Guest Entry: How to Build a Comic!

How to Draw a Successful Science Comic – by Alexandra Greenbaum

Just as a brief introduction, my name is Alex and I am a fellow science nerd. I often express my love for all things science and technology in the form of funny (debatably) comics. The real key to successful science comics are about living and loving science! The rest is just cole slaw. Enjoy:

For the first step, I introduce some guidelines for getting started.

Number 1: Know stuff!

This is not limited to science by any means, but it helps to be informed. For me and many of my fellow comrades, physics and astronomy provide great material (and I myself have got some engineering jokes up my sleeve). But what are you into? Do you know a lot of history, or maybe you’re a psychology major (I bet that’s a ripe field for jokes). In fact having a less common area of expertise leads to some new creative ideas. Everybody loves a good “positive” ion joke but they get old! Show off your knowledge as well as your sense of humor.

Number 2: You don’t have to draw well – just well enough.

You can impress with artistic ability if that’s your game, but for those, like me, who lack much ability it’s sufficient to draw just well enough so that someone else can tell what it is.

And when all else fails, a little labeling goes a long way. Personally, labeling is my technique of choice. I have certainly been influenced by the cartoonist James Pendergrast, who taught me that text and arrows bring the real imagery to the picture.

 

 

Number 3: Most important of all, draw it for yourself! The person to impress is you; if you are amused then you have been successful (at least that is my standard).

Now that the guidelines are covered, let’s take a look at types of jokes.

The power of the pun

Three words: Homonyms, homonyms, homonyms! Never underestimate a good (or bad) pun. The more it makes your friends groan, the more successful you have been.

 

 

Things that look like other things

This one is fun for me, because I consider it a quality exercise in metaphysics. That figure you just drew in your notes kind of looks like a dinosaur; mission accomplished. For example, let’s examine a simple phase diagram chart:

Themes

Themes are a little more abstract and I find them the hardest. But they have the potential to make excellent comics. By taking a theme familiar to one context and adapting it to another, a thoughtful piece is born.

Just observe – what makes you laugh? If you think of anything funny, don’t let it go to waste. Scribble it down on your notes, on the wall, on your arm, or wherever right away!

The last order of business is the approach:

#1 Doodling in Class or at Work

Doodling in class is a gold mine. Remember to pay some attention to the lecture because you never know when the professor might spark an idea for your next masterpiece. The fact that you are already bored means that your mind is ready and willing to wander. Channel that energy into something amusing!

#2 Thinking Really Hard

This approach is slightly less effective than a context like class where you mind is forced to wander out of boredom. However, it’s certainly possible to brute force a comic. In fact most of this post has been by brute force. It’s important not to get discouraged if you don’t think of something right away. The more you practice comic drawing, the easier the ideas come. Eventually, if you think really hard, chances are you will think of something. Once you have that seed work it into shape and develop the details.

#3 Live Your Humor

This is more of a life philosophy, but let the humor come to you. Be inherently open to funny ideas and live your humor. In other words, be genuine in your attitude toward your expertise. For example, I’ll introduce one exercise I tried a couple of times in my quantum physics class. Every time the teacher mentioned the letter “Psi” (which happens a lot in Qmech) I took a sigh out loud.

Lastly, make friends with someone who has a blog so you can post on their site without having to do any of the work! I want to thank Dan for having an excellent science blog, which I read regularly, and for letting me post some nonsense.

I hope you learned something from this post, in the very least to love and embrace science, or whatever interests you! As a final treat I’ll debut my most recent comic, inspired by the AAS speaker session on the conditions for habitability on earth and other planets.

