.d. Web.
“Brighton Beach.” Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, n.d. Web. 10 May 2016.
The West Village: Then and Now
After my A train arrives at the West 4th subway station, I walk up the stairs to end up on Waverly Place and the Avenue of the Americas. I walk westward on Waverly to Grove, and follow that for just a short while before using West 4th to cross over onto Christopher Street. The streets of the West Village don’t conform to the rest of the New York City grid, so it’s taken me almost a dozen trips to be able to navigate the area. Once I land my feet onto Christopher Street, I’m set; I walk straight along the street towards the southwest until I’m only 2 blocks from the water. It is here that I arrive at 154 Christopher Street: the office of Chemo Comfort where I volunteer once a week. However, the West Village is much bigger than the one building I’m most comfortable with. The neighborhood is bordered by West Houston on the south, the Avenue of the Americas on the east, West 14th on the north, and the Hudson on the west. And that isn’t even considering the entirety of Greenwich Village, which is an extension of West Village to Broadway on the east.
The current demographic of the West Village is dominantly white, rich, young people – a much different description than much of New York. With about three-quarters of households being nonfamily ones, it is easy to accept that about 69% of West Village residents are in college or graduate school. However, even without much ethnic diversity, this area has a rich history that can be related to much of the development of Manhattan itself. Everything from the Village’s wacky streets to its thriving food scene and artistic culture can be explained through an analysis of how the neighborhood became settled. There have been many changes in the socioeconomic make-up of the area; the West Village hasn’t always been a land of high rents, but its history of art, culture, and cultural diversity has been constant for the past 200 years. With a 2010 population of 66,880, the Village only contributes 4.2% of the Manhattan population and less than 1% of the total NYC population (US Census Bureau), but almost every New Yorker knows of the neighborhood. Ask someone what they think of the Village, and they’ll conjure up images of hip coffee shops, artistic endeavors, and “the area’s charms and its vivid bohemian past” (Jacobson, 2015). Paul Whitteby, a student at NYU, says that although he moved from upstate New York when he started to attend the university, he had “known about Greenwich Village forever, it always seemed so fun and exciting compared to where [he’s] from …When [he] moved here, [he] couldn’t believe all the food that was everywhere you looked. [He] went out for like, every meal.” However, even with ideas of today’s Village, not many people know the history of this section of New York dating back to the city’s first settlement.
When the Canarsee Indians still occupied current-day Manhattan, the Greenwich Village area was known as “Seppanikan” and they focused their settlement around today’s Minetta Street, where there was a small stream. When the Dutch arrived in the Americas, they decided to make the area a tobacco plantation until the British arrived and renamed the area Greenwich (The Street Necrology, n.d.). As the Industrial Era began in the 1800s, the village of Greenwich developed and became more populated as the economy in New York began to thrive. As the wealthy citizens became more established, they wanted somewhere to go to relax after the long work day. A contrast to industrial, crowded downtown Manhattan, the village of Greenwich and nearby Bowery village became suburban recluses for the downtown workers (Strykowski, Ehrlich & Greer, 2010).
As the area became more populated, structures such a prison, gallows, and potter’s field, or burial ground, were established near current-day Washington Square Park (“Village History,” n.d.). The existence of these structures, in hindsight, seem to foreshadow the next era of Greenwich Village; the future unique and unparalleled atmosphere of the neighborhood can also trace its roots to this time period. Although the rest of Manhattan had plans to come together and conform to cohesive gridded streets in 1811, Greenwich Village didn’t change because a “yellow fever and cholera epidemic in the early 1800s” kept it isolated (“The Street Necrology,” n.d.). This explains why this area of Manhattan is exceptionally hard to navigate, especially compared to the easy-to-understand streets of midtown and uptown.