Posted in Comics, Guest | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Astrology the Pseudoscience

There once was a little pseudoscience called Astrology. He wanted nothing more than to be a real science, like his classmates Biology, Anthropology and Physics. Even his cousin, Astronomy, was allowed to join in the ranks of the real sciences. “What must I do to become a science?” asked Astrology desperately. “Well that’s easy,” replied Chemistry, “You just need to base your knowledge on laws and principles that follow scientific logic, and theorems which make predictions that are rigorously tested and proven time and time again. And, as you learn more, adapt your laws to explain the things you see.” No matter what, Astrology just couldn’t figure out how to do this. And so, while Astrology was able to climb to great fame, it was doomed to forever be a pseudoscience.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Hello, my friends. Recently, news sources and non-scientists have been jumping all over articles such as this one: http://newsfeed.time.com/2011/01/13/horoscope-hang-up-earth-rotation-changes-zodiac-signs/

These articles have brought to light a realization to the “field” of Astrology and its followers…it’s wrong. Don’t be fooled…this is not new news. In fact, astronomers have known about this for years, it just hasn’t been this widely publicized until now. Don’t believe me? Watch this video from our favorite TV personality/scientist, Bill Nye: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oQPFoDkGFrU

So what’s the problem, you ask? Well, in addition to a totally false premise, Astrology has a big credibility problem. Even if you believe your life is determined by the position of the stars, astrologers are following their charts incorrectly. Let’s go through the problems one by one, shall we? First up is the fact that astrologers tell you there are 12 signs. WRONG! There are 13 signs…Ophiuchus being the forgotten zodiac sign. This sign isn’t new…it was thrown out thousands of years ago because only 12 signs were desired. So already, we’re forgetting a sign…and a badass one as well. Ophiuchus is a freakin’ serpent holder! Much cooler than being a stupid fish.

What’s the next problem? Well, the Earth wobbles! So what…what does that have to do with astrology? The Earth’s wobble causes various alignments in the sky to shift slightly. This is seen in the Earth’s north star. Right now, we know of the north star called Polaris, because it is best aligned with the North Pole of the Earth…but it wasn’t always the North Star. The wobble shifts the axis slightly, and thousands of years ago (and in the future) there were and will be different north stars. Similarly, the constellations shift slightly as well. Your sign is determined by the constellation the sun rises in on your birthday. The signs you are used to are based on the constellations as they were over 2000 years ago. I was born on April 15th…back then, the sun rose in the constellation Aries. And that’s what astrologers say. But if I was to stay up on my birthday, I would not see the sun rise in Aries…it would rise in Pisces! Oops. That’s because the signs are off by one full sign. But for some reason, astrologers haven’t been able to keep up. One complete wobble takes 26000 years…so if they’re too stubborn, astrologers will be overlapped in about 24000 years!

Here’s another problem. I’m told that if I’m an Aries (or a Pisces) then my daily fate is exactly the same as every other person born in that time period. Well, that’s a little bizarre, don’t you think? I have the same personality traits and mesh well with specific signs. Doesn’t that sound like racism to you? I like to call this “horoscopism”.

Horoscopism

Extensive scientific studies have shown that horoscopes are not valid or real. And yet, so many people believe in them. I implore you all—wake up! Do not let horoscopes and zodiacal bullshit drive your lives! Be free! A society free of yet one more piece of ignorance is a better and smarter society.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Astrology was sneaky. He tried everything to be a science. He lied to the masses, and preached shoddy laws based on mysticism and ignorance. But Astronomy was cunning, and showed everyone that his cousin was a fake; he proved that Astrology was using some of Astronomy’s science to pass off his own as truth. After being exposed of his fraud, Astrology was thrown in intellectual jail, serving out a life sentence for his crimes and lies. And the other sciences lived happily ever after.

Posted in Astronomy, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 4 Comments

Propulsion through a Vacuum!

Hi science junkies! I’m geared up and ready for the AAS conference in Seattle, which means that before I leave, I finally have time to field a request made a while ago by my friend Maria—she asked me how rockets propel themselves through space if there’s no air to push against.

It’s an interesting question, and grows out of a common misconception that you need something like air to “push against” in order to move, like an airplane does with its wings to create lift. It’s true that movement through air is different than movement through a vacuum, but the general laws and principles governing the movement do not change. In order to understand how rockets propel themselves, all you will need are Newton’s laws of motion.