Additionally, the outbreak of yellow fever led to people deciding to flee their downtown homes to more “open spaces,” such as Greenwich Village, because it was thought that yellow fever came from unsanitary conditions, rather than mosquitos (Strykowski, Ehrlich & Greer, 2010). Upon being told this tidbit of history, Steve Nicolls, a long-time employee at Pizzetteria Brunetti, told me, “I simply can’t imagine a bunch of sick folks hangin’ out around here! The place is so clean and beautiful now, I hate to think it was ever dirty.” As people flocked to the Village, merchants settled and opened stores, which led to the construction of a church and school, and suddenly, Greenwich Village was a functioning neighborhood. Even after the epidemic ended, many people stayed in the area and turned their temporary houses and shops into more permanent settlements.
At this point, it was the early 1800s and the first waves of European immigration were starting. In the 1820s and 1830s, “Greenwich Village began to be a neighborhood of extremes in wealth disparity” as freedmen from the south, free blacks from the North, Irish immigrants, and other merchant groups decided to move to the Village. Tenements were built in the neighborhood, although “antebellum, urban architecture” was the norm. Newcomers began to find permanent housing in the Village, whereas the previous residents were wealthy folks just looking for vacation homes.
During this time between 1830 and 1850, New York University also opened and offered housing to not just the staff and students but to their friends and affiliates, such as many artists, scientists, writers like Samuel Colt, Samuel Morse, and Edgar Allen Poe (Strykowski, Ehrlich & Greer, 2010). This influx of intellectuals set the foundation for the Bohemian era and a lower cost of living in the West Village, as they established “art clubs, private picture galleries, learned societies, literary salons, … fine hotels, shopping emporia, and theaters.” Additionally, “when German, Irish, and Italian immigrants [came and] found work in the breweries, warehouses, and coal and lumber yards … [older] residences were subdivided into cheap lodging hotels and [plummeting] real estate values prompted nervous retailers and genteel property owners to move uptown” (“Village History,” n.d.).
When I chatted with Betty Calanzo, a resident of the West Village for over 50 years, she thought back to her first days here and compared them to both today and the history I told her. “You know, me and Pat came here when I was only twenty-five. Bright-eyed and scared as hell, I came here not knowin’ what to expect. We felt at home in the community here, and over the years, I’ve realized I don’t wanna be anywhere else … But what you’re tellin’ me sounds crazy: it was cheap to live there then too? I’m lucky I got here when I did, [I’ve had] the same apartment for so long, there’s no way I could buy one now!”
As the late 1800s approached, these “new waves of immigrant groups including [the] French, Irish, and Italian” settled in the Village, and “the area experienced a rise in Bohemianism,” caused also by “the departure of the upper classes” who moved more uptown near Central Park. By 1900, the area was “quaintly picturesque and ethnically diverse; … [it] was widely known as a bohemian enclave with secluded side streets, low rents, and a tolerance for radicalism and nonconformity.” This reputation led Greenwich Village to be a tourist attraction for many. Then when Prohibition began, “local speakeasies attracted uptown patrons” (“Village History,” n.d.). Furthermore, by the 1950s, the neighborhood became influential place in the Beat movement, which was a movement by “beatniks” to separate from society and strive toward “personal release, purification, and illumination” through the use of jazz, poetry, and unique vocabulary, among other things (“Beat movement,” 2016).
The next decade brought “a homosexual community [that] formed around Christopher Street.” The Village’s reputation as a gay-friendly place began in 1969 when the police and local patrons at the Stonewall Inn, a well-known gay bar, got into a week-long confrontation called the Stonewall Rebellion. Following these riots, New York saw many groups form over civil rights, and on the one-year anniversary, “the first gay pride parades in U.S. history took place in Los Angeles, Chicago, San Francisco, and near the Stonewall Inn in New York” (“Stonewall Riots,” 2009). Soon after, a movement for LGBT rights began all throughout the United States. Greenwich Village’s penchant for backlash continued has it “became a rallying place for antiwar protesters in the 1970s and for activity mobilized in response to the AIDS epidemic in the 1980s” (“Village History,” n.d.).
According to some residents of the West Village, the neighborhood’s past is both allowing it to continue thriving and causing it to lose some of its uniqueness. After the Stonewall Rebellion, the Village was a “cool place to live” but now that acceptance has spread, the area isn’t as concentrated with LGBT residents and it “is attracting more families … as well as “successful young people in financial services, and a lot of high-tech people.” Because “about 80 percent of the West Village has landmark status,” most of the people who live there reside in “low-rise historic buildings.”
However, because of the novelty of “the area’s charms and its vivid bohemian past,” prices are rising (Jacobson, 2015). About 27% of West Village residents have a yearly income over $200,000 and 54% have an income over $100,000, compared to only 7% over $200,000 and 25% over $100,000 in all of New York City. This is most likely due to about 72% of residents being involved in jobs in management, business, arts, and science, compared to the 39% in New York City overall. These contrasts in jobs can be traced back to 98% of West Village residents having a high school degree or higher and 84% having a bachelor’s degree or higher (US Census Bureau).
While a higher median income and younger population is good for the economy and local businesses, some long-time residents are opposed. One resident claims that the demographics have shifted from “respectable” artists to a younger, more party-loving crowd. They seem to care less about the community and its bohemian history, and more about their own personal lives (Lynne, 2013).
Overall, the West Village has faced many shifts and evolutions over time, but they all coincided and interlocked to create the current dynamic of the neighborhood. A hub for art, culture, and unique residents, the neighborhood has had an impact nationwide through the Stonewall Riots, but also on the entirety of Manhattan through its function as first a suburban recluse, then a bustling commercial center, and finally a cultural center. The demographic has been consistently shifting toward a new, younger, more wealthy crowd, but the history of the neighborhood is evident whenever you walk through the jigsaw streets or look at the old, low-rise buildings.
Works Cited
“Beat movement.” Encyclopædia Britannica Online. Encyclopædia Britannica Inc., 2016.
Jacobson, A. “The West Village: Bohemian Past, Lofty Prices.” New York Times, 2 September
- Web.
Lynne, J. “Dorm Mentality: Trending WV Demographics.” Huffpost New York. 14 January 2013.
“Stonewall Riots: The Beginning of the LGBT Movement.” The Leadership Conference. 22 June
2009.
Strykowski, J., Ehrlich, K., Greer, R. “The Early 19th Century.” Creating Digital History. 20
November 2010. Web.
“The Street Necrology of Greenwich Village.” Forgotten New York. n.d. Web.
United States Census Bureau. New York City: GPO, 2010. Web.
“Village History.” The Greenwich Village Society for Historic Preservation. n.d. Web.
The Chinatown in Brooklyn
Avenue U is a street located in Brooklyn, New York. Its cross streets were named by numbers from west to east, such as East 15th Street, where the Q train station is located. It starts from Bergen Avenue in Bergen Beach near Jamaica Bay and is essentially cut off by Stillwell Avenue, one block after West 13th street. The neighborhood after Stillwell Avenue is 86th street, another area that has many Chinese stores. Avenue U is very long, but only the section between the Homecrest and Sheepshead Bay is considered as Chinatown. This part of the neighborhood covers areas from Coney Island Avenue (E 11th St.) to Nostrand Avenue (E 30th St.).
Avenue U is actually the boundary that separates Homecrest from Sheepshead Bay. Known as the second Chinatown of Brooklyn, Avenue U does not actually have clear borders. The Chinese spreads from Kings Highway to Sheepshead Bay, but they are densely populated near Avenue U. The Homecrest neighborhood is consisted of mostly white collar family households. The community makes up mainly by Italians. Sheepshead Bay’s occupational employment is mainly white collar as well. White people dominate the community, which makes up 75.4% of the population in the neighborhood.