The first and third laws are the most useful here. The first law is the law of inertia, which states that bodies will remain at a constant speed (or at rest) unless acted upon by a force. This force can be anything…air resistance, gravity, your girlfriend after you tell her how she looks in that dress…any force that is not balanced by another will result in a change in movement. For an airplane, you not only have to push yourself forward and create lift, but you must also counteract air resistance, something rockets do not encounter (or encounter very little of, in reality) in space. That is why the majority of the thrust rockets create in order to get to their destination is done initially, as they’re leaving, or “escaping” Earth’s gravity. You’ve all seen rockets and spacecraft strapped onto gigantic fuel carriers…all of that fuel is used to propel the ship off of Earth and flying towards their target.

Let’s pretend we’re shooting to the moon. Because there is no air resistance in space, the spacecraft will be traveling in basically a straight line. Before the rocket is shot into space, scientists must calculate the exact location of the moon when the rocket gets there, because over the few travel days, the moon’s position changes. Here’s what the trip may look like:

If something happens, and there needs to be a small adjustment in the flight path, or the speed of the craft, then that’s where the thrusters come in. To understand how they work, we need to employ Newton’s third law: Action-Reaction. This may be the most famous of the laws, and the easiest to understand (even though if never stops us from getting angry and punching a wall). For a force applied to a system, there is an equal but opposite force applied. Going back to your angry girlfriend, if she slaps you on the cheek, she is applying a force to your face. At that moment, an equal force is applied by your cheek to her hand, and her hand will hurt a little. So you can have a little bit of solace in the fact that it will hurt her a bit too, even though telling her to lose some weight did enough emotional damage for the week.

But I digress. Thrusters shoot out fuel from the back or side of the vehicle, and an opposite force gets applied to the vehicle. You don’t really need something to push off of—by applying a force to the fuel, the ship gets a force back on it to propel it in whatever direction it wants. This is an experiment you can try at home! Sit in a computer chair on a floor with a small coefficient of friction (slippery), and throw an object across the room. You’ll notice that you and your chair will slide across the floor in the opposite direction. It’s the same idea, only the fuel is the object. An ice skating rink is another good place for that experiment. Just push off another person while on the ice…or play a game of catch. It’ll be harder than you expect.

The last thing I’d like to mention is the notion of using gravity as a slingshot. Another way to propel spacecraft through space is to use the gravity of the other planets as a slingshot. Here’s a VERY oversimplified picture of the idea:

Sorry Mars, you're just not that cool to be included.

The idea is that as you approach a planet, especially one like Jupiter, you get caught in its gravity. This gravity will accelerate you, and if you are moving fast enough, you will not stay in orbit, but instead get flung out. Scientists do the calculations so that you’re flung out towards your next destination. This method is not only effective, but it requires little to no fuel to take advantage of. AND as a bonus, you get a flyby of a cool object.

All of these things are more complicated, but this is a basic picture of how rocket propulsion works, as I understand it. Hope this was understandable, and that your girlfriend forgives you for calling her a cow. You do need to learn some more tact.

See you in Seattle, or when I get back!

Posted in Astronomy, Physics | Tagged , , , , | 4 Comments

Friend’s Blog!

Hi everyone, and Happy New Year! Hope you all enjoyed some new years fun (I’ve always thought of New Years as being the most anti-climactic holiday out there, but that can’t stop you from enjoying the build-up).

I’m writing this entry to tell you all about the new blog called “Physicist/Feminist”. It’s about cool women in science, issues facing women in science both then and today, as well as some cool science itself! It’s written by Vivienne Baldassare, who’s a really good friend of mine (and someone I’ve done research with); she’s an aspiring astrophysicist like myself, and happens to be a great writer. So you definitely want to check out her blog—the link is: http://physicistfeminist.wordpress.com/

Cheers!

-Dan

Posted in Physics, Uncategorized | Tagged , | 1 Comment