With a large number of white people residing in the surrounding neighborhoods, how did the Avenue U turn into Chinatown? In fact, there had been racial tension during the late 1980s that the Chinese will take over the whole neighborhood. The history has to go back to the rapidly growing number of Chinese immigrants that were filling up 8 Avenue in Sunset Park. Congestion and the skyrocketing price of real estates in 8 Avenue during the 1990s had caused the Chinese to moved out from Sunset Park. The pouring number of Chinese into Avenue U led to the establishment of the second Chinatown of Brooklyn in the late 1990s, between the Homecrest and Sheepshead Bay sections.
Avenue U is an area that draws back a lot of my childhood memories. When I initially moved to the United States from GuangZhou, the first place I took a step on is E 26th Street between Avenue U and Avenue T. Back in time, I was surprised by the inexpensiveness of things. Though I was not familiar with currencies at the age of 11, I was still amazed by how you can get a product without even paying a dollar.
My father and I were the only two from our family who live in New York. My father immigrated three years before I did, and he initially resided at E 26th Street at a distant relative’s house. A one-bedroom house with a kitchen and a bathroom was rented for $400, which also included the fees for all utilities. The landlord thought that the rent might be too cheap and he imposed some additional requirements: my father needed to regulate and move the garbage cans to the edge of the street every week, and he had to shovel the snow during the winter. My father agreed to it and lived there for 9 years.
“Right at where we lived, the 26th Street, is actually an Italian neighborhood. When I first moved there around 2006, Avenue U used to be a lot quieter and has fewer people,” my father said. The Italians moved away probably because they were buying houses from other states. As a result, more and more Chinese immigrants have moved to New York and they choose to settle on Avenue U because their family members and relatives had already been living here. The neighborhood now is supported by the southern Chinese from GuangDong (Canton) Province. To be more specific, it is mostly populated with Taishanese.
My middle school friend, Christina, is one of the examples. She moved to New York in 2008 and settled at E 28th St until now. Her family is renting her aunt’s property and they are paying a lower-than-average amount. Similarly, they also need to keep the house in good condition because her aunt would occasionally come over for a spontaneous check. Christina grumbles, “sometimes it is annoying to rent your relative’s house because she complains a lot about what you do to her house.”
In recent years, as Christina’s mother recognized, there is a growing number of Fuzhounese moving into the neighborhood. This doesn’t seem to pose a problem to the younger generation because young people tend to focus more on schools and jobs. However, the older generation would sometimes complain that the Fuzhounese from 8 Avenue, Sunset Park is going to flood Avenue U in the future. Ironically, the Cantonese are now concerned with the same thing as the white people did twenty years ago. They worried that too many people moving in will increase the rent and turned Avenue U into an overcrowded and unclean place, just like 8 Avenue at Sunset Park.
Their concern is not necessarily a problem. Since the Great Recession from December 2007 to June 2009, the U.S. labor market lost 8.4 million jobs. The inflation rate reached its peak in July 2008, which was 5.6%. Though the rate was negative in 2009, but the average inflation rate remains positive after that, which means the prices are still rising. The rise in prices cannot be solely caused by a small group of people. Inflation occurs in the entire country, and Avenue U is not an exception to this. Price in general only gets higher and higher.
Joyce Situ, who is currently attending Hunter College, admitted that the price of housing increased. She noticed that a house that would cost you about $70,000 a few years ago is now going to cost you over a million dollars. However, she did not agree that the Fuzhounese pose the threat. Joyce said, “I don’t think the Fuzhounese is going to flood this area. There is an increase in the number of Mandarin speakers, but it’s only a few.” She believed that the neighborhood is nearly as perfect and there were no complaints she can make. Joyce’s family also settled in Avenue U because of its relatives. Her family originally resided on the first floor of her aunt’s house at Bedford Avenue. The rent was cheap, but the place was extremely small with only one bedroom for a family that has three people. After living there for two years, they moved to a new house across the street. Her family wanted to stay in this area because the Chinese community has made it a comfort zone. Her new home is on the first floor with two bedrooms including a kitchen and a bedroom. They are renting it for $1300 per month, which does not include electricity fee. I believe that is the average rent for a family. After living here for so many years, Joyce is familiar with her neighbors, especially people around the same age. Now, her biggest concern is not putting on makeup when she goes out to the street because her friends are everywhere.
Joyce’s mother, Yoyo, opened up a new hair salon last year on 12th Street. She took over Paul’s Hair Salon from her old boss and renamed it as YoYo Hair & Beauty Salon. Yoyo said, “I opened up this salon because it is near my home. I have been living here for almost ten years and I find it convenient to travel to work.” She recognized that her customers were not just Chinese, but they were a mix of different kinds of people. I observed that the salon has many white customers, and most of them specified Yoyo to be their stylist. The customers all left the salon with beautiful hair with great smiles on the faces and appreciation to the stylists. Yoyo’s talent has brought people with different ethnicities together.
My father, who doesn’t speak English, was also praised by many patients with different ethnicities. In 2006, he received a satisfying job at a clinic near the Avenue U Q train station as a physical therapy assistant. He found the transportation very convenient and worked there for 8 years. The clinic provided a comfortable environment for him to work in because everybody around knew how to speak Chinese. Often, there were non-Chinese patients who came to receive treatment, but he wasn’t afraid of the language barrier because he can always find someone to translate for him. Regardless of his language barriers, the patients always specified that they wanted Mr. Hu to assist them during their treatments. “The clinic had more and more patients over the years because people shared and spread the fact that the clinic has an amazing assistant who provides excellent health care,” my father said.
Cross from the clinic is the Health Star Pharmacy. It is the most populated pharmacy I have seen in Avenue U due to its location. There are three clinics around and it is very convenient for patients to come pick up their medicines right away. After that, they can shop for groceries in the supermarket next door, and get ready to prepare the night’s dinner. There have been numbers of grand open food markets and restaurants. Food markets seem to be most profitable business in this area. Lan, a 55 years old woman who has been living on Avenue U with her husband and son for twenty-five years, enjoyed shopping in the traditional Chinese supermarkets. She said, “These food markets sell fresh vegetables, fruits, and even fresh meats! I do not have to travel elsewhere to get my groceries. I can just buy it near my home.” Lan also liked the fact that she always bumps into someone while she was shopping. They would stop at the spot and gather for a short conversation.
Hang, who lives in Staten Island, opened a sushi restaurant on 19th street around Avenue U. “I took over this restaurant in 1998. The business is pretty good and stable throughout the years.” Sushi Bistro is very small and it only fits eight small tables, but customers were continuously coming in for take-outs, and some people waited in line to eat inside. My two friends and I sat down on a table, and right next to us was a group of white customers who were speaking in English. While I was waiting for the food, I asked Hang if he has any complaint about the neighborhood. His eyes rolled over and he thought about the question for a few seconds, then he answered, “No.” We ordered a party tray and we were enjoying the meal with nice cups of tea. The food was very delicious. No wonder why people are constantly coming back to order.
Now, my father is working at a different clinic in midtown. His eyes were full of nostalgia, and he griped that if it wasn’t the stingy and selfish boss, he would never leave Avenue U. He admitted that the neighborhood is undergoing expansion throughout the years and the economy is getting better. The depression in 2008 had struck many people’s hearts. But living in this neighborhood never gave him the sense of insecurity because he had made so many friends there and the Chinese community resembled a big family. We would introduce jobs and places to live to the ones who need help. Though many people do not speak English, the ones with more knowledge would never hesitate to help out.
The increasing number of stores opened on Avenue U has characterized its ongoing economic expansion. This Chinatown has practically everything. It has food markets, restaurants, 99 cents stores, banks, schools, Rite Aid, shoes and clothing stores, bakeries, Laundromats, train station, bus stops, bubble tea shops, electrical shops, phone stores, clinics, pharmacies, and salons. Many of these shops are owned by Chinese immigrants. Immigration has posed a huge benefit to the society. It has made the people living around a lot more convenient by providing a variety of services and resources. The whole community is working well. People with different ethnicities are getting along with each other. More importantly, Avenue U has also served to be a family for Chinese immigrants to reunite.
Source
http://stateofworkingamerica.org/great-recession/
http://www.yelp.com/biz/paula-hair-and-beauty-salon-brooklyn
http://www.city-data.com/neighborhood/Homecrest-Brooklyn-NY.html
http://stateofworkingamerica.org/great-recession/
http://www.usinflationcalculator.com/inflation/current-inflation-rates/
http://www.point2homes.com/US/Neighborhood/NY/Brooklyn/Sheepshead-Bay-Demographics.html
Sunset Park
When the train arrived in 8 Av on the N line, I got off following most of the passengers from my cart – all of whom were Chinese. The cart was instantly emptied out. My first sight out of the station was a sea of people. The background was hundreds of colorful signs written in a familiar language. I had a sense that I was back in Hong Kong.
A neighborhood located on the West side of Brooklyn, Sunset Park endured influxes of immigrants over the past twenty years. Now, the neighborhood had become racially distinct from the rest of the city. Within itself, the neighborhood is separated into three regions in terms of ethnic groups. Chinese immigrants dominate 8th Avenue, Hispanic immigrants dominate 5th Avenue, and Jews dominate the East of them. Between 5th and 8th Avenue, I saw mostly Chinese stores and sporadically Hispanic ones.
I walked down along 8th Avenue from the station on the 62nd street. Signs in all sizes and colors protrude in all directions, competing for attention. Since the businesses there aim for customers who live around there and speak the same language, some of them even bother not to put an English translation beside the Chinese title on the signs. When they do, the translations are often only a phonetic translation of the Chinese name. In other words, you cannot figure out what type of store it is if you look at the English “translation” alone.
Anyone who comes to the neighborhood for the first time would probably have a bad impression on 8 Av, for it is unbearably crowded, unhygienic, and noisy. I could not possibly take a picture of the street view without someone bumping into me. The situation was like two waves from the North and the South flushing into each other. I was a drop of water that is trying to swim against the opposing stream with my side of army. Walking along with my stream of people on the narrow pavement, I felt as if it was unlawful to stop in the middle of the street. It was impossible to keep my friend by my side when we were walking. We both tried very hard to penetrate through the moving herd of people. Passing a lot of bakeries and cafes, I reached fish market of 8th Avenue.
Boxes of live fishes are lined up from the stores to outside of the stores, making the street even narrower. The ground is all wet. It was even harder for us to walk. Then I realized 8th Avenue is filled with pregnant women, because they would block the only space between the boxes of fish and the road with their baby carriages, while they were bargaining.
“That’s for sure. Guess what. Because they cannot in China,” the old woman at a bakery explained to me. The population growth control policy in China restricted that its people can only bear two babies in a family. When some of them have the opportunities to come to the United States, their traditional sense of 「兒孫滿堂」(which means having descendants filled up the hall) is finally unbound. The old woman resumed, “Of course it’s better to have them ABC sons than Chinese sons. (Why?) For the welfare they could suck from the government of course.” She meant that Chinese immigrant parents prefer their children to be American-born Chinese (ABC) because they could exploit the benefits and welfare for citizens. It is surprising that a Chinese would denounce another Chinese from the same community. It turns out they are really not from the same exact community.
The old woman is a Cantonese who immigrated twenty-seven years ago and have been living in Sunset Park since then. She started to complain about the Fujianese coming in. She said, “At the start it was all Hispanics. Then the Taishanese Chinese came and that made the Hispanics on 8th Avenue move away. This became the Chinatown of Brooklyn. About ten years ago, the Fujianese started to come from China and made this place such a mess.” This old woman thinks that the ongoing immigration of the Fujianese caused the hygiene problems in the neighborhood because they have less of a sense of morality in the province they are from, according to her. It turns out that some Chinese groups are actually at odds even though they have seemingly established a strong sense of unity of a Chinese-American community by living close to each other.
On 8th Avenue, there are two large Chinese American organizations, Brooklyn Chinese-American Association (BCA) and Chinese-American Planning Council (CPC), which aim at assisting all Chinese people to acquire good quality of life just as other Americans do. These organizations promote a interprovincial community. However, I discovered that the staff in both organizations are almost all Cantonese or Taishanese, who share the same Chinese dialect – Cantonese. They could speak Mandarin as well to the Fujianese, and they do hire some Fujianese people who speak in their dialect. Nevertheless, it is apparent that the Fujianese are more or less excluded from the Chinese community and the services.
Another phenomenon I saw was the variation of stores (or the lack thereof) there is. Along 8th Avenue, you can see a lot of bakeries, cuisines, bubble tea places, fish and vegetable markets, and SAT-test preparation schools. “Sunset Park is ghetto. It gets more ghetto as you go towards forty-somethingth street,” said a fifteen-year-old girl who was stepping out of one of the many test preparation schools on 8th Avenue. She told me that she does not like living in this neighborhood because it is “dirty” and “crowded.”
It is unexpected that although 8th Avenue is filled with Chinese people, the Asians only comprise 11.6 percent of the population of Sunset Park. And 78.7 percent of population is Hispanics. In the neighborhood, the most concentrated and vibrant region lies on 5th Avenue. It predominantly contains Hispanic stores. Like 8th Avenue, the stores on 5th Avenue lacks variations. They are mostly boutiques and supermarkets.
Walking along 5th Avenue, I could see that Chinese people are starting to enter this region. Unlike 8th Avenue where almost 95% of pedestrians are Chinese, 5th Avenue seems to involve more interracial interactions. There are some Chinese accessories stores and Chinese bubble tea places. There are more Chinese people on the streets of 5th Avenue than Hispanics on those of 8th Avenue. There is even a senior day care center, that targets to serve both Hispanics and Chinese in the neighborhood.
The owner of the day care center, Ms. Ng Pang, is a Chinese lady born in Puerto Rico who spent her childhood in China and came back to America since high school. “Because of my cross-cultural background, I feel obliged to bring both immigrant communities together and help them strive in society,” she said, “I chose to open the day care center here because Sunset Park is a place where minorities work together as one, regardless of their ‘sub-identities.’” The population shift there was very thorough in the past twenty years. It started as almost entirely a Hispanic neighborhood, then the Taishanese Chinese moved in and dominated 8th Avenue, and now new waves of Fujianese Chinese are flushing out the previous Chinese group. The neighborhood has always been an immigrant community albeit the racial shift. Ms. Ng Pang does not see it this way. She thinks this is a time when the underprivileged unite and work for the better for themselves.
Sunset Park has been the neighborhood dedicated for new immigrants. I can foresee that more immigrants of different cultural backgrounds will settle there. The neighborhood is an exceptional gift for new immigrants because of the old immigrants already settled there and the many organizations that seek to help. The people seem to be living in harmony across cultures despite some hostility against a particular Chinese group. The hygiene and noise pollution are also significant issues in the neighborhood. Better management and restrictions should be made to limit and improve the unwanted output of the local stores. Despite that, it is very nice to live in this neighborhood because of the close bonding between people of a common background. It is easy for them to find help that suits their needs.
After the new immigrants get accustomed to living in this country and become more independent from the help of others in the same community, they tend to move out to the more Southeast part of Brooklyn. There sees a new growing Chinatown in Bensonhurst right now. More Cantonese speaking Chinese are moving there because of the fact that they have come to the country for the longer and that a rapidly increasing number of Fujianese is residing in Sunset Park. Apparently, Sunset Park is very dynamic, always welcoming new waves of people coming in. This neighborhood has been dutiful to accommodates for thousands and thousands of immigrants in New York City. It will continue to be a lot of new immigrants’ new home in the future and the dynamics will endure